<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>So I&#039;ve Heard &#187; Daily News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.soiveheard.com/category/daily-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.soiveheard.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/03/classcol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/03/classcol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 1992 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The news is not all bad. Over the usual sour coffee and sweet rolls last week, the Los Angeles Philharmonic announced its upcoming season with something close to justifiable pride. It begins to look as if we have a music director once again. (Bet you&#8217;d forgotten, by the way, that Esa-Pekka Salonen is not the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news is not all bad. Over the usual sour coffee and sweet rolls last week, the Los Angeles Philharmonic announced its upcoming season with something close to justifiable pride. It begins to look as if we have a music director once again. (Bet you&#8217;d forgotten, by the way, that Esa-Pekka Salonen is not the first-ever Finn to serve here in that capacity. The first was Georg Schneevoigt, who held the post in 1927-29 seasons.) Not that the new young maestro is planning to blow the Music Center apart with a steady diet of tone-rows and synthesizers. The ponderous romantics of the late 19th century still hold sway, as do their musical progeny  of more recent decades. The season begins promisingly: four whole weeks before a note of Prokofiev or Sibelius is struck. On the fifth week, however, both composers appear, as if to atone for lost time. Then the goulash really hits the fan: Zubin Mehta in all-Tchaikovsky, followed by Zubin Mehta in all-Strauss. Oh well, this is the programming that sells tickets and placates elderly subscribers. What is more impressive are the flickers of genuine programming originality that shine through the murky pages of the new season&#8217;s published plans. I am, I must admit, a pushover for creative program-building, the kind that juxtaposes the devotional aura around Debussy&#8217;s &#8220;Martyrdom of St. Sebastian&#8221; with the dark radiance of the chorales in Hindemith&#8217;s &#8220;Mathis der Maler&#8221; and the Berg Violin Concerto; all three works share a most high-minded program sometime in February. You can also detect a creative hand in linking Gyorgy Ligeti&#8217;s &#8220;Clocks and Clouds&#8221; with the clouds that drift across Debussy&#8217;s &#8220;Nocturnes,&#8221; listed for around the same time. Symphonies of Haydn make a welcome return, after too long away. This wondrously inventive music draws out a sympathetic strain in Salonen, as his Sony recording and his recent adventure with the Symphony No. 80 clearly prove. A Haydn-Bartok program scheduled for March is another neat and imaginative juxtaposition:  Hungarian composers two centuries apart, but linked in their love of devastating musical hi-jinks. Yes, it&#8217;s a splendid season. Among the guest conductors, the known quantities are no less exciting for being predictable: the marvelous old Kurt Sanderling doing the Beethoven Ninth, Witold Lutoslawski conducting yet another program of his abstruse but intensely civilized music. Anytime you entertain doubts about the cultural integrity of at least part of the Los Angeles audience, rememberthat Lutoslawski&#8217;s visits here, along with those of those other formiable composer/conductors Pierre Boulez and Oliver Knussen, invariably draw large and loving crowds.There is, in all this, a clear suggestion that Salonen&#8217;s gifts as music director, his vision of what a symphonic season in a hidebound establishment like the Music Center can and should embrace, are strong and original. The persistent noise, about managing director Ernest Fleischmann&#8217;s vision of the Philharmonic as his personal playpen, ought to be stilled by this enticing list. There is, in these prospects, a faint glimmer of a new and strong musical personality come to town. The job ahead will be to keep him happy.One of last year&#8217;s stranger stories dealt with the awarding of a prize in the amount of $250,000 to a middle-aged British pianist named David Owen Norris, through the offices of the Irving Gilmore Piano Foundation in far-off Kalamazoo. This was not a competition in the usual sense; the Gilmore judges surveyed the field of worthy pianists in secrecy and chose Norris much to his own surprise. As it happens, I heard Norris at the Sydney Piano Competition in 1981, where he played miles above the level of anyone else there, baffled the judges with a free-choice of contemporary British music instead of the expected Chopin and, not surprisingly, won nothing. Sometimes even in music, however, justice  prevails. Norris plays at UCLA&#8217;s Royce Hall this coming Thursday. There&#8217;s reason to suspect that this will be the most interesting piano recital of the season (except, of course, for Maurizio Pollini at the Music Center on April 1, but that goes without saying). Amid all the moaning and gnashings from the voice buffs at the current dire shortage of star-quality singers, 25-year-old Cecilia Bartoli has emerged with radiant assurance that there is, after all, someone worth hearing in the firmament. Her recital at Ambassador last week, cobbled together at the last minute and, therefore, inadequately promoted, didn&#8217;t quite draw  a capacity house. Those who were there, however, came away with delighted memories that will not soon fade. Th marvel of Bartoli is not only the way she sings &#8212; the voice an idealized clarinet, curling itself  eloquently around ravishingly beautiful melodies with awesome accuracy and infectious ease. It is also in the way she seems, so far at least, to have paced her career with caution and intelligence. You think of the most recent phenomenon of her magnitude, Los Angeles&#8217; own Aprile Millo, who soared to the heights as her genuine talent warranted, and almost immediately turned into a parody of herself. Something about Bartoli gives off the message that she is with us for the long haul, as an artist rather than a freak.Her Ambassador concert was all-Rossini: the delicious repertory of songs that occupied him in his late years, plus a couple of arias. The artistry was pure and enchanting; it extended to the Martin Katz&#8217;s marvelous support at the piano. Some of the program is duplicated on Bartoli&#8217;s latest London record, also a Rossini recital but including the dazzling Joan of Arc cantata. Bartoli also has a Mozart recording, this time with orchestra: arias for both Susanna and Cherubino from &#8220;Figaro&#8221; and some moments from &#8220;La Clemenza di Tito&#8221; that will just break your heart. This is what music is all about, or should be.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/03/classcol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/03/classcol-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/03/classcol-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 1992 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mastery in &#8220;Kullervo&#8221; extends from the work itself &#8212; the words and music by Aulis Sallinen &#8212; to the splendor of the production at the Music Center. However strange Peter Hemmings&#8217; gamble may have appeared, when he announced in 1990 that his own Music Center Opera planned to sponsor the world premiere of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mastery in &#8220;Kullervo&#8221; extends from the work itself &#8212; the words and music by Aulis Sallinen &#8212; to the splendor of the production at the Music Center. However strange Peter Hemmings&#8217; gamble may have appeared, when he announced in 1990 that his own Music Center Opera planned to sponsor the world premiere of a contemporary opera by a relatively unknown composer, from a country both geographically and culturally remote, the gamble has been handsomely won. Sallinen has fashioned his story from pages in Finland&#8217;s dark, sprawling epic poem &#8220;Kalevala.&#8221; Kullervo lurks in those pages as an anti-hero, a loser turned plunderer and murderer by a world into which he doesn&#8217;t fit. Sallinen&#8217;s  libretto exerts its own twists on the legend, and this is all to the good. What rattles around in the murky pages of &#8220;Kalevala&#8221; as hard-edged facts become transmuted in Sallinen&#8217;s own poetry into a beautifully conceived blend of fact and fantasy, moving in and out of reality as easily as the music moves through its vast stylistic vocabulary. As Kalle Holmberg&#8217;s production spans the gap between dream and reality, and between mythic time and modernity (so that, for example, a pop ballad singer with microphone and backup synthesizer shares the stage at one point with others in medieval robes), so do words and music hang tantalizingly free of definition. The three hours of &#8220;Kullervo&#8221; sweep through some remarkable music: sad, haunting arias, abrasive confrontations, and a short burst of leavening hilarity by a quartet of drunkards on their way to perpetrate a massacre. Sallinen&#8217;s music establishes him as a doctrinaire conservative, while pointing up the uselessness of such pat identifications. He draws upon the language of tonality, but shifts his harmonic focus easily and often. If further identification is needed, think Shostakovich tinged with Janacek&#8217;s exoticism, a dab of Strauss here, an authentic-sounding ripoff of contemporary Finnish cabaret there. The sounds themselves are wonderful: great, rolling choral sonorities, streamers of audible flame from the orchestra. Sallinen has been copiously recorded, mostly on the Ondine and Finlandia labels: three operas including, as of this week, &#8220;Kullervo,&#8221; three of his five symphonies, quite a lot of chamber music. He demands, and deserves, attention.So does the enlightened work of the Finnish forces on our stage. Start the list with Seppo Nurmimaa&#8217;s geometrically patterned backdrop that changes fantastically with the lighting, and his costumes that range from regal robes for the principals to  modern street clothes for the chorus (a statement as to the opera&#8217;s timelessness, and a boon to the costume budget). Continue with the sophistication of Holmberg&#8217;s stage direction, a way of creating enormous impressions with the barest elements that some local directors might profitably study. To these marvels add the overpowering vocal presence of the great Jorma Hynninen in the title role, and of Eeva-Liisa Saarinen in the harrowing role of Kullervo&#8217;s tortured mother. End with the masterful musical leadership of Ulf Soederblom, splendidly seconded by the awesome precision of the chorus (misidentified here last week as being the same as the Helsinki University Chorus, which it isn&#8217;t) and our own pit band, the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra, more resonant and more responsive by far than the Helsinki orchestra on the recording. Beyond most of our expectations, I would safely guess, &#8220;Kullervo&#8221; turns out to be a towering musical experience, and an experience as well in a level of stagecraft and production integrity we would do well to observe. One performance remains, tomorrow night; be advised, be urged.Along the Finnish line: Esa-Pekka Salonen&#8217;s three weeks here, which ended last weekend, showed our young conqueror-designate in several lights, not all complimentary. The Mahler Fourth, the first week, was easily the low point: a misreading full of wilful distortions and mere smartass gimmickry. At the other end, however, was all of last weekend&#8217;s program: Haydn&#8217;s 80th Symphony with  its cheeky innovations firmly in place, a most elegant performance of the Stravinsky Violin Concerto by Cho-Liang Lin, and a clean, bright, dry-eyed reading that did more for the Brahms Second Symphony than I might have believed possible. A conductor who can deliver this level of performance is one worth waiting for.To reach your seat in Houston&#8217;s new Wortham Opera House, you have to ride up, on an escalator bordered with weird sculptures probably filched from Darth Vader&#8217;s armory, then back down some stairs to the theater. You arrive in a mood for the quiet devotions of Wagner&#8217;s &#8220;Parsifal,&#8221; but this is destroyed by a pianist in the lobby, filling the space with cocktail-hour reveries. You decide that maybe Los Angeles isn&#8217;t the cultural pits after all. The &#8220;Parsifal&#8221; was Robert Wilson&#8217;s creation. Wilson hangs on Los Angeles&#8217; conscience, after the failures, in consecutive years, to finance his &#8220;Civil Wars&#8221; and his &#8220;Einstein on the Beach,&#8221; both some kind of important masterwork. The &#8220;Parsifal,&#8221; co-produced with the Hamburg Opera, was a latter-day reminder of what we missed: stagecraft of the utmost subtlety and poignance, a vocabulary of light, scenery and movement that seems to flow unimpeded from the work itself. A deaf man could have realized the music in this supremely moving evening. Christoph Eschenbach, who now heads the Houston Symphony and often crosses the line to conduct for the Opera as well, led a musical performance worthy of the setting. Houston may not know how to build or maintain an opera house, but the company itself, under David Gockley&#8217;s 20-year leadership, has made an enviable mark in innovative repertory and productions. (The present house opened, in 1987, with the world premiere of &#8220;Nixon in China.&#8221;) Filling out last week&#8217;s playbill were two highly contrasting operas based on the &#8220;Beauty and the Beast&#8221; legend: the new &#8220;Desert of Roses&#8221; by the avant-garde-cultural-terrorist-turned-pussycat Robert Moran, and an updated version of Andre Gretry&#8217;s 1771 &#8220;Zemire et Azor&#8221; in which, to cite one instance, the father of Beauty, a medieval Persian prince in the original, is now an American vacuum-cleaner salesman. Get the idea?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/03/classcol-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 1992 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It took about ten notes, sung by the Helsinki University Choir at the Music Center, at the start of last week&#8217;s Philharmonic concert, to remind us of what is sadly missing in the musical life of Los Angeles, and of most American cities for that matter. Here was a chorus, with a tradition of excellence [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took about ten notes, sung by the Helsinki University Choir at the Music Center, at the start of last week&#8217;s Philharmonic concert, to remind us of what is sadly missing in the musical life of Los Angeles, and of most American cities for that matter. Here was a chorus, with a tradition of excellence extending back more than a century, which performed with standards like those of an idealized orchestra or chamber ensemble. It didn&#8217;t merely sing the right notes, or merely get the words out with something resembling a recognizable language. Even though this was, strictly speaking, half a chorus (men only), there was no limit to the beauty of their work, nor its awe-inspiring precision. You expect this level of work in small ensembles; the Tallis Scholars come to mind. Here were nearly 100 marvelously trained singers, who performed with amazing unanimity. There was a depth and a balance of tone here, a truly beautiful shaping of sounds, a command of diction that could make poetry sound not only clear but poetic. Without a scrap of knowledge of the Finnish language, any listener could grasp the sense of the words. It wasn&#8217;t only that the choir members knew what they were singing; they made us both know and care. Great choral singing is a cherished tradition in Northern Europe; it endures in the U.S. in some midwestern communities that maintain schools founded by Scandinavian immigrants: St. Olaf&#8217;s in Minnesota, for one. Our municipally maintained choirs, for the most part, fall below this level, probably from a lack of caring. Our Master Chorale, which follows a gruelling schedule every season, gets through the notes pretty well. It has a tradition of singing with great gusto that persists from the Roger Wagner days, and which survived every effort from its last leader, John Currie, to dampen it. But the standards of a group like the Helsinki (which, despite its name, is not a student group but a professional organization maintained by the university to benefit the community) are out of the reach of even the best of American municipal choirs. I hope all their leaders, from Robert Shaw on down, get to hear the chaps from Helsinki. They are here as the chorus in the Music Center Opera&#8217;s &#8220;Kullervo&#8221; this coming Tuesday, but also participated in the Philharmonic&#8217;s all-Sibelius program, with Esa-Pekka Salonen conducting, last week as a warmup. Imagine, hearing a program of Sibelius, and wishing it wouldn&#8217;t end.Those last thoughts only apply to the first half of the program, however: a garland of short Sibelius choruses, written at various times in his career, works of great charm, in a rather outdoorsy romantic style (early Mahler, perhaps, with even a touch of Wagner). They displayed, at very least, a fine coloristic sense in the writing for voices, and they were nicely set forth under the Choir&#8217;s present director, Matti Hyokki. To the Sibelius &#8220;Kullervo,&#8221; which sprawled across the second part of the program, none of these words apply. I am hard pressed to come up with another stretch of 70 minutes, or even 30 or 10, by any reputable composer where so little takes place. Granted that this is the work of a young Sibelius (if 27 be reckoned young); granted, too, the bravery in creating a work in Finnish when that language was only slowly gaining recognition. All that granted, this is drab, tawdry, crude music in which the choral writing is dull, the vocal solos empty declamation, and the orchestra goes tearing around creating atmosphere out of tricks already tried and discarded by the minor Russians of a generation before. It&#8217;s hard to imagine that Esa-Pekka Salonen, who conducted a properly loud and frenzied performance that must have aroused lots of nostalgia among the movie buffs in the audience, chose on his own to bring out this tattered baggage. It does tie in rather neatly, of course, with Aulis Sallinen&#8217;s upcoming opera. Cooperation between the Philharmonic and the opera was doubtless helpful in bringing the chorus to town along with the superb baritone Jorma Hynninen. But even a rational admirer of Sibelius, one willing to award points, however grudgingly, to a a couple of symphonies and, perhaps, half of a tone-poem, has to be embarrassed by &#8220;Kullervo.&#8221; Unfortunately, the monolithic Sibelius hangs like an albatross around the collective necks of the excellent conductors, not to mention composers, that Finland has produced in modern, post-Sibelian times: Sallinen, Salonen and dozens more. Like the demons who haunt the hapless, doom-ridden Kullervo, Sibelius himself is ripe for exorcism. Don&#8217;t believe all the ads and other flackery about Gioacchino Rossini&#8217;s 200th birthday, or even his 50th. He was born on Leap Year Day, 1792. which makes him 200 years old next Saturday, on his 48th birthday. Any calendar freak will tell you that 1800 and 1900 were not leap years, for reasons beyond my allotted space. San Francisco&#8217;s opera company has a major Rossini festival planned for later this year. Los Angeles has no celebration, unless you count the Music Center Opera&#8217;s &#8220;Barber of Seville&#8221; earlier this season, with its chamber-pot sight gags and dull conducting. But there&#8217;s a wonderful new Rossini singer, a mezzo-soprano named Cecilia Bartoli, who has just brought out a spectacular recording (on London) of Rossini songs and his &#8220;Joan of Arc&#8221; cantata, which she sings with flair and with a wonderful way of caressing the gorgeous vocal lines. Better yet, Bartoli has been late-booked for a local appearance, shoehorned into an Ambassador Auditorium recital this coming Wednesday night. If she sounds anything like this new disc, you&#8217;ll come away happy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 1992 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Memories of last Wednesday&#8217;s unspeakable weather were handily dispelled that night at the Music Center, in the spell of enchantment cast by Barbara Hendricks. When did we last hear, anywhere in town, a program of pure art song &#8212; no operatic arias, no empty vocal showpieces &#8212; so handsomely delivered? Four years ago, by Peter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Memories of last Wednesday&#8217;s unspeakable weather were handily dispelled that night at the Music Center, in the spell of enchantment cast by Barbara Hendricks. When did we last hear, anywhere in town, a program of pure art song &#8212; no operatic arias, no empty vocal showpieces &#8212; so handsomely delivered? Four years ago, by Peter Schreier, on a similarly rainy night? Nothing more recent comes to mind.Hendricks had sung with Esa-Pekka Salonen and the Philharmonic the week before, in a generally unsatisfactory, if not actually mindless concert. This time, with the excellent collaboration at the piano of Staffan Scheja {cq}, she ruled the stage. Nobody can pretend that the 3,000 seats of the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion are any kind of venue for an art song program; the tragedy of the dropping of a subsidiary small concert room from the plans for Disney Hall becomes apparent at times like this. Hendricks helped, graciously summoning all hearers to fill in the spaces down front (and even directing stragglers to empty seats). Her art helped even more; her beautifully chosen program, and the way she sang it, turned the vastness of the place into intimate surroundings. The magic of Hendricks is her seemingly infinite power to react to the poetry in these songs. It&#8217;s that amazing skill she has for coloring the voice from an intuition about the composer&#8217;s own reactions to the text. It doesn&#8217;t do merely to sing the words of Schubert&#8217;s miraculous &#8220;Nacht und Traeume&#8221;; you must draw your vocal colors from the soft, dark clouds that play over Schubert&#8217;s setting, the sudden desolate shiver as the harmony topples into a chasm midway. It doesn&#8217;t do merely to fling forth the outcries that end each verse of Hugo Wolf&#8217;s &#8220;Kennst du das Land,&#8221; unless you can also bring the pain of those words into your own tone. The marvel of Hendricks&#8217; program was the way she fulfilled all these hopes, with beauty of voice and high intelligence as well. Lots of opera singers drag small bouquets of art songs into their concert programs, along with the larger bouquets of showy blossoms from grand opera. It somehow establishes, in their own minds at least, their stature as &#8220;serious&#8221; artists, their own high purpose. Great singers willing to specialize in German lieder or French chansons &#8212; such as made up all of Hendricks&#8217; program &#8212; are rare right now. Twenty years ago they flourished in abundance. Now Elisabeth Schwarzkopf has retired; Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau and Hermann Prey never seem to pass by this way; Peter Schreier is building a second career as a conductor. And so the wonderful Hendricks is virtually alone. UCLA doesn&#8217;t have a single art song recital this eason; Ambassador&#8217;s vocal series offers the usual mixed grill of aria-plus-song programs. What Los Angeles needs, and achingly so, is the proper small and comforting setting for concerts such as this one: not the vastness of the Music Center or Royce Hall, not the impersonal blandness of the Japan-America or the garish bad taste of Ambassador. The final miracle of Hendricks is that she created the illusion, even in the hostile surroundings of the Music Center, that we had all been transported to the most beautiful, intimate concert hall in the world, there to hear the most beautiful, intimate  music. The Japan-America does work for certain kinds of concerts where a kinder, gentler atmosphere might actually be jarring. It works very well for the Philharmonic&#8217;s &#8220;Green Umbrella&#8221; series, which continues successful. By all odds the crowning glory of the most recent program (February 3) was Tod Machover&#8217;s Viola Concerto (subtitled &#8220;Song of Penance&#8221;) written for Kim Kashkashian and played by her with Stephen Mosko&#8217;s excellent podium support.Machover is a comer. With his curls, dimples and boyish grin, he has become a self-made media hero, marvelously voluble about his own work and about the new horizons he keeps on creating with all his electronic gadgetry at the M.I.T. Media Lab on the banks of the Charles. Fortunately, the quality of his work exonerates the manner of presentation; nobody can fault a composer just because he comes on strong, if the product justifies the presentation. His sci-fi opera based on Philip Dick&#8217;s &#8220;Valis,&#8221; recorded on Bridge, has caught on. Cheeky, eclectic, and devastatingly clever, it contains zillions of notes and doesn&#8217;t waste one. The Viola Concerto is cut from the same cloth. The deal here is that the solo viola is actually an electronic creation, with the usual strings but also with miles of cable connecting it to a bank of computers. The soloist&#8217;s sounds are, thus, drastically modified, as are the sounds of the surrounding instrumental ensemble. To thicken the brew even more, a tape of a singer, her voice also processed, is stirred in. Daunting as this sounds, the piece is immensely likeable. The sounds of the electronicized solo viola are so rich, and often so &#8220;human&#8221; in their impact, that just the sound of the piece is interesting enough. But there&#8217;s more: a genuine throb that goes beyond matters of technology, survives its own gadgetry and comes out sounding like some kind of great music. Machover has written another piece of similar intent, this time for electronic cello. We get to hear it during the upcoming CalArts Contemporary Music Festival at the end of March.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 1992 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The notion of a cultural entente between Los Angeles and Helsinki may seem somewhat far-fetched, but it seems to be working. Evidence is easily at hand this month, as the shadow of Kullervo falls upon the Music Center. This week (Friday and Saturday nights and next Sunday afternoon) Esa-Pekka Salonen, a deputation of his fellow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion of a cultural entente between Los Angeles and Helsinki may seem somewhat far-fetched, but it seems to be working. Evidence is easily at hand this month, as the shadow of Kullervo falls upon the Music Center. This week (Friday and Saturday nights and next Sunday afternoon) Esa-Pekka Salonen, a deputation of his fellow Finns and the Los Angeles Philharmonic busy themselves with Sibelius&#8217; 70-minute symphony bearing that name. Later this month (four performances starting February 25), welcome please the visiting Finnish National Opera, bearing Aulis Sallinen&#8217;s brand new opera of the same name, in its world premiere under Music Center Opera auspices. Kullervo, &#8220;the blue-stockinged gaffer&#8217;s son, yellow-haired, handsome, fair of shoe,&#8221; the sad-sack anti-hero of Finland&#8217;s epic poem &#8220;Kalevala&#8221;: he hardly seems the heroic essence of symphony or opera. Rejected by his father, and again by his foster father, he roams the countryside as a brooding, dangerous loner. He rapes and murders a woman he finds on the road, and then discovers that she was his sister. He returns to confess his misdeeds to his parents, but only his mother acknowledges his presence. He leaves again to slaughter his father&#8217;s enemies, then takes his own life by self-immolation. &#8221;No, he is not what you&#8217;d call a hero.&#8221; This is the great baritone Jorma Hynninen, who sings the music of Kullervo both in the Sibelius symphony this week and in the opera later on (and also on the recording of the opera, due out next week on the Ondine label). I talked to him in Helsinki last fall, when I sat in on some of the recording sessions. &#8220;But he epitomizes quite a lot of the Finnish soul, which can be very dark and sometimes very cruel. To me Kullervo is a lot like some of the Texas loners I&#8217;ve seen in films &#8212; like Hud, for example.&#8221;Both works, the Sibelius symphony of 1891 and the Sallinen opera of exactly a century later, spend much of their time in darkness. They are not otherwise, however, very much alike. The darkness in the Sibelius is the warm, enveloping Romantic night. Sallinen&#8217;s opera is cloaked in a more austere, intimidating darkness. It comes closer to the essence of the &#8220;Kalevala,&#8221; that 666-page long national epic that demands of its readers infinite patience and rewards them with some powerful folk drama. His orchestral textures are shot through with electric bolts of violent, glacial colors. His characters sing, exult, argue and grieve in long, rhetorical melodic lines of haunting beauty. There are great arias, not in the Verdian sense, but full of deep, personal passion. One aria in particular lingers in my memory after hearing the mezzo Eeva-Liisa Saarinen {cq} singing it in a Helsinki recording studio: a mother telling her son (Kullervo) that a mother&#8217;s love for a son outweighs any of that son&#8217;s wrongdoing. There is much we can learn from Finland&#8217;s musical life, and especially from that nation&#8217;s remarkable aptitude for supporting its own music. That comes out of a continuing pride of nationhood that people there seem eager to impart to all visitors. I was struck by Hynninen&#8217;s earnestness, for example, when he told me that he would rather sing new roles in unfamiliar operas in Finland than become a star on the international operatic circuit (which he could certainly be). &#8220;I like the life that&#8217;s a little dangerous,&#8221; he said. The &#8220;Kalevala&#8221; is a compendium of centuries-old legends about everything from the creation of the world (out of eggshells) to a final folkish retelling of the coming of Christ. It was only collected and published about 150 years ago, but that event had a profound impact on the country: the first substantial forward step toward the establishment of Finnish as an official language in a country starved for any national identity. Decades after the publication of the poem, Sibelius began writing symphonies and tone-poems inspired by episodes in the poem; that, too, became an important step. Whatever you may feel about Sibelius&#8217; music (and I don&#8217;t happen to feel much), you have to award him points on the heroism that made a work like the &#8220;Kullervo&#8221; Symphony an act of political and cultural defiance. Perhaps inspired by Sibelius&#8217; forthright heroism, Finland supports its contemporary composers handsomely. It does so even when their composers choose to live somewhere else. Sallinen, for example, lives in the south of France. &#8220;Whenever I come to Helsinki,&#8221; he told me, &#8220;my batteries go dead. Even Sibelius had to go to Italy now and then to warm up his talent.&#8221;Sallinen composed &#8220;Kullervo&#8221; to inaugurate Helsinki&#8217;s new opera house. When construction on that house fell behind schedule, the deal was made to bring it here for its on-the-road premiere: a coup for Los Angeles, some Los Angeles sunshine for the visiting Finns (including the Helsinki University Chorus, which sings in both the symphony and the opera). Sallinen has now composed four operas, all produced by Finnish forces and three of them now recorded. The Finnish National Opera (or &#8220;Ooppera,&#8221; with Finland&#8217;s typical propensity for too many letters) has a remarkable record of support for native composers; it produces, and usually records, at least one new work every season. The new operas aren&#8217;t all about the hardship of life on Finland&#8217;s rocky soil; check out Einojuhani Rautavaara&#8217;s splendid &#8220;Vincent&#8221; (about Van Gogh) on the Ondine label. By the standards of Esa-Pekka Salonen&#8217;s own music, or that of his compatriot Magnus Lindberg, the 56-year-old Sallinen ranks as a conservative. If that means that he works with sounds and ideas that composers before him have also tried, so be it. In Sallinen&#8217;s case, it also means that he uses these sounds and ideas in new ways. You will like &#8220;Kullervo&#8221;. Among the reasons is the assurance it bears that there is still someplace in the world, at least, where grand, romantic, accessible, dramatic opera is still being created, sung and supported.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 1992 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the roster of Los Angeles culture heroes is next compiled, the name of Lynn Harrell will figure close to the top. The smiling cellist, New York-born but of tall, blond Texas stock, has been a part of the local scene since he moved here in the 1980s. He has taught a generation of young [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the roster of Los Angeles culture heroes is next compiled, the name of Lynn Harrell will figure close to the top. The smiling cellist, New York-born but of tall, blond Texas stock, has been  a part of the local scene since he moved here in the 1980s. He has taught a generation of young cellists at USC&#8217;s School of Music as the heir to the equally tall, legendary, Gregor Piatigorsky. He has led, with enormous spirit and resource, the  admirable summer Philharmonic Institute (now temporarily, but tragically, in abeyance). And he has turned on lights all over the area with the splendor of his playing. Thursday night he celebrated his 48th birthday by performing the solo cello part in Richard Strauss&#8217; &#8220;Don Quixote,&#8221; a warhorse which he rode easily and masterfully. The week before, at the Philharmonic&#8217;s &#8220;Green Umbrella&#8221; new-music concert at the Japan-America Theater, he had been soloist in something even more extraordinary, the Concerto by Gyorgy Ligeti, a killer piece which he performed as easily, as masterfully, as &#8212; well, as the &#8220;Don Quixote.&#8221; Nothing holds terrors for Lynn Harrell. He is a performer whose adoration of the art he serves plays across his wonderful, outsize countenance, up there on the stage. He is a joy for the eye and the ear in equal measure. He comes by it naturally. His father was the great baritone Mack Harrell, who died at 50, far too young for the great art he gave us. Baritones and cellists have a lot in common, of course, but there is more that this father and son have in common. Harrell was a phenomenal artist who could take on almost any kind of music and do it full justice. If you were around New York in the 1940s and &#8217;50s, you&#8217;d hear Mack Harrell in a Bach Cantata one week, a Schubert or Schumann song cycle the next, on the Metropolitan Opera stage in roles as diverse as Papageno and Amfortas. When the Met finally got around to Stravinsky&#8217;s &#8220;The Rake&#8217;s Progress,&#8221; Harrell was the inevitable, and brilliant, choice to sing the diabolical Nick Shadow. When Dimitri Mitropolos and the New York Philharmonic broadcast Alban Berg&#8217;s &#8220;Wozzeck&#8221; in 1951, the first time many of us had heard this landmark score, Harrell was the Wozzeck, the only member of the cast to sing the notes on pitch and with overpowering emotion as well. (If you&#8217;re lucky, you might find the recording.)Mack Harrell was more than a great artist, then; he was a valuable one, an artist who made things happen that wouldn&#8217;t have happened if he hadn&#8217;t been there. That&#8217;s what his son has developed into as well. The world is well populated with cellists these days, more so than usual, perhaps. Some of them &#8212; you know their names &#8212; are among the greatest musicians today on any instrument. But there&#8217;s even more to Lynn Harrell than that, because of the many ways he makes things happen.Someone came up to me at the intermision of the first &#8220;Green Umbrella&#8221; concert, a highly placed and intelligent cultural leader. &#8220;You know,&#8221; she said, &#8220;I would swap a dozen Philharmonic subscription concerts for one like this.&#8221; She was on target; it was an extraordinary concert for all the best reasons: the music, the way it was played, and the way it was received. The only subscription concert that has come close to that level this season was last week&#8217;s with Dawn Upshaw. Yet, when the Philharmonic starts crying poverty, as it has this season, it&#8217;s the &#8220;Umbrella&#8221; series that gets cut back.It was, indeed, an exceptionally rewarding and challenging evening, with the formidable Elliott Carter on hand to beam pride at a clutch of his short chamber and solo pieces, and with Oliver Knussen, that great teddy-bear of a conductor, in charge. The Carter pieces were Carter as usual, mostly desiccated notes being pushed around a page seemingly at random but probably with a great skill that I cannot bring myself to recognize. The great Witold Lutoslawski had sent over a brand-new and most flavorsome song-cycle, delicious pieces about flowers that sing, and these songs were splendidly sung by Solveig Kringelborn, a new Scandinavian soprano who sounds as delightful as her name. And there was, as the evening&#8217;s high point, Harrell&#8217;s performance of the Ligeti: a stupendous musical conceit that seems to rise  out of utter silence, flame forth in showers of sparks, only to fall back again into a void whose very emptiness one could actually feel. A work of great fantasy, this 13-minute score from 1966; at the &#8220;Umbrella&#8221; it fell into sympathetic hands and stirred an alert capacity audience to cheers. Meanwhile, back at the Philharmonic&#8230; This week&#8217;s program was only given twice, so you&#8217;ve already missed Harrell&#8217;s richly humorous traversal of Don Quixote&#8217;s famous escapades, with equally good-hearted support from the orchestra under David Zinman. The program also served to introduce Christopher Rouse, 42, currently teaching composition at Rochester&#8217;s Eastman School, and much performed by East Coast orchestras. Rouse&#8217;s best known works are a series of short orchestral workouts, fearsomely loud, fast and cloaked in a superficial virtuosity. Not so the First Symphony, designed as if in atonement as a single slow movement meandering through the better (or, let&#8217;s say, the longer) part of half an hour. On its meandering course, it take in a few gulps of Mahler, a fair chunk of Bruckner (including a direct quote from the Seventh Symphony) and rather a lot of Shostakovich. Pastiche? No, more like hodgepodge: a set of roughed-out eclectic episodes that hand off some interesting sounds along the way, ioncluding a few sonic booms to evoke memories of the Christopher Rouse we all know, but fail to come together in any way that might stand in as an individual composer with something to say. This was the only contemporary symphonic work on a  Philharmonic subscription concert from now until the end of the season. It&#8217;s not hard to agree with that woman I talked to at the &#8220;Umbrella.&#8221; The next &#8220;Umbrella&#8221; concert, by the way, is tomorrow night.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/02/classcol-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 1992 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The curtain went up on the Music Center Opera&#8217;s new production of Bizet&#8217;s &#8220;Carmen,&#8221; which began its five-performance run on Wednesday night. There, on the empty stage, stood the Carmen, a figure in whom beauty and menace were equally merged. Since Bizet&#8217;s opera actually doesn&#8217;t bring the Carmen on until some 25 minutes of scene-setting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The curtain went up on the Music Center Opera&#8217;s new production of Bizet&#8217;s &#8220;Carmen,&#8221; which began its five-performance run on Wednesday night. There, on the empty stage, stood the Carmen, a figure in whom beauty and menace were equally merged. Since Bizet&#8217;s opera actually doesn&#8217;t bring the Carmen on until some 25 minutes of scene-setting music has gone by, you could guess right off that you were in for one of those new-fangled conceptual productions, with the composer&#8217;s instructions tossed out the window and some smart director&#8217;s ideas substituted. But this &#8220;Carmen&#8221; isn&#8217;t all that bad; it belongs, in fact, among the opera company&#8217;s more successful escapades: not perfect, mind you, but close. It offers the company&#8217;s resident superstar in one of his best roles. It offers, in the title role, an exciting new young singer whose career has zoomed into orbit only in the last year. It offers a handsome, massive scenic production and a director who knows how to use it. It looks good and, for the most part, sounds good. Denyce Graves is the new Carmen, replacing the scheduled Agnes Baltsa whose mother is seriously ill. Graves is 27. Two years ago she was working the switchboard at the Washington Opera; since then she has made a specialty of being in the right place when scheduled Carmens have dropped out &#8212; in  San Francisco, Vienna, and now here. She is impressively gifted: a big, bright mezzo-soprano voice, a gorgeous figure with face to match. This is the authentic look and sound of a Carmen. She has some distance still to cover, however. At Wednesday&#8217;s performance she sang beautifully most of the time, but she also let the pitch droop at crucial times and also lost coordination with conductor Randall Behr. She also displayed some bad stage manners, especially in the matter of avoiding eye contact with other singers and performing, instead, straight out to the audience. If I had been Placido Domingo during their final duet, I might have considered using a real dagger. Domingo was wonderful. That animal quality that gets into his voice at moments of high passion is, once again, the right sound for a Don José. On Wednesday it was powerful enough to cancel out his customary wooden stage manner; sound stood in for sight. Neither Angelique Burzinski&#8217;s Micaela (hard-voiced and tremulous) nor Michael Devlin&#8217;s Escamillo (strained at both ends of his range) were quite up to this level, but neither were distinctly bad. The production comes here from London&#8217;s Royal Opera. It is a vast piece of Spanish pseudo-stone work designed by Gerardo Vera. Franca Squarciapino&#8217;s costumes place the action around 1870, the time of the opera itself. Nuria Espert&#8217;s direction surrounds the central action with a swirl of people-props, including a large children&#8217;s contingent marvelously used. The version used is not the most up-to-date; it&#8217;s the old standard edition, with sung recitatives composed by an inferior hand after Bizet&#8217;s death, replacing the original spoken dialog. It&#8217;s an unfortunate choice, perhaps, in these enlightened times. But at least the usually lethargic Randall Behr seemed this once, on the production&#8217;s opening night, to have found the inner resources to create, from his podium, a reasonable likeness of this most grandiose grand opera. Chalk it up, then, as one of the Music Center Opera&#8217;s better offerings. It&#8217;s about time. LINE<br />
