After 2010, What

AFTER 2010, WHAT? “It’s been a momentous week,” noted Mark Swed in yesterday’s “Critic’s Notebook,” and he was, even so, a day early. The worst news of last week, many weeks, was Gérard Mortier’s decision to resign as head of the New York City Opera, over the unwillingness of board members to finance his dreams, before a note was sung under  his administration. A forward move in operatic administration that could be likened to – what? – to the striding forth of the New York City Opera at its inception, — had claimed a major leader.
Here at home we are in a momentous dither over the ten weeks of RingFest that will seize our city’s interest in 2010, direct our collective gaze toward a certain mode of artistic expression, adapt our taste buds toward a certain culinary ideal (mostly covered with brown sauce, if memory serves),  fill our ears with massive orchestrations of unresolved dominant thirteenths. I’ve seen it happen. I was in Seattle in 1975,  during early Ringomania. Glynn Ross and his opera company were vesting upon the city not one but two Rings, one sung in English the other not, and United Airlines was sharing in a citywide promotion so vast that everyone you saw on the streets carried a UAL bag decorated with Valhalla images. The performances weren’t much; the sets were make-do, but that was a Ring, by God, and it ran for several years. I went up and wrote that it wasn’t very good, and several shocked local critics c ame to interview me; nobody had ever noticed before. It got Seattle so bored with the whole Ring  idea that when Speight Jenkins took over the company and started producing real opera, including a handsome, naturalistic Ring  set among Northwest-style evergreens, and beautifully performed, the public treats it as an opera, not some kind of shrine.
Anyhow – I’ve wandered – will it somehow occur to somebody here at home that Gérard Mortier would be the right man to lead the Los Aneles Opera, away from four-Puccinis-a-season and toward a contemporary distinctiveness equal to that of the Philharmonic and other arts organizations. The acquisition of Achim Freyer to creat the local Ring  is a great step forward; he is the legacy of the late Edgar Baitzel, who up of the moment of his death served the company nobly as what the Germans call Dramaturg and can take credit for most of the forward movement the company has shown in rrecent years, but Edgard is gone. He brought Achim Freyer here for The Damnation of Faust and (to lesser credit) the staged B-minor Mass. Without a dramaturg of that quality, we get The Fly and reruns of an ancient Carmen production and Marta Domingo’s hapless Traviata.
I am not so foolish as to hope that Mortier would step down the ladder from an executive post to something less with the L.A. Opera. I am suggesting that the L.A. Opera needs his executive service, under whatever title. It also needs a full time artistic administrator, not one who is also the administrator, or the singing star even entrusted with creating new productions with other companies, and is away from this, his own company,  leaving operas for his iwife to direct, usually ineptly, for long periods for  reasons that are various common knowledge. If this requires creating an executive post with a new name, for one position or both, I am naïve enough to think that might not be so diffictult.  Mortier, I might naively add, has supportive friends out here. The last time I looked, he, the great patron Betty Freeman and I were going for a walk..

BEEFCAKE: November’s Disney Hall program book has a new Esa-Pekka picture on the cover, beefcake-of-the month, a reminder that we are wrong to let him get away. Miguel Harth-Bedoya is this week’s conductor; he once was our associate conductor, and we shouldn’t have let him get away, either. A lively, exuberant spirit, friendly to audience, audiences and music, he was all over the place last night.
Who couldn’t love “Appalachian Spring,” music with not one note to prick or irritate? I suppose I could, for just that reason; I long for one of those unresolved thirteenths I was discussing up there. I haven’t looked at the score, but I’ll bet it’s all in  F and G major, and sometimes just reaches out hungrily for a sharp of a flat. Copland’s original score, for only thirteen instruments, goes along better with this mood than the blown-up orchestral version, and I’ll bet it would have sound a whole lot better before the Britten last night. But it is a very pretty score, a smile of an autumn night without an angry thought to stir into its apple-pie mind
Britten’s Violin Concerto…now where did that come from? (I rushed home, and in my bundles of Britten there wasn’t a single copy. I fixed that from Amazon for a mere seven bucks.) It is a very strange piece, by turns emotional and aloof, beautiful turns for the soloist, mere hiccoughs from the orchestra. The first movement is tight, self-contained. The scherzo devolves into a recit, then something else, than it just keeps going; you want to break in and remind them you’re here. Midori played it as if she truly believed it, and I think she does; after her showbiz years she’s become a fascinating musician, wonderful to watch.

This entry was posted in Bookmark the permalink.