Thursday night&#8217;s Philharmonic concert belonged to Dawn Upshaw. Five years ago the slender, smiling young Chicagoan made her local debut singing the ten-or-so notes allotted to the soprano in Mahler&#8217;s Second Symphony; a year later she had the eight-minute solo in the Brahms Requiem. This time she came as a soloist in her own right, acclaimed as one of the brightest fixtures in the operatic firmament, an artist whose every note breathes enchantment. This time &#8212; the concert is repeated this afternoon &#8212; she came with Samuel Barber&#8217;s exquisite, nostalgia-drenched setting of James Agee&#8217;s &#8220;Knoxville, Summer of 1915&#8243; and two Mozart concert arias, exceptionally rich and complex pieces. (She has recorded the &#8220;Knoxville,&#8221; on Nonesuch; it was everybody&#8217;s favorite vocal record a year ago.) With warm-hearted, pliant support from the orchestra under David Zinman, she filled the hall with that true, splender, beautifully airy voice of hers, further illuminated by her impeccable command of diction, and her manner of phrasing that makes everything she sings sound spontaneous and radiant. If these words suggest that Dawn Upshaw, in the brief orbit of her career so far, has ripened into a perfect musical artist, they are well chosen. Line<br />
Apropos Samuel Barber: the haunting &#8220;Knoxville&#8221; piece from 1947, along with the even earlier First Symphony that was also on Zinman&#8217;s program, are the work of a poetic artist, robustly imaginative and totally in command of a musical language that managed to be both conservative and original. But Barber was soon to go into a sad decline. How sad, you can measure from his 1966 opera &#8220;Antony and Cleopatra,&#8221; written to open the new Metropolitan Opera House at Lincoln Center, a tired spinning-forth of exhausted formulas. The opera persists, on the strength of its famous origin and its composer&#8217;s stature. A recent production from the Chicago Lyric Opera, directed by Elijah Moshinsky in a version much edited and otherwise revised, circulated earlier this season on PBS. It was rejected by KCET, but it shows up tomorrow night on the Huntington Beach PBS outlet KOCE (Channel 50). Catherine Malfitano and Richard Cowan sing the title roles; Richard Buckley conducts. They do not quite rescue the opera from its deserved oblivion, but they come as close as the music allows.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 1992 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These haven&#8217;t been very good weeks at the Philharmonic. Two of the orchestra&#8217;s former leaders have been around as guest conductors, presenting new evidence as to why not to mourn their absence from our midst.Zubin Mehta&#8217;s visit ended earlier this month with a wad of Beethoven, including the Violin Concerto with Pinchas Zukerman and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These haven&#8217;t been very good weeks at the Philharmonic. Two of the orchestra&#8217;s former leaders have been around as guest conductors, presenting new evidence as to why not to mourn their absence from our midst.Zubin Mehta&#8217;s visit ended earlier this month with a wad of Beethoven, including the Violin Concerto with Pinchas Zukerman and the Eighth Symphony. Trustworthy friends reported with some horror on a most depressing evening, with a faceless meander through the concerto, a loveless approach to this most lovable symphony, and a performance level at which the orchestra seemed to unravel. I missed the event, listening instead to poised, meticulous, spirited playing by an orchestra of mere freelancers in a concert hall in Tokyo. I returned for Andre Previn&#8217;s concerts this week and last; his last concert in this brace falls this afternoon. and &#8220;fall&#8221; may, indeed, be the right word. Actually, I confess to having only heard half the program; no searching of souls, Previn&#8217;s or mine, has come up with a reason to devote an hour or so to music from Tchaikovsky&#8217;s &#8220;Nutcracker,&#8221; which either belongs on a stage with mice and a Christmas tree, or in Disney&#8217;s &#8220;Fantasia&#8221; with dancing mushrooms.The half I did hear had Radu Lupu in a depressingly heavy-handed onslaught on Mozart&#8217;s great C-major Piano Concerto, with his own dull, unstylish cadenzas in the first and last movements, and with orchestral support from Previn and the orchestra that seemed rushed at times and underrehearsed at others. Before had come Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Cosi fan tutte&#8221; Overture, which lay flat on the page. The previous week&#8217;s programs had, at least, included something of nominal interest. Try as I might, however, I cannot detect the slightest glow of light or heat in the music of Sir Michael Tippett. It is an affliction of long standing, embracing the four symphonies, the operas (give or take a small fortunate accident here and there in &#8220;The Midsummer Marriage&#8221;) and, most recently, the Triple Concerto that formed the centerpiece of last weekend&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic program. The concerto runs about 35 minutes, and dates from 1979. The scoring is interesting enough, involving as it does some nice, rattly percussion; the writing for solo instruments is mettlesome, and it was bravely dispatched on this occasion by three Philharmonic stalwarts &#8212; the violinist Elizabeth Baker, the violist John Hayhurst and the cellist Barry Gold. The viola writing is particularly attractive; Tippet knows how to favor the instrument&#8217;s coppery sonorities, and Hayhurst&#8217;s playing had something you would have taken for eloquence in better music.But what goes on in this piece &#8212; or in anything else of Tippett&#8217;s you might name, for that matter? The work is a thing of shreds and patches: a gambit in one direction here, then a reversal; the start of a promising line of musical oratory, and then a shift that dashes hopes. The element of surprise can be a wonderful thing in music; it certainly works well in Mozart. With the Tippett brand of illusion and disillusion, however, you cannot think back and recognize the composer&#8217;s bag of tricks &#8212; as you can with Mozart.It&#8217;s a scattershot style, as if the composer simply threw in everything he could devise, in the hope that something might work. The harmonic style is fairly dense; the music moves, with no clear logic, among several tonal plateaus. But the end result, from all I can glean after hearing the work live under Andre Previn last week, and from the recording under Colin Davis on Philips, comes off as deaf-and-blind manipulation, paper music or, at best, cardboard.You will know how mindlessly, agonizingly dull this work turned out when I tell you that the Brahms Fourth Symphony, which followed it on the program, sounded positively giddy by comparison. Giddiness is not, actually, one of Brahms&#8217; more noticeable traits, and the truth of the matter is that the quotient of ponderosity in this Fourth Symphony is actually a fair match for the Tippett.But there are attractions, as well, and the least you can say is that when Brahms&#8217; music starts off toward some particular goal, it usually gets there. Previn conducted the work interestingly this time around, somewhat more rhythmically plastic than on his Telarc recording. The orchestra, at least on Thursday, played badly for him, with long stretches of poor balance and some fuzzy entrances. Perhaps it had been corrected by the Sunday concert, perhaps not. Driving home I soothed my assaulted ears with some of Angel-EMI&#8217;s new recording of Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Magic Flute&#8221; under Roger Norrington, with his London Classical Players on their reconstructed Mozartian instruments, and with an astonishingly good cast. Perhaps the world didn&#8217;t need another &#8220;Magic Flute,&#8221; with a full column of fine-print listings in the Schwann Catalog that includes the deliriously beautiful 1938 recording under Sir Thomas Beecham with his mostly-Nazi cast and the powerful 1987 performance under Nikolaus Harnoncourt. But there is an infectious quality to this Norrington performance. It sounds young and spirited, full of invention. Liberties are taken, including some orchestral interjections at key moments that may not be Mozart&#8217;s intention but do no harm. The Pamina of Dawn Upshaw is sheer delight, and the scene between Tamino (Anthony Rolfe Johnson) and the Speaker of Olaf Baer&#8211; the crucial moment when the plot takes its magical pivotal turn &#8212; is marvelously underscored by Norrington&#8217;s firm conductorial hand. The Mozart celebration continues, with just cause.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 1992 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Tokyo last Tuesday night, a crowd of nearly 3,000 clapped and cheered and went joyously mad after a concert by a visiting American orchestra. Another crowd of similar size had done the same on Monday, and on each of three days before that. No previous American conquest of Japan (of which there have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Tokyo last Tuesday night, a crowd of nearly 3,000 clapped and cheered and went joyously mad after a concert by a visiting American orchestra. Another crowd of similar size had done the same on Monday, and on each of three days before that. No previous American conquest of Japan (of which there have been many) was more skilfully managed, or more joyously received. The conquerors this time were the 80 members of the Hollywood Bowl Orchestra, on its first-ever tour: two concerts over the New Year holiday in Osaka then  five in Tokyo. The imponderables surrounding the event are many, but the over-all success of the venture renders them meaningless. It isn&#8217;t very often, for example, that a symphonic-sized orchestra would embark on an international concert tour less than a year after its founding. But the Hollywood Bowl Orchestra has led a backward life from the start, and it simply doesn&#8217;t matter.  The Japan tour was booked, for example, before the roster of musicians had been filled in or even drawn up. So was the recording contract with Philips, which has already seen fruition in two compact discs that ended 1991 high on the charts (&#8220;Hollywood Dreams,&#8221; which was nearly everybody&#8217;s favorite crossover record last year, and &#8220;The Gershwins in Hollywood,&#8221; an even more substantial achievement). And so, of course, were the six weekends the orchestra played at the Bowl last summer, replacing the resident Los Angeles Philharmonic for the Friday/Saturday easy-listening series. There are some easy explanations, of course, as to why this orchestra had been so precipitously rushed into being. The birth pangs were lightened by the deal with Philips, which had lost its juicy Boston Pops Orchestra connection and needed a glamorous substitute. The Los Angeles Philharmonic, with its own plans that include a stint at the Salzburg Festival smack in the middle of next summer&#8217;s Bowl season, needed some reputable caretaker orchestra to hold down the home fort. Even against the wretched financial statistics in today&#8217;s orchestral world, the Hollywood Bowl Orchestra made sense on paper long before the first downbeat.   There&#8217;d be some justice, even so, in approaching the idea of this Japan tour as an act of precocity. This was, after all, an orchestra that had only been formed last February for the &#8220;Hollywood Dreams&#8221; recording session, whose members had come together again during the summer for the Bowl concerts, the Gershwin recording session and a Rodgers-Hammerstein session (out on discs come spring), and had then gone their separate ways again until this past December 27. On that day the orchestra reassembled on a Culver City sound stage, and ran two rehearsal sessions to prepare the 37 numbers that made up the Japan tour  repertory. The Japan concerts &#8212; in Osaka&#8217;s Festival Hall and Tokyo&#8217;s Orchard Hall, both rather drab venues both visually and acoustically &#8212; also marked, mind you, the first times the orchestra had played in actual concert conditions, without microphones on a normal stage. The group sounded terrific through the Bowl&#8217;s microphones last summer, and it sounds even better on their first two state-of-the-art recordings. Playing a normal concert, however, presents a whole new set of conditions, the only proper lens for examining an orchestra&#8217;s true quality. Under that lens, the brand-new Hollywood Bowl Orchestra stands out as a genuine phenomenon. By the time of their seventh and last concert, these top Los Angeles freelance players had formed themselves into an orchestra with sheen and precision. The players seemed to recognize this no less than the audiences; along with the exhilaration of the players&#8217; discoveries of Japan (with its shrines to ancient gods coexisting with its shrines to cut-rate electronic equipment) I&#8217;ve never picked up so much backstage conversation by orchestral players, genuinely proud at how good the whole group was sounding.  Never mind that the programs for these concerts consisted mainly of showtunes from stage and screen, with some Tchaikovsky dances and Gershwin&#8217;s &#8220;An American in Paris&#8221; added for ballast. The first concerts had their rough spots, but the orchestra I heard at the final Tokyo concerts was an ensemble I would trust with the challenging transparencies of a Mozart symphony. Credit where due, of course: in John Mauceri the Hollywood Bowl Orchestra&#8217;s sponsors have hit upon the perfect force to weld these players into the ensemble they became this past week. Mauceri is now 46. I remember the blond curls and the winning grin when he presided over the first (and best) restoration of Bernstein&#8217;s &#8220;Candide&#8221; at the Brooklyn Academy in 1973; they&#8217;re still in place. He has grown in eclectic mastery; the week before Tokyo he had conducted Wagner&#8217;s &#8220;Die Walkuere&#8221; at the Scottish National Opera of which he is artistic director. He talked, and was entitled so to speak, about an American repertory of film and stage music as an entity deserving attention by symphonic-sized orchestras. He proved his point with such items on the Japan programs as the exquisite &#8220;Walking the Dog&#8221; number from Gershwin&#8217;s film score to the Astaire-Rogers &#8220;Shall We Dance.&#8221; Mauceri&#8217;s task was made lighter by the orchestra itself. &#8220;I looked for freelance players from around Los Angeles who already knew each other, who could travel and work together as friends,&#8221; he told me. &#8220;Many of these people I&#8217;ve known from my days conducting Opera Pacific in Costa Mesa. I hold onto my memories of the night I conducted &#8216;La Boheme&#8217; there, when at my last bow onstage the players in the pit threw flowers at me. How do you take an aggregation of freelance players, even the best ones, and make them into an orchestra so quickly? &#8221;I think that what I work for,&#8221; said Mauceri, &#8220;is what you could call a collective agreement. I try to unlock in every player the thing that made that person a musician in the first place. And then it just snowballs; the players hear how well everybody is playing, and so they play even better.&#8221; Pride of performance: it&#8217;s a pretty good perk for a freelancer, along with such added rewards as the chance to explore sushi at the source. Even so, several Hollywood Bowl Orchestra members took a money loss in playing with the orchestra. Daily salaries ranged from $140 to $210, with an daily $90 per diem (not exactly lavish at current Tokyo prices). At home in a Hollywood studio, playing for a TV commercial, the money can be a lot better. &#8221;Sure, it&#8217;s better,&#8221; said violinist Jay Rosen. &#8220;But I&#8217;ll tell you the real payoff on a gig like the Hollywood Bowl Orchestra. It&#8217;s the chance to take time off from the music business, and to play some music for a change.&#8221;    PAGE  1PAGE  3</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 1992 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[*] STEVE: This comes in early because I&#8217;m off to Japan next week, (leaving Sunday 12/29) along with the Hollywood Bowl Orchestra for its concerts in Osaka (New Year&#8217;s Eve) and Tokyo. We get back on January 8, so my column for the 12th will be a report on the tour (Jon knows about this). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[*] STEVE: This comes in early because I&#8217;m off to Japan next week, (leaving Sunday 12/29) along with the Hollywood Bowl Orchestra for its concerts in Osaka (New Year&#8217;s Eve) and Tokyo. We get back on January 8, so my column for the 12th will be a report on the tour (Jon knows about this). I&#8217;ll have photographs fromJapan fed-exed to you directly. [F/L]Seekers after the uncommon experience in the realm of chamber music have a rewarding month ahead. Just in the next couple of weeks, for example, three separate groups will bring in three marvelous and large-scale works of Dvorak: the E-flat-major Piano Quartet (played by the Los Angeles Piano Quartet at Doheny Mansion on Jan. 10th), the G-major String Quartet (by the Chester Quartet at the Southwest Museum on the afternoon of the 12th) and the A-major Piano Quintet (with Mona Golabek and the Cleveland Quartet at the Wilshire-Ebell Theater on the 15th).The Doheny and Southwest Museum concerts are, as you&#8217;ve probably guessed, part of the Da Camera Society&#8217;s &#8220;Chamber Music in Historic Sites&#8221; series. Historic sounds as well as sites. Before we get to any of these marvelous works, none of them heard all that often, consider another chamber concert scheduled for next Sunday (January 12 at 7 p.m. at UCLA&#8217;s Schoenberg Hall), the start of the new season of the Music for Mischa concerts. That program offers a work even less often heard than any of the Dvoraks. Why is it, pray, that Ludwig van Beethoven&#8217;s C-major String Quintet has virtually disappeared from the repertory, both live and recorded? Against the dozens of recorded performances of Beethoven&#8217;s quartets, only one is currently listed of this quintet, and that on a small imported label.Ask an interesting question: if Beethoven had died, or stopped composing, after completing this particular work (Opus 29 in the chronological list), where would he rank today among composers? He would have had one symphony to his name, a brace of six string quartets, two piano concertos and quite a few piano sonatas. The symphonies, concertos and quartets would probably still hold their places as clear descendants of 18th-century models, with enough originality to establish Beethoven as a chap who might, someday soon, have blazed exciting new musical trails. The piano sonatas &#8212; the &#8220;Pathetique&#8221; and the &#8220;Moonlight&#8221; in particular &#8212; are even more clearly the work of a young composer eager to kick out against the restrictions of classical forms. Then there&#8217;s this C-major Quintet. The work dates from 1801; Beethoven was 31, and had already begun to make some noise around Vienna. Even so, the very start of this work might have startled its first hearers: Beethoven&#8217;s way of pushing his opening theme up the chromatic scale, rudely and forcefully. The effect is a little like that of a serpent slowly uncoiling. That&#8217;s startling enough.Move on to the slow movement. Mozart would have smiled at this, a haunting, songlike melody hovering over a simple accompaniment. Beethoven&#8217;s instrumental music doesn&#8217;t often seize the listener&#8217;s power to breathe this kind of melody that seems to imitate the intensity of human song; he would do so again in one or two of the slow movements of the later string quartets. He does it here, in this C-major Quintet, for the first time. Is this, then, the sort of music we, and the record companies, can choose to overlook?The finale is famous; it gave the entire work its nickname, &#8220;Storm.&#8221; It does, indeed, burst upon you: rolling, snarling tremors that sweep across all five performers. Then &#8212; surprise! &#8212; the storm is choked off, with a butter-wouldn&#8217;t-melt minuet that sneaks in out of nowhere. The storm returns. So does that minuet, now greatly changed. The sweet dance has grown oratorical, even petulant, and it is swept aside at the end with a violent harmonic change. Here is the shadow of the Beethoven to come!All credit, then, to cellist Robert Martin for pulling this remarkable, and remarkably little-known, work of Beethoven&#8217;s out of the shadows. This is the third &#8220;Music for Mischa&#8221; series at UCLA, produced by Martin and named for his late friend and colleague Mischa Schneider, cellist of the legendary Budapest Quartet. The quality of the programs &#8212; four this season &#8212; is worthy of the man whose name they bear.We could make the same case for Dvorak that we do for Beethoven: that we know many of his works all too well, at the expense of other works we know all too little. The G-major String Quartet is a case in point. The Dvorak quartet we know best is the F-major, subtitled &#8220;American&#8221; because he composed it during his sojourn in this country. The G-major is a later work, and its wisdom and intense beauty are the work of a man who has pondered deeply on the nature of his own art. It is a quiet work; the exuberance of the early Dvorak has given way to a deep calm, of the sort that often overtakes artists (Brahms of the Clarinet Quintet, Shakespeare of &#8220;The Tempest&#8221;) late in their careers. The scherzo does, to be sure, mirror the composer&#8217;s love of his own country&#8217;s folk dances; the slow movement, on the other hand, transcends all boundaries with Dvorak&#8217;s gorgeous theme and its ensuing variations. Again, this G-major Quartet is virtually ignored; a single recording exists, as opposed to 18 of the &#8220;American.&#8221; The Piano Quartet and Piano Quintet are full of that aforementioned exuberance; this is music that, from the first note, settles you back in your seat with the message that you&#8217;re in for a wonderful ride. Do both works go on a little long for their length? To be sure; yet in this music, as in all Dvorak, you&#8217;ll dig long and hard before you find a note you would willingly spare.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1992/01/classcol-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For this final Sunday of the Mozart year, another fond glance at music&#8217;s purest genius might be in order.The admirable project begun by Philips, to amass a complete recording of the Mozartian heritage in its numerical and radiant fullness, nears completion on schedule. Of 45 projected volumes, 37 are now at hand. Of the remaining [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For this final Sunday of the Mozart year, another fond glance at music&#8217;s purest genius might be in order.The admirable project begun by Philips, to amass a complete recording of the Mozartian heritage in its numerical and radiant fullness, nears completion on schedule. Of 45 projected volumes, 37 are now at hand. Of the remaining eight, six will be reissues of recordings already familiar, complete operas conducted by Sir Colin Davis. The entire project &#8212; the quality of performance, the packaging and annotations  &#8212; has been carried out on a high level of integrity and taste. The final volume, by the way, consists of a miscellany, including pieces from a sketchbook that the 9-year-old wunderkind compiled during a visit to London. Also in this volume is an uncompleted rondo for horn and orchestra, whose manuscript was only discovered this past year. The work may be inconsequential, but it stands as a reminder that the Mozart treasury continues to grow.The passion for completeness, surely one of the motivating forces behind this monolithic recording project, has its down side, of course. Nobody will be so foolhardy as to proclaim that every moment on every one of these 180 compact discs is the affirmation of high genius. Any rational-minded connoisseur must admit, on working his way through all or part of this treasurable collection, that there is a hierarchy of excellence clearly in evidence. My own lists of expendable Mozart have contained, from time to time, such varied repertory as the two big Vesper services, the Concerto for Three Pianos, the interminable variations that form the finale of the Sinfonia Concertante for Winds, and the opera about the Disguised Gardener that appears in the series in both Italian and German versions, each running over three hours. In every case I have returned to the works in question, listened again with ears somehow mysteriously refreshed, and discovered some haunting turn of phrase, some astounding harmonic progression or breath-stopping orchestral color that I had somehow missed before. These works are, then, banished from the dark lists and returned to favor &#8212; until the next time.The essence of mastery in a piece of music, of whatever extent, is its power to reveal new aspects on repeated hearings. To visit and revisit  these Mozart packages over the past year, to check out one more time a work you think familiar, or to investigate some juvenile caprice you&#8217;ve never before heard, becomes an experience in continual revelation. When, before, did you hear the wind passage before the reprise in the slow movement of the 39th Symphony played with such exquisite balance as it is here by the winds of Neville Marriner&#8217;s Academy of St. Martin in the Fields? How did you miss, until just now, the sheer boyish delight in the piece called &#8220;Galimathias musicum,&#8221; flung forth by this incredible child at the age of ten?The total of these 180 discs is a staggering outpouring of great music. It makes for a daunting stretch along eight feet of shelf space, yet the quality of its content makes it user-friendly in a way that, say, a similar project for Bach or Haydn might not be. The ultimate triumph of Mozart is the way a human voice is, almost always, close to the surface of the music. The voice may be impersonated by a clarinet or horn, as in the slow movements of his mature piano concertos. It may be the voice of a real person, as when Susanna sings of her marital bliss in the last act of &#8220;The Marriage of Figaro.&#8221; But Mozart has this way in his music of making you believe that he is talking to you alone, and nobody else. It&#8217;s a gift he never lost. The Philips Mozart project was not the only large-scale tribute to this angelic composer produced in the anniversary year; his music has been lavishly attended to by any number of producers. But the Philips series was by far the broadest, and it was also managed by a group of artists exceptionally well-suited to the task. For a record company with Marriner and Davis under contract among its conductors, with Alfred Brendel and Mitsuko Uchida as its pianists, with its violin repertory still fresh in older recordings by the late Arthur Grumiaux and Henryk Szeryng, and with the Academy of St. Martin in the Fields  to provide the idealized Mozartian orchestral sound, its all-out participation in a Mozart celebration was preordained. You will search long before you come across a project of this size with performance standards so consistently maintained.The question of so-called &#8220;authenticity&#8221; arises. Strange; when Marriner&#8217;s Academy made its first recordings, some 20 years ago, their Mozart was hailed as a revelation of the &#8220;authentic&#8221; Mozartian sound, mostly because of the careful balance between a relatively small string section and the winds &#8212; as opposed to the full-orchestra sound of, say, Seiji Ozawa&#8217;s Boston Symphony.  Now, however, we have other ensembles (also mostly British) who dig deeper into the &#8220;authentic&#8221; sound, with instruments reconstructed from old models. By their standards, the Academy now sounds old-fashioned.And so it may be, and so may be the sound of Brendel and Uchida, playing on modern concert grand pianos. Yet there is another way of looking at this whole &#8220;authenticity&#8221; syndrome: the matter of fidelity to the spirit, no less than the sound. Someday, Heaven forfend, yet another record producer will hit upon the idea of a complete Mozart project, this time jiggered to as to produce exactly the sounds Mozart and his 18th-century audiences may have heard. It would be hard to conceive, however, that any such project could come as close to the authentic spirit of the music as you&#8217;ll find in the undertaking already at hand.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some brain-dead hobgoblin decreed some time ago that the Christmas season is a time of silence. Our concert halls are empty, except for a stray sing-along &#8220;Messiah.&#8221; Home from the holidays, the kids might, you&#8217;d think, find diuersion or self-improvement in a live symphony concert, or even a string quartet. But no; out of one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some brain-dead hobgoblin decreed some time ago that the Christmas season is a time of silence. Our concert halls are empty, except for a stray sing-along &#8220;Messiah.&#8221; Home from the holidays, the kids might, you&#8217;d think, find diuersion or self-improvement in a live symphony concert, or even a string quartet. But no; out of one side of their collective mouths, our musical managements scream at finding themselves out of touch with the young audience, but then they blatantly talk their way around this one opportunity to reaching a sizable segment of that audience with challenging programming at this time of the season. We can, of course, ward off cultural starvation at home. Handel&#8217;s &#8220;Messiah&#8221; on the home stereo can be an uplifting experience (especially with the superb new Nicholas McGegan performance released this year on Harmonia Mundi) but there are other serious musical pleasures appropriate to the season and less often heard. Since the musical managements have abandoned their task of broadening our musical horizons (at least for the moment) it falls to your reporter to fill the breach. Here, then, are some great works you may have overlooked, which may help you to hold onto sanity in this interval until the Philharmonic, the Opera Company and the various other local groups are back in operation.When was the last time, for example, that you heard the Christmas Oratorio by Heinrich Schutz? Never, you say? You are, then, missing a work of simple, powerful beauty. Schutz (1585-1677) comes in at the start of the Baroque. Like his German contemporary, the painter Albrecht Durer, Schutz spent much time in Italy, thawing his Northern sensibilities under the Tuscan sun. The result is a wonderful mixture of craftsmanship and delight.  This work from his mature years is full of fresh dramatic devices that were all new and startling in their time: voices interacting with instruments in a way that foreshadows operatic writing. Solo voices and chorus alternate in telling the story of the Nativity; near the end there&#8217;s a chorus in praise of God that is so simply, radiantly beautiful that you&#8217;ll need to play it again and again.The work is available on two recordings, both marvelous: Rene Jacobs and his Concerto Vocale on Harmonia Mundi and Andrew Parrott&#8217;s Taverner Choir and Players on Angel-EMI.Go back a few years, and revel in Claudio Monteverdi&#8217;s 1610 &#8220;Vespers of the Blessed Virgin.&#8221; This is not Christmas music, strictly speaking; it&#8217;s a setting of the evening service in the Catholic Church at any time of the year. But this particular setting was composed by Monteverdi for a festive celebration at the Court in Mantua, and so it will do for Christmas as well as not. Monteverdi&#8217;s dates are 1567-1643, which fortells 1993 as a big year for this composer. The Vespers form an astounding work: 90 minutes in which one of music&#8217;s sovereign innovators revels in an astounding vocabulary of new musical inventions, some of them of his own devising. The opening is astounding enough: the chorus in the center, surround by the raucous brass contingent pealing forth their challenges as if to ring the whole thing  by flames.Then Monteverdi moves us on, through a number of Psalm settings for soloists and chorus, up to one of the most stunning compositional feats of his or anyone else&#8217;s time. That would be the &#8220;Sonata sopra Sancta Maria.&#8221; The full Baroque orchestra &#8212; strings, winds, brass and organ &#8212; take on the measures of a dance: zany, wildly spirited, breathless, the rhythm constantly changing. Threaded through this glorious racket is a single line of chant, taken up by the sopranos and repeated 11 times: &#8220;Sancta Maria, ora pro nobis&#8221; (&#8220;Blessed Mary, pray for us.&#8221;)There is something in these insistently repeated phrases, and in the flickering dances all around it, that suggests something grandiose, wild and infinite; there&#8217;s nothing else in music quite like this.Recordings: there are several excellent performances, but the one conducted by Philippe Herreweghe on Harmonia Mundi stands apart, with the brazen sound of archaic trumpets and trombones (played by a group called the Toulouse Sacqueboutiers) adding to the sense of grandeur. There is also considerable charm in Arthur Honegger&#8217;s &#8220;Christmas Cantata,&#8221; on a recent Erato disc. Honegger (1892-1955) is one of those composers whose fame falls through the cracks now and then, and then occasionally gets revived. He was one of the composers (the so-called &#8220;Group of Six&#8221;) who hung out with Jean Cocteau in the 1920s, and, like most of the others, turned toward a very simple, devotional musical style in his later scores. The &#8220;Christmas Cantata&#8221; dates from 1953; it is scored (very prettily) for baritone, children&#8217;s and adult choirs, organ and orchestra, with a simple devotional text hailing Jesus&#8217; birth in ecumenical terms. The new recording, excellently led by Michel Corboz, also includes a more familiar Honegger work: &#8220;La Danse des Morts&#8221; (&#8220;Dance of the Dead&#8221;), decidedly not a Christmas text. It&#8217;s a marvelous work on its own, however, with the narrator howling forth the story of Ezekiel in the Valley of Dry Bones and the chorus and soloists shrieking forth their commentary. Unless you can lay your hands on the historic (but, alas, long-discontinued) performance under Charles Munch, with the glorious oratory of Jean-Louis Barrault as narrator, this one will do fine.Happy holidays!</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two veterans of the local battlefields have been back among us these weeks. Zubin Mehta is currently here at his old stand, the Los Angeles Philharmonic podium; the first of his three programs here will be repeated this afternoon at the Music Center. Gerard Schwarz {cq}, who was never invited to the Philharmonic podium during [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two veterans of the local battlefields have been back among us these weeks. Zubin Mehta is currently here at his old stand, the Los Angeles Philharmonic podium; the first of his three programs here will be repeated this afternoon at the Music Center. Gerard Schwarz {cq}, who was never invited to the Philharmonic podium during his years as head of the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra, attained that podium for a pair of programs earlier this month.Neither of these conductors rank high in my personal pantheon, but that&#8217;s not the same as saying that their visits here were without interest. Schwarz, currently with the Seattle Symphony, has carved a small niche for himself as a   proponent of American symphonic music from the recent past; his program here began with David Diamond&#8217;s Second Symphony, typical of the nuggets he has recently exhumed. Mehta&#8217;s program this past week began with a ghastly miscalculation not entirely his fault, but ended with some grand noise from the narrow repertory which he has come close to mastering.David Diamond is now 76. Thanks mostly to Schwarz&#8217;s efforts on his behalf, in concerts and on Delos Records, he seems to be enjoying a return to popularity  &#8212; a reputation, you might say, for having a reputation. The Second Symphony dates from 1944, and was commissioned by Serge Koussevitzky and the Boston Symphony. It was, and remains, Koussevitzky&#8217;s kind of music: sonorous, bland, academically correct. (By coincidence, there was more of Koussevitzky&#8217;s kind of music at the Music Center last week; more on this later.)The work&#8217;s history may be interesting, but the music is not. What can we learn today from this kind of tepid, derivative tone-spinning, in style midway between Sibelius and Vaughan Williams but with none of either composer&#8217;s profile? Here was more of what we were talking about last week: music dated from the moment of birth, desiccated beyond repair. On Schwarz&#8217;s program here there was also newer music, Lukas Foss&#8217; Clarinet Concerto in its American premiere. Again the matter at hand was a string of derivative gestures, designed so that a talented soloist &#8212; Richard Stoltzman, in this case &#8212; could strike handsome poses at the end of each section. Foss &#8212; another local warrior from times past, from when he taught at UCLA &#8212; has spent a lifetime as the great almost-ran among composers: nibbling skilfully at one modish musical style after another, never quite turning his serendipitous skill  into real music. The new concerto is more of the same. Mehta&#8217;s hobbyhorse on his first program was the Bruckner Eighth Symphony, and he rode it skilfully. No, it wasn&#8217;t the kind of performance to take the full measure of the work&#8217;s grandiosity, the flooding of naive but heartfelt emotion that can make the slow movement practically glow in the dark. It was, instead, a careful, meticulous performance, nicely balanced, loud enough at the end to convince the capacity crowd that angels had, indeed, passed overhead, but slack at times so that the endless, repetitive vulgarity of that final movement became, as usual, an exercise in listeners&#8217; frustration.Before had come Midori and her not-so-magical violin, at 20 no longer dismissable as a precocious nymphet. So out of touch she was with her music &#8212; the wondrous Violin Concerto of Alban Berg &#8212; that this listener&#8217;s hand itched to spank not only this oversized child but also whatever concert management dreamed up the notion that she was ready (or would ever be ready) to play the score. LINE<br />
Gidon {cq} Kremer, a violinist and enkindling musician of quite a different order, brought his German Chamber Philharmonic into the Music Center earlier this past week for two programs partly wonderful partly (to say the least) curious. The orchestra itself, Frankfurt-based, is a marvelous small ensemble, warm in tone and astounding in precision and balance. Kremer, a performer of genuine creative skills  of a breed that hardly exists these days, endowed the programs with a thread of gold by performing all five of Mozart&#8217;s Violin Concertos, leading the orchestra from his soloist&#8217;s stand.But the first program also included two sizable works by Arthur Lourie; Kremer had also performed some of his music at his Royce Hall concerts last season. Why Lourie? He was a Russian-born composer (1892-1966) who emigrated here shortly after the Revolution and landed for a time in Boston, at the feet of the aforementioned Serge Koussevitzky. He wrote an adulatory, if not exactly accurate, biography of Koussevitzky who then &#8212; surely more out of gratitude than musical taste &#8212; performed lots of Lourie&#8217;s music.The Lourie pieces Kremer played and conducted (with high skill, needless to say) were bland little exercises in a mostly backward style that made one think of cafe orchestras behind potted palms and punctuating cries of &#8220;Hey, Waiter!&#8221; Yet here is Kremer, one of the great musical adventurers of our time, carrying around the music of Arthur Lourie as something aflame with seraphic majesty. You just never know.1-line<br />
Sian Edwards merits belated mention, the English lass who led the Philharmonic over Thanksgiving weekend and, thus, became only the second woman to lead the orchestra in a subscription concert. (Marin Alsop, the first, had only preceded her by two weeks.) Edwards is a real talent, although a strangely planned program partially did her in.It was strange, for example, to start with Ravel&#8217;s &#8220;Spanish Rhapsody,&#8221; a rousing concert-ending piece but here out of place. A rather tentative, colorless reading heightened that impression, as did the ensuing music, Peter Serkin&#8217;s show-offish performance of the Beethoven First Piano Concerto.But Edwards ended the program with a stunning reading of the Shostakovich Sixth Symphony, a work full of  easy, rousing effects but full also of a dark profundity molded with a fine, dramatic hand. Edwards and the orchestra collaborated beautifully; this was major music-making.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SUGGESTED HED: CONTEMPORARY MUSIC, NEW AND OLDSome music, like some great stage &#8216;n&#8217; screen stars, never shows its age. Some music, like minor luminaries, begins to wrinkle right at birth. You never know.After as much Mozart as we&#8217;ve heard in recent weeks, due to the anniversary celebration that officially (but probably not actually) ended last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUGGESTED HED: CONTEMPORARY MUSIC, NEW AND OLDSome music, like some great stage &#8216;n&#8217; screen stars, never shows its age. Some music, like minor luminaries, begins to wrinkle right at birth. You never know.After as much Mozart as we&#8217;ve heard in recent weeks, due to the anniversary celebration that officially (but probably not actually) ended last Thursday, it would still be hard to remember any performances that put this music across as anything but fresh, innovative, as inventive as if newly composed. Not even thepoorer occasions, the ones you remember the way you remember a stone in your shoe (Peter Maag&#8217;s conducting at the Bowl, for one of many examples) could erase the perpetual youthfulness in this music. Therein lies the Mozartian miracle: the phenomenon of a composer working in a time when musical form and style were fairly rigidly systematized, yet able through the clarity of his own vision to trick his way out of the system. The further miracle lies in the many ways Mozart found to work those tricks. Grasping the outlines of his style is no problem &#8212; for a 1991 audience, or even one in 1791. Against this familiar background, however, the Mozartian earmarks stand out in bold relief. Sometimes he chills a listener&#8217;s blood by merely wrenching the harmony into unexpected realms; the switch at the unmasking of Leporello in &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; is an ageless example. Sometimes it&#8217;s just a matter of a shift in tone; the slow movement of the Clarinet Concerto, which Richard Stoltzman played with the Philharmonic this past week, lingers in the memory because the melody demands of its soloist the tone of a human voice pure and haunting. There is nothing here that needs to be considered as very old music or very new; it remains timeless as a communicative act at its purest. These thoughts about aging and agelessness were brought on by a more negative experience. At last week&#8217;s Monday Evening Concert at the County Museum the composer-of-honor was Sylvano Bussotti, a major figure in avant-garde music both here and in Europe as recently as the mid-1960s. Bussotti, along with an ensemble of 12 musicians called Bussottioperaballet (one word), were flown here from Rome to give this single concert, the whole trip underwritten by several Italian cultural agencies here and abroad. The mind boggles at what this must have cost, and at how the money could have been better used.There was a style in vogue in the 1960s, whose earmarks were a kind of fragmented, insecure melodic line, lots of silences, an affectation of profundity through inscrutability, bits of straw passed off as diamonds. Anton Webern and John Cage were its progenitors; Lukas Foss (in town this weekend with his new Clarinet Concerto) was among its ardent disciples. Some of the music had a convincing  shape that could pass for something close to a melody. The Italian contingent was especially good at that, the composers Luciano Berio and Bruno Maderna along with Bussotti. They worked with pastiche and collage, and at least one work from that time&#8211; Berio&#8217;s Sinfonia &#8212; deserves its place in the repertory.Not much else does, I&#8217;m afraid. Bussotti came to town, charmed a couple of audiences with lectures, and brought a (blessedly) short program to the Museum, consisting for the most part of bloops and bleeps from this bygone style. More depressing was the fact that some of the music was quite recent: a noisy, incoherent pastiche of bird-imitations, all tossed together and performed as a 30-minute hullabaloo, that suggested that Bussotti was still mining the old veins. Here was music created during our lifetime, stillborn from the start, utterly devoid of anything like the energy that maintains the spark of life in Mozart&#8217;s music. Now it&#8217;s manifestly unfair, of course, to use the Mozartian miracle as a stick to clobber Silvano Bussotti, or any other composer living or recently dead. Yet the close comparisons that recent concerts have allowed do bring up this basic question about timelessness in music. Two nights after the Bussotti fiasco at the County Museum the EAR Unit came to the same auditorium with a program of works by Frederic Rzewski {cq}, with the composer himself on hand to play his new Piano Sonata. Again, it&#8217;s probably stretching a point to clobber the Italian innovator Bussotti with the American innovator Rzewski, yet the two evenings added up to a study in creative energy. From Rzewski we heard an evening of great, sprawling, untidy pieces. There was the Sonata, running on for some 40 minutes, cruising around some borrowed melodies that ran the gamut from a medieval folktune to &#8220;Three Blind Mice,&#8221; phenomenally difficult but marvelously dispatched by its creator. There were a couple of satiric pieces in Rzewski&#8217;s activist style, pastiches that kicked around familiar tunes and the cliches of modern advertising. Not everything came together, but everything had an energy that leaped from the stage. Even the Sonata, for all its length, held the crowd silent and spellbound. That wasn&#8217;t Mozart, either, but at least the music fairly glowed from its own  energy level, which the performers caught and flung out into the hall. That&#8217;s what music is all about, or should be. Talk about energy! With 23 complete boxed sets of the Beethoven symphonies ensconced in the latest LP catalog, you&#8217;re justified in questioning the need for No. 24, but a few minutes with the latest entry &#8212; performances by Nikolaus Harnoncourt leading the Chamber Orchestra of Europe on five Teldec discs currently selling for the price of four &#8212; might make you wonder if you weren&#8217;t hearing nine newly composed essays in the symphonic form at its most incandescent. Harnoncourt, Berlin-born and best known for a lot of fairly ho-hum Baroque performances using authentic period instruments, seems to have undergone a rebirth of the spirit. Last year&#8217;s &#8220;Don Giovanni,&#8221; and now this Beethoven set, are the work of an enkindling, energized musical visionary. The orchestra uses modern instruments, except for the brass players, who use old-fashioned valveless trumpets and trombones with their slashing, hard vibrance. That sound, best of all in the Seventh Symphony, will simply send shivers up your spine. So will the more eloquent passages, like the mysterious, half-spoken slow movement of No. 4, which Harnoncourt takes to the edge of silence. The vocal soloists in the Ninth are merely adequate; everything else about this set is extraordinary. Even if you already own the other 23, Harnoncourt&#8217;s new recording will usurp a place of leadership.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[STEVE: I have art for opera; will bring by Tuesday noonishRossini&#8217;s &#8220;Barber of Seville&#8221; &#8212; exquisitely comic, meticulously timed, both supple and subtle &#8212; has been put forward by the Music Center Opera as a mindless, vulgar laff show. Imposed, like wanton graffiti, upon this beautiful structure there are Pavarotti gags, chamber-pot gags, bad-breath gags. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STEVE: I have art for opera; will bring by Tuesday noonishRossini&#8217;s &#8220;Barber of Seville&#8221; &#8212; exquisitely comic, meticulously timed, both supple and subtle &#8212; has been put forward by the Music Center Opera as a mindless, vulgar laff show. Imposed, like wanton graffiti, upon this beautiful structure there are Pavarotti gags, chamber-pot gags, bad-breath gags. The scenery, a Magritte ripoff done up in finger paints, is its own set of gags. Some of the sight gags do, to be sure, distract from the inadequacy of much of the singing, but that can hardly condone the over-all sense of vandalism. Given that inadequacy &#8212; the squeaky, off-pitch Almaviva of Raul Gimenez, Louis Lebherz&#8217;s woolly Basilio, Rodney Gilfry&#8217;s cute but underpowered Figaro, adrift under the shapeless musical leadership of Randall Bore (sorry, Behr) &#8212; the obvious alternative might be to turn one&#8217;s back on the enterprise. That, however, would cost us the one positive element in the production, which steps out beyond the shadows and works in pure light. That, of course, is the Rosina of Frederica von Stade, a role she has long owned. Lovely in appearance, graceful in her every move, and totally in command of the mighty benevolence that Rossini has bestowed on the role (which, by the way, she sings in the original mezzo-soprano range), von Stade moved through the otherwise depressing evening as if ensconced on a whole &#8216;nother planet.To say that she saved the show, but that she deserved one more worth saving, is to propound the obvious.Two performances remain: tomorrow and Wednesday nights. Better by several light years was last weekend&#8217;s other music-drama entry, Philip Glass&#8217; and Allen Ginsberg&#8217;s brilliant &#8220;Hydrogen Jukebox.&#8221; given two sold-out performances at UCLA&#8217;s Royce Hall. It was a glorious collaboration: two of our times&#8217; rebellious archetypes, surprisingly adept at finding common cause. I say &#8220;surprisingly&#8221; for a reason. The typical Glass texts &#8212; the sci-fi pieces, the dense overlay of metaphor in the early operas &#8212; have always embodied a kind of indirection that also spilled over into the music, not always to its benefit. Here we got 20 poems of the good old  Ginsberg, howling out his activist political posters, the sometimes drooling but well-meant sentiment, all in a slam-bang verbal onslaught in which metaphor played no part. And the impact upon Glass resulted in some of his strongest music in years.Six singers, all strong and wonderfully acrobatic, participated against Jerome Sirlin&#8217;s spectacularly textured projected scenery; Ginsberg himself came on stage for one gorgeous reading. There were, to be sure, moments of strain in the visual creation; words and music dwarfed the stage images most of the time. It&#8217;s good news, therefore, that &#8220;Hydrogen Jukebox&#8221; is up for a recording (on Sony) in a few months.What a busy weekend! In Long Beach on Saturday the brave JoAnn Falletta led her Long Beach Symphony and a chorus through Prokofiev&#8217;s complete score for &#8220;Alexander Nevsky,&#8221; with the great Eisenstein movie, in a beautifully restored print, on a screen overhead. It&#8217;s happened before, with the Los Angeles Philharmonic both indoors and out, but it cannot happen too often. The majesty of Eisenstein&#8217;s conception grows with repetition; his use of music (and of no music, when metal grinds upon metal in the battle scenes) deserves every filmmaker&#8217;s scrutiny. The production, in this enlightened restoration, cries out for capture on video.Philharmonic honcho Ernest Fleischmann, who in his time has brought to the Music Center a remarkable array of guest-conducting talent, struck gold once again last weekend with the local debut of Franz Welser-Moest. Now the conductor of the London Philharmonic (which he brings to the Music Center on March 16) the young (31) Welser-Moest delivered a powerful reading of the Mahler First Symphony, daredevil in the breadth of its contrasts but marvelously under control. He&#8217;s wonderful to watch, this Welser-Moest, with arms that look ten feet long, wheedling and shaping the music with splendid control. I also have a special fondness for a conductor modest enough to take a bow without removing his glasses; few do. That&#8217;s what I call spectacular.The Mozart celebrations come to a head this week. The financially-beset Philharmonic has only one all-Mozart concert (on Thursday, the actual 200th anniversary of Mozart&#8217;s death). But that concert has Richard Stoltzman to play the Clarinet Concerto, and there is no performer, on any instrument, with better command than Stoltzman&#8217;s of the shape of a Mozartian phrase, its power to wind itself around the hearer&#8217;s mind and heart.Two chamber orchestras are on hand, both under proven Mozartians: Sir Neville Marriner and his Academy of St. Martin in the Field at Ambassador tomorrow and Tuesday, our own Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra under Trevor Pinnock, Thursday at Royce, Friday at the Japan-America Theater downtown, Saturday at Ambassador. And another local band, the brave little Los Angeles Mozart Orchestra (adrift under guest conductors since the retirement of founder David Keith) has a charmer of an idea for next Saturday, the 7th. First, at 4 p.m., there&#8217;s a wake at &#8212; where else? &#8212; Forest Lawn (the Junior Achievement Patio), with champagne and a eulogy and with, the program states, &#8220;black arm band optional.&#8221; That&#8217;s followed by a concert in Forest Lawn&#8217;s Hall of Liberty, with the orchestra and the Cambridge Singers doing, among other things, Mozart&#8217;s Requiem.After that, we can all get back to business. Next year&#8217;s anniversary: Rossini,  on Leap-Year Day. That should be fun.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/12/classcol-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-16/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fame in music, as in other endeavors, comes and goes. Five years ago, for example, nobody could have foreseen the return to favor of Franz Schreker. Now here we are with three new recordings of Schreker operas. This past weekend, furthermore, Nov 15-17 [F/L] the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra revived Schreker&#8217;s 1916 Chamber Symphony (for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fame in music, as in other endeavors, comes and goes. Five years ago, for example, nobody could have foreseen the return to favor of Franz Schreker. Now here we are with three new recordings of Schreker operas. This past weekend, furthermore, Nov 15-17 [F/L] the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra revived Schreker&#8217;s 1916 Chamber Symphony (for 23 Solo Instruments). Schreker (1878-1934) had been at one time Europe&#8217;s most respected composer, his operas prized even above those of Richard Strauss, revered also as a teacher and conductor. His stage works &#8212; big, sprawling, superheated romances, the operatic equivalent of Barbara Cartland&#8217;s novels &#8212; appeared in dozens of houses throughout the German-speaking world. Shortly after World War I, however, his fame simply vanished; a new musical language, sparked by Europe&#8217;s frenzy over the new-fangled thing called jazz, made Schreker suddenly seem old fashioned. He hung on through the 1920s, but the Nazi rise cost the Jewish Schreker the remaining shreds of his fame, and brought on the heart attack that killed him.It might be stretching a point to think of Schreker as a genius rescued from undeserved neglect; he still sounds old-fashioned. So what? The operas, for all their gooey boy-loves-mountain-loses-girl mysticism, have some soaring,high-caloric, irresistible passages. The Chamber Symphony, which Christoph Perick led marvelously with the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra, is full of what the Germans call &#8220;Klangzauber&#8221;: magical sounds. The work is in one movement lasting half an hour. In that time it dances, sighs, weeps, and gives off showers of bright sparks: Mahler touched by a fairy wand.The Schreker was followed on this program by exactly the kind of music that did him in: Ravel&#8217;s shimmering, flip, jazz-infused Piano Concerto of 1930, nicely set forth by Pascal Roge. The final work was an even greater miracle, however, Haydn&#8217;s &#8220;London&#8221; Symphony (No. 104) in a performance under Perick that still, a week later, resounds in my head.Haydn symphonies are often used to start off orchestral programs: the undemanding, easy-listening classical symphony to set the crowd comfortably in its seats. Placed this time as the climactic work on the program, and conducted by Perick with marvelous vitality and breadth, the symphony became a revelation. Here is the great Haydn at the absolute zenith of his musical mastery, honoring his adoring London audience with music crammed with novelty. He wreaks all kinds of violence against the accepted structural practices of the time, launching (at one magical point in the slow movement) into a series of harmonic changes that would do credit to any composer of our own time. This isn&#8217;t just any old piece of 18th century note-spinning; this is a work of awesome mastery, and that was the way Perick and the soon-to-be-his orchestra played it. If memory serves (and, believe me, it does), this was the best orchestral concert of the year so far.The arrival of Disney&#8217;s &#8220;Fantasia&#8221; &#8212; finally and, apparently, briefly &#8212; at your local video store (drugstore, supermarket and probably pizzeria) is a public-relations triumph orchestrated with the skill of Leopold Stokowski orchestrating a Bach Toccata. Even so, the film is some kind of cherishable disaster, a curio surviving from a bygone culture naive and permissive beyond any contemporary understanding.Purely as music, there is a ghastliness here beyond measure. It doesn&#8217;t have to do only with the major cuts &#8212; Beethoven&#8217;s &#8220;Pastoral&#8221; Symphony and Stravinsky&#8217;s &#8220;Rite of Spring&#8221; reduced by about half. At least the passages that remain are fairly extended. But even the small pieces are hacked at; in &#8220;The Sorcerer&#8217;s Apprentice,&#8221; generally regarded as one of the better segments, there are agonizing deletions of two or four bars here and there, obviously done to match the music to the animation. In 1940 there weren&#8217;t the 25 recorded versions of &#8220;The Sorcerer&#8217;s Apprentice&#8221; to insure that we all know the music backward and forward; there was one, and one each of the &#8220;Pastoral&#8221; and the &#8220;Rite.&#8221; To most of us seeing the film for the first time, in theaters with the requisite outlandish stereo setup that the video release preserves, this was all new music. It&#8217;s astounding now, when our audiences achieve repertory literacy at a far earlier age, to discover what Leopold Stokowski and his touted Philadelphia Orchestra put over on Disney and on &#8220;Fantasia&#8217;s&#8221; first audiences 50 years ago.The playing is coarse and inaccurate; as early as the opening Bach &#8220;Toccata and Fugue&#8221; the strings proclaim their inability to play 16th-note passages together. This was the time when the flamboyant Stokowski was inflicting his famous orchestral experiments on Philadelphia, including ordering the strings not to bow in unison. This created a flowing, gooey sound that seemed to hang suspended with no downbeats. It would be impossible to imagine dancers working in time to Tchaikovsky&#8217;s &#8220;Nutcracker&#8221; ballet in Stokowski&#8217;s treacly version. As a cultural document, a manifestation of the marketing of serious culture in times past, &#8220;Fantasia&#8221; has its value. (And has that brand of marketing, for that matter, really disappeared? Doesn&#8217;t it linger in the dose of pseudo-cultural pap ladled out daily by Karl Haas on KUSC-FM and its affiliates?) Oh well; just those opening moments, as the ethereally beautiful Stokowski mounts his podium in silhouette and raises his arms to conduct, and the studio lights catch just his hands and turn them to pure gold, you&#8217;re sure of two things. One: you&#8217;re being had. Two: it doesn&#8217;t matter.Then you should check out &#8220;Allegro non troppo,&#8221; also available on video. Bruno Bozzetto&#8217;s 1975 masterpiece was probably meant as a long-after-the-fact answer to &#8220;Fantasia,&#8221; but it&#8217;s a work of animation far better on its own in both concept and execution. Like the Disney, Bozzetto aims his animator&#8217;s imagination at a program of familiar pops chestnuts, in a series of contrived scenarios hilarious, loaded with compelling satire and in one instance (Sibelius&#8217; &#8220;Valse triste&#8221;) authentically tragic. Run his version of Ravel&#8217;s &#8220;Bolero&#8221; after the Disney &#8220;Rite of Spring.&#8221; Bozzetto&#8217;s dinosaurs are the real thing, and he puts them to far better use.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women conducting symphony orchestras: what will they think of next? This is meant in jest, I hastily add; the phenomenon is, as of some years now, a fact of life. And yet, in all the Los Angeles Philharmonic&#8217;s 72-year history, no woman had dared to broach its podium during a seasonal subscription concert &#8212; no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women conducting symphony orchestras: what will they think of next? This is meant in jest, I hastily add; the phenomenon is, as of some years now, a fact of life. And yet, in all the Los Angeles Philharmonic&#8217;s 72-year history, no woman had dared to broach its podium during a seasonal subscription concert &#8212; no woman, that is, until Marin Alsop this weekend (including this afternoon at 2:30). Interestingly enough, the second claimant in that rarefied category, Britain&#8217;s Sian Edwards, makes her local debut in two weeks. A certain skewed perception is, therefore, inevitable. You think you hear genuine musical quality at work on the Music Center podium, but then you shut your eyes and think: am I being honorable, or merely chivalrous? In the case of the 35-year-old Marin Alsop, currently head of the orchestra at Eugene, Oregon, chivalry played no part (or not much, anyhow) this past Thursday night; here was a conductor to the manner born. Blonde, slender (just this side of petite) and refreshingly modest in her podium behavior, Alsop drew high-spirited, poised playing from the orchestra in a difficult program: Bartok&#8217;s marvelous Concerto for Orchestra, Tchaikovsky&#8217;s evergreen &#8220;Romeo and Juliet&#8221; and, midway, Leonard Bernstein&#8217;s 1954 Serenade for Violin and Strings, by turns winsome, boisterous, contrived and momentarily moving, with Dmitry {cq} Sitkovetzky {cq} as soloist. The Bartok might have been the problem piece, but not this time; Alsop&#8217;s reading was the work of someone who truly owns the work. The tempos were dangerous and exuberant &#8212; perhaps a little too much so in the finale, at least on Thursday, when details sometimes got blurred. But the playing was big and exciting, virtuoso playing for a masterpiece that merits no less. No, the problem came with the Bernstein. There is sweet music here, and some amusing racketing at the end. But the substance is mostly gesturesome to no purpose. It is a concert work, and yet the first notes of the opening theme also outline the spiky melodic motive that starts the song &#8220;Maria&#8221; in the &#8220;West Side Story&#8221; of three years later, and you can&#8217;t hear the one without the other. The gigantic Sitkovetzky (son and frequent partner of the Soviet emigre pianist Bella Davidovsky) played the work with the requisite slickness, and Alsop got the orchestral sound nicely throttled down to chamber-music sonority. Important music, however, simply did not come. The remainder of the program &#8212; including a dazzling rendition of the Tchaikovsky &#8212; made amends. line<br />
Orchestras from abroad that engage in worldwide tours fall into two categories. There are the genuine star-quality ensembles (from Vienna, Amsterdam or Leningrad) which always sell out their American concerts and deservedly so. Then there are the lesser ensembles driven by some sort of nationalistic ego, which draw smaller crowds but usually garner a few reviews that read well back home. These events are at least valuable, if the visiting orchestra brings some of its country&#8217;s music that might otherwise escape American notice. The Oslo Philharmonic, which gave two programs this past week at the Music Center, brought along one attractive trifle from back home, Arne Nordheim&#8217;s &#8220;Canzona.&#8221; Otherwise the programs were undistinguished; if they were meant to tell us something about the Osla Philharmonic&#8217;s quality, they didn&#8217;t. The orchestra&#8217;s &#8212; and our &#8212; time was wasted with standard concertos with uninteresting soloists: Frank Peter Zimmermann in the Mendelssohn Violin Concerto one night, Misha Dichter in the Beethoven First Piano Concerto the next. They reminded us merely that the Oslo Philharmonic&#8217;s recording career is largely as a backup orchestra for concertos. Whatever the reasons for Norsk Hydro, the Oslo power producer that supports the orchestra back home, to fling it into the international critical arena, those reasons escaped detection. As heard at the Music Center, the orchestra wasn&#8217;t bad, just ordinary in tone, often unreliable in attack. Mariss Jansons, its conductor, has appeared here under better circumstances, leading the Los Angeles Philharmonic and, more recently, the Leningrad Philharmonic. But his proven powers were useless against the Shostakovich Seventh Symphony, which sprawled across 75 minutes of the first program. For all the work&#8217;s fame (as music composed during the Nazis&#8217; siege of Leningrad and, thus, a paean to Soviet heroism and determination) the Seventh is minor Shostakovich, agonizingly dull and contrived at every moment once the trickery of the first movement has passed. Maybe the work demands the flamboyance of a Leonard Bernstein; maybe the unfurling of flags and the release of white doves at the end might help. Jansons played the music straight, and the result was agonizing. line<br />
Awareness of the splendors of Mexican art, and the desire to pay it tribute, inundates the city these days, and the musical side of the celebration is not inconsiderable. Last Wednesday, however, there was a low point. Xochimoki is an ensemble consisting of the ethnomusicologist Jim Berenholtz and the composer Maxatl {cq} Galindo. At the County Museum they performed on an array of ancient Mexican instruments &#8212; flutes, whistles and a handsome array of percussion.There is no preserved repertory of indigenous Mexican music, so the two men made up their own instead: dull, thudding, unchanging drum rhythms, the other instruments spinning out the  cliches you may remember from old South-Sea adventure flicks &#8212; a sort of generic exotica. If Dorothy Lamour had slunk across the stage in her sarong, it wouldn&#8217;t have been out of place. At the start the crowd overflowed the capacity of the museum&#8217;s Bing Theater, but by intermission many had left. I am not one to go against tides.More interesting Mexican music, by five contemporary composers, is on tap next Friday at the museum, in the season&#8217;s first performance by the Los Angeles Philharmonic&#8217;s New Music Group (prior to their &#8220;Green Umbrella&#8221; series that starts in January). Ticketholders can also visit the museum&#8217;s spectacular Mexican show.But also on that night (Nov. 22) there&#8217;s the opening of the Music Center Opera&#8217;s &#8220;Barber of Seville,&#8221; and the Philip Glass/Allen Ginsberg &#8220;Hydrogen Jukebox&#8221; at Royce Hall. You could go to &#8220;Hydrogen Jukebox&#8221; the next night, but then you&#8217;d miss the following: JoAnn Falletta and the Long Beach Symphony playing Prokofiev&#8217;s score to Eisenstein&#8217;s &#8220;Alexander Nevsky&#8221; with the great film (newly restored) on the screen; Jorge Mester and the Pasadena Symphony in the Mahler Sixth Symphony, and the Los Angeles Philharmonic under the promising young German conductor Franz Welser-Moest. Most urgently, the city needs some kind of scheduling commission to coordinate the many performing groups now in action, and to prevent this kind of pileup. The musical life hereabouts is rich enough to merit that kind of supervision.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until this past week, the local cultural forces had honored the Mozart bicentennial with no particvlar distinction. There were lots of routine programs of predictable substance, and a half-hearted attempt by the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra, to commission a series of new pieces &#8220;in the style of&#8230;&#8221; that bore but withered fruit. Then came the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until this past week, the local cultural forces had honored the Mozart bicentennial with no particvlar distinction. There were lots of routine programs of predictable substance, and a half-hearted attempt by the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra, to commission a series of new pieces &#8220;in the style of&#8230;&#8221; that bore but withered fruit. Then came the Long Beach Opera&#8217;s production of &#8220;Lucio Silla,&#8221; and a note of true distinction was finally sounded. The work dates from Mozart&#8217;s 16th year, composed for a company in Milan whose own tradition rested largely in sustaining a repertory of artificial, serious, display operas set to old-fashioned plots. By and large, &#8220;Silla&#8221; honored that tradition. Giovanni di Gamerra&#8217;s plot held no surprises: the tyrannical Silla loves the virginal Giunia who loves the virtuous Cecilio who plots, with his friend Cinna (loved by Silla&#8217;s sister Celia) to assassinate Silla. The plotters are discovered, but Silla brings on the requisite happy ending by forgiving them all. The forgiveness gimmick was, of course, a basic 18th-century plot device; it showed up again in Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Seraglio&#8221; and in &#8220;La Clemenza di Tito&#8221; and is also faintly echoed in &#8220;The Magic Flute,&#8221; in Sarastro&#8217;s sudden conversion from villain to saint.&#8221;Silla&#8221; was a success in Milan, on what must have been a grandiose staging with lots of clanking armor and elaborate sets. The Long Beach staging, which was none of the above, used the tiny space of the Center Theater to stunning effect; the company&#8217;s finest hours, over its 14-year existence, have been in that smaller of the Convention Center&#8217;s two theaters, in a repertory extending from Monteverdi to Britten. &#8220;Silla,&#8221; which has virtually no history of modern stagings in this country (although a fair number of cut-down concert performances), was a triumphant addition to this list. A single lush, green plant, in a lighted niche high above the stage, provided the one visual contrast. Most of director Roy Rallo&#8217;s action took place in heavy shadow, with single characters brought out with narrow spotlights, against a floor and a back wall done mostly in black.The plan of action made no attempt to do battle against the basically static manner of the music; the mind was left to feed, undistractedly, on the work&#8217;s multitudinous beauties.  It all worked, surprisingly well. &#8220;Lucio Silla&#8221; is not an opera of action; its arias and set pieces are long, and the musical forces at Long Beach made no  cuts in what is accepted as the opera&#8217;s authentic form. (The original Milan production ran some six hours, by dint of several inserted ballet episodes not by Mozart. The Long Beach production, with all repeats observed and nothing cut, came in at 3 1/2 hours.)For his &#8220;pit&#8221; band (actually located on a platform above the stage) impresario Michael Milenski chose wisely; Gregory Maldonado&#8217;s Los Angeles Baroque Orchestra is evolving into one of the area&#8217;s most valuable ensembles. For all the small accidents among horns and winds in the opening performance last Sunday, the orchestral sound was prevailingly sweet and strong. Patrick Summers, of the San Francisco Opera, conducted, and shaped a splendidly paced, unflagging performance. Conductors of this early-classic repertory must make many decisions on their own, and Summers&#8217; decisions &#8212; in the matter of tempo. and in determining questions of the singers&#8217; improvised ornamentations and cadenzas &#8212; seemed constantly just. Without gimmickry or intrusive attempts at updating, the essential power in this exquisite work of Mozart&#8217;s boyhood came across. An extraordinarily fine cast helped: not merely five singers of excellent technique and exemplary diction, but a cohesive enesemble that had obviously been well-trained in the elusive art of singing together. A brilliant young mezzo-soprano named Lynnen Yakes sang the Cecilio (a role orginally for castrato) with marvelous strength; Carmen Pelton, as his sweetheart Giunia, was equally touching. Lydia Mila, Anne Marie Ketchum and William Livingston (in the title role) rounded out this most remarkable group. &#8221;Lucio Silla&#8221; exists on a splendid new recording on Teldec, under the lively, probing leadershipo of Nikolaus Harnoncourt, with a fine cast that includes the delectable Dawn Upshaw as Celia. There&#8217;s no point in bemoaning the fact that a work as glorious as this hasn&#8217;t found its way to the major houses. A traditional staging at the Metropolitan or the Music Center would undoubtedly underscore the opera&#8217;s length and relative lack of action at the expense of its many musical wonders. The Long Beach production was exactly right, a tribute to this occasionally misguided, more often triumphant and always enterprising company, and a tribute to Mozart as well.Scholarly conscience dictates that I deliver a critical broadside against Paul McCartney&#8217;s &#8220;Liverpool Oratorio,&#8221; which sprawled across quite a lot of PBS&#8217;s time time a week or so ago. I cannot; something about the sweetness of the piece, underscored by the personality of Paul himself as it came out in the hourlong documentary that preceded the performance, drew out in me a benevolent tolerance toward the music itself that no exercise of common sense can quite obliterate. Sure it&#8217;s pure cornball, and its derivations stick out like a porcupine&#8217;s quills. Yet the piece is likeable, in exactly the ways that Andrew Lloyd Webber&#8217;s sludge never is. It never overreaches itself, and that&#8217;s a rare achievement.I only wish Angel-EMI had issued the documentary along with the video of the performance. That, at least, was a work of art.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Melvyn Tan&#8217;s playing epitomizes quite a lot of what&#8217;s right, and what&#8217;s wrong, about this whole authentic-performance hangup. Tan, who specializes in playing old pianos (across the historical spectrum from the forte-piano of Mozart&#8217;s time to the piano-forte of later decades) is popular through his many records; surprisingly, however, his performances here over the past [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melvyn Tan&#8217;s playing epitomizes quite a lot of what&#8217;s right, and what&#8217;s wrong, about this whole authentic-performance hangup. Tan, who specializes in playing old pianos (across the historical spectrum from the forte-piano of Mozart&#8217;s time to the piano-forte of later decades) is popular through his many records; surprisingly, however, his performances here over the past two weeks constituted his local debut.To start MaryAnn Bonino&#8217;s &#8220;Chamber Music in Historic Sites&#8221; a week ago Friday, Tan played the three sonatas of Beethoven&#8217;s Opus 2 plus an early sonata of Mozart. Then this past week, with the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra at Pasadena&#8217;s Ambassador Auditorium and UCLA&#8217;s Royce Hall, he played an early Mozart concerto and, more remarkable, participated in a brand-new piece (sort of brand-new, anyhow) by Stephen Hartke, the Chamber Orchestra&#8217;s composer-in-residence.Tan, born in Singapore in 1956 and now living in London, is not the only advocate of early pianos, but he has become the most flamboyant and, thus, popular. His affectations at the keyboard are what a lot of people think solo performers should look like &#8212; the head bobbing, the hands (whenever not otherwise employed) engaged in spinning gossamer cobwebs above the keyboard. The word &#8220;cute&#8221; made its way more than once into intermission conversations.Affectation on the part of performers&#8217; stage deneanor is not necessary a sin in itself; you need look no farther than Leonard Bernstein for proof. But Melvyn Tan&#8217;s playing is also, you might say, &#8220;cute&#8221; and, in that way, most disturbing. He reduced great moments in the Beethoven Sonatas &#8212; of which there were many &#8212; to a series of fussy, overshaded, disconnected events. There are always reasons to suspect that a performer who takes up exotic instruments and nonstandard repertory, as Tan has built a reputation for doing, might be hiding inadequate musicianship behind the mask of authenticity. I have seen Tan often in other cities, notably with Roger Norrington&#8217;s London Classical Players for whom he is the house pianist. At the start I found it difficult to look at him while playing. These last two weeks I&#8217;ve found it difficult to listen to him as well.If it wasn&#8217;t all that interesting a week for fortepianists, it was a shade more interesting for small orchestras. At the end of last week Vladimir Spivakov brought his Moscow Virtuosi to Royce Hall; this week there has been our own Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra.Spivakov&#8217;s marvelous orchestra didn&#8217;t draw very well; we happy few were well rewarded, however. Most of the music was for strings alone, but the two French horns that joined the ensemble for Mozart&#8217;s wondrous 29th Symphony brought out marvelously  the element of the demoniac that Mozart had written for those instruments. Coming two nights after Tan&#8217;s first recital, that one performance restored the awareness of the many violent passions that sweep across the music of this indescribable genius. Mozart was 18 when he wrote it; call it a youthful work, but remember also that, at 18, half his life was over.The highlight of the Moscow program was yet another new discovery from Alfred Schnittke, a Sonata for Violin with the original piano accompaniment newly scored for chamber orchestra. Spivakov himself played the solo.What dazzling, edgy, thoroughly original music! One great sense in Schnittke&#8217;s music is the sureness in the way it unfolds. Sometimes it takes sideswipes at other people&#8217;s music &#8212; there is a hint or two of Stravinsky here and there in this Sonata. The best of it is the assurance it gives off that tough, serious, extended new music is still flowing off a few inspired pens somewhere.Alas, Stephen Hartke&#8217;s 9-minute work for the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra, offered no comparable heartsease. The orchestra&#8217;s management has had the clever idea of commissioning a number of American composers to write short works to form a latter-day tribute to Mozart. It&#8217;s not that bad an idea, as witness Ravel&#8217;s &#8220;Tombeau de Couperin&#8221; or Brahms&#8217; Haydn Variations.It wasn&#8217;t a bad idea, the Hartke, just a bad piece. People sometimes ask why the current breed of American composers so often indulge in lightweight, insipid, forgettable compositions. One answer, of course, is that orchestral managements and audiences delight in the whole &#8220;it&#8217;s modern but no so bad&#8221; repertory. But that&#8217;s only a halfway answer, and we have the example of Mel Powell&#8217;s Pulitzer-winning Two-Piano Concerto of 1990 to prove that it doesn&#8217;t have to be that way.But the new Hartke piece, which goes by the imponderable name &#8220;I Kiss Your Hands a Thousand Times&#8221; (a familiar salutation in Mozart&#8217;s letters to his father), simply wasted everybody&#8217;s time: a kind of lavender later-romantic nocturne (Faure, perhaps). It included a few lines for Melvyn Tan&#8217;s fortepiano, but they might as well have been played on a kazoo for all the personality they embodied.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/11/classcol-19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was nothing all that remarkable about this weekend&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic program (repeated this afternoon at 2:30). But excellent orchestral performance is always a remarkable event, and this week&#8217;s entry in the orchestra&#8217;s subscription series at the Music Center, under the estimable and reliable Kurt Sanderling, was certainly that. Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; Overture roared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was nothing all that remarkable about this weekend&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic program (repeated this afternoon at 2:30). But excellent orchestral performance is always a remarkable event, and this week&#8217;s entry in the orchestra&#8217;s subscription series at the Music Center, under the estimable and reliable Kurt Sanderling, was certainly that. Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; Overture roared out its message of doom and false cheer as it hadn&#8217;t at the opera (under Lawrence Foster&#8217;s more timid baton) two weeks before. Richard Strauss&#8217; &#8220;Ein Heldenleben&#8221; spun out its web of sugar and hokum with something approaching eloquence. And in the middle there was the phenomenal Mitsuko Uchida, in a one-on-one discourse on the Beethoven C-minor Piano Concerto, enough glory in itself to stand in for a supreme evening of concertgoing.The wonder of truly great performances, whenever they sometimes come your way, is their power to make even the most familiar music seem freshly reborn. It didn&#8217;t matter that Beethoven&#8217;s Third Piano Concerto lingers in the realm of thewell-roasted orchestral chestnut &#8212; heard less often, perhaps, than the &#8220;Emperor&#8221; but more often than the superior Fourth (which, by luck, turns up on next week&#8217;s program). The Third Concerto was heard in town as recently as the past summer at Hollywood Bowl. You might, quite pardonably, have slouched into Mrs. Chandler&#8217;s Pavilion last Thursday night with an &#8220;oh no, not the Third again&#8221; scowl.But then the miracle took shape: the beautiful, caring shaping of the solos under Uchida&#8217;s life-giving musicianship, the sublime way she and Sanderling seemed enraptured in their mutual rediscoveries of the brave drama that the young Beethoven &#8212; 30 years old and firmly launched on his campaign to conquer the musical world &#8212; had poured into this work.  The greatest performances are like clear windows through which masterpieces can be viewed. Uchida and Sanderling collaborated on one of those. You soon forgot to admire merely the presence of this handsome, dynamic woman in front of the orchestra, and began to sense through her work the creative energy that Beethoven had brought to his score: the fury in that stark opening theme, the obsessions in the way just the last five notes of that theme (TUM-ta-TUM-ta-TUM) echo again and again through the movement, a foretaste of the obsessiveness in the Fifth Symphony of eight years later.  You heard the spirit of the composer soar toward far horizons, in the supremely quiet meditations of the slow movement. You heard the wonderful inventiveness in pure sound in Beethoven&#8217;s orchestration: the hushed mystery in the soft strings and drums after the first-movement cadenza, the spaced-out stillness in the quiet piano scales that accompany the closing moments of the slow movement. You heard all this, because Uchida&#8217;s and Sanderling&#8217;s performance was of that supreme order in which performers disappear and only the genius of the music remains. The ultimate test was the hush that fell over the house during the Thursday performance, and the reception at the end: not the usual automatic, perfunctory Los Angeles standing ovation, but a prolonged tribute to a rare and marvelous occasion. Common sense, and an instinct for self preservation, ordained a homeward journey after the Beethoven. But MaryAnn Bonino&#8217;s pre-concert talk, wise and clear-eyed, raised suspicions that there might be better music in Strauss&#8217;s &#8220;Ein Heldenleben&#8221; than meets the ear. No such thing, of course; few works in the repertory are so fully packed with audible agony as this wretchedly vulgar piece of Straussian self-indulgence. Yet the Sanderling performance had its attractions. He kept the orchestral sound well focussed and clear. Barring a few mishaps from the solo horn on Thursday night, the performance had power, sometimes even a touch of wit. If the work must be done &#8212; a matter open to some argument &#8212; let it be as it was this time. line<br />
The preceding week found me in Helsinki &#8212; cold, damp but welcoming &#8212; to sit in on recording sessions for Aulis Sallinen&#8217;s &#8220;Kullervo,&#8221; the work that the Finnish National Opera brings to Los Angeles for its world premiere on February 25, 1992. Sallinen, who has created several operas performed and recorded by the Finnish National Opera, composed &#8220;Kullervo&#8221; to inaugurate Helsinki&#8217;s new opera house. Since that building won&#8217;t be ready until sometime in 1993, it was somebody&#8217;s bright idea to offer the work to Los Angeles for an out-of-town premiere. The good fortune is ours. I will write more about the opera closer to the premiere; the recording (on the Ondine label) will be on hand by mid-January.Kullervo is one of the tragic heroes from Finland&#8217;s epic poem &#8220;The Kalevala.&#8221; Sibelius also fashioned his story into a choral symphony which, surely not by coincidence, Esa-Pekka Salonen will perform with the Philharmonic here ten days before the opera premiere. (Do not confuse Sallinen with Salonen and don&#8217;t, for that matter, ask me for any rational explanation of the Finnish language.) From what I heard, &#8220;Kullervo&#8221; is a strong work, not exactly joyous but wonderfully written, in a style not distant from that of, say, Janacek. One of its strengths will be the presence of the great Jorma Hynninen in the title role, Finland&#8217;s superb baritone now at the height of his career. You can bone up on Sallinen&#8217;s operatic style with the recording of his &#8220;The Red Line,&#8221; which also has Hynninen in the principal role. Tense, devastating tragic drama, it reveals some surprising news about the current high estate of Finland&#8217;s new music. &#8220;Kullervo&#8221; will reinforce that news.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No composer, of this or any other era, enjoyed a longer, or more beneficial love affair with history&#8217;s muse than did Igor Stravinsky. As long ago as 1928, long before recording technology had advanced to where it could cope with the flamboyant orchestration of his early ballet scores, Stravinsky was in the studios of American [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No composer, of this or any other era, enjoyed a longer, or more beneficial love affair with history&#8217;s muse than did Igor Stravinsky. As long ago as 1928, long before recording technology had advanced to where it could cope with the flamboyant orchestration of his early ballet scores, Stravinsky was in the studios of American and European Columbia, setting onto 78-rpm masters his own versions of &#8220;The Firebird&#8221; and &#8220;Petrouchka.&#8221; Long before the worldwide arguments had been settled on the relative sanity of his &#8220;Rite of Spring,&#8221; Stravinsky had entrusted to disc his views on that innovative blockbuster as well. And now Sony Classical, the corporate heir of Columbia, has issued its own blockbuster, 22 compact discs in one distinguished plastic box, containing Igor Stravinsky&#8217;s recorded legacy, his own recordings, or recordings made under his intimidating, critical eye, of nearly every work of consequence from his pen in the 61 years between the E-flat Symphony of 1905 and &#8220;The Owl and the Pussycat&#8221; of 1966. There are no surprises here. Every performance, even the half-hour of rehearsal takes and a chat with the composer and producer John McClure, has seen the light of day on previous issues, including the 31-LP blockbuster that Columbia had brought forth in 1982 for the centennial. The only Stravinsky anniversary that might occasion this new release is the current 20th anniversary of his death; you can be sure that 1996 will bring more widespread celebrations (including, of course, yet another reissue on the medium of choice at that time). What occasions this latest issue is the passion for the boxed set that currently sweeps both the pop and classical record market. If Mozart can rate the 180-disc whammo from Philips, can Stravinsky be far behind? The asking price for the Stravinsky package is $333. If Sony has immediate plans to issue the discs separately, nobody there is talking. You can bet it won&#8217;t be anytime this side of Christmas. Therein lie problems. There is no question of documentary value in a disc release of one of the most influential composers of our time involved in performances of more than 60 of his scores &#8212; lacking, in fact, only a few meagre scraps and arrangements that failed to engage the master&#8217;s hand. Would that we had similar documentary packages for other composers of this and past centuries! Of the musical values therein contained, more must be said. With few exceptions, the recordings now at hand date from the 1960s, when Stravinsky had moved to Hollywood and was lured back to the recording studios for a virtual remake of his entire repertory. He was then in his 80s, and increasingly dependent on Robert Craft for help even with performances that were issued under his own name. Most recordings were made with pickup studio orchestras under names like The Columbia Symphony Orchestra; they stood in for previous recordings made with earlier technology, but at least with genuine ensembles: the New York Philharmonic most notably.  Even the generous Carlo Maria Giulini, not known for raising his hand against a colleague, said in a 70s interview that &#8220;even if Stravinsky were his own worst enemy, he couldn&#8217;t have done better to destroy himself&#8221; than by conducting his own music at that time. Whatever qualities Stravinsky might have had as a conductor in younger days, they are much diminished in these late products of his work on the podium. Like Toscanini, he lives in recorded history only by the deeds of his dotage. Unlike Toscanini, however, many earlier Stravinsky performances still linger &#8212; on collectors&#8217; shelves or even, now and then, on compact disc reissues &#8212; to shame the new versions. Where is the diabolical eloquence in the dry-as-dust 1960 &#8220;Rite of Spring&#8221; to match the 1939 New York Philharmonic performance? Where, the wit in the 1960 &#8220;Petrouchka&#8221; to match the crackle in the 1928 version, still surprisingly vivid in a compact-disc reissue on England&#8217;s Pearl label? Where, the sardonic splendor of Jean Cocteau. reading his own text for &#8220;Oedipus Rex&#8221; in a 1950 Stravinsky-led performance from Cologne, no way challenged by the pomposity of John Westbrook in 1961?It all comes down to this. Even if someone didn&#8217;t already own a single disc of Stravinsky and wanted the composer whole, I could not recommend this package. There are too many superior alternatives: Esa-Pekka Salonen&#8217;s growing Stravinsky series (also on Sony Classical, apparently a label adept at shooting itself in the foot), Charles Dutoit&#8217;s glistening readings of the early ballets and &#8220;The Rake&#8217;s Progress&#8221; under Riccardo Chailly, both on London, Leonard Bernstein&#8217;s &#8220;Les Noces&#8221; on Deutsche Grammophon&#8230;and the list goes on.Like those boxed complete book editions your grandpa used to display with pride (but never opened), the new Stravinsky box seems fated to sit handsomely on a shelf gathering dust. At least the books came in handy for pressing flowers. The Stravinsky &#8212; box, booklets &#8216;n&#8217; all &#8212; comes to a mere seven pounds: a lightweight in more ways than one.line<br />
Tell me about there being no worthwhile music in Los Angeles! This week we have the finest of all American (arguably, world) orchestras, the Cleveland, with concerts at the Orange County Performing Arts Center on Tuesday and Wednesday, and at UCLA&#8217;s Royce Hall on Saturday. But Saturday is also the night for terrific programs by the Pasadena Symphony at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium and the Long Beach Symphony at Long Beach&#8217;s Terrace Theater. Stuck in among these other not-to-be-missed events, the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra offers Britten&#8217;s &#8220;Serenade for Tenor, Horn and Strings,&#8221; as beautiful a work as this century has produced, Friday night at Royce Hall and Saturday night at Ambassador Auditorium. Atop all this the Los Angeles Philharmonic, still under the beloved Kurt Sanderling, welcomes the exquisite pianist Mitsuko Uchida, Thursday and Saturday nights at the Music Center. All this, and the Vienna Choir Boys, too: Saturday matinee at CalTech&#8217;s Beckman Auditorium. Some week!</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One message the Music Center Opera&#8217;s &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; made abundantly clear atits opening last Monday night: babies do not come from storks. From Giovanni&#8217;s first entrance, fresh from his aborted attack on Donna Anna&#8217;s virtue, still buttoning up his trousers and retrieving his boots from Leporello, to Zerlina&#8217;s calming of her angry sweetie by removing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One message the Music Center Opera&#8217;s &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; made abundantly clear atits opening last Monday night: babies do not come from storks. From Giovanni&#8217;s first entrance, fresh from his aborted attack on Donna Anna&#8217;s virtue, still buttoning up his trousers and retrieving his boots from Leporello, to Zerlina&#8217;s calming of her angry sweetie by removing his belt as she sings her lovely aria, the carnal byplay in Mozart&#8217;s dark comedy becomes the dominant tone. When, at the end, Mozart&#8217;s anti-hero goes off to his deserved doom among the eternally damned, he is actually carried off by a bevy of maidens. We are left to guess, therefore, whether he has gone to damnation or a juicy reward. For the most part, the opera comes across; it would take a lot to destroy this riveting masterpiece.  Jonathan Miller created the production last year, at the Florence May Festival; the local restaging, by his assistant Karen Stone, presumably maintains Miller&#8217;s outlines. It is, in fact, pure Miller: diabolically spirited, too clever by half at times, irritating and stimulatingby turns. Two performances remain, this coming Tuesday and Friday nights. Robert Israel, who worked here on Miller&#8217;s &#8220;Mahagonny&#8221; in 1987, is again the designer and his work, again, is vintage Robert Israel. Like the &#8220;Mahagonny&#8221; set, the new one again looks most of all like a theatrical warehouse, with free-standing wall units, predominantly gray (as opposed to &#8220;Mahagonny&#8217;s&#8221; predominant beige) pierced with doorways, carving the stage into angular performing spaces that sometimes cramp the action, but just as often surround it with uncharted emptiness. Lighting designer Duane Schuler&#8217;s sudden changes of tone, presumably attempting to reflect the violent clashes of mood in the work itself, become wearying. If it is possible for just the look of a production to add up to informational overload, this is it.Yet &#8220;Don Giovanni,&#8221; of all the masterpieces of the lyric repertory, can absorb this kind of treatment, and more drastic permutations as well. The cast in this instance is of enormous help, not only because the singing is, of itself, on a high level, but because the performing forces so keenly reflect the inner life of the opera. This is emphatically true of the three women, all of them superb singers but also neatly differentiated in manner and tone. As heard at the first performance, Karen Huffstodt&#8217;s Anna was a splendid study in self-indulgent, shrill frazzlement, wallowing in the delight of her own grief, yet wise enough to realize that her wimp of an Ottavio suddenly seems terribly small to a woman who has felt Giovanni&#8217;s caress. Rachel Gettler&#8217;s Elvira provided the perfect counterpart: thoroughly unhinged by her brief encounter with Giovanni, her mania pouring out in sharp, jagged melodic fragments. Balancing them both was the adorable and infinitely wise Zerlina of Gwendolyn Bradley, fully aware that those flashing eyes of hers, that melting smile are no less potent a seductive force than the blandishments of Giovanni himself.Thomas Allen was a superb Giovanni, sleek, insinuating, childishly self-centered, the supreme embodiment of everything you&#8217;ve ever read or wondered about the character&#8217;s twisted psyche; Kevin Langan&#8217;s wonderfully earthy Leporello was, again, a superb counterbalance. Local luminaries Jonathan Mack (his phrasing still eloquent but his once fluent tenor sounding rather tired these days) John Atkins and Louis Lebherz rounded out this superior vocal ensemble. Once again, however, some of this valuable effort was fogged over by Lawrence Foster&#8217;s workaday leadership on the podium. The orchestra that had soared and glowed in last month&#8217;s &#8220;Trojans&#8221; now sounded merely competent. Time and again the onrush of Mozart&#8217;s genius in this incredible work seemed to falter, as if the performance itself &#8212; not the individual singers &#8212; had run out of breath. The opera deserved better and so did the audience.line<br />
There is a temptation to find parallels between the Mozart opera and &#8220;Pioneers,&#8221; the performance artwork by the Paul Dresher Ensemble that drew undeservedly small crowds to UCLA&#8217;s Royce Hall last weekend. The similarities have to do with dramatic archetypes in both works: the self-destructive mania of women stripped of reason by carnal yearnings, the mindless macho destructiveness of the rogue male, the wanton urge of the haves to despoil the have-nots. But the parallels are tenuous, and &#8220;Pioneers&#8221; stands on its own. If you saw the previous members of the trilogy (both done at UCLA in recent years), &#8220;Slow Fire&#8221; and &#8220;Power Failure,&#8221; both also dealing through extended metaphor with the destructive force of the materialist obsession, you only need to know that &#8220;Pioneer&#8221; is the best work of the three, the surest theatrically, the most attractive musically. The work is hung up with exploration, with the need to get someplace first, to be the first on the block to own, to buy, to flaunt. Dresher&#8217;s kaleidoscopic electronic score, played behind a wonderfully lit scrim, was fleshed out with a few hilarious pastiche ballads by Terry Allen. The singers included the Dresher stalwarts Rinde Eckert and John Duykers, plus the marvelous vulgar raunch of Jo Harvey Allen, the good ol&#8217; Texas gal who told all those hilarious lies in David Byrne&#8217;s &#8220;True Stories.&#8221; If you weren&#8217;t there the loss is yours.  line<br />
At the Music Center this past Thursday the Philharmonic began its season by celebrating the end of the world &#8212; Richard Wagner&#8217;s world, that is, in its apotheosis in the final music of the mighty &#8220;Ring&#8221; cycle. The phenomenal soprano Jessye Norman was the center of the celebration, in all the volcanic majesty of her sight and sound. She is a phenomenon of our time, a force of nature beyond reckoning. She could also stand to pay better attention to diction, both in Wagner&#8217;s &#8220;Immolation&#8221; music and in Beethoven&#8217;s &#8220;Ah Perfido.&#8221; So much sound, so little meaning! Christof Perick conducted, in one of those rare and valuable instances in which one orchestra in a community &#8220;borrows&#8221; the leader of another. Perick, soon to take over the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra, is clearly a splendid local catch: an ardent young musician full of old-world sensibilities. German conductors are in right now, as witness the latest acquisitions in New York and Philadelphia. Perick&#8217;s own contributions to the program began with the Beethoven First Symphony and continued with the familiar orchestral excerpts from Wagner&#8217;s music drama, all nicely set forth, large-scale and exuberant. The orchestra, after its month off, sounded rested. The omens are excellent.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-23/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There being little of musical consequence hereabouts for most of the past week, it seemed like a good time to seek refreshment at the source. Word was out that the Eastman School of Music, that singular adornment of Rochester, NY, was holding a weekend-long American music festival, and that the program even included music by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There being little of musical consequence hereabouts for most of the past week,<br />
it seemed like a good time to seek refreshment at the source. Word was out<br />
that the Eastman School of Music, that singular adornment of Rochester, NY,<br />
was holding a weekend-long American music festival, and that the program even<br />
included music by California composers. That, plus the prospect of Upstate New<br />
York apples, cider and foliage at this time of the year, became a siren call<br />
too potent to ignore.Eastman, founded with the money and the blessing of the same George Eastman who<br />
gave the world the Kodak camera and its film, is now 70 years old. It isn&#8217;t<br />
the only school that could be described as a source, but it is one of the best<br />
in the land, rivalled only by a couple of other East Coast schools and perhaps<br />
&#8211; but at some distance &#8212; the music department at U.S.C. It operates under<br />
the umbrella of the University of Rochester, but it is a separate institution<br />
in most ways. Current enrollment is 700, of which about two-thirds are are<br />
subsidized by scholarship funds.Even so, Eastman was, until recently, something of a joke among music schools.<br />
You went there to study trombone, or bandmastership, or public-school music<br />
education. The school had a bad reputation for its tendency to tell all<br />
graduates that an Eastman diploma, waved in the air, would immediately open<br />
all doors to hopeful performers. Thus, it became a school known for its<br />
ability to sow seeds of disillusionment and heartbreak. Its present director,<br />
a dynamic, fast-talking, supersalesman named Robert Freeman, has seen to it<br />
that Eastman graduates now go out into the world with a firmer grip on<br />
reality.He has also seen that they go out with a broader view of the musical panorama.<br />
Eastman&#8217;s guiding spirit from its founding until about 20 years ago was the<br />
composer Howard Hanson, in whom the spirit of arch conservatism resided full<br />
time. (The story is that George Eastman had originally offered the job to Jan<br />
Sibelius, who turned it down because the United States was in the throes of<br />
Prohibition. Hanson was only the second choice, but he repaid Eastman&#8217;s<br />
confidence by going on to compose music right out of the Sibelius<br />
stylebook.)Anyhow, the Hanson ghost has now been thoroughly exorcised, and Eastman now<br />
fields an impressive roster of composers who work in a wide variety of styles.<br />
Joseph Schwantner and Christopher Rouse, two of this country&#8217;s leading<br />
progressive spirits, are among the faculty luminaries; Samuel Adler, from a<br />
somewhat older generation, heads the composition department. Rouse, by the way, has a symphony scheduled for the upcoming Los Angeles<br />
Philharmonic season (January 30, 1992). During my weekend in Rochester I heard<br />
one of his string quartets, strong and abrasive music nicely put together. The<br />
performance, by the way, was by an amazingly talented young ensemble, the Ying<br />
Quartet: four siblings named Ying, aged 21 to 27, born in Chicago and clearly<br />
headed for a major career.The weekend&#8217;s music was programmed to honor Betty Freeman, the well-known<br />
Beverly Hills music patron, who was on hand to exhibit her marvelous set of<br />
photographs of major composers and to smile benevolently at being serenaded by<br />
music she had commissioned. Most of the names,the composers Rand Steiger,<br />
Ingram Marshall and Stephen Hartke, were unfamiliar to the Eastman audience.<br />
California&#8217;s music, several people told me, still hasn&#8217;t made the trip<br />
eastward in sufficient quantity. Only Berkeley&#8217;s John Adams flies high.<br />
Eastman&#8217;s weekend of music, which also included some of the &#8220;Freeman Etudes&#8221;<br />
composed for her by the ex-Californian John Cage, was of considerable help in<br />
filling in the informational gap. I sat in on a class in which a group of<br />
students jawboned some of the music they&#8217;d heard over the weekend, and the<br />
comments were lively and informed; Eastman&#8217;s intellectual level struck me all<br />
weekend as remarkably high. So was the performance level. The student new-music ensemble, Eastman Musica<br />
Nova, works up tough, challenging programs like this once every three weeks.<br />
Its conductor, Sydney Hodkinson, seems to have that rare gift for making<br />
young, raw players want to perform on a level over their own heads. The<br />
concerts were full of crackle, and they were also well attended. There is much<br />
to envy on the Rochester musical scene. l-line<br />
Local musical life starts in earnest this week: &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; opening<br />
tomorrow night at the Music Center, the Philharmonic season starting on<br />
Thursday, the marvelous Lucia Popp in a song recital at Ambassador this very<br />
afternoon. By far the major event is the first local appearance of Evgeny<br />
Kissin at the Music Center on Saturday night.<br />
Kissin turns 20 this week. His many recordings, including a number taken from<br />
live performances, herald him as a pianist of exceptional ability, and also<br />
something of a throwback to a bygone manner of playing that most of us had<br />
thought (with considerable regret) to have passed from the scene. It is<br />
significant that Kissin has made his way totally without the usual crutch of a<br />
competition win. That, in fact, may account for the remarkable amount of<br />
freedom and individuality in his playing. One of the major blights on the competition circuit is the way performers take<br />
on a deadly uniformity of interpretation, a style imagined as pleasing to the<br />
typical competition judge. Kissin is the first pianist in a long time to which<br />
the epithet &#8220;interesting&#8221; may be justly applied. Now he is launched on his<br />
first American tour, after his spectacular one-shot New York appearance a year<br />
ago. Pray that he can hold onto the extraordinary mix of freshness and<br />
eloquence that ennobled that Carnegie Hall recital last year.line<br />
The Mozart anniversary year has produced plenty of fine recordings but only a<br />
handful of important books; that counts more as a blessing than a curse. One<br />
extremely valuable book is &#8220;The Compleat Mozart,&#8221; (Norton, $29.95), compiled<br />
by Neal Zaslaw with William Cowdery. The book is what its title suggests: a<br />
gathering of analytical essays on every work from Mozart&#8217;s pen, written by a<br />
number of major scholars who &#8212; unlike a few scholars one could name &#8212; are as<br />
much captivated by the sound of the music they describe as by the surrounding<br />
facts. The value of the book lies, above all, in its writers&#8217; ability to define what<br />
is unique (or, for that matter, what isn&#8217;t) in each work. Next to the complete<br />
recording of the Mozart heritage, therefore, the book is the second-best way<br />
to get close to the sublime genius whose catalog of miracles we currently<br />
celebrate.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/10/classcol-23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/classcol-24/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/classcol-24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[N.B.: NEW HED THE CLASSICAL COLUMNFairness demanded a second visit to the Music Center Opera&#8217;s &#8220;Madama Butterfly&#8221; to check out the new tenor, Jorge Antonio Pita, who has replaced Placido Domingo in the role of Lieut. B. F. Pinkerton in five of the six performances. Fairness, however, has also turned out to be service beyond [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N.B.: NEW HED THE CLASSICAL COLUMNFairness demanded a second visit to the Music Center Opera&#8217;s &#8220;Madama<br />
Butterfly&#8221; to check out the new tenor, Jorge Antonio Pita, who has replaced<br />
Placido Domingo in the role of Lieut. B. F. Pinkerton in five of the six<br />
performances. Fairness, however, has also turned out to be service beyond the<br />
call. Pita, whose local debut this was, is 28, Cuban born with an impressive dossier<br />
of performances with major European companies, including a Pinkerton six years<br />
ago with the Vienna State Opera. He is tall, good looking, and reasonably<br />
proficient in his stage presence, although his decision to smoke a cigarette<br />
during his first long scene was rendered questionable by the way he held the<br />
thing &#8212; as if it were his first ever. He sang the role badly, his thin vocal line disturbed by a tendency to sob on<br />
the high notes. Did he really sing this way at the Vienna State Opera, with so<br />
little thrust, so little projection of the many-sided characters in this role?<br />
Granted, the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion seats twice the capacity of the Vienna<br />
House, and this discrepancy in size has brought singers to grief before. Chalk<br />
up these latter &#8220;Butterfly&#8221; performances  as the company&#8217;s first boo-boo of<br />
the season. The Music Center Opera&#8217;s &#8220;The Trojans&#8221; has fared well, by and large, in the<br />
national press. You&#8217;d think it might be high time, however, for visiting<br />
reporters and critics to find another way of leading off a report from Los<br />
Angeles than the usual invocation of smog and freeways. There are still lots<br />
of slow learners, apparently, beyond the mountains. The accusation of &#8220;gimmickry&#8221; has been leveled on the production, however.<br />
Upon a second visit &#8212; yes, all five hours &#8212; it is harder than ever to<br />
substantiate this accusation. There are some egregious miscalculations, to be<br />
sure. I would hope that both the director, Francesca Zambello, and the<br />
choreographer, Susan Marshall, might someday weigh the relative importance of<br />
the prestige of a note-for-note complete performance against the blatant<br />
inferiority of the insanely protracted dance episode that simply delays the<br />
sublime Love Duet in Act IV. Theatrically, this is the evening&#8217;s major<br />
failure, but it is a partial failure on Berlioz&#8217;s part as well. Losing the<br />
entire scene would be no loss. I had neglected to mention one other episode in the opera that represents a far<br />
more illustrious choreographic achievement: the staging of the famous &#8220;Royal<br />
Hunt and Storm&#8221; music. The few companies that have staged &#8220;The Trojans&#8221;<br />
invariably come to grief at this episode. The Metropolitan Opera did it with<br />
some dopey amateur movies when it first presented the work in 1973. In the<br />
1983 revival they simply left the stage empty, in this most colorful and<br />
action-packed orchestral episode. Zambello and Marshall have, at least, solved this one problem brilliantly, not<br />
with hunting and storms, but with a splendid battle pantomime: Aeneas and his<br />
Trojans vanquishing the enemies of Dido&#8217;s realm in some classy, stylized<br />
balletic action. It works just fine. Two performances remain (this afternoon<br />
and next Wednesday). Even if the production were less the brilliant near-<br />
success that this one is, the chance to hear this rarely performed, wildly<br />
ecstatic product of Berlioz&#8217; superheated genius, set forth with comparable<br />
genius under Charles Dutoit&#8217;s incomparable music direction, should be reason<br />
enough to make tracks for the Music Center. LINE<br />
The recent good news from the Baltic republics is a reminder of the remarkable<br />
resurgence of that region in musical matters. Estonia&#8217;s Arvo Part (pronounced<br />
PAIRT) fled his country in 1980, at the height of Soviet artistic repression<br />
pre-glasnost; he now lives in Germany. The music he has created during his<br />
years of exile has earned him regard as one of the most remarkable of<br />
contemporary composers, and a new disc on the ECM label will surely add to his<br />
renown. It contains two large vocal works, a Miserere for solo voices, small chorus and<br />
instrumental ensemble, and a work entitled &#8220;Sarah Was 90 Years Old&#8221; for<br />
voices, organ and percussion. In between comes &#8220;Festina Lente,&#8221; a brief work<br />
for chamber orchestra. Paul Hillier, who has participated in many performances<br />
of Part&#8217;s music in the past (including a concert here last season as part of<br />
the &#8220;Historic Sites&#8221; series) conducts the voices; Dennis Russell Davies<br />
leads the instrumental forces. The music on this disc is one of those<br />
powerful, mysterious experiences that deserve to be regarded as essential.<br />
Why this is so is not easy to explain. Like other works of Part on ECM, above<br />
all his overwhelming, 70-minute setting of the St. John Passion which Hillier<br />
also conducts, the surface of the music is a slow-moving, unruffled, austere<br />
sequence of small events. Like ice crystals in a winter landscape, they<br />
coalesce in the mind only gradually; you find yourself gripped by this music<br />
almost before you know it. If you have seen, and are moved by, the films of<br />
the great Soviet director Andrej Tarkovsky, you are on your way to<br />
understanding  the inexorable pace of Part&#8217;s music, the way it generates an<br />
almost subliminal sense of exhilaration.On the subject of Soviet films, there is also an interesting two-disc set on<br />
the Chant du Monde label (distributed in the U.S. by Harmonia Mundi of Los<br />
Angeles): film and stage music familiar and rare by Serge Prokofiev, in vivid<br />
if edgy performances by a vocal ensemble and the &#8220;Maly&#8221; Moscow Symphonic<br />
Orchestra under Vladimir Ponkin. The familiar music is the delicious<br />
&#8220;Lieutenant Kije&#8221; suite of 1933-34: music for a satiric film that was never<br />
made, about a character who never existed. The remainder of the set is filled with rarer material also very much worth<br />
while: music for a 1938 ballet version of Hamlet and a whole hour of<br />
incidental music for a 1937 stage production of Pushkin&#8217;s &#8220;Eugene Onegin. The<br />
&#8220;Onegin&#8221; also never actually materialized, but Prokokiev&#8217;s music did. He<br />
cribbed some of it later for the opera &#8220;War and Peace&#8221; and the Eighth Piano<br />
Sonata, but he also preserved his original sketches: orchestral music, songs<br />
and vocal ensembles. The musicologist Elizaveta Dattel completed the<br />
orchestration in 1973, and presented the world with an authentic Prokofiev<br />
masterpiece that now, in its first recording, is the crown of this splendid<br />
new release.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/classcol-24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TROYENS</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/troyens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/troyens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The curtain at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion came down at 11:28 on Saturday night, five hours (minus a couple of minutes) after the start of the Music Center Opera&#8217;s production of Berlioz&#8217; &#8220;The Trojans.&#8221; There were cheers, a few boos, a final cry of &#8220;Viva Berlioz!&#8221; Lively productions deserve lively audiences.Yes, a few of those [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The curtain at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion came down at 11:28 on Saturday<br />
night, five hours (minus a couple of minutes) after the start of the Music<br />
Center Opera&#8217;s production of Berlioz&#8217; &#8220;The Trojans.&#8221; There were cheers, a<br />
few boos, a final cry of &#8220;Viva Berlioz!&#8221; Lively productions deserve lively<br />
audiences.Yes, a few of those boos were deserved, but so were the cheers. The real news<br />
is this: confronted with the most challenging artwork it has taken on in its<br />
six-year existence (a work, by the way, that has had only two previous<br />
American  fullscale productions in its nearly 150-year history) our opera<br />
company reached out bravely. It reached out for innovative if relatively<br />
unknown staging talent; it took some big chances in casting; it found the<br />
conductor as qualified as anyone alive to lead the score; it endowed its<br />
forces with sufficient rehearsal time so that even this first performance (of<br />
five) needed none of the apologies sometimes necessitated by present-day<br />
operatic realities.It didn&#8217;t all work, of course. There are a few terrible things about this<br />
&#8220;Trojans.&#8221; Most of the booing seemed directed at Susan Marshall&#8217;s silly<br />
choreography, a writhing disco scene just before Dido and Aeneas fall into bed<br />
in the fourth of the opera&#8217;s five acts, whose greatest sin was its failure to<br />
connect with Berlioz&#8217; music. Some of it may have reflected shock at some of<br />
director Francesca Zambello&#8217;s basic concepts; again, her curious<br />
constructivist vision of Berlioz&#8217; Carthage may have been interesting in itself<br />
but seemed mismatched to the music.Much more, however, is fully worthy of the score. The scenes at Troy, set into<br />
designer John Conklin&#8217;s frame of a ruined, toppled building that will, five<br />
hours later, rise from its own ruins to become Rome&#8217;s Pantheon, are powerfully<br />
put forth, wonderfully lit by Pat Collins. Even as seen first in silhouette<br />
behind a screen, and then merely as a head lying on the ground, the Trojan<br />
horse is an overpowering, fearsome spectacle. So is the tableau that ends the<br />
Trojan scene: the women in a powerful, writhing mass, oozing blood onto<br />
costume designer Bruno Schwengl&#8217;s virginal white  nighties. (The opera goes<br />
through quite a lot of ketchup, by the way, or whatever it is they use these<br />
days.)There is a quality of mind in all this: ill-advised at a few times, thrilling<br />
at many more times. The main problems occur in that ill-defined area where<br />
Zambello&#8217;s action-plan and Marshall&#8217;s choreography meet. Given the, let&#8217;s say,<br />
limited acting ability of tenor Gary Lakes (the Aeneas) and Carol Neblett (the<br />
Dido), it was a ludicrous notion to let them mix into the pseudo-disco<br />
dancing. Somewhere out in Weight-Watcher Land there might be a Dido and Aeneas<br />
with the voices these singers have, and the onstage grace they don&#8217;t; until<br />
they are found this one scene cries out for restaging. Ironic notion: Maria<br />
Ewing, so miscast as Butterfly two nights before, would probably have been the<br />
ideal Dido in both sight and sound, as Neblett wasn&#8217;t quite.Lakes is a splendid Aeneas. The highest compliment is that on Saturday night he<br />
constantly awakened memories of Jon Vickers in the role: the voice strong,<br />
plangent, beautifully lit with a golden thread that can turn both heroic and<br />
tender. The Cassandra for the Trojan scenes, Nadine Secunde, was also<br />
splendid, a strong vocal presence in a killer role, and a striking sight later<br />
on, as Zambello hatches the bright notion of using her as a ghostly visual<br />
presence in some of the Carthage music.Smaller roles were handsomely taken, for the most part, by the good local Music<br />
Center Opera stalwarts: Michael Gallup, Jonathan Mack (barring a momentary<br />
mishap on a cruelly exposed high note), Louis Lebherz and, best of all, the<br />
splendid youngster Nikolas{{cq} Nackley, so fine in last season&#8217;s &#8220;Turn of<br />
the Screw,&#8221; and fine again as the boy Ascanius.Over it all was the lively, probing, surging leadership of the great Dutoit,<br />
hero of some of the best Berlioz recordings in the catalog, and now a<br />
Berliozian hero in person as well. Under any circumstances the Los Angeles<br />
Chamber Orchestra is one of the world&#8217;s best pit bands; under these<br />
circumstances (and, of course, filled out far beyond  &#8220;chamber orchestra&#8221;<br />
size) it became the seething, churning, multicolored mirror of the composer&#8217;s<br />
orchestral genius. Whatever other problems this brave, challenging, uneven<br />
production may present, the sounds of &#8220;The Trojans&#8221; at the Music Center<br />
these nights add up to an exhilarating imperative.THE FACTS:What: The Music Center Opera&#8217;s production of Hector Berlioz&#8217; &#8220;The<br />
Trojans.&#8221;Where: Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, Los Angeles Music Center.When: 6:30 p.m. tonight, Friday and Sept. 25; 1 p.m. Sept. 22.Starring: Gary Lakes, Nadine Secunde, Carol Neblett.Behind the scenes: staged by Francesca Zambello, conducted by Charles Dutoit,<br />
designed by John Conklin and Bruno Schwengl, choreographed by Susan<br />
Marshall.Tickets: $17 to $85; for information call 213 972-7211.Our rating: * * *</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/troyens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/bowl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/bowl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hail, this land of no seasons, where you can go to indoor grand opera one night and the Hollywood Bowl the next. These two cultural manifestations overlapped by one day this year; the Bowl went out with a bang &#8212; actually, with several- - this past weekend. A crowd of 17,942 (five short of capacity) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hail, this land of no seasons, where you can go to indoor grand opera one night<br />
and the Hollywood Bowl the next. These two cultural manifestations overlapped<br />
by one day this year; the Bowl went out with a bang &#8212; actually, with several-<br />
- this past weekend. A crowd of 17,942 (five short of capacity) was on hand on<br />
Friday night to witness the grand finale.It was, actually, quite grand. Whatever you can say against the notion of<br />
outdoor music in Cahuenga Pass, the one undisputed triumph is the massive<br />
fireworks displays at the weekend programs. Once again, to the great tunes of<br />
Handel&#8217;s &#8220;Royal Fireworks&#8221; Music, the whole place blazed into vivid action:<br />
pinwheels, rockets, pots of flame, even an effigy of Handel himself rising<br />
over it all. Friday&#8217;s weather added to the show; a heavy cloud layer trapped<br />
the smoke close to the ground, imparting a soft mistiness to the color scheme:<br />
modern technology as Manet might have painted it (as long as he didn&#8217;t have to<br />
breathe).David Alan Miller was part of the farewell; by Bowl time next year he will no<br />
longer be the Los Angeles Philharmonic&#8217;s associate conductor, to the Albany<br />
Symphony Orchestra&#8217;s gain. His program was the usual weekend grabbag,<br />
listener-friendly for the most part: nice, rambunctious performances of some<br />
Dvorak tidbits, Ronald Leonard&#8217;s sturdy runthrough of the Saint-Saens Cello<br />
Concerto No. 1 (with the solo cello badly overmiked) and all that Handel. The<br />
latter was done in a modern recreation of what might have been the original<br />
scoring, with 16 oboes, 9 horns, 9 trumpets, 13 bassoons or contrabassoons and<br />
3 drums: sonorous as all get-out.Not all the banging came from fireworks and drums. The evening&#8217;s second soloist<br />
was the Scots-born Evelyn Glennie, who banged with commendable agility on an<br />
array of clatter-machines (xylophone, marimba, vibraphone and glockenspiel) in<br />
an endearing medley that included more Saint-Saens (the &#8220;Introduction and<br />
Rondo Capriccioso,&#8221; originally written for violin) Richard Rodgers&#8217;<br />
&#8220;Slaughter on 10th Avenue,&#8221; and, if you&#8217;re ready, Rimsky-Korsakoff&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Flight of the Bumblebee.&#8221; Glennie, 28 and, with her major hair, an alluring spectacle, won hearts. One<br />
might, even so, question the usefulness of capricious rondos and bumblebees<br />
transmuted into workout-pieces for percussion. The result seemed a little like<br />
butter sculpture or painting on velvet: feasible but why bother? The cheers of<br />
the crowd, however, suggested a different attitude.The air traffic, busy enough during the first half, kept its distance once the<br />
fireworks began. Perhaps that&#8217;s the answer to the overhead noise problem:<br />
continuous fireworks at all concerts. Worse ideas have been proposed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/bowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BUTTERFLY</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/butterfly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/butterfly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The opera season began on Thursday night with all the fixings: gala crowd, sold-out house, Placido Domingo to sing, high-society supper afterwards. Musically, too, the news wasn&#8217;t all bad. It wasn&#8217;t all good, either. This was the Music Center Opera&#8217;s second try at Puccini&#8217;s &#8220;Madama Butterfly.&#8221; The other one came during the company&#8217;s first season, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opera season began on Thursday night with all the fixings: gala crowd,<br />
sold-out house, Placido Domingo to sing, high-society supper afterwards.<br />
Musically, too, the news wasn&#8217;t all bad. It wasn&#8217;t all good, either. This was the Music Center Opera&#8217;s second try at Puccini&#8217;s &#8220;Madama Butterfly.&#8221;<br />
The other one came during the company&#8217;s first season, in 1986, and the less<br />
said the better. Version No. 2 suggested that the company still hasn&#8217;t quite<br />
got the hang of the piece.As any opera buff will tell you, Puccini&#8217;s operas are all about singing, and<br />
they&#8217;re very good of their kind. Perhaps the works don&#8217;t attain the<br />
sophistication level of, say, his illustrious predecessor, Giuseppe Verdi. But<br />
they display an  uncommon gift for using the human throat, and the human<br />
lungs, to project a sense of high drama. &#8220;Butterfly&#8221; has its great tunes,<br />
but it also has all the material in between those high spots, music that curls<br />
itself with high skill around the sad and helpless characters and the poignant<br />
drama of their destruction. All that being so, we can easily overlook one more important earmark of these<br />
Puccini almost-masterworks, that even with superior singing they don&#8217;t perform<br />
themselves. The element most lacking in Thursday&#8217;s performance was the sense<br />
of momentum that a superior conductor can bring to the work, without which<br />
even the best singers are lost in a sea of apathy. Randall Behr, the evening&#8217;s<br />
conductor, seemed unable to generate that momentum. Long sections seemed to slip by without sense of shape; the long love duet that<br />
ends the first act, to cite an egregious example, made these ears aware of the<br />
sense of interminable repetition, less aware of the subtle buildup of tender<br />
passion threaded through the music. It was hard, and at some moments<br />
impossible, to get the sense that the singers were at all interested in what<br />
they were about.There was nothing particularly wrong with Randall Behr&#8217;s leadership; there just<br />
wasn&#8217;t enough right. Behr is the company&#8217;s resident conductor, and is slated<br />
to conduct three of the season&#8217;s eight productions. Suspicions arise that<br />
perhaps the company might try a little harder in the podium department. (Such<br />
suspicions, of course, will be temporarily allayed by the arrival of Charles<br />
Dutoit for tonight&#8217;s &#8220;The Trojans.&#8221;) Meanwhile, back on the stage. Placido Domingo was the one-time-only Pinkerton;<br />
he heads for the Metropolitan Opera&#8217;s new production of &#8220;Girl of the Golden<br />
West,&#8221; with his place taken for the remainder of the &#8220;Butterfly&#8221; run by his<br />
protege Juan Antonio Pita. Domingo at 50 remains a phenomenon; nobody can<br />
touch him for sheer, animal vibrance of tone which he can produce over a<br />
phenomenal range of volume. As an actor he remains a clunk: one arm doing the<br />
semaphore gestures, the other hanging useless as if belonging to someone else.<br />
The real acting is in his singing; as many times as Domingo has sung this one<br />
role he could still, on this occasion, command that heartbroken throb in the<br />
last act, when the brutality of his actions finally confronts him.The Butterfly was Maria Ewing&#8217;s first-ever; Los Angeles seems to have become<br />
her tryout town for new roles. This did not, this first time out, seem like<br />
the role for her. She sounded like what she is, a retreaded mezzo dazzling in<br />
some dramatic soprano roles but out of her element in the lyric repertory. Ian<br />
Judge&#8217;s stage direction had given her some interesting stage tricks to divert<br />
awareness that she is hardly the wounded adolescent of Puccini&#8217;s drama, but<br />
the heaviness of her voice (apart from many moments under the pitch) betrayed<br />
her more than once.The cast was filled out decently  with Thomas Allen&#8217; strong, sympathetic<br />
Sharpless and Stephanie Vlahos&#8217; somewhat hooty Suzuki. And a tiny tot named<br />
Stephen M. Gilbert, in the silent but surefire role of Trouble (rechristened<br />
&#8220;Sorrow&#8221; in the supertitles) stole the show by just toddling across the<br />
stage a couple of times.John Gunter&#8217;s all-purpose indoor-outdoor set right out of Sunset Magazine, a<br />
sort of Malibu beachhouse with the Jacuzzi just out of view, was, let&#8217;s say,<br />
strange. A garish red frame upstage, setting off the background as if through<br />
an enormous picture window, completed the illusion. In the pit, the Los<br />
Angeles Chamber Orchestra seemed a little lackadaisical at times about<br />
togetherness. It was obvious that the upcoming Berlioz opera had gotten the<br />
bulk of the rehearsal time this week.THE FACTSWhat: Puccini&#8217;s &#8220;Madama Butterfly,&#8221; presented by the Los Angeles Music Center<br />
Opera.Where: Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, 135 N. Grand Ave. in downtown Los<br />
Angeles.When: 8 p.m., Sept. 15, 18, 21, 24; 2 p.m. Sept. 29.Starring: Maria Ewing and Juan Antonio Pita, with Randall Behr conducting.Behind the scenes: directed by Ian Judge, designed by John Gunter and Liz da<br />
Costa.Tickets: $17-$85; for information call 213 972-7211.Our rating: **</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/09/butterfly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Record collectors have known the name of Switzerland&#8217;s Peter Maag for several decades. In the early days of the long-playing record his Mozart performances, with various European orchestras, were regarded as beacons of clarity and strength. Something must have happened, however, because Maag&#8217;s belated debut with the Los Angeles Philharmonic, at the Hollywood Bowl on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Record collectors have known the name of Switzerland&#8217;s Peter Maag for several<br />
decades. In the early days of the long-playing record his Mozart performances,<br />
with various European orchestras, were regarded as beacons of clarity and<br />
strength. Something must have happened, however, because Maag&#8217;s belated debut<br />
with the Los Angeles Philharmonic, at the Hollywood Bowl on Tuesday night in<br />
the third in its skein of four all-Mozart programs, fell somewhat short in<br />
both  clarity and strength.Maag is now 72. He looks like Central Casting&#8217;s prototype of a distinguished<br />
old-world musician, white hair and all. His podium manner is exemplary, modest<br />
and direct. Joined by the pianist Peter Roesel in the C-major Piano Concerto<br />
(known to movie buffs as the &#8220;Elvira Madigan&#8221; Concerto) he provided<br />
orchestral support that was accurate and considerate. He even apparently<br />
acquiesced to the pianist&#8217;s silly cadenzas (attributed in the program to<br />
Robert Casadesus) and to his breakneck speed in the finale.On his own, however, the conductor introduced some strange devices into both<br />
the opening &#8220;Magic Flute&#8221; Overture and the concluding Symphony No. 39.<br />
Conductors obsessed with establishing their own recognition factor will<br />
sometimes overstress some of the inner details in a score score, simply for<br />
the sake of differentness. Maag laid himself open to suspicions along this<br />
line. In the overture the conductor seemed obsessed with overstressing a line of<br />
brass scoring buried in Mozart&#8217;s textures; in the concerto he more-or-less<br />
invented a curious percussion effect; in the symphony he bent the recurrent,<br />
garrulous theme of the finale completely out of shape by inserting a<br />
gratuitous hiccup in each of its many recurrences. The good-sized crowd,<br />
11,856 strong, may have thought they had come to hear Mozart; they ended up<br />
hearing more of the conductor, less of the music.Moments here and there rose above this sorry norm, however. Conductor and<br />
soloist did blend their resources beautifully in the slow movement of the<br />
concerto: sublime, nocturnal music to blend with the radiant skies and the<br />
full moon (if not with several passing aircraft). And, that one melodic quirk aside, the symphony did receive a respectable,<br />
middle-of-the-road reading. It was, at least, a generous performance, with all<br />
the section repeats observed. The wondrous clarinet duet in the Minuetto, as<br />
played by Lorin Levee and Michele Zukovsky, could have been repeated another<br />
dozen times with no objection from this corner.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEWMEXICO&#160;CULTURE</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/newmexico-culture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/newmexico-culture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Crosby chose well.An opera coach and conductor, Yale-educated, making his way in New York circles in the early 1950s but suffering under the pace and the bad air of East Coast urban life, Crosby decided that sinuses and sanity demanded a change of venue. Santa Fe beckoned: still in 1956 the sleepy desert town [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Crosby chose well.An opera coach and conductor, Yale-educated, making his way in New York circles in the early 1950s but suffering under the pace and the bad air of East Coast urban life, Crosby decided that sinuses and sanity demanded a change of venue. Santa Fe beckoned: still in 1956 the sleepy desert town that Willa Cather had celebrated in her &#8220;Death Comes for the Archbishop.&#8221; Here, the 30-year-old Crosby reasoned, he could stock up on much-needed r&#038;r.In this one regard, he was wrong. Within a year Crosby had sensed something else about Santa Fe: that under that sleepy desert facade there was a magnificent cultural awakening just waiting to happen. Crosby gathered some friends, well-heeled themselves and with access to other local money, and presented them with a plan, an 18-page single-spaced memorandum that laid out costs down to the smallest dry-cleaning item for a new opera company offering six operatic presentations over an eight-week summer season. Never mind that the theater for these operas hadn&#8217;t even been built. Ten months later it was. On July 3, 1957 the Santa Fe Opera was born, right on schedule. The opera was Puccini&#8217;s &#8220;Madama Butterfly&#8221;; Crosby himself was on the podium.This was not, by the way, just any old opera house. Crosby had come to Santa Fe to escape New York; now his opera house had to escape even the minimal urban encroachment of Santa Fe. A loan from Crosby&#8217;s father secured a parcel of land in the foothills of the Sangre de Cristo mountains 7 miles north of town: a natural bowl with space in front for a ranch-house office and dormitory, and a hillside onto which an indoor-outdoor performance facility could perch. The first theater seated 480; the success of the venture demanded expansion. In the summer of 1967, in the wee hours after an evening performance, the theater &#8212; which by then had grown to a nearly 1200-seat capacity &#8212; was completely destroyed by a fire whose cause remains a mystery.The company didn&#8217;t miss a performance that summer, working in a highschool auditorium without sets or costumes. By the next season a new theater had been built on the site, the present architectural marvel with a current capacity of 1,777 &#8212; the size, but not the shape, of most of the great houses of Europe.The shape is both a glory and a danger. The local architectural firm, Santa Fe&#8217;s McHugh and Kidder, marvelousy caught the dynamic of the site: the steep natural rake that promised a full stage view from every seat, with the distant prospect of more mountains, the distant lights of Los Alamos visible through the open back of the stage, and the occasional glimpse of dramatic mountain lightning storms through the open sides. Best of all, the roof would be split, with a wide swathe of sky visible between the front and rear portions. On clear, moonlit or starry nights, which Santa Fe sometimes (but not always) enjoys during the June-through-August opera season, there is no more exhilarating setting for opera anywhere in the world. The theater itself is ringed with further amenities: spacious refreshment areas on both sides, and a promenade up back.That&#8217;s the story on those clear nights. But that is not the entire weather picture of Santa Fe. The monsoons do come, especially in late July and August. The rains pour down in torrents through the split roof, and the winds take care to seek out and drench even those souls in the covered seats. This past summer has seen an above-average number of meteorological visitations; some 60 per cent of the summer&#8217;s operas were rained upon. Not rained out, mind you; just rained upon. Santa Fe&#8217;s busy opera season has no room for postponements. If management finally decides to fill in that roof, and reports out of Santa Fe indicate some talk in that direction, the loss in atmosphere will be great, but the loss in humidity will be universally welcomed. Meanwhile, the gift shop this past summer did a roaring business in ponchos.Credit Santa Fe&#8217;s audiences, at least, with holding their ground however soggy. It has to be a tribute to the high quality of the company&#8217;s world-class performing casts, and the comparable quality of the repertory itself &#8212; which can range from exquisitely formed Mozart performances to a dazzling excursion into brand-new, contemporary work &#8212; to see a capacity crowd sitting out a splendid night of opera in Santa Fe, the rains pouring down over them, nobody even daring to raise an umbrella. When you talk of operatic heroes, Santa Fe&#8217;s audience belong to their number.Not all of Santa Fe&#8217;s high culture has been planned in defiance of the elements. The Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival is also firmly entrenched, in the (blessedly) roofed-over Saint Francis Auditorium in a handsome courtyard building just off the main downtown Plaza. Founded 19 years ago and, like the opera, largely funded by the local growing, culturally-aware population, the festival has grown into the largest event of its kind anywhere in the country: six weeks of events nearly every night, most of them sold out, combining a fascinating mix of serious contemporary fare with the classics.One thing you come up against in Santa Fe, as soon as you start hunting down the cultural resources: there&#8217;s an overt sense of support there that you sometimes miss in larger cities. The opera has come to attract an international audience of opera connoisseurs, but even among the locals the talk during intermissions is about opera, not about the high cost of baby-sitters.And the sense of community involvement is, if anything, even stronger around the Chamber Music Festival. In their infinite wisdom, the sponsors allow the public in to all rehearsals, free of charge. Instead of possibly cutting down attendance at the concerts themselves, this breeds a sense of greater interest. When new music is rehearsed, the composer is often on hand to explain the music.The atmosphere crackles, with musical wisdom and with pride. At 7,000 feet, Santa Fe has proven the bane of some singers and wind players who must fight extra hard for their oxygen fixes. But it isn&#8217;t only the physical Santa Fe that&#8217;s that high; it&#8217;s also the cultural standards of the place, and that&#8217;s why people keep coming back.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/newmexico-culture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot to be said for symphony concerts controlled by a firm hand at the podium. Once in a while, there&#8217;s something to be said as well for concerts in which the audience takes command. Something like that happened at the Hollywood Bowl on Tuesday night, and no harm was done.The program was all-Mozart, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot to be said for symphony concerts controlled by a firm hand at the<br />
podium. Once in a while, there&#8217;s something to be said as well for concerts in<br />
which the audience takes command. Something like that happened at the<br />
Hollywood Bowl on Tuesday night, and no harm was done.The program was all-Mozart, with Stephen Bishop-Kovacevich as conductor and<br />
piano soloist. Since Mozart&#8217;s music demands a fairly small orchestra, without<br />
the heavy brass and percussion usually in evidence at Bowl concerts, the<br />
conductor decided to omit the customary &#8220;Star-Spangled Banner&#8221; at the start.<br />
The audience began to stand when Bishop-Kovacevich made his entrance, only to<br />
fall back as the orchestra struck up the &#8220;Marriage of Figaro&#8221; Overture<br />
instead of the expected anthem.Considering the political situation, perhaps this wasn&#8217;t the night to omit the<br />
anthem. Anyhow, no sooner had the conductor left the stage after the overture<br />
than a bunch of singers over on the right side started up &#8220;The Star-Spangled<br />
Banner&#8221; on their own. The sound spread; the crowd &#8212; 11,544 strong &#8212; came to<br />
its feet and sang along. Some orchestral players joined in on their own. The<br />
night was made safe for patriotism.It was made safe for Mozart as well. One of our most imaginative pianists,<br />
Bishop-Kovacevich has also emerged as a splendid conductor in recent years.<br />
The program&#8217;s concluding work, the great &#8220;Jupiter&#8221; Symphony, was capitally<br />
set forth. The conductor&#8217;s broad, expressive tempos might be the despair of<br />
the &#8220;authentic-performance&#8221; crowd, which likes its Mozart swift and crisp.<br />
But this was another kind of authentic performance, authentically powerful<br />
and, in the sublime slow movement, deeply moving.The solo piano concerto was a relatively early work, the A-major (K. 414).<br />
Here, too, both pianist and conductor (who happened to be the same person)<br />
worked for the expressive side of the young Mozart, and found it especially in<br />
the sweet, serene slow movement. Two single movements for violin and<br />
orchestra, sweetly and prettily played by Philharmonic member Michele Bovyer,<br />
rounded out the evening&#8217;s pleasures.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At intermission at the Hollywood Bowl on Sunday night, the season&#8217;s final concert by the Philharmonic Institute Orchestra, Philharmonic managing director Ernest Fleischmann came on stage. He had never, he told 8,725 listeners, come before an audience to ask for help, but the Philharmonic Institute was now in trouble. Unless $250,000 can be raised before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At intermission at the Hollywood Bowl on Sunday night, the season&#8217;s final<br />
concert by the Philharmonic Institute Orchestra, Philharmonic managing<br />
director Ernest Fleischmann came on stage. He had never, he told 8,725<br />
listeners, come before an audience to ask for help, but the Philharmonic<br />
Institute was now in trouble. Unless $250,000 can be raised before October 31,<br />
Fleischmann said, the entire Institute program &#8212; a training venture for young<br />
orchestral musicians and conductors, now rounding off its tenth year, of which<br />
each summer&#8217;s orchestra has been the most visible and audible product &#8212; could<br />
not continue.Fleischmann couldn&#8217;t have picked a better occasion to plead the cause of the<br />
Institute. This year&#8217;s orchestra has been a spectacular venture, performing<br />
with remarkable skill both under its own conductors-in-training and also with<br />
some of the guest conductors booked for the current Bowl season. Sunday&#8217;s<br />
program had some of both: two of the summer&#8217;s conducting fellows, Susan<br />
Davenny Wyner and Thomas Dausgaard, conducting music by Bernstein and<br />
Stravinsky before intermission and the redoutable Simon Rattle leading the<br />
Mahler Fourth Symphony to end it, with Rattle&#8217;s wife, soprano Elise Ross, a<br />
slightly quavery but eloquent soloist in the last movement.There were rough moments, to be sure. Dausgaard&#8217;s reading of the complete<br />
&#8220;Petrouchka&#8221; ballet score had its nervous moments, a tendency now and then<br />
to over-emphasize small details at the expense of momentum. At least this was<br />
a big, energetic conception whose rawness will mellow in time, and it at least<br />
drew beautiful playing from the orchestra all the way. The Mahler was, in a word, stunning.  Rattle, too, might be accused of an<br />
excess of concern with details, and there were moments where Mahler&#8217;s own<br />
suggestions of flexibility of tempo got exaggerated to the point of<br />
wilfulness. But there were also stunning moments, exquisite playing from the<br />
string section with tones throttled down to just this side of audibility (and<br />
with horrendously accurate intrusions from aircraft at exactly the worst<br />
moments), marvelous dabs of light from winds and brass. If Los Angeles can annually develop an orchestra of this quality, out of young<br />
and untried talent, in the mere seven weeks of the Institute, then the<br />
question of whether the Philharmonic Institute deserves all the help it can<br />
get becomes self-answering.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent published statement a local air-traffic official claimed that the unusual amount of intrusion by planes and helicopters over the Hollywood Bowl was due to an exceptional amount of overcast this summer and the consequent rerouting of landing patterns. Well, the skies were crystal-clear on Thursday night &#8212; over the Bowl, and over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent published statement a local air-traffic official claimed that the<br />
unusual amount of intrusion by planes and helicopters over the Hollywood Bowl<br />
was due to an exceptional amount of overcast this summer and the<br />
consequent rerouting of landing patterns. Well, the skies were crystal-clear<br />
on Thursday night &#8212; over the Bowl, and over Van Nuys, Burbank and Santa<br />
Monica airports as well. Did it make any difference? Is the moon made of green<br />
cheese? Four planes came over the Bowl during the first half of the concert,<br />
interfering with large stretches of Beethoven&#8217;s fourth Piano Concerto (the<br />
evening&#8217;s quietest music). Suspicions arise that the official regard, in high<br />
places, for the quality of Bowl concerts is largely doubletalk. If nobody up<br />
there is concerned, there was concern and annoyance on many faces among the<br />
10,306 concertgoers.At least the Prokofiev Fifth Symphony, the last work on Simon Rattle&#8217;s program<br />
with the Los Angeles Philharmonic, came through unscathed, probably because<br />
small airports shut down after a certain hour. Any doubts about the young<br />
Briton&#8217;s emergence as one of the spellbinding conductors of our time could be<br />
set aside after this performance. Unlike some conductors not worth naming,<br />
Rattle chose to explore the symphony rather than to hack at it. The beauty of the performance lay in the richness of its orchestral detail,<br />
the clarity with which, for example, the solo strands of wind and string tone<br />
twined around each other in the expansive, haunting slow movement. We&#8217;ve heard<br />
the symphony more than once, to put it mildly, in this Prokofiev anniversary<br />
year; it took Simon Rattle to reveal what the work is really about.Some doubts, in all frankness, had emerged about Rattle&#8217;s omnipotence in his<br />
Beethoven Ninth on Tuesday night. Beethoven brought out some curious responses<br />
this time as well. The evening&#8217;s soloist, the 20-year-old German keyboard whiz<br />
Lars Vogt in his American debut, went after Beethoven&#8217;s marvelous lyric<br />
patterns in a manner full of self-indulgence, a smart-aleck approach in which<br />
much of Beethoven&#8217;s eloquent, subtle rhetoric got blown up into empty oratory.<br />
This seemed to be the conductor&#8217;s way as well; the long invocation for<br />
orchestra alone was fussed with, touched up with tempo changes that only<br />
served to underline what was already obvious in the score.For starters Rattle and the orchestra got through Beethoven&#8217;s &#8220;Consecration of<br />
the House&#8221; Overture in fine style. This is a work, after all, where a certain<br />
amount of oversized oratory harmonizes with the composer&#8217;s plan. That&#8217;s what<br />
it got this time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Onstage and out front, Stravinsky, Beethoven and Simon Rattle filled the Hollywood Bowl quite handsomely on Tuesday night. If the Beethoven Ninth can draw one of the season&#8217;s largest crowds (17,073, just 900 short of capacity), there&#8217;s hope for civilization after all.The night began wondrously well. Rattle led his reduced orchestral forces (minus violins and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Onstage and out front, Stravinsky, Beethoven and Simon Rattle filled the<br />
Hollywood Bowl quite handsomely on Tuesday night. If the Beethoven Ninth can<br />
draw one of the season&#8217;s largest crowds (17,073, just 900 short of capacity),<br />
there&#8217;s hope for civilization after all.The night began wondrously well. Rattle led his reduced orchestral forces<br />
(minus violins and violas) and the Los Angeles Master Chorale through a quiet,<br />
radiant probing of Stravinsky&#8217;s short masterwork, his elegant and austere<br />
&#8220;Symphony of Psalms&#8221; created in 1930 for the Boston Symphony&#8217;s 50th<br />
anniversary. It&#8217;s not exactly an inviting work, with its colors all muted<br />
bronze and silver. Rattle&#8217;s performance, remarkable especially for its quiet,<br />
unhurried unfolding, made the work come alive even in the Bowl&#8217;s overlarge<br />
space.The Beethoven Ninth fared less well. It had the feel of a learning process: a<br />
conductor still in his mid-30s trying things out, testing how far he can get<br />
away with bending Beethoven&#8217;s designs toward a personal statement. It came off<br />
as a curious mingling of authenticity and wilfulness. The authentic touches<br />
were excellent, with all repeats honored and with the orchestra, for once,<br />
seated in proper classical formation with the first and second violins<br />
downstage and the lower strings to the rear.But there were strange goings-on with changes of tempo, to underline effects<br />
that Beethoven had made abundantly clear on their own. It seemed almost as if<br />
the young conductor hadn&#8217;t yet come to trust the work, hadn&#8217;t quite gotten the<br />
hang of the music&#8217;s own marvelous sense of flow.He wasn&#8217;t helped much by the vocal soloists,  by Terry Cook&#8217;s delivery of the<br />
baritone invocation, with its register break that made it sound as if to<br />
unalike voices were sharing the line or Robert Tear&#8217;s tenor solo, strangulated<br />
and unfocussed. Soprano Alison Hargan and mezzo Alfreda Hodgson  sounded<br />
merely okay, but Beethoven&#8217;s cruel writing for these soloists is no way to<br />
judge a singer&#8217;s quality.With all its problems, and under a constant flow of air traffic sufficient to<br />
cover the Normandy invasion, this was a recognizable Beethoven Ninth. It may,<br />
for all anyone knows, carry the seeds of a great Ninth from Simon Rattle<br />
sometime in the future. It&#8217;s not quite there, however.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/08/bowl-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL&#160;WAGNER</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-wagner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-wagner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In music-making, more may be merrier, but more is often mellower as well. That theory was nicely put to the test at the Hollywood Bowl on Tuesday night, when the presence of two orchestras &#8212; 200 musicians &#8212; sounded at least as good, perhaps even better, than either of the orchestras by itself.This was, in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In music-making, more may be merrier, but more is often mellower as well. That<br />
theory was nicely put to the test at the Hollywood Bowl on Tuesday night, when<br />
the presence of two orchestras &#8212; 200  musicians &#8212; sounded at least as good,<br />
perhaps even better, than either of the orchestras by itself.This was, in other words, the annual bout of duelling orchestras, when the<br />
resident Los Angeles Philharmonic moved over to share its stage with the<br />
youngsters of the Philharmonic Institute Orchestra. The result, it was easy to<br />
sense, was one of those ideal occasions when the young players&#8217; energy<br />
provided a challenge to the Philharmonic’s old-timers, while the older group<br />
could show the youngsters a thing or two about stability. All that, of course,<br />
is only an outsider&#8217;s intuition, but it might go a long way to explain why the<br />
combined forces sounded as good as they did that night.John Nelson was the evening&#8217;s conductor, formerly of the Indianapolis Symphony<br />
and more recently an active Europe-based freelancer; his contribution included<br />
the Barber Adagio for Strings and a set of selections from Wagner&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Gotterdammerung,&#8221; with the two orchestras, and the Grieg Piano Concerto<br />
with the Philharmonic alone, and with the young Norwegian pianist Leif Ove<br />
Andsnes, in his local debut, as soloist. On its own, the Institute Orchestra<br />
was led by conductor-trainee Arthur Post in a brief Meditation from Leonard<br />
Bernstein&#8217;s &#8220;Mass.&#8221; A rich, full evening it was. Where, in fact, to start? The popular Barber Adagio, composed originally for<br />
four strings, was the evening&#8217;s only real failure in its drastic expansion;<br />
the simple, quiet patterns simply do not work under the burden of all that<br />
tone. Bernstein&#8217;s brief reworking of his &#8220;Mass&#8221; excerpt, arranged as a piece<br />
for cello and orchestra (and beautifully played by Lynn Harrell) is an<br />
elegant, impassioned tidbit from an otherwise grossly uneven work.<br />
But these were as divine discourses compared to the mindless vulgarity of<br />
Grieg&#8217;s strained and strenuous pomposities. Norwegian musicians must bear<br />
their Grieg as an albatross, as Finnish conductors must bear Sibelius, but<br />
Leif Ove Andsnes, at 21, is worthy of stronger challenges. The work demands<br />
old-fashioned, flamboyant, rhetorical virtuosity; the Andsnes performance,<br />
made up of interesting single moments but lacking in any real character, came<br />
off as so much clatter.But then came the Wagner to storm the heavens &#8212; and even, for once, to drive<br />
the air traffic from the skies. Nelson had put together a sweep across this<br />
final chapter of the mighty &#8220;Ring of the Nibelung&#8221;: &#8220;Dawn and Siegfried&#8217;s<br />
Rhine Journey&#8221; merging through a well-constructed bridge into the &#8220;Funeral<br />
March&#8221; which then oozed, somewhat less successfully, into the entire last<br />
scene of &#8220;Brunnhilde&#8217;s Immolation.&#8221; Without the voice, the final scene did have its aimless moments; some of it<br />
might have been cut back with no real loss. The rest was glorious: the<br />
marvelously paced, solemn March with its crashes like the harbingers of Doom,<br />
the throat-grabbing lamentations as the final harmonies build their unbearable<br />
tension. It&#8217;s all very well that we honor Mozart at the Bowl in this<br />
anniversary year, but it&#8217;s always the right year to celebrate Wagner, at least<br />
when it&#8217;s done this well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-wagner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL&#160;MORGAN</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-morgan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-morgan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as one can determine, given the peculiar acoustical and aeronautical atmosphere at the Hollywood Bowl, Michael Morgan is a new arrival very much worth your attention. Morgan, who conducted the Los Angeles Philharmonic on Tuesday night in a most impressive debut appearance, is 35, and is the assistant conductor at the Chicago Symphony. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as one can determine, given the peculiar acoustical and aeronautical<br />
atmosphere at the Hollywood Bowl, Michael Morgan is a new arrival very much<br />
worth your attention. Morgan, who conducted the Los Angeles Philharmonic on<br />
Tuesday night in a most impressive debut appearance, is 35, and is the<br />
assistant conductor at the Chicago Symphony. More important, he&#8217;s the latest<br />
hired to try, where others have failed, to bring the Oakland Symphony (or<br />
Oakland East Bay Symphony, as it is now called) back to the glory it enjoyed<br />
under the prematurely departed Calvin Simmons.If Tuesday&#8217;s concert is any criterion, Morgan can do the job up north. He led<br />
an interesting program, more than usually challenging: Strauss&#8217; &#8220;Don Juan,&#8221;<br />
the Mendelssohn &#8220;Scottish&#8221; Symphony and, with Misha Dichter, the Beethoven<br />
Third Piano Concerto.Never  mind the Beethoven, which foundered on the inadequate visions of its<br />
soloist, in another of those uninflected, clattery performances that seem to<br />
characterize Dichter&#8217;s playing in recent years. What was truly exciting about<br />
Morgan&#8217;s part of the program was the depth and firmness of his orchestral<br />
command. He resisted the usual temptations to turn the Strauss tone-poem into a mere<br />
orchestral dazzler. Aided immeasurably by David Weiss&#8217; eloquent playing of the<br />
long oboe solo, he made the work into something resembling poetry. The<br />
balances between winds and strings were beautifully controlled; the noisy<br />
passages were oratorical but not vulgar. That takes doing; &#8220;Don Juan&#8221; may be<br />
a popular chestnut, but it is full of secrets as well, and these Morgan<br />
unlocked remarkably well.The Mendelssohn also went well, in a solemn but nicely paced reading, again<br />
agreeably free of the bombast that others have applied to this warm-hearted if<br />
somewhat padded score. The orchestra sounded fine; the woodwinds, so often<br />
entrusted in Mendelssohn&#8217;s scoring to shine little lights through the texture,<br />
did just that. The final peroration was truly grandiose.The crowd numbered 7881. The air traffic numbered a mere 3, but they were<br />
strategically placed: a helicopter to ruin the quiet ending of the Strauss,<br />
another to try to awaken Misha Dichter during the first-movement cadenza of<br />
the Beethoven, a third to out-roar the climax of the Mendelssohn finale.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-morgan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL&#160;MOZART</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-mozart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-mozart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At 10:50 on Sunday the final joyous strains of Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;The Marriage of Figaro&#8221; filled the cool night air at the Hollywood Bowl. Billed variously as a &#8220;Mozart Akademie&#8221; and a &#8220;Mozart Mini-Marathon,&#8221; the concert had begun 4 hours and 20 minutes earlier, and had covered a lot of ground, all of it Mozartian. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 10:50 on Sunday the final joyous strains of Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;The Marriage of<br />
Figaro&#8221; filled the cool night air at the Hollywood Bowl. Billed variously as<br />
a &#8220;Mozart Akademie&#8221; and a &#8220;Mozart Mini-Marathon,&#8221; the concert had begun 4<br />
hours and 20 minutes earlier, and had covered a lot of ground, all of it<br />
Mozartian.  The crowd number 9,725, small by Bowl standards but a favorable<br />
comparison to the total count of people who heard Mozart&#8217;s music during his<br />
lifetime.It was a heady event: three overtures, a serenade for winds, three concertos<br />
plus one extra concerto movement, one symphony and nearly the whole last act<br />
from &#8220;Figaro&#8221; (minus only the arias for Marcellina and Basilio that are<br />
usually left out anyway). Historians have noted that concerts of this length<br />
were common in Mozart&#8217;s time, and that they did, indeed, go by the name<br />
&#8220;Akademie.&#8221;The splendid young orchestra of the Los Angeles Philharmonic Institute, the<br />
orchestra&#8217;s summer training program, now in its tenth year and impossible to<br />
praise too highly, held the stage all evening, although there were some<br />
personnel substitutions along the way. A wide screen was used to cut down the<br />
Bowl&#8217;s huge stage to fit the modest proportions of a Mozart-sized orchestra,<br />
and this had the effect of brightening the sound considerably. In terms of ensemble quality, as well as the excellence of individual players,<br />
this is a top-grade orchestra. Mozart&#8217;s scoring favors the wind contingent;<br />
the flutes, oboes and clarinets of this year&#8217;s Institute Orchestra made some<br />
elegant sounds throughout the long and demanding concert.At that there were some downs as well as ups. The guest instrumental soloists<br />
were uniformly poor: Misha and Cipa Dichter clattering their way through the<br />
Two-Piano Concerto (K. 365); Misha himself in as rash and unaffectionate<br />
saunter through the A-major Concerto (K. 488) as any anti-Mozartian could<br />
dream of hearing; Jaime Laredo, as conductor and soloist, clipping the wings<br />
of the G-major Violin Concerto (K. 216) and throwing in some dreadful cadenzas<br />
(by Sam Franko) along the way.As amends, there was a splendid vocal group, most of them younger Music Center<br />
Opera stars-to-be, to do full justice to the changing moods, the sorrow and<br />
the hilarity of the &#8220;Figaro&#8221; excerpt, done in concert format. Jennifer<br />
Trost, who sang the Countess in her recent European opera debut, came home to<br />
sing those few poignant phrases most disarmingly. Hector Vasquez and Jennifer<br />
Smith were a delightful Mr. and Mrs. Figaro, standing stock still and even so<br />
managing to suggest the drama in their roles, as did John Atkins as the ill-<br />
tempered Count.The evening&#8217;s conductors included this summer&#8217;s four trainees: William Eddins,<br />
Susan Davenny Wyner, Thomas Dausgaard and Arthur Post. David Alan Miller led<br />
the two-piano concerto, and Lawrence Foster led the opera excerpt with a fine<br />
sense of underlining the important role the orchestra plays in this<br />
music.Overhead, the air traffic was a constant bane; one tended to lose count after a<br />
dozen or so helicopters. But up there, too, beaming his benefice on the crowd,<br />
was the  little fellow whose music the night was intended to honor. Mozart<br />
looked happy, this once.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-mozart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yuri Temirkanov, who conducted the Los Angeles Philharmonic at the Hollywood Bowl on Tuesday night &#8212; the fourth of his five appearances here &#8212; remains one of the most interesting of contemporary conductors. Perhaps &#8220;interesting&#8221; conducting wasn&#8217;t exactly what Tuesday night&#8217;s program called for, however.It was another of those solid, chestnut-studded programs: Tchaikovsky&#8217;s &#8220;Romeo and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yuri Temirkanov,  who conducted the Los Angeles Philharmonic at the Hollywood<br />
Bowl on Tuesday night &#8212; the fourth of his five appearances here &#8212; remains<br />
one of the most interesting of contemporary conductors. Perhaps<br />
&#8220;interesting&#8221; conducting wasn&#8217;t exactly what Tuesday night&#8217;s program called<br />
for, however.It was another of those solid, chestnut-studded programs: Tchaikovsky&#8217;s &#8220;Romeo<br />
and Juliet&#8221; Overture, Rachmaninoff&#8217;s &#8220;Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini&#8221; and<br />
that old inevitable, Rimsky-Korsakov&#8217;s &#8220;Scheherazade,&#8221; junk food at its<br />
tastiest. Nikolai Petrov was the pianist in the Rachmaninoff, no better and no<br />
worse than his playing at his Ambassador recital a few seasons back &#8212; a<br />
recital that somehow lingers in the memory as almost a textbook essay in<br />
dullness.Given the minimal intellectual demands of this program, a case could be made<br />
for a fairly straightforward, zippy approach to all three works. Nothing like<br />
that was forthcoming, however. Temirkanov obviously takes considerable<br />
pleasure in imposing his own stamp upon everything he plays, an approach that<br />
used to be more common among conductors than it is in these electronic days.<br />
The range of tempos in both the Tchaikovsky and Rimsky-Korsakov works was<br />
extreme: slowness to the point of an imperceptible ooze, speed to violate all<br />
local traffic laws.The conductor has the technique to make all this work, and so, in his deadpan<br />
way, did the pianist. Barring the allowable quota of bloopers (mostly in the<br />
brass) it was a pretty good sounding program. But you could easily mistake<br />
these works, under Temirkanov&#8217;s heavy hands, for something more serious than<br />
their real nature. Nothing seemed to soar&#8230;Except, of course, the usual skyful of intrusions: a veritable regatta during<br />
the Rachmaninoff, with two small planes flying directly overhead and a couple<br />
of helicopters within easy earshot. A decent-sized crowd, 11623 strong, stayed<br />
to cheer at the end. At that, they had reason; it&#8217;s hard to spoil<br />
&#8220;Scheherazade.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GETTY</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/getty-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/getty-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even when silent, the Getty Museum stands as continuing assurance that civilization abides. Add music, and the proof becomes indisputable.This summer&#8217;s Saturday-night series at the Getty (long since sold out) is, unsurprisingly, devoted to Mozart, whose music is the perfect match for the classical decor in the small inner garden where the music is played. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even when silent, the Getty Museum stands as continuing assurance that<br />
civilization abides. Add music, and the proof becomes indisputable.This summer&#8217;s Saturday-night series at the Getty (long since sold out) is,<br />
unsurprisingly, devoted to Mozart, whose music is the perfect match for the<br />
classical decor in the small inner garden where the music is played. But the<br />
fare is hardly garden-variety Mozart. The series is called &#8220;The Uncommon<br />
Mozart&#8221; and that, judging from last Saturday&#8217;s concert, is putting it<br />
mildly.The five concerts, put together by UCLA&#8217;s dynamic musicologist Robert Winter,<br />
is arranged more-or-less chronological. Saturday&#8217;s program found Mozart in his<br />
late teens, chafing at the provincial  life in Salzburg but beginning to<br />
develop his own musical voice. A Divertimento (K. 131 in the complete Mozart<br />
catalog) from 1772, Mozart&#8217;s 16th year, was full of the richness of the later<br />
Mozart: harmonic progressions and melodic turns that simply stop the breath,<br />
marvelous effects in an uncommonly large orchestra (strings, solo winds and<br />
four horns). A short Mass (K. 272b) from five years later was, once again, an amazingly rich<br />
score, joyous and profound by turns and with a closing chorus that prophecied<br />
moments in the later operas. And the slashing early G-minor Symphony (K. 183),<br />
the evening&#8217;s one familiar work, struck the tragic notes that Mozart would<br />
sound again, and often, in his mature years.Performances couldn&#8217;t have been better &#8212; not much, anyhow. Gregory Maldonado&#8217;s<br />
Los Angeles Baroque Orchestra seems to get better with every hearing. This is<br />
no longer merely a local early-instrument group standing up to the big guys,<br />
but a splendid ensemble that plays with style and real sheen, makes European<br />
tours, and has started to record. There was a little bit of rumpus among the<br />
horns now and then, nothing serious. It could happen anywhere. A small chorus<br />
from the Church of Saint Martin of Tours, led by Tracey Adams, joined forces<br />
with the orchestra in the B-flat Mass.  At the end there was wine and cheese and carrot cake alongside the Getty&#8217;s<br />
long pool. Who says this isn&#8217;t the best of all worlds?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/getty-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Old Sebastian Bach lived a lifetime without hearing a note of his &#8220;Brandenburg&#8221; Concertos. There&#8217;s no information, in fact, that anyone &#8212; in the castle of the Brandenburg nobles or anywhere else &#8212; heard these works in their own time. Contrast that with the 7,549 souls privileged to sit through all six of these iridescent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old Sebastian Bach lived a lifetime without hearing a note of his<br />
&#8220;Brandenburg&#8221; Concertos. There&#8217;s no information, in fact, that anyone &#8212; in<br />
the castle of the Brandenburg nobles or anywhere else &#8212; heard these works in<br />
their own time. Contrast that with the 7,549 souls privileged to sit through<br />
all six of these iridescent scores at the Hollywood Bowl on Friday night, and<br />
you may suspect that, in some ways at least, the world has improved somewhat<br />
since Bach&#8217;s time.From any angle these are remarkable works. They constitute a compendium, first<br />
of all, of some of the best devices of Baroque instrumentation: the use of<br />
solo instruments against a larger ensemble, and the ways that ensemble can be<br />
subdivided to present an infinite variety of sonority. They also offer a fair<br />
study of the moods, the rhythms, the virtuosity of players available to<br />
composers in the year 1721. Each of the works draws an entirely different set<br />
of rules and expectations. An evening of all six &#8220;Brandenburgs&#8221; becomes an<br />
adventure in glorious excess.One might raise doubts, even so, about the fitness for this music in so vast a<br />
space as the Bowl, performed by the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra in groups<br />
ranging in size from six players to 30. Truth to tell, the sound pattern<br />
wasn&#8217;t always kind to Bach&#8217;s invention. The horns in the first concerto were<br />
undermiked so that their marvelous rhythmic patterns of threes against the<br />
other players&#8217; twos weren&#8217;t always audible. The harpsichord in several works<br />
was overmiked almost to the point of drowning out the ensemble. Nobody ever<br />
claimed the Bowl as an ideal Baroque music venue, and nobody should,Yet there was vitality in iona Brown&#8217;s approach to the music, and high<br />
expertise in the way her ensemble did her bidding. Sometimes, in truth,<br />
vitality won out over repose; much of the music &#8212;  the marvelous, burbling<br />
fantasy of the fourth concerto, to cite one instance &#8212; went by so fast, and<br />
with so little inflection, that it sounded smaller than life, even in its<br />
larger-than life setting. Often as not, Brown&#8217;s conducting seemed to suggest<br />
that she didn&#8217;t like the music very much, a most peculiar attitude if true.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The roar of drums split the evening air; the brassy strains of &#8220;The Star- Spangled Banner&#8221; lit up the evening sky. At approximately 7:45 last Tuesday evening a new season at the Hollywood Bowl sprang into life. From now until September 21, the most generously planned of any urban music festival will be going on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The roar of drums split the evening air; the brassy strains of &#8220;The Star-<br />
Spangled Banner&#8221; lit up the evening sky. At approximately 7:45 last Tuesday<br />
evening a new season at the Hollywood Bowl sprang into life. From now until<br />
September 21, the most generously planned of any urban music festival will be<br />
going on right in our own backyard.Something else was new, as well, at this opening concert, since it also saw the<br />
debut of a brand-new orchestra. The Hollywood Bowl Orchestra was formed last<br />
winter; it has already released &#8220;Hollywood Dreams,&#8221; its first recording,<br />
under its permanent conductor John Mauceri. Made up of freelance musicians<br />
from the Los Angeles studio scene, the orchestra&#8217;s principal summer job will<br />
be to take over some of the lighter programs that the Los Angeles Philharmonic<br />
used to have to play. The benefit is, of course, twofold: the new orchestra<br />
gets the work, and the parent orchestra gets more time to rehearse its more<br />
serious symphonic programs.So far as any orchestra can be judged in its early weeks of existence,<br />
performing into microphones in a vast open space, the new ensemble shows every<br />
sign of filling a long-felt need hereabouts, and filling it handsomely.<br />
Conductor Mauceri, led it through a fine razzle-dazzle program, in which the<br />
orchestra got the chance to anticipate on its own, purely through its music-<br />
making, the fireworks that were to come at program&#8217;s end.Expectedly from musicians used to playing on sound stages into microphones, the<br />
orchestra&#8217;s tone is big and brassy. It is capable, as well, of some soft and<br />
elegant sounds. An orchestral version of an unfamiliar Gershwin song,<br />
&#8220;Soon,&#8221; brought quite a lot of fine, silky playing from the strings. Like<br />
Andre Previn and a few other wise conductors, Mauceri has seated the orchestra<br />
with the violas, not the cellos, on the outside. The arrangement greatly<br />
lightens the string sound; even through microphones and loudspeakers, the<br />
difference showed.The concert was subtitled &#8220;America the Beautiful,&#8221; and was planned as a<br />
light-hearted family journey through familiar territory. Leonard Bernstein&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Candide&#8221; Overture (well-known to Mauceri, who had conducted the Broadway<br />
revival of the show) was the most substantial work. The splendid young<br />
baritone Bruce Hubbard, who sings &#8220;Ol&#8217; Man River&#8221; on the famous complete<br />
&#8220;Show Boat&#8221; recording, did so again, and beautifully. He also sang five of<br />
Copland&#8217;s &#8220;Old American&#8221; song settings and another unknown Gershwin song<br />
whose lyrics have only recently been rediscovered, a blues number to a tune<br />
from &#8220;An American in Paris.&#8221; Even an uneventful saunter through the tall<br />
corn can sometimes turn up unexpected treasures.Mauceri proved a genial host, with some easy-going humor and even a little<br />
subversion (&#8220;please feel free to applaud any time you feel like it&#8221;) to put<br />
the crowd at ease. At the end came three Sousa marches, with fireworks to<br />
match: spectacular stuff, amazingly well coordinated to the downbeats in the<br />
music. Glowing likenesses of Desert Storm heroes emerged from the smoke and<br />
flame; at the end the pictorial epitome of America glowed high overhead. The<br />
audience of 13,155 happy souls appeared to be having the time of their<br />
respective lives, as well they should.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/07/bowl-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RICHCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/richcol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/richcol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The opera season ended with two ringing reaffirmations of the high quality of scores some of us may have laid aside. A second visit to &#8220;La Fanciulla del West&#8221; at the Music Center turned up details in Puccini&#8217;s score I hadn&#8217;t previously bothered to notice: the marvelous breadth of the harmonic language, the iridescent orchestration, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opera season ended with two ringing reaffirmations of the high quality of<br />
scores some of us may have laid aside. A second visit to &#8220;La Fanciulla del<br />
West&#8221; at the Music Center turned up details in Puccini&#8217;s score I hadn&#8217;t<br />
previously bothered to notice: the marvelous breadth of the harmonic language,<br />
the iridescent orchestration, the grandeur of the choral writing.<br />
Then came an even more exciting rediscovery, Benjamin Britten&#8217;s &#8220;The Turn of<br />
the Screw,&#8221; in a stupendous staging that brilliantly underlined the<br />
extraordinary depth of this score, the way so little time and so few players<br />
are needed to fulfill Henry James&#8217; wonderful story in music as mere words<br />
never could. Strange to tell, neither opera has been adequately dealt with on records.<br />
Against the dozens of &#8220;Bohemes&#8221; and &#8220;Toscas,&#8221; there are only two proper<br />
recordings of &#8220;Fanciulla&#8221; (plus two dim-sounding &#8220;pirate&#8221; recordings).<br />
Each has its brutalizing force: Mario del Monaco on the London set with Renata<br />
Tebaldi, Zubin Mehta&#8217;s conducting on the DG set with Carol Neblett and Placido<br />
Domingo. A new version is needed, especially one to preserve the astounding<br />
performance given here by Gwyneth Jones.The &#8220;Turn of the Screw&#8221; lingers in the old London recording conducted by<br />
Britten (with the very young David Hemmings, in his boy-soprano days, as<br />
Miles). There is also a video version, a film by Petr Weigl with its imagery<br />
full of smirking Freudian subtexts and with the singers&#8217; voices dubbed onto a<br />
cast of actors. But  Helen Donath at least sings the role of the Governess, as<br />
she did here, and that makes the video worth enduring.Britten&#8217;s 37-year-old opera abides as a proclamation of the validity of<br />
contemporary harmonies and vocal lines as the bearers of operatic action. In<br />
its taut, exquisitely structured way it is as important a score as, say,<br />
&#8220;Wozzeck&#8221; or &#8220;Nixon in China&#8221;&#8230;or, as &#8220;Le Grand Macabre&#8221;<br />
Gyorgy Ligeti composed &#8220;Le Grand Macabre&#8221; in 1978; it circulated to ecstatic<br />
reception in several European houses, and has now finally achieved a proper<br />
recording, a two-disc Wergo set just released. From its wild and wondrous<br />
opening, a violent chorus of automobile horns that returns several times to<br />
punctuate the diabolical tale, to its finale as the devils sizzle over an open<br />
fire and bits of Mozart and Verdi are threaded through the orchestral<br />
pandemonium, the sheer bravado of the work holds you enthralled.<br />
Ligeti, 68, Hungarian by birth, now living in Germany, is still too little<br />
known in this country, although Pierre Boulez brought a large chunk of his<br />
music to Ojai two years ago. Two short, marvelously atmospheric pieces of his<br />
were used (without his permission and without payment) in the score Stanley<br />
Kubrick assembled for &#8220;2001.&#8221;Those who know Ligeti&#8217;s music have come to suspect him of omnipotence;<br />
everything he has attempted, over a wide stylistic panorama, seems to work.<br />
There are five CDs of his music on Wergo, including orchestral and chamber<br />
music, and there isn&#8217;t a moment less than enthralling.<br />
&#8220;Le Grand Macabre&#8221; is taken from a 1934 play by Michel de Ghelderode, who<br />
in turn took his inspiration from Pieter Breughel&#8217;s ghastly fantasy &#8220;The<br />
Triumph of Death.&#8221; Into this stewpot of influences Ligeti has stirred a<br />
fantastic mix of his own. The characters include a nude Venus, a fat boy who<br />
is the &#8220;Prince of Breughel-Land&#8221; and who in the London production was got up<br />
to look like Prince Charles. The stage directions are loose; in Paris the<br />
characters included Greta Garbo, the Marx Brothers and Superman.<br />
You&#8217;ll just have to believe that all this translates into music of the utmost<br />
appeal. The musical pastiche is wild: jazz, ancient liturgy, some corny<br />
waltzes &#8212; they all seem to hobnob, and the resultant mix is amazingly<br />
entertaining. The recorded performance is a production of the Austrian Radio;<br />
the conductor, who has given most of the performances of &#8220;Le Grand Macabre&#8221;<br />
from the beginning, is the splendid Britisher Elgar Howarth. You won&#8217;t<br />
recognize a single name in the cast, but it&#8217;s a fine ensemble and it sounds as<br />
if it is having fun with this grotesque but appealing music. Perhaps you will,<br />
too.Some kind of great operatic upsurge seems to be taking place in Finland, as<br />
we&#8217;ll learn for ourselves when the Finnish National Opera comes over with<br />
Aulis Sallinen&#8217;s &#8220;Kullervo&#8221; next February. Finland&#8217;s culture ministry,<br />
working through the opera company, has been exemplary in commissioning new<br />
works. Sallinen is becoming well known, and so is his compatriot Einojuhani<br />
Rautavaara. (In Finnish, by the way, you pronounce all vowels separately;<br />
there are six syllables in Rautavaara.)Rautavaara&#8217;s &#8220;Vincent&#8221; is at hand, an opera composed last year and recorded<br />
on the Ondine label. Its subject is not lakes or mountains or ancient Finnish<br />
heroes; the &#8220;Vincent&#8221; is Van Gogh, and the opera was written to celebrate<br />
the painter&#8217;s centenary. It is a work of tremendous power.The composer, now 63, wrote his own libretto. Van Gogh, nearing death, lies in<br />
a mental hospital. Voices call out to him, and the composer has fashioned a<br />
dense, powerful counterpoint of sounds. Paul Gauguin, cynical and hostile,<br />
wanders through the action. Later on Vincent&#8217;s mind wanders to his few moments<br />
of a happy love affair. Then the clouds settle in once again. The ending is<br />
devastating; Vincent tries to make a gift to the doctors of his remaining<br />
paintings, but they are rejected as &#8220;too modern.&#8221;Rautavaara&#8217;s music is dense and tortured, and some of it sounds amazingly like<br />
the way Van Gogh paintings look. Each of the opera&#8217;s three acts, by the way,<br />
starts with a prelude that is supposed to represent a particular painting.<br />
They might go together as an orchestral suite, in the manner of &#8220;Mathis der<br />
Maler.&#8221; But the opera as a whole also deserves to be heard. In this<br />
performance, conducted by Fuat Manchurov, the marvelous baritone Jorma<br />
Hynninen is  Van Gogh.On Virgin Classics there is John Casken&#8217;s &#8220;Golem,&#8221; winner of the Benjamin<br />
Britten Award for composition last year. This story, too, is told in<br />
flashback, as the mystical Rabbi Maharal tells of his creation of a Golem &#8211;<br />
the guardian spirit in Yiddish folklore &#8212; and how, like the monster of<br />
Frankenstein, the creation outgrew its purpose and turned violent. Casken,<br />
born in Yorkshire in 1949, fashioned his own libretto.<br />
Here, too, we have eloquent, skillful music drama. The Britten connection is<br />
clear; Casken&#8217;s vocal melodies have that same dry-point, understated quality<br />
that comes around and lingers in the memory. &#8220;Golem&#8221; isn&#8217;t quite a<br />
masterpiece, although it is a most proficient work by a composer hitherto<br />
unknown. The music uses a small orchestral ensemble plus tape; the<br />
performance, under Richard Bernas, was recorded at the University of Durham in<br />
the North of England. The best of it is the assurance that composers are still<br />
composing opera. Someday John Casken will compose a better opera than<br />
&#8220;Golem,&#8221; but at least he has been encouraged to make a start.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/richcol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCREW</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/screw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/screw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like the story that inspired it, Benjamin Britten&#8217;s &#8220;The Turn of the Screw&#8221; holds you in its grip from beginning to end. So does the Music Center Opera&#8217;s brilliant production of the work, which had the first of four performances at the Music Center on Saturday night. Miss it at your peril.The power of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the story that inspired it, Benjamin Britten&#8217;s &#8220;The Turn of the Screw&#8221;<br />
holds you in its grip from beginning to end. So does the Music Center Opera&#8217;s<br />
brilliant production of the work, which had the first of four performances at<br />
the Music Center on Saturday night. Miss it at your peril.The power of the Henry James story, as every schoolboy knows, lies in its<br />
ambiguity. We are left to guess which is real, the ghosts or the Governess who<br />
thinks she sees them. Putting the story on stage, as play or opera, forces a<br />
producer to choose a single alternative, and this Britten and his librettist<br />
Myfanwy {cq} Piper have done in this masterful small opera of 1954. The ghosts<br />
are real; they come on stage and sing. The Governess, too, is real, because<br />
she too sings. And how, she sings!Yet, one beauty of this production, devised by Jonathan Miller for the English<br />
National Opera in 1979, is its success in preserving ambiguities. Patrick<br />
Robertson&#8217;s sets, with projections both on scrims and a back wall, so fill the<br />
stage with with a jumble of images that characters seem to float in and out of<br />
reality. The effect is both disturbing and stunning; you will look far before<br />
you discover better justice done to this greatest of all psychological<br />
thrillers, in any medium.The performances are, in a word, phenomenal. No milder word will do for the<br />
overwhelming Governess of Helen Donath, previously known here only from<br />
recordings. She has worked a magisterial voice and a powerful stage presence<br />
into a consistent portrait. It might be described as lyric frazzlement, or it<br />
might better reside beyond rational description. No less extraordinary is the<br />
work of 12-year-old Nik{cq}Nackley as the haunted Miles: again, a  marvelously<br />
consistent performance at once angelic and sinister,  and nicely sung<br />
besides.Old friends round out the cast: Marvellee Cariaga as a strong yet troubled Mrs.<br />
Grose, Jonathan Mack and Angelique Burzynski as a pair of reptilian ghosts,<br />
Eileen Hulse as the other child (although clearly several times the age of<br />
eight years specified in the script). The orchestra of a mere 13 players,<br />
under Roderick Brydon&#8217;s alert, flexible direction, reproduces the wonders of<br />
Britten&#8217;s iridescent scoring. And so a far-from-capacity crowd on opening night found itself, possibly with<br />
some surprise, cheering to the rafters a 20th-century chamber opera on a<br />
serious topic. &#8220;The Turn of the Screw&#8221; deserved no less. It has taken this<br />
whole season for our opera company to come up with one production for which<br />
the highest praise might pass as understatement. This time it happened.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/screw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LEVITCH&#160;NOTE</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/levitch-note/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/levitch-note/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The scene was the Leo Baeck Temple in Brentwood, at last week&#8217;s invitational tribute to Leonard Bernstein. The veteran pianist Leo Smit came onstage to play the opening work, tried to strike a few notes, and stopped. Something in the Yamaha grand piano, furnished for the concert by David Abell, was decidedly off-key. Smit tried [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scene was the Leo Baeck Temple in Brentwood, at last week&#8217;s invitational<br />
tribute to Leonard Bernstein. The veteran pianist Leo Smit came onstage to play<br />
the opening work, tried to strike a few notes, and stopped. Something in the<br />
Yamaha grand piano, furnished for the concert by David Abell, was decidedly<br />
off-key. Smit tried a second time; no luck. &#8220;Is Leon Levitch in the house?&#8221;<br />
the master of ceremonies called out.<br />
There was a stir up back; Leon Levitch was definitely in the house. Down the<br />
aisle he came, the smiling, diminutive, white-haired man of all pianos, looking<br />
for all the world like Central Casting&#8217;s idea of a kindly old-world craftsman -<br />
- which, indeed, he is. He twirled a couple of wing nuts under the piano, and<br />
before you could say &#8220;Mieczyslaw Horszowski&#8221; he had the entire innards of the<br />
instrument spread across the floor of the stage.<br />
A dab, a twiddle, and Levitch had the piano back together again. &#8220;I don&#8217;t know<br />
what I did,&#8221; he shouted out in all innocence, &#8220;but it seems to work.&#8221; Chalk<br />
up another Leon Levitch victory.<br />
Every city has its legendary piano wizard, about whom tales are told with<br />
laughter and awe. Levitch, who now lives in Pacoima, is that man for Los<br />
Angeles. Born in Yugoslavia 63 years ago, Levitch taught himself the rudiments<br />
of piano building while interned in an Italian prison camp during World War II.<br />
After Italy&#8217;s defeat, the Levitch family was part of a token group of freed<br />
prisoners brought to the United States by Franklin D. Rossevelt and quartered -<br />
- behind more barbed wire &#8212; in an abandoned army camp in upstate New York.<br />
Word got out that the camp had among its inmates a teenage piano tuner, and<br />
Levitch was frequently smuggled out under darkness, crawling through a break in<br />
the barbed wire,  to repair pianos in nearby Oswego.<br />
Along the way, Levitch also studied composition, later working with Roy Harris<br />
at UCLA. Several of his chamber compositions have been recorded, and he is now<br />
at work on a Requiem, to be performed next year at the opening of a museum in<br />
Oswego commemorating the wartime encampment.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/levitch-note/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OJAI</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/ojai-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/ojai-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The glory of the Ojai Music Festival surfaced once again this past weekend, as it has every year since 1947 around this time, somewhat tarnished but recognizable. No, it wasn&#8217;t the best festival ever, not as programming nor as performance. It also wasn&#8217;t the worst. In five generously planned programs, from Friday night to Sunday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The glory of the Ojai Music Festival surfaced once again this past weekend, as<br />
it has every year since 1947 around this time, somewhat tarnished but<br />
recognizable. No, it wasn&#8217;t the best festival ever, not as programming nor as<br />
performance. It also wasn&#8217;t the worst. In five generously planned programs,<br />
from Friday night to Sunday afternoon, there had to be something for nearly<br />
everyone somewhere along the way.<br />
The mix was interesting, to say the least: Mozart, the prolific American John<br />
Harbison, the iconoclastic Briton Sir Peter Maxwell Davies. Inevitably, the<br />
flames of creativity burned the brightest in the Mozart; that would probably<br />
have been the case no matter which contemporary figures had come on.<br />
Even so, there was something uncommonly depressing, deadly even, about the<br />
contemporary fare. Harbison, former composer-in-residence at the Los Angeles<br />
Philharmonic, Pulitzer laureate, brought along two of his large-scale song-<br />
cycles: one to words of Emily Dickinson, one to William Carlos Williams.<br />
Handsomely sung &#8212; Janice Felty, Sanford Sylvan &#8212; they nevertheless seemed<br />
like random notes curled willy-nilly around the respective texts but untouched<br />
by the beauty or the passion of the poetry. Any moment of Mozart&#8217;s text-<br />
settings heard over the weekend &#8212; a pair of concert arias, some extended<br />
excerpts from his final opera &#8220;La Clemenza di Tito&#8221; &#8212; might have served as a<br />
model for the way words and music can be blended into a higher art.<br />
Such judgments are probably unfair; few composers past or present could survive<br />
comparison with the divine Mozart. Still, the Ojai fare seemed almost<br />
stubbornly designed to shame the present with the past. From Max Davies we got<br />
two meandering, grossly extended concertos, one for clarinet and one for horn<br />
and trumpet, part of a series he&#8217;s creating for the soloists in the Scottish<br />
Chamber Orchestra. Of course they weren&#8217;t inflamed with the Mozartian spark,<br />
but they seemed on this occasion to have no spark of any kind. A couple of folk<br />
dances and a brand-new &#8220;Ojai Festival Overture&#8221; may have been small-scale<br />
exercises on Davies&#8217; part, but there was a sense of shape there, and also a<br />
sense of pleasure, that the larger works didn&#8217;t have.The Mozart works were all drawn from his last year: the sublime Clarinet<br />
Concerto, the operatic excerpts, the radiantly beautiful &#8220;Ave, verum corpus&#8221;<br />
(which Harbison had the gall to link to his own slapdash setting of the same<br />
text) and rather a lot of small dances. True, Mozart earned most of his money<br />
at the end with these German dances and minuets for Viennese court functions,<br />
but 27 of them at a throw, conducted with no excess of grace by Harbison and<br />
Davies, came across as something of an overdose.In the absence of the Los Angeles Philharmonic &#8212; currently touring European<br />
capitals and, according to reports, piling up ecstatic reviews &#8212; Ojai&#8217;s stage<br />
band  this time around was the Scottish Chamber Orchestra, playing with no<br />
great distinction. The singers were marvelous; outstanding among the<br />
instrumentalists were Dennis James, who brought along his &#8220;glass harmonica&#8221;<br />
for two Mozart works for that eerie, captivating instrument and Charles<br />
Neidich, tootling his way enchantingly through the Mozart Clarinet Concerto.<br />
But violinist Rose Mary Harbison (the composer&#8217;s wife) led a sub-professional<br />
reading of Mozart&#8217;s E-flat String Quintet that simply shouldn&#8217;t have been<br />
allowed onstage. Oh well, there&#8217;s always next year, with the guesswork favoring a return to Ojai<br />
of the Philharmonic and, dare we hope, Pierre Boulez. At least the weather was<br />
sublime and the setting &#8212; outdoors in Ojai&#8217;s Libbey Park and indoors for one<br />
late-night church event &#8212; beguiling beyond description. As long as these<br />
factors remain constant, no running of Ojai&#8217;s Music Festival can be reckoned a<br />
complete loss. Still&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/ojai-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUNDAY</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/sunday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/sunday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 1991 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Witold Lutoslawski is in town this week, for two Los Angeles Philharmonic programs of his music. The Kronos Quartet&#8217;s program at UCLA on Saturday includes music by Alfred Schnittke. George Enesco&#8217;s opera &#8220;Oedipus&#8221; has been released on Angel-EMI, the first-ever recording of a kind of masterpiece by Romania&#8217;s best-known composer. Comprehensive, six-CD surveys of Lutoslawski&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Witold Lutoslawski is in town this week, for two Los Angeles Philharmonic<br />
programs of his music. The Kronos Quartet&#8217;s program at UCLA on Saturday<br />
includes music by Alfred Schnittke. George Enesco&#8217;s opera &#8220;Oedipus&#8221; has been<br />
released on Angel-EMI, the first-ever recording of a kind of masterpiece by<br />
Romania&#8217;s best-known composer. Comprehensive, six-CD surveys of Lutoslawski&#8217;s<br />
music, and that of his countryman composer Karol Szymanowski, were released<br />
last year on Poland&#8217;s Muza label. Krysztof Penderecki&#8217;s dark, intense &#8220;St.<br />
Luke Passion&#8221; has been newly recorded, under the composer&#8217;s direction, on<br />
Britain&#8217;s Argo label.<br />
These matters are related. They suggest an emergence, a growing awareness, or<br />
both, of a repertory of major significance, remote both geographically and<br />
artistically from the musical mainstream. Sure, the mainstream Russian and<br />
Soviet symphonic repertory has been with us for over a century. We&#8217;ve known<br />
something, if not very much,  about Polish music from a few salon tidbits by<br />
Szymanowski and Paderewski&#8217;s Minuet in G. And Enesco&#8217;s first &#8220;Romanian<br />
Rhapsody&#8221; has long been a pop-concert staple.<br />
But the new music from Eastern Europe is none of the above. Szymanowski died in<br />
1937, and it&#8217;s stretching a point, perhaps, to include him in a report of new<br />
music. But these six CD&#8217;s of his works &#8212; big pieces, including three<br />
extroverted, handsomely crafted symphonies, and stunning choral music &#8212; along<br />
with the opera &#8220;King Roger&#8221; which Long Beach produced three seasons ago (and<br />
which is also available in a recording on the Olympia label), point to a major,<br />
original talent whose reevaluation in the West is long overdue. What&#8217;s more,<br />
much of Szymanowski&#8217;s expressive style bears little resemblance to what anyone<br />
else was doing in his time. Violently colorful in the Scriabin manner, it has<br />
at the same time the jagged quirkiness of some of Stravinsky: a strange<br />
mixture, but one which seems to work.<br />
What you hear in Szymanowski&#8217;s music, most of all, is a fierce energy that<br />
seems to stem from his obsession with breaking away from everyone else&#8217;s music.<br />
And the generation of Polish composers that emerged after World War II &#8211;<br />
Lutoslawski, and the younger  Penderecki &#8212; picked up on that obsession.<br />
Similar in intent, but not in style, to the revolutionaries of Western Europe -<br />
- Pierre Boulez and Karlheinz Stockhausen above all &#8212; the new Poles set about<br />
inventing their own musical language.<br />
Life was made easy, for a time anyhow, by the cultural &#8220;thaw&#8221; that began in<br />
1956 and lasted  more or less until a new wave of artistic repression took hold<br />
a dozen years later. While beleaguered Soviet musical renegades like Schnittke<br />
were composing their progressive, abrasive scores in dark corners and<br />
underground enclaves, Poland&#8217;s composers moved freely around the world, and<br />
absorbed a broad spectrum of world outlooks.<br />
Lutoslawski first came to the U.S. in 1962, invited by Aaron Copland to teach<br />
at Tanglewood. We met that summer, and his warm, enthusiastic portrait of<br />
Poland remains memorable: a land where the government sponsored no-strings<br />
festivals of new art every autumn, where commissions for new works seemed to<br />
grow on trees, where young composers could experiment in electronic labs and<br />
study the works of Boulez and John Cage.<br />
The cultural paradise Lutoslawski outlined in 1962 crumbled a few years later,<br />
but the greatest of Poland&#8217;s composers did survive &#8212; at home in Lutoslawski&#8217;s<br />
case, in exile for Penderecki.<br />
Lutoslawski talked at our meeting, more than a quarter-century ago, about his<br />
own musical tendency toward the kind of chance techniques explored by John<br />
Cage, devices which allow the performer a certain range of choice within the<br />
broad outlines of the piece. He had, at the time, made his first venture into<br />
chance music with his &#8220;Venetian Games&#8221; for chamber orchestra, and that<br />
captivating work (included in the Muza record series) retains its<br />
freshness.<br />
But the Third Symphony, which is on Lutoslawski&#8217;s Philharmonic program this<br />
coming Thursday night (repeated Saturday night and Sunday afternoon) is<br />
stronger yet. Even though long passages threaded throughout the half-hour work<br />
challenge the orchestra&#8217;s powers of improvisation, the symphony as a whole<br />
seems to derive its terrific energy and sense of cohesion from just those<br />
creative challenges. It stands as one of the great symphonic creations of our<br />
time, far removed from anyone else&#8217;s conception of how symphonies are supposed<br />
to be built, fresh and explosive on its own.<br />
(You may also remember that this work was on the Philharmonic program the day<br />
Los Angeles first discovered the fresh-faced youth named Esa-Pekka Salonen. His<br />
recording, for reasons beyond rational explanation, comes bundled at the end of<br />
a two-disc set of Messiaen&#8217;s preternaturally vulgar &#8220;Turangalila&#8221; Symphony:<br />
like having to buy a whole overcooked meatloaf blueplate special in order to<br />
get the salad.)<br />
Anyhow, Lutoslawski is with us this week, first with the Philharmonic New Music<br />
Group tomorrow at the Japan-America Theater, in a program that also includes,<br />
besides three chamber-orchestra Lutoslawski scores,  a short work of<br />
Szymanowski and another by a composer as yet unknown here, Pawel Szymanski. Do<br />
not confuse the two; they are Poles apart.<br />
As Szymanowski stood apart in his own time, so did  Enesco in his: violinist<br />
beyond compare, mentor (to, among others, the young Yehudi Menuhin),<br />
extraordinary conductor and, least known of all, a remarkable composer.<br />
&#8220;Oedipus,&#8221; comes to records from a startlingly star-studded studio session at<br />
Monte Carlo in June, 1989 (Jose Van Dam as Oedipus, Barbara Hendricks, Brigitte<br />
Fassbaender, Gabriel Bacquier, with Lawrence Foster conducting). Like &#8220;Roger&#8221;<br />
for Szymanowski, &#8220;Oedipus&#8221; was to be for Enesco his crowning achievement. He<br />
struggled with it over most of a lifetime, until it finally achieved a premiere<br />
in 1936 &#8212; only to disappear almost immediately.<br />
It deserves better. It is a work of dazzling ambition, even if only fitfully<br />
realized. The evocation of antiquity through a kind of contrived paganism is<br />
extravagant, absurd at one moment, truly grandiose at another. Now and then the<br />
fraudulent exoticism of Carl Orff comes to mind, but this is better, more<br />
honest stuff. There is a genuine lyricism here; Enesco&#8217;s own adoration for the<br />
sweet fragrance of Gabriel Faure&#8217;s songs is easy to detect.<br />
The music is dense and difficult; it would be hard to imagine a major opera<br />
house taking it on, yet a major house would be needed for the opera&#8217;s extreme<br />
difficulty. At least there is this recording, and it casts a magnificent<br />
shadow.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/06/sunday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KREMER</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/05/kremer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/05/kremer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The season winds down, but happily. Tuesday night&#8217;s concert at Royce Hall was, indeed, a most happy and vital occasion: challenging, joyous and rewarding. Gidon Kremer is an old friend; he has performed here as violin soloist with the Philharmonic, as recitalist on his own, and as a chamber player. Tuesday&#8217;s program was none of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The season winds down, but happily. Tuesday night&#8217;s concert at Royce Hall was,<br />
indeed, a most happy and vital occasion: challenging, joyous and<br />
rewarding.<br />
Gidon Kremer is an old friend; he has performed here as violin soloist with the<br />
Philharmonic, as recitalist on his own, and as a chamber player. Tuesday&#8217;s<br />
program was none of the above; it had Kremer sharing the stage with another<br />
violinist, nothing more. The other violinist, new to these parts, was none<br />
other than Tatyana Grindenko. At one time she and Kremer were married, raising<br />
a family in Moscow. Then he defected from both home and homeland, and found new<br />
worlds and new wives in other lands. Grindenko, meanwhile, won a few prizes and<br />
amassed a career on her own. Now, with glasnost, she is beginning to earn a<br />
worldwide reputation.<br />
Well she might; she&#8217;s an exciting performer, eloquent and gifted with a<br />
dazzling technique. She made her way into a killer piece by Luciano Berio, the<br />
&#8220;Sequenza VIII&#8221; for solo violin, snapped a string, fixed it and began the<br />
whole work over again &#8212; an evening&#8217;s toil in itself for most violinists.<br />
On his own, Kremer delivered a stupendous reading of the Bach Chaconne, the<br />
only really familiar work on the program. He also took on six rather sweet<br />
little Zodiac-inspired pieces by Stockhausen (the same music we heard when the<br />
EAR Unit did his &#8220;Belly Music&#8221; a couple of months ago).<br />
Together (Kremer plus Kremer, if a note of cuteness may intrude) the pair<br />
played some truly fascinating music. First came a strange duet piece by the<br />
late Luigi Nono, Italy&#8217;s great political and musical rebel &#8212; his last work,<br />
entitled &#8220;We must go forth.&#8221; LIke most of Nono, this was a piece as much<br />
theatrical as musical; the performers circle one another like slow-moving<br />
panthers, coming to rest and playing some music off at the edge of audibility,<br />
then moving on again. Irritating? Hypnotic? Nono had a way of being both.<br />
Finally came the Prokofiev Two-Violin Sonata of 1932, and where has it been all<br />
our lives? Wonderful music, this, from Prokofiev&#8217;s most robust period: four<br />
tiny, terse movements full of charm, wisdom and, in the scherzo, some<br />
enchanting arrogance. Violinist and violinist {cq} joined forces as one, in a<br />
performance that came across as nothing less than a revelation. For dessert<br />
there was a delicious ham sandwich, a pastiche of various romantic composers&#8217;<br />
treatment of the famous &#8220;Carnival in Venice&#8221; tune, hilariously tossed off<br />
with a hilarious larger-than-life delivery to send happily homeward a loving<br />
but undersized crowd.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/05/kremer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PIRATES</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/05/pirates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/05/pirates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In its 14 years of presenting the joys of the Gilbert and Sullivan repertory in unalloyed, untampered estate, Richard Sheldon&#8217;s Opera a la Carte has racked up an impressive string of triumphant productions. It would be hard to imagine, even so, a performance of more consistent delight than the company&#8217;s &#8220;Pirates of Penzance&#8221; given this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its 14 years of presenting the joys of the Gilbert and Sullivan repertory in<br />
unalloyed, untampered estate, Richard Sheldon&#8217;s Opera a la Carte has racked up<br />
an impressive string of triumphant productions. It would be hard to imagine,<br />
even so, a performance of more consistent delight than the company&#8217;s &#8220;Pirates<br />
of Penzance&#8221; given this past Saturday night and Sunday afternoon before<br />
capacity crowds at Ambassador Auditorium.<br />
At a time when some producers feel the need to update these wise and witty<br />
Victorian treasures with modern settings or revisionist jokesmanship, Sheldon&#8217;s<br />
company remains steadfast in its belief that the authors knew best. Without any<br />
sense of merely ransacking some museum of bygone mannerisms, Sheldon&#8217;s stage<br />
direction has always been directly descended from the comic routines of the<br />
works&#8217; own times.<br />
Better yet, he also clings to pristine orchestrations and full-length musical<br />
numbers. Frank Fetta&#8217;s pit band for this &#8220;Pirates&#8221; may have been undersized,<br />
but the sounds &#8212; the marvelous Mendelssohnian wind scoring in particular &#8211;<br />
had the ring of authenticity. Above all, Sheldon&#8217;s company honors the most<br />
important of all Gilbert-and-Sullivan rubrics, the demand for crisp, flawless<br />
English diction. (Some well-placed floor-level microphones also helped<br />
immeasurably, of course.)<br />
So did the performance itself, an unusually strong and consistent cast this<br />
time around, with a superb pair of lovers in Patrick Gallagher and Lova Lee<br />
Hyatt and, of course, the redoutable Sheldon himself as the nimble-tongued<br />
Major General. Joining them as welcome guest was the grandiose veteran of G&#038;S<br />
performances on two continents, the d&#8217;Oyly Carte veteran Donald Adams, whose<br />
Pirate King is simply one of the great creations in any kind of musical theater<br />
these days. Among the day&#8217;s veterans, a low bow is also due the magnificent<br />
Eugenia Hamilton, who has done the repertory &#8220;heavies&#8221;&#8211; the nursemaid Ruth,<br />
this time &#8212; with the company since its founding.<br />
This, then, is a company to cherish, not only for its own work but also for its<br />
missionary services in keeping this marvelous repertory alive. (Sheldon, for<br />
example, has just been appointed artistic director of the Colorado Gilbert and<br />
Sullivan Festival at Boulder this summer.) For this, and for one of the<br />
season&#8217;s most delightful afternoons, &#8220;three cheers and one cheer more&#8221;  are<br />
very much in order.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/05/pirates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/05/lapo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/05/lapo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And so the Philharmonic season ended, not with a whimper but with several bangs. The final subscription concert, Thursday night at the Music Center, drew only a small crowd; perhaps anything would be an anticlimax after the Salonen weeks. Those who showed up were well rewarded, however. John Nelson was the conductor, replacing the scheduled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And so the Philharmonic season ended, not with a whimper but with several bangs.<br />
The final subscription concert, Thursday night at the Music Center, drew only a<br />
small crowd; perhaps anything would be an anticlimax after the Salonen weeks.<br />
Those who showed up were well rewarded, however.<br />
John Nelson was the conductor, replacing the scheduled Neeme Jarvi; Peter<br />
Frankl was the soloist, replacing the scheduled Zoltan Kocsis. The program<br />
began with Charles Ives&#8217; &#8220;The Unanswered Question,&#8221; replacing the scheduled<br />
work by Eduard Tubin. Otherwise, there was the Bartok Second Piano Concerto and<br />
the Dvorak Sixth Symphony, as scheduled.<br />
Nelson, an old friend from the Cabrillo Festival as well as several Hollywood<br />
Bowl appearances, is a practiced hand with an orchestra. Still, whoever dreamed<br />
up the Ives as a concert opener must live on another planet. Four flutes<br />
constituted the stage contingent; a small string ensemble played, pianissimo,<br />
backstage; solo trumpeter Donald Green was somewhere in the loges &#8212; all<br />
according to Ives&#8217; plan in this haunting, nocturnal essay.<br />
Yes, but&#8230; It took at least a minute, out of the work&#8217;s total of five, for the<br />
people out front to realize the music had begun. The ushers slammed doors shut<br />
during the music; the audience made the noises that Thursday night subscription<br />
audiences usually make. This was listed as the work&#8217;s first hearing at a<br />
Philharmonic concert, but it remains unheard.<br />
Peter Frankl&#8217;s stunning traversal of the Bartok was thoroughly audible,<br />
however: a big, rawboned, dazzling performance of some of the most difficult<br />
piano music on this planet. What a work this is: the slithery, shimmering<br />
scoring in the quiet moments, the thrilling moments when piano and orchestra<br />
are transformed into some kind of super-drum. This performance was worthy of<br />
the music, and then some.<br />
Then came the delicious, rambunctious, lovable Dvorak, the perfect symphony for<br />
a May evening. Elliott Carter once wrote of &#8220;Dvorak fans&#8221; as the &#8220;little<br />
folk in the hills,&#8221; and Carter can go climb a tree. There is a special<br />
grandeur in this music; it takes patience (especially as Nelson chose to<br />
observe each and every one of the optional repeats) and it rewards patience.<br />
Nelson was inspired to allot an extra mini-second or two to give the grand,<br />
discursive themes plenty of breathing space, and it all worked. A lovely<br />
ending, to a mostly splendid season.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/05/lapo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BSO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/bso/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/bso/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The performers&#8217; parts for Bartok&#8217;s Concerto for Orchestra, on the Boston Symphony Orchestra&#8217;s music stands at the Music Center on Tuesday night, were yellowed with respectable old age. They&#8217;re entitled; this was the orchestra, after all, that gave the work its world premiere, on November 30, 1944, before these very ears. (They then belonged to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The performers&#8217; parts for Bartok&#8217;s Concerto for Orchestra, on the Boston<br />
Symphony Orchestra&#8217;s music stands at the Music Center on Tuesday night, were<br />
yellowed with respectable old age. They&#8217;re entitled; this was the orchestra,<br />
after all, that gave the work its world premiere, on November 30, 1944, before<br />
these very ears. (They then belonged to a second-balcony usher at Boston&#8217;s<br />
Symphony Hall.)<br />
To those ears, however, the historic relationship between the Boston Symphony<br />
and Bartok&#8217;s autumnal masterwork has fallen on poor days. Under Seiji Ozawa&#8217;s<br />
flamboyant but flippant direction the other night, Bartok&#8217;s exploration into<br />
the personality of a great symphony ended up as merely an essay on how well the<br />
Boston Symphony can perform. It was a performance that laid bare the subtle but<br />
crucial difference between music-making and mere playing and came down,<br />
unfortunately, on the wrong side.<br />
The Boston Symphony plays very well, and always has. Its strings, even in an<br />
unfamiliar and untried acoustical setting, have a burnished lustre superior to<br />
the sound of any other American string section. Its winds are mellow virtuosi;<br />
its brass can blow you out of your seat. And all of this has been known to come<br />
together, now and then during the 18 years of Ozawa&#8217;s stewardship, in some<br />
performances beyond reproach.<br />
But Tuesday&#8217;s concert was the work of a tired orchestra under the command of a<br />
leader in a rampaging mood. He led the orchestra on a cold-hearted dash through<br />
Beethoven&#8217;s Eighth Symphony, with a few moments most accurately described as<br />
vulgar. He gave the Bartok no warmth of feeling, no regard for the rich humor<br />
of the work. He did somewhat better with the dear, lightweight &#8220;Semiramide&#8221;<br />
Overture of Rossini, in which the woodwinds chirped most engagingly and the<br />
music took on something close to a sense of spirit and momentum.<br />
But those last were exactly the qualities lacking in the rest of the concert.<br />
It&#8217;s seldom realistic to judge any orchestra on tour, especially when the<br />
realities of touring don&#8217;t allow for proper testing of a hall&#8217;s acoustic before<br />
concert time. But there were signs, even so, that the Boston Symphony is not,<br />
these days, in pristine shape &#8212; a temporary affliction, let us pray. 30.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/bso/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LEIPZIG</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/leipzig/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/leipzig/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mention the Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra, and good vibrations arise. Here is a musical organization whose very name suggests longevity (210 years, in fact), distinguished bloodlines (Felix Mendelssohn was one of its conductors) and adherence to solid, middle-class virtues. (The Gewandhaus was the home of Leipzig&#8217;s fabric merchants, and it once housed a concert hall as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mention the Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra, and good vibrations arise. Here is a<br />
musical organization whose very name suggests longevity (210 years, in fact),<br />
distinguished bloodlines (Felix Mendelssohn was one of its conductors) and<br />
adherence to solid, middle-class virtues. (The Gewandhaus was the home of<br />
Leipzig&#8217;s fabric merchants, and it once housed a concert hall as well.)<br />
Current conditions bear out these virtues. Kurt Masur, its conductor for the<br />
past 21 years, is known for his solid, middle-of-the-road recordings of the<br />
most respected classical masters. Inevitably, he has recorded the Beethoven<br />
Nine, and these performances are correct as correct can be. On top of all that,<br />
he cuts a handsome figure, conducts most of his repertory from memory, and<br />
gives off a most statesmanlike aura. New York, of whose Philharmonic he is<br />
conductor-designate, will gobble him up after its years with the erratic Zubin.<br />
&#8220;Erratic&#8221; and Kurt Masur are strangers to one another.<br />
That being so, this report on Tuesday&#8217;s concert at the Music Center, the second<br />
of three appearances by Masur and his orchestra in our midst these past few<br />
days, ought to give off clouds of praise. It cannot, however. It wasn&#8217;t an<br />
awful concert, just a dull one. Drowning as we are in the surfeit of Prokofiev<br />
in this 100th birthday year, did we need another round of &#8220;Romeo and Juliet&#8221;<br />
cuttings? Masur&#8217;s half-a-program&#8217;s-worth of excerpts may have included material<br />
left out of the usual suites, but his orchestra&#8217;s strings were no match for the<br />
passionate declamation of this ballet&#8217;s great moments. The music simply did not<br />
dance.<br />
The evening&#8217;s novelty, at least in name, was Hans Werner Henze&#8217;s &#8220;Seven Love<br />
Songs,&#8221; a kind of anti-concerto for solo cello and large orchestra, its<br />
inspiration drawn from English poems which, however, the composer declines to<br />
name. There is nothing in it less than proficient. The orchestral palette is<br />
vast, although sometimes to the point of overpowering the soloist. The style is<br />
basic Henze: an eclectic mix, some Stravinsky, some merely generic-trendy-mod.<br />
Henze&#8217;s stage works are brilliant, teeming with personality, even personal<br />
rage. The blandness of this orchestral work, despite the eloquent pleading of<br />
cellist Jurnjakob Timm and the orchestra, make it all the clearer that Henze&#8217;s<br />
music is at its happiest when built around a text.<br />
All this faceless music should have made the final work, Strauss&#8217; perennial<br />
&#8220;Till Eulenspiegel,&#8221; more than usually welcome. But where was the humor in<br />
the work, the scamper, the blowsy tongue-in-cheek vulgarity? The performance<br />
was merely careful. Even the solo horn sounded timid. Yet the crowd cheered on<br />
and on, and for their trouble they got a reprise of the last moments of<br />
&#8220;Till,&#8221; torn bleeding out of context. Is that any way to treat a tone<br />
poem?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/leipzig/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MEC</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/mec/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/mec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were only two people on the stage, and not many more in the audience, for this week&#8217;s Monday Evening Concert at the County Museum. The concert was extraordinary even so, a reunion with one of the most remarkable musical minds of our time. Gyorgy Kurtag is reasonably well known among the new-music crowd. Five [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were only two people on the stage, and not many more in the audience, for<br />
this week&#8217;s Monday Evening Concert at the County Museum. The concert was<br />
extraordinary even so, a reunion with one of the most remarkable musical minds<br />
of our time.<br />
Gyorgy Kurtag is reasonably well known among the new-music crowd. Five years<br />
ago he made his first, and so far only, American appearance, as composer in<br />
residence at the 1986 Ojai Festival. The lucky audiences there encountered a<br />
shy, soft-spoken Hungarian gentleman in his early 60s. Better yet, they<br />
encountered the richness, the robust iconoclasm of his music, especially his<br />
song-cycle &#8220;Messages of R.V. Troussova,&#8221; which Susan Narucki sang<br />
magnificently.<br />
Monday&#8217;s concert was all one piece, Kurtag&#8217;s hour-long song-cycle &#8220;Kafka<br />
Fragments,&#8221; and the remarkable Susan Narucki was again the singer, joined by<br />
the equally remarkable Bay Area violinist Roy Malan. One song-cycle, 40 songs<br />
(mostly extremely brief or, better said, compressed), one singer, one<br />
violinist: that&#8217;s all it took for a powerful, fulfilling musical experience, as<br />
much so as any of this season&#8217;s offerings at the Museum. That, in this<br />
rewarding season, is saying a lot.<br />
Kurtag&#8217;s texts are drawn from Kafka&#8217;s diaries and letters, fragmentary<br />
impressions, sometimes just two or three words of stabbing eloquence. Around<br />
these texts Kurtag weaves his two voices: the singer explicitly tied to the<br />
texts, the violinist soaring on flights of fantasy inspired by the texts. Some<br />
moments are overtly pictorial: the shrieking of birds, the undulating crawling<br />
of snakes, a fiddler on a tramcar. Now and then the sharp-eared might detect a<br />
reference to the work of Kurtag&#8217;s great countryman, Bela Bartok.<br />
Kurtag does not flinch at wandering into exotic harmonic effects: quarter-<br />
tones, a violin deliberately mistuned. You come away aware, not so much of the<br />
juncture of composer, singer and instrumentalist, but of a oneness in which the<br />
separate voices transcend themselves. &#8220;Kafka Fragments&#8221; is one of those rare<br />
works, like the late Beethoven quartets, where the listener&#8217;s imagination is<br />
teased to fill in around the sparseness of the music. Without stretching a<br />
point, hearing this music in the capable care of these musicians became a<br />
cleansing experience. Some sixty rapt listeners, adrift in an auditorium with<br />
room for ten times as many, mustered a fine sendoff at the end. But where were<br />
you?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/mec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EAR&#160;UNIT</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/ear-unit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/ear-unit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suddenly, there are Estonian composers where there were none before. The past few years have seen the emergence of Estonia’s Arvo Part, whose quiet, mystical compositions have won a large following. As Wednesday night&#8217;s County Museum concert by the California EAR Unit suggested, Part is not the only man of his country worth our attention. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suddenly, there are Estonian composers where there were none before. The past<br />
few years have seen the emergence of  Estonia’s Arvo Part, whose quiet,<br />
mystical compositions have won a large following. As Wednesday night&#8217;s County<br />
Museum concert by the California EAR Unit suggested, Part is not the only man<br />
of his country worth our attention.<br />
The concert included Part&#8217;s best-known work, &#8220;Fratres,&#8221; an 11-minute, slowly<br />
unfolding exploration of a single fragment of melody, repeated over and over<br />
with a rhapsodic line taking flight above it. The work exists in many scorings;<br />
here it has also been played by the Philharmonic and by the Kronos Quartet. At<br />
the EAR Unit concert the performers were violinist Robin Lorentz and pianist<br />
Vicki Ray. In any scoring, the work exerts its magic.<br />
So did the evening&#8217;s other Estonian work, Errki-Sven Tuur&#8217;s [*] yes that&#8217;s the<br />
way it&#8217;s spelled [F/L] &#8220;Architectonics III,&#8221; subtitled &#8220;Post Meta-minimal<br />
Dream.&#8221; Unlike his countryman Part, who has emigrated to the West, Tuur (born<br />
in 1959) remains in Estonia. &#8220;Architectonics III&#8221; is a striking work, 15-or-<br />
so minutes of dazzling instrumental writing,  somewhat touched by the style of<br />
American minimalism, but also rhapsodic in a way that reveals the composer&#8217;s<br />
exotic origins. Cold, glistening and exhilarating, the work nurtures a<br />
listener&#8217;s desire to hear more from this remarkable composer.<br />
The Estonian works were the program highlights; a thoroughly American work,<br />
Michael McCandless&#8217; &#8220;Against Nature&#8221; was not far behind. A charter member of<br />
the EAR Unit at its founding in 1980, McCandless has since defected to the New<br />
York area. His work, claims descent from &#8220;Against the Grain,&#8221; the famous<br />
Huysmanns novel about non-conformity, and it might even be that the form of<br />
this work &#8212; in which a long lyric line for clarinet seems to thread its way<br />
through opposing forces from the rest of the ensemble &#8212; owes something to the<br />
book.<br />
That possibility aside, this is an attractive piece, strong and compelling. An<br />
editor&#8217;s hand might help near the end; the composer seems to pass through a<br />
number of logical stopping-places before finding the one that suits his fancy.<br />
But the music was tidiness personified compared to the two other works on the<br />
program: Greg Fish&#8217;s garrulous, unmannered &#8220;The Powers that Be,&#8221; and Mary C.<br />
Wright&#8217;s self-consciously jazzy &#8220;He Don&#8217;t Care.&#8221;<br />
Win a few lose a few; the collective skills of this attractive group of young<br />
new-music wizards is, and was, never less than rewarding.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/ear-unit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ARDITTI</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/arditti/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/arditti/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ardittis have done it again.Miracle workers in the cause of contemporary music, master musicians unafraid, the London-based Arditti Quartet came to town once again on Tuesday night, drawing a large (but not capacity) crowd to USC&#8217;s Bovard Auditorium, taking on a fearsome program and&#8230; Well, let&#8217;s pause there. Even the Ardittis&#8217; splendid performance fell [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ardittis have done it again.Miracle workers in the cause of contemporary music, master musicians unafraid,<br />
the London-based Arditti Quartet came to town once again on Tuesday night,<br />
drawing a large (but not capacity) crowd to USC&#8217;s Bovard Auditorium, taking on<br />
a fearsome program and&#8230;<br />
Well, let&#8217;s pause there. Even the Ardittis&#8217; splendid performance fell short of<br />
transforming the Fourth Quartet of Elliott Carter into a silk purse, because it<br />
simply cannot be done. Faced with all that desiccated note-spinning, the dense<br />
clusters of notes pushed around on page after page with no apparent reason or<br />
destination, the Ardittis at least succeeded in turning the whole dreary<br />
exercise into a stupendous study in pure momentum. That much, on its own, was<br />
exhilarating.<br />
The Carter Quartet, and the Fifth Quartet of Bela Bartok, were the evening&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;classics.&#8221; One of the Ardittis&#8217; noble deeds, however, is to perform music by<br />
local composers at many of their tour stops; they can apparently produce<br />
handsome performances virtually at sight.<br />
And so Tuesday&#8217;s program was pieced out with local works: Donald Crockett&#8217;s<br />
1987 &#8220;Array&#8221; (which the Kronos Quartet also has played) and Stephen Cohn&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Eye of Chaos,&#8221; the latter in its world premiere. Both composers were born in<br />
1951; Crockett is on the USC faculty, and Cohn is the vice-president of ICA<br />
(the Independent Composers Association) which sponsored the program. Wheels<br />
within wheels, you might say.<br />
Neither score suggested itself as permanent repertory material for even the<br />
most liberal-minded of performing groups, but the Crockett &#8212; 20 minutes or so<br />
of carefully worked-out musical patterning with a fine academic hand at<br />
dissonant counterpoint &#8212; was at least the work of a competent craftsman. Cohn,<br />
a successful composer of film and TV scores, has pathetically overvalued his<br />
own limited talents, producing music of the consistency of tepid mush, loaded<br />
down with a sorry collection of worn-out cliches. Its position on the program,<br />
after the Carter, should have saved it if anything could. Nothing could.<br />
That left the grand, pulsating Bartok to bring about the evening&#8217;s one melding<br />
of high performance and music worth the effort. What a work: sizzling, icy,<br />
deeply mysterious in its nocturnal passages, hilarious in its tiny bit of nose-<br />
tweaking at the end. And what a performance! Here, finally, the amazing<br />
Ardittis rode to glory in a vehicle worthy of their efforts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/arditti/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SANTA&#160;CLARITA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/santa-clarita/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/santa-clarita/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a few hours last Saturday morning and early afternoon, the center of Los Angeles&#8217; musical life shifted northward from its usual downtown location to some dusty, sunbaked real estate in the Santa Clarita Valley. The occasion was &#8220;A Day in the Old West,&#8221;organized by the indefatigable MaryAnn Bonino as an event in her &#8220;Chamber [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a few hours last Saturday morning and early afternoon, the center of Los<br />
Angeles&#8217; musical life shifted northward from its usual downtown location to<br />
some dusty, sunbaked real estate in the Santa Clarita Valley. The occasion was<br />
&#8220;A Day in the Old West,&#8221;organized by the indefatigable MaryAnn Bonino as an<br />
event in her &#8220;Chamber Music in Historic Sites&#8221; series.<br />
The sites were nothing if not historic. In the morning the splendid local<br />
group, the Santa Clarita Chamber Players, performed in the ancient (1887)<br />
Saugus train station (moved from its original location but handsomely<br />
restored). In the afternoon there was an old-fashioned outdoor brass concert in<br />
the vast (and unrestored) ruins of Melody Ranch, Gene Autry&#8217;s old stamping<br />
ground, in Placerita Canyon.<br />
In between, there were the opportunities to ramble through other local<br />
landmarks, including the one-time estate of another Western movie star, William<br />
S. Hart, which now stands as a museum at the center of Hart Park in Saugus.<br />
Ticket-holders were also furnished with a box lunch.<br />
If this sounds like a happy, folksy outing, that&#8217;s pretty much what it was. The<br />
Chamber Players&#8217; concert did, to be sure, have its challenging side, including<br />
a handsome set of songs by Ralph Vaughan Williams on William Blake texts,<br />
scored for soprano and oboe and nicely performed by Maurita Phillips-Thornburgh<br />
and Alan Vogel. Works by Haydn, Friedemann Bach and Villa-Lobos made up the<br />
rest of the rewarding program.<br />
The afternoon program made up for all that seriousness, however. The occasion<br />
was folksy as all get-out, with the Da Camera Brass Quintet struggling to<br />
protect their sheet music against the stiff breezes (some colorful clothespins<br />
helped) and struggling less happily against the demands in a set of perky<br />
little nose-thumbing marches by Charles Ives and a few Scott Joplin rags. The<br />
crowd seemed happy, however. If nothing else, the afternoon afforded the crowd<br />
of 150-or-so the chance for a start on this season&#8217;s suntans.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/santa-clarita/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/lapo-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/lapo-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were many empty seats at the Music Center at the start of Thursday night&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic concert, and many more after intermission. The sounds of electronic beepers and the squeal of moribund hearing aids rang out in the vast spaces. Even after 250 years, the three-hour-plus bulk of Bach&#8217;s &#8220;St. Matthew Passion&#8221; is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were many empty seats at the Music Center at the start of Thursday night&#8217;s  Los Angeles Philharmonic concert, and many more after intermission. The sounds  of electronic beepers and the squeal of moribund hearing aids rang out in the  vast spaces. Even after 250 years, the three-hour-plus bulk of Bach&#8217;s &#8220;St.  Matthew Passion&#8221; is  an intimidating presence. In all frankness, the work is a strange presence as a subscription event at a  series mostly dedicated to noisy romantic symphonies. (It was even more out of  place at the Hollywood Bowl in the summer of 1985, when the haunting moment  describing the death of Jesus was punctuated by a car alarm.) Yet the nature of  the work, its hold on the emotions of any listener willing to give in to its  splendors, demands some kind of hearing in some kind of context. Peter Schreier, who conducted this week&#8217;s performances (repeated tonight at the  Orange County Performing Arts Center and Sunday afternoon at the Music Center)  has dreamed up his own manner of presentation, and for the most part it worked;  when it didn&#8217;t, on Thursday night, the fault was not his. Schreier is, of course, better known as singer than conductor; he can only  conduct, he said recently, music that he also sings. The idea of combining the  role of Bach&#8217;s Evangelist with conducting makes a great deal of sense,  furthermore, since his is the central role in the work, and his own vocal lines  tend to activate most of the music&#8217;s other elements.  To make this work, Schreier has fashioned his view of the Evangelist&#8217;s music  around a highly emotional delivery. He breaks through the mask of stylized  Baroque singing. He erupts in anger and scorn at the lies and corruptions of  those who have sent Jesus to the Cross; he melts in agony as he tells of  Peter&#8217;s threefold betrayal. His Jesus  was the marvelous young bass Olaf Baer,  known chiefly for his splendid artsong recordings. The heartbreaking  vulnerability of Baer&#8217;s delivery became the perfect balance to the intensity of  Schreier&#8217;s conception.  If only the other soloists had been up to this level! Memories of bygone  Elisabeth Schumann, Janet Baker or Kathleen Ferrier recordings reflected no  glory on the thin, pinched singing of soprano Ulrika Sonntag and contralto  Elisabeth von Magnus. It was even more depressing to experience the watery  singing of the tenor and bass arias by David Gordon and David Evitts, standing  next to the singers &#8212; Schreier and Baer &#8212; who could have sent this music  heavenward.It was, then, a only a fair representation of a work deserving far better. The  Philharmonic&#8217;s forces performed well, as did a small contingent from the Master  Chorale. The Paulist Boy Choristers, who sang the chorale that floats across  the top of the amazing opening chorus, could barely be heard &#8212; the fault, most  likely, of the curious stage arrangement to allow Schreier some eyeball contact  with singers and orchestra, while singing toward the front.Oh well, it was a noble idea that almost worked. Sibelius next week; back, alas,  to normalcy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/lapo-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PAN</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/pan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/pan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I HAVE ART, ONE VERTICAL; WILL BRING IN THURSDAY A.M. [F/L]The music at Wednesday night&#8217;s concert by Ensemble P.A.N. (&#8220;Project Ars Nova&#8221;) may have been old in years, but it was thoroughly modern in spirit. It was, if anything. fairly aflame with the energy of its own innovation. This splendid ensemble. five singers and performers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HAVE ART, ONE VERTICAL; WILL BRING IN THURSDAY A.M. [F/L]The music at Wednesday night&#8217;s concert by Ensemble P.A.N. (&#8220;Project Ars Nova&#8221;)<br />
may have been old in years, but it was thoroughly modern in spirit. It was, if<br />
anything. fairly aflame with the energy of its own innovation.<br />
This splendid ensemble. five singers and performers on instruments proper to<br />
the Middle Ages and Renaissance, takes its name from a period of great change<br />
in musical history, the &#8220;New Art&#8221; of the 14th and early 15th century.<br />
Wednesday&#8217;s concert, of the County Museum&#8217;s low-priced Bing series, consisted<br />
of a joyous romp over about a century of musical progress: vocal works both<br />
sacred and secular, dances and instrumental versions of vocal pieces.<br />
Naturally, we have to hear this music from a historical perspective. What<br />
sounded strange and somewhat mannered in music of the Flemish Johannes Ciconia<br />
(circa 1335-1411) was actually the work of one of the earliest contrapuntal<br />
composers, working his colorful combinations of harmony and rhythm at a time<br />
when virtually every new composition was a step into unexplored territory. Yet<br />
this music &#8212; the motets and lovesongs, songs of celebration and warfare &#8211;<br />
cannot be reckoned as primitive. It is highly developed, remarkably complex at<br />
times, a likely forerunner in its intricacies of the manneristic painting of<br />
two centuries later. It works best today, when heard by fresh ears free of too<br />
much information about later musical developments.<br />
Heard on its own, with the group&#8217;s splendid performance manner that, rightly,<br />
perceived no harm in an occasional slowing-down of the pace, even a<br />
&#8220;romantic&#8221; enhancement now and then of a particularly loving phrase, the<br />
music sounded vivid, and timeless as well. In style, the program ranged from<br />
the early mannerisms of Ciconia and his contemporaries, to the truly &#8220;modern&#8221;<br />
music of Guillaume Dufay (1397-1474) in which rhythms and harmonies become<br />
&#8220;ironed out&#8221; to approach a style closer to our contemporary concert<br />
experience.<br />
Ensemble P.A.N. was founded in 1980 in Switzerland; its members are currently<br />
scattered from Basel to Boston, coming together for occasional concert tours<br />
and recordings (on the New Albion label). Their recordings so far &#8212; one of<br />
secular music and one of music from a remarkable manuscript from the island of<br />
Cyprus &#8212; were enough to draw a near-capacity crowd to the museum.<br />
The presentation had its flaws; it didn&#8217;t occur to anyone until after the<br />
intermission that there might be an incompatibility between furnishing printed<br />
song-texts and turning the lights so low that they couldn&#8217;t be read. And midway<br />
in the second half, one misguided listener wrecked the beautiful mood of the<br />
musical flow by loudly demanding further program information from the<br />
performers, then and there. It was, therefore, a better night for musical mannerism than for concert<br />
manners. In any case, Ensemble P.A.N. deserves a R.A.V.E.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/pan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COSI</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/cosi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/cosi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like the shock waves streaming from Dr. Mesmer&#8217;s magnets that figure in its dizzy plotline, Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Cosi fan tutte&#8221; seems to have had a revitalizing effect on the Music Center Opera. The production, cheered to the rafters at its first performance on Monday night, represented enlightened opera at fairly close to its best: stimulating, controversial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the shock waves streaming from Dr. Mesmer&#8217;s magnets that figure in its<br />
dizzy plotline, Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Cosi fan tutte&#8221; seems to have had a revitalizing<br />
effect on the Music Center Opera. The production, cheered to the rafters at its<br />
first performance on Monday night, represented enlightened opera at fairly<br />
close to its best: stimulating, controversial and, for the most part,<br />
beguiling. Four more performances of the opera are scheduled; any or all of<br />
them are very much worth your while.<br />
Sir Peter Hall created the production for the company in 1988, with his then<br />
wife, Maria Ewing, as an alluring but grossly overdirected Dorabella. The Halls<br />
have since divorced, and neither were on hand for this revival; Stephen Lawless<br />
is credited with the updated staging, vastly different in tone, superior in<br />
many respects, and definitely challenging. There is an unseen hand involved<br />
here, as well: the hand of Peter Sellars, whose revisionist &#8220;Cosi,&#8221; seen on<br />
television earlier this year, has made it virtually impossible to return to the<br />
standard regard of the work as artificial, mannered comedy.<br />
Perhaps Stephen Lawless has actually arrived at his view of &#8220;Cosi&#8221; free of<br />
outside influences; that doesn&#8217;t matter. What does matter is the powerful,<br />
truly dramatic tone he has achieved, in which the comedy of artifice and the<br />
tragedy of deception and betrayal play equal roles. Conductor Randall Behr<br />
must, of course, also be reckoned in these credits, since his altogether<br />
original pacing of the score contributes much to the intensity of the<br />
experience.<br />
The result, to be sure, won&#8217;t be everybody&#8217;s &#8220;Cosi.&#8221; For one thing, every<br />
scrap of music that Mozart wrote for the first or subsequent performances,<br />
minus one short aria which he later replaced with a better long one, has been<br />
restored: arias, ensembles and long stretches of recitative as well, music<br />
usually cut in live performances and even on records. Behr&#8217;s pacing allows for<br />
frequent long pauses (a Sellars trick as well) to give dramatic points plenty<br />
of time for fermentation. The result, between the pauses and the restorations,<br />
stretches the evening out to almost Wagnerian length; Monday&#8217;s performance came<br />
in mere moments short of four hours.<br />
Yet it was time well spent. The best news is that the six-member cast formed an<br />
acting unit beautifully in tune with the staging concept: Christine Weidinger&#8217;s<br />
violent, stupendously sung, sacred monster of a Fiordiligi, Jeanne Piland&#8217;s<br />
dear, dithering Dorabella, Anne Howells&#8217; deliciously frumpy Despina. (The<br />
supertitles quite properly step around the &#8220;girl of 15 years&#8221; line of Howells&#8217;<br />
big aria.) The male side of the cast was almost as fine: Rodney Gilfry&#8217;s first-<br />
ever Guglielmo was another step up by this splendid young baritone, and veteran<br />
Richard Stillwell&#8217;s Alfonso was, as expected, rock-solid. Only the Ferrando,<br />
Jonathan Mack, whose long and valuable career has now brought him to the point<br />
of strain, seemed in over his head.<br />
The music is there, and it is honorably treated. John Bury&#8217;s handsome,<br />
breakaway set leaves plenty of room for stagefuls of extraneous characters<br />
without any sense of clutter. And there are arias sung in the moonlight of the<br />
uncredited stage lighting that look almost as beautiful as they sound.<br />
Considering that the sound is by Mozart, that&#8217;s saying a lot.<br />
THE FACTS<br />
What: The Music Center Opera&#8217;s production of Mozart&#8217;s Cosi fan tutte.<br />
When: 7:30 p.m., Saturday, April 15 and 17; 1 p.m. April 20.<br />
Where: Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, 135 N. Grand Avenue, downtown L.A.<br />
Behind the scenes: Staged by Stephen Lawless, designed by John Bury, conducted<br />
by Randall Behr, with Christine Weidinger, Jeanne Piland, Anne Howells and<br />
Rodney Gilfry.<br />
Tickets: $15 to $80. Phone 213 480-3232 or 213 972-7211.<br />
Our rating: * * *</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/cosi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PART</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/part/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/part/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Music of a poignant beauty almost beyond the reach of mere words, achieved with means so simple that they, too, disappear in the telling: that was the essence of a most extraordinary concert on Wednesday night at Saint Basil&#8217;s Church in downtown Los Angeles. The performers were Paul Hillier&#8217;s newly formed ensemble called Theater of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Music of a poignant beauty almost beyond the reach of mere words, achieved with<br />
means so simple that they, too, disappear in the telling: that was the essence<br />
of a most extraordinary concert on Wednesday night at Saint Basil&#8217;s Church in<br />
downtown Los Angeles. The performers were Paul Hillier&#8217;s newly formed ensemble<br />
called Theater of Voices; the music, all of it, was by the Estonian-born Arvo<br />
Part, including the first American performance of his &#8220;Berlin Mass,&#8221; composed<br />
in and for that city last May.<br />
Part (pronounced &#8220;pairt&#8221;) has achieved a following through a small handful of<br />
recordings, many of them performed by his fellow Estonian Neeme Jarvi, or by<br />
Hillier. They cover a broad spectrum; a recording of his three symphonies, by<br />
Jarvi on the B-I-S label, shows the work of an ardent atonalist and a skilled<br />
handler of great gobs of orchestral violence. More recently, however, Part&#8217;s<br />
music has taken a turn toward the austere, with performing forces cut down to<br />
small instrumental or vocal groups. His &#8220;Passio,&#8221; a setting of the story of<br />
the Crucifixion, recorded by Hillier with his previous vocal group, the<br />
Hilliard Ensemble, is an hour of enthralling, quiet, slow-moving music of<br />
utmost emotional impact, seemingly hovering on the edge of silence.<br />
The music on Wednesday&#8217;s concert, including several short religious works, two<br />
brief organ solos, and the 25-minute Mass, was of like quality. Included among<br />
the short works were three  vocal pieces &#8212; in English, Latin and ancient<br />
Slavonic &#8212; so transparent in texture that the slightest change of harmony<br />
seemed cataclysmic. The Mass, of all the works, seemed to waver enchantingly<br />
between very old and very new styles. The simple word settings, mostly<br />
syllable-by-syllable, note-by-note, had some of the quality of old church<br />
hymns. But there were moments &#8212; the radiant, bell-like harmonies at the start<br />
of the &#8220;Gloria&#8221; linger in the memory &#8212; when all sense of time disappeared.<br />
This was music at its most elemental, stripped down to its central expressive<br />
core.<br />
An ensemble of four singers &#8212; the extraordinary soprano Pat Forbes, alto Mary<br />
Nichols, tenor Paul Agnew, baritone Hillier with Christopher Bowers-Broadbent<br />
on the small, clear St. Basils organ &#8212; was all Hillier needed to recreate the<br />
wonder of this strangely austere yet impassioned music.<br />
The church itself, with its Franco Assetto bas-reliefs of the Stations of the<br />
Cross that also, like the music, seem to bestride very old and very new art,<br />
was the perfect setting. Credit MaryAnn Bonino, once again, for her special<br />
skill, in these &#8220;Chamber Music in Historic Sites&#8221; concerts, to effect the<br />
ideal merging of sight and sound.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/part/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCHICKELE</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/schickele/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/schickele/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a feat of transformation worthy to stand beside the changeover from Superman to Clark Kent, the volcanic force behind the delights of P.D.Q. Bach on Monday night became, one night later, just plain Peter Schickele. The result: new realms of delight. Schickele, Swarthmore and Juilliard trained, had already made his name as a serious [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a feat of transformation worthy to stand beside the changeover from<br />
Superman to Clark Kent, the volcanic force behind the delights of P.D.Q. Bach<br />
on Monday night became, one night later, just plain Peter Schickele. The<br />
result: new realms of delight.<br />
Schickele, Swarthmore and Juilliard trained, had already made his name as a<br />
serious composer before the invention of the P.D.Q. mealticket in 1965. On<br />
Tuesday night in a small theater on the Brentwood campus of Mount Saint Mary&#8217;s,<br />
the Armadillo Quartet, a splendid local group of freelance musicians founded in<br />
1980, performed Schickele&#8217;s entire quartet repertory to<br />
and a piece called &#8220;Music for an Evening&#8221; for quartet and piano duet (with<br />
Schickele and Guy Hallman as pianists). Charming, modest music it was,full of<br />
bright, kicky energy.<br />
In defining his chosen musical style, Schickele would have to rank as a<br />
conservative. His music uses familiar harmonic progressions in familiar ways.<br />
It also dips into popular American idioms, including a kind of elementary jazz<br />
and a fair amount of bluegrass. It comes up, in most cases, with results that<br />
are thoroughly original.<br />
The works on Tuesday&#8217;s program were all fairly recent, the earliest dating from<br />
1982. One of the quartets, by the way, has been recorded, a work subtitled<br />
&#8220;American Dreams.&#8221; This, the first of the quartets, proved the most<br />
ingratiating. The middle movement, a long, slow evocation of a remembered<br />
birdcall at dawn in upstate New York, might fairly be thought of, in fact, as<br />
gorgeous. The other movements, including a set of jazz studies and a whole<br />
bluegrass movement, had their charms as well.<br />
If there are clear points of reference in this music, it seemed to point to the<br />
rustic, outwardly simple but profound music of Leos Janacek. That is meant as a<br />
compliment, by the way.<br />
The concert drew a small crowd, including both Schickele and P.D.Q. Bach<br />
groupies who had assembled in town because of Monday night&#8217;s P.D.Q. farewell.<br />
Bill Walters, who has served P.D.Q. Bach as stage manager since the start,<br />
noted that this was the first Schickele concert where he could sit out front<br />
with his wife.<br />
Schickele delivered some valuable insights in his spoken program notes. He<br />
made no effort to conceal the fact that has been the most apparent in all his<br />
work: that he is one of the world&#8217;s great spontaneous humorists, and an honest<br />
and attractive musician as well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/04/schickele/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PDQ</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/pdq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/pdq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The true believers already know the scene by heart.Monday night at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium, a few minutes past 8. A capacity crowd stirs in anticipation. The unitiated are a little restless, but the Believers know the order of events. A sleepy-eyed stage manager shuffles out, glowers at the crowd, blows into the microphone and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The true believers already know the scene by heart.Monday night at the Pasadena Civic Auditorium, a few minutes past 8. A capacity<br />
crowd stirs in anticipation. The unitiated are a little restless, but the<br />
Believers know the order of events. A sleepy-eyed stage manager shuffles out,<br />
glowers at the crowd, blows into the microphone and shuffles back. The<br />
Believers hiss and boo.<br />
The stage manager returns. Professor Schickele, he announces, has become lost.<br />
He was due here in Glendale long ago. (Glendale??? groan the uninitiated.) But<br />
now it looks as if we&#8217;ll have to canc&#8230;<br />
A hullabaloo in the lobby, a rush down the aisle. Times were when Peter<br />
Schickele, self-proclaimed Professor of Musicological Pathology at the<br />
University of Southern North Dakota at Hoople, discoverer of and amanuensis<br />
(sidekick, to you) to the ignoble P.D.Q. Bach (1807-1742), &#8220;last but least of<br />
J.S.Bach&#8217;s 20-odd children,&#8221; made his famous belated entrances down a high<br />
wire, but that was many years and many pounds ago. Now, at 55, he zoooooms down<br />
the aisle, his concert clothes half-on half-off, his huge yellow workman&#8217;s<br />
shoes flailing furiously, the image of a deranged Rasputin trying to look like<br />
Brahms.<br />
Will the concert now begin? Not quite. His breath regained, Schickele returns<br />
to the podium. &#8220;There&#8217;s a change in the program,&#8221; he announces. &#8220;May we have<br />
the house lights up, please?&#8221;<br />
He directs the audience&#8217;s attention to a certain line on a certain page. &#8220;You<br />
see that comma in the third line? Well, that has to be changed. It&#8217;s supposed<br />
to be a semi-colon.&#8221;<br />
Like every detail in these gloriously wise and antic P.D.Q. Bach outings,<br />
Schickele takes this matter of the typos very seriously. If you&#8217;d been<br />
backstage an hour before concert time, you&#8217;d have found Schickele and his crew,<br />
including the selfsame stage manager, Bill Walters, poring through the night&#8217;s<br />
printed program. &#8220;I&#8217;ve made it a point of honor,&#8221; he said in a phone<br />
conversation last week, &#8220;never to plant a typo in my own material, but to rely<br />
on the rest of the booklet.&#8221;<br />
Has he ever been unable to find one? &#8220;One time in San Francisco, we came<br />
close. In desperation, I started to check the printed list of San Francisco<br />
Symphony patrons. I saw one name, Macdonald, with a small d in the middle. Now<br />
I know you can spell it that way, but I had a hunch. Sure enough, after sending<br />
someone to the Symphony office to check, it turned out that it should have been<br />
a capital D. The day was saved!&#8221;<br />
And yet, with all that thrill of the chase, and the blessings that the antics<br />
of P. D. Q. Bach have bestowed on deliriously delighted audiences since that<br />
first joint appearance in Manhattan&#8217;s Town Hall in April, 1965, Schickele is<br />
about to retire his sterling creation. Monday&#8217;s concert will mark the finale of<br />
the collaboration, at least for now. &#8220;I&#8217;m not calling it a farewell tour,&#8221;<br />
said Schickele, &#8220;because the next step would be to call it the first annual<br />
farewell tour. I like the idea of indefinite sabbatical, instead.&#8221;<br />
The time and place for the grqnd finale are appropriate. Monday is, after all,<br />
April Fool&#8217;s Day, which P.D.Q. has, naturally, taken over as his birthday.<br />
Pasadena is equally appropriate. Jorge Mester, currently conductor of the<br />
Pasadena Symphony, was on the podium for P.D.Q.&#8217;s debut in 1965, and he will be<br />
on the podium for the finale as well.<br />
The auspices were favorable, at the birth of P.D.Q. Bach. After a time of<br />
musical wandering that included a stint as resident composer in the Los Angeles<br />
Public School system, Schickele ended up at the Juilliard School, &#8220;majoring in<br />
cafeteria.&#8221; Around a cafeteria table Schickele and some pals &#8212; including<br />
Mester and fellow composers Philip Glass and Richard Peaslee &#8212; swapped jokes<br />
and wisecracks and doodled some parodies on the more ludicrous aspects of<br />
strict musicology.<br />
Suddenly there was a repertory: a marvelous piece called &#8220;Quodlibet&#8221; which<br />
played off unlikely tune combinations (&#8220;Tea for Two&#8221; on top of the Beethoven<br />
Seventh Symphony, for example) and a &#8220;Concerto for Horn and Hardart&#8221; of which<br />
the name alone was hilarious enough. (Horn &#038; Hardart was the corporate name of<br />
the East Coast restaurant chain better known as Automats.) Schickele, whose<br />
personal musical gods always included both Mozart and Spike Jones, endowed his<br />
new creation with both influences in equal measure. Someone among his friends<br />
and relatives back home in Fargo, North Dakota, came up with the name of<br />
P.D.Q.; Schickele is no longer sure who it was.<br />
The Hardart, a glorious assemblage of noisemakers that would do a Rube Goldberg<br />
proud, was the stellar attraction at the first concert; where is it now?<br />
&#8220;Mostly, in my basement in Brooklyn,&#8221; said Schickele. &#8220;Unfortunately, it&#8217;s<br />
in pretty bad shape, because we&#8217;ve cannibalized many parts over the years. I<br />
don&#8217;t think we could rebuild it. That would mean finding a mixing bowl in A-<br />
flat, for example, or a toy wind-up owl in B-flat. They make those things out<br />
of plastic nowadays, and they don&#8217;t make music the way the old ones did.&#8221;<br />
No, you&#8217;ll never see the Hardart in a concert any more. After Monday night<br />
there&#8217;s not much chance, for that matter, of another virtuoso coming along who<br />
can match the virtuosity of the Schickele-P.D.Q. team on the Schlagenfrappe &#8211;<br />
a set of cardboard mailing tubes of various sizes played by bounding them off<br />
your head &#8212; or the Tuba Mirum (&#8220;mere tube), a length of hosepipe filled with<br />
wine.<br />
You&#8217;ll miss the live performances of the Cantata &#8220;Iphigenia in Brooklyn,&#8221;<br />
with its deathless line &#8220;only he who is running knows&#8221; followed by an aria<br />
based on just those last two words. Or the &#8220;Howdy&#8221; Symphony, P.D.Q.&#8217;s rebuff<br />
to Haydn&#8217;s &#8220;Farewell&#8221; Symphony. Or the &#8220;1712 Overture,&#8221; which puts &#8220;Yankee<br />
Doodle&#8221; through the same treatment that Tchaikovsky imposed on Russian<br />
folktunes in his &#8220;1812.&#8221; Or the grand oratorio &#8220;Oedipus Tex&#8221; or&#8230;<br />
We have it all on records, of course. What sets Schickele and his creation<br />
ahead of certain less responsible entertainers who dine well off the inherent<br />
inanities in classical music is this: he is musical, and he is honest.<br />
And after you&#8217;ve gone through the records, there is the video of P.D.Q.&#8217;s<br />
magnum opus (to date, anyhow), the opera &#8220;The Abduction of Figaro,&#8221; a<br />
superbly observed Mozartian pastiche (including characters named not only Papa<br />
Geno but also Mama Geno). Unperformed here since its 1984 premiere, the work is<br />
eminently worth any impresario&#8217;s attention<br />
If there is an archetypal figure behind the art of P.D.Q., it is Mozart<br />
himself, whose boyhood scores were full of the little cadential cliches that<br />
pop up sidewise in such P.D.Q. masterworks as the &#8220;Schleptet,&#8221; a brilliantly<br />
observed takeoff that has become a repertory piece on its own. Later in his own<br />
career, Mozart set down the music that clearly prophesied the coming of P.D.Q.<br />
Bach, the sextet known as &#8220;A Musical Joke,&#8221; which purposely and deliciously<br />
falls into exactly the same compositional traps that Schickele and his pal<br />
would dig anew two centuries later.<br />
And Schickele&#8217;s great accomplishment beyond the keenness of these musical<br />
observations is that he has emerged, through the smokescreen of musicology, as<br />
a superb entertainer. What we will miss, most of all, is that stupendous array<br />
of stage tricks. You could go to P.D.Q. Bach resolutely and proudly ignorant of<br />
Mozartian sonata form and Baroque oratorio mannerisms, and still have a<br />
marvelous evening of funny sounds and stage shenanigans. An enlightened society<br />
might have laws against the P.D.Q. Bach deprivation that Peter Schickele now<br />
threatens. He and his alter ego would, in such a society, be locked up, in<br />
adjacent padded cells.<br />
*   *   *   *   *<br />
&#8220;If I have one regret,&#8221; said Schickele, &#8220;it&#8217;s that I didn&#8217;t think up another<br />
funny name for myself &#8212; Walter Krankheit, perhaps &#8212; when I started with<br />
P.D.Q. Almost the same time as that first concert, a publisher brought out my<br />
first serious compositions under my own name. Inevitably, my serious stuff has<br />
been taken in some circles as the clown wanting to play Hamlet.&#8221;<br />
There is, in fact, a considerable and attractive repertory of authentic<br />
Schickele: a musical version of the old play &#8220;The Knight of the Burning<br />
Pestle,&#8221; large-scale pieces that pit rock or bluegrass bands against symphony<br />
orchestras, songs and chamber music, and the much-admired score to the sci-fi<br />
film classic &#8220;Silent Running.&#8221; The very next night after the P.D.Q. Bach<br />
farewell, in fact, April 2, Schickele appears as pianist, with the Armadillo<br />
String Quartet, in a program of his chamber music at Mount St. Mary&#8217;s College<br />
in Brentwood.<br />
And then? Schickele ticked off a larger-than-life agenda: a radio series to be<br />
called &#8220;Schickele Mix&#8221; (&#8220;a little bit of everything that happens to interest<br />
me at the moment&#8221;), a television series for children, a possible movie project<br />
on the life of P.D.Q. (Aha! There goes that sabbatical!), chamber concerts by<br />
&#8220;Peter Schickele and Friends&#8221; on a barge under the Brooklyn Bridge.<br />
Even if he wanted to, Hamlet isn&#8217;t going to have the time to play the clown.<br />
Not for a while, anyhow.<br />
SIDEBAR:<br />
&#8220;I&#8217;m not making this up, you know!&#8221; shrieks Anna Russell in the middle of her<br />
famous retelling of the story of Richard Wagner&#8217;s &#8220;Ring of the Nibelung,&#8221; at<br />
the point where the hero Siegfried meets the first woman he has ever seen who<br />
isn&#8217;t one of his aunts. The point, which Russell superbly establishes, is that<br />
you don&#8217;t have to make things up to extract music&#8217;s quotient of hilarity. All<br />
you have to do is to tell the truth &#8212; somewhat selectively, of course.<br />
Russell, London-born and now retired, enchanted audiences for years with the<br />
thrust and the wisdom of her musical observations. Her persona was the<br />
lecturer, with her talks garishly illustrated from the piano. Like Schickele,<br />
she was awesomely accurate in her parodies and pastiches: a whole Verdi opera<br />
based on &#8220;Hamlet,&#8221; a program of mock Schubert lieder (with the deathless<br />
observation that singers of German songs, like cheese, are only good when<br />
they&#8217;ve properly rotten).<br />
Russell&#8217;s records, taken from live performances and therefore sometimes<br />
blotted out by laughter and applause, are a priceless legacy &#8212; or would be, if<br />
they were still in the catalog. There is, however, a splendid video of a<br />
complete Russell recital, including the Wagner.<br />
Records of the Hoffnung Festival, once on EMI-Angel, also seem to be out of the<br />
catalog, a situation best described as unconscionable. The late Gerald Hoffnung<br />
was a conductor, tuba player, cartoonist and humorist who assembled several<br />
elaborate music festivals, with contributions by major composers, to explore in<br />
depth music&#8217;s lunatic fringe &#8212; again, with deadly accuracy.<br />
What if, a Hoffnung piece asks, the offstage trumpet in Beethoven&#8217;s Third<br />
&#8220;Leonore&#8221; Overture kept chiming in in the wrong place, and then missed his<br />
proper entrance? What about the &#8220;1812&#8243; played by an ensemble of baroque<br />
instruments? The Hoffnung treasures include the absolute last word on<br />
Schoenbergian 12-tone music, a piece in which the climax is a measure of<br />
silence, notated in 3/4 time, to &#8220;impart a quasi-Viennese flavor.&#8221; Wise,<br />
accurate and hilarious, Hoffnung never had to make anything up, either.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/pdq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Davis had already done well by the Los Angeles Philharmonic two months ago, in a regularly scheduled appearance as guest conductor. This week he has done even better, in a noble rescue operation. This week&#8217;s concerts at the Music Center, Beethoven&#8217;s Second Symphony and the Berlioz &#8220;Fantastic&#8221; Symphony, were slated as the program for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Davis had already done well by the Los Angeles Philharmonic two months<br />
ago, in a regularly scheduled appearance as guest conductor. This week he has<br />
done even better, in a noble rescue operation.<br />
This week&#8217;s concerts at the Music Center,  Beethoven&#8217;s Second Symphony and the<br />
Berlioz &#8220;Fantastic&#8221; Symphony, were slated as the program for Roger<br />
Norrington&#8217;s debut with the orchestra. Norrington has had emergency surgery,<br />
however, and Davis took over the same program, most handsomely. Despite less-<br />
than-normal rehearsal time &#8212; he was engaged in England until two days before<br />
Thursday night&#8217;s concert &#8212; he presented a superior evening of high-grade<br />
musicianship, with support from the orchestra of like quality.<br />
It wasn&#8217;t the evening it was going to be, of course. Norrington&#8217;s readings of<br />
both these symphonies are known quantities from recordings: interesting,<br />
powerful and, well, strange. Davis, instead, gave polished and spirited<br />
versions of both works that had little in the way of iconoclastic value, but<br />
much in the way of musical value.<br />
The Beethoven, the composer&#8217;s high-spirited farewell to the musical methods of<br />
a previous generation, is not nearly often enough heard for its fund of<br />
delights. Davis managed those delights very well. If a single objection might<br />
be advanced, it would embrace the rather spirited tempo for the slow movement<br />
that is, after all, marked &#8220;larghetto.&#8221; This seemed to trivialize the<br />
profound lyricism of this one movement.<br />
The Berlioz went capitally: a raw, marvelously raucous reading of the final<br />
movements, some lovely tenderness and mystery in what had come before. The<br />
symphony, 160 years old, remains incredible. It is one of those works, daring<br />
and iconoclastic when it appeared (only 3 years after Beethoven&#8217;s death but<br />
utterly unrelated to anything in anyone else&#8217;s music) whose fund of modernity<br />
has never faded. It stands beside the &#8220;Eroica&#8221; of Beethoven and Stravinsky&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Rite of Spring&#8221; as one of music&#8217;s imponderable forward steps.<br />
This quotient of daring seemed uppermost in Daviss reading. His woodwinds<br />
shrieked &#8212; best of all the ghostly dance from Michele Zukovsky&#8217;s clarinet in<br />
the finale. His brass roared, his percussion thundered. The famous passage for<br />
four tympani players at the end of the slow movement raised goosebumps on any<br />
attentive listener. It was a good night for listening.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCHOENBERG&#160;QT</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/schoenberg-qt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/schoenberg-qt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arnold Schoenberg liked to complain that his name wasn&#8217;t well enough known. He would have had a ball on Sunday afternoon, when the Schoenberg Quartet from The Netherlands played a Schoenberg quartet at UCLA&#8217;s Schoenberg Hall, with a contingent from U.S.C.&#8217;s Schoenberg Institute also in attendance. The group has played here before, most recently in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arnold Schoenberg liked to complain that his name wasn&#8217;t well enough known. He<br />
would have had a ball on Sunday afternoon, when the Schoenberg Quartet from The<br />
Netherlands played a Schoenberg quartet at UCLA&#8217;s Schoenberg Hall, with a<br />
contingent from U.S.C.&#8217;s Schoenberg Institute also in attendance.<br />
The group has played here before, most recently in 1989 at U.S.C. Since then,<br />
however, a new cellist has come aboard, the dynamic Viola De Hoog, and it has<br />
made a difference. There was none of the sense of ho-hum another concert about<br />
their playing this time. Anything but, in fact.<br />
The program was curious: three works written within five years: Schoenberg&#8217;s<br />
First Quartet of 1905, Anton Webern&#8217;s Five Pieces from 1909 and the Opus 3<br />
Quartet by Alban Berg from 1910. The choice propounded an interesting study in<br />
middle-European romanticism in its hysterical twilight, but it may have<br />
actually been too much of a not-quite-good thing.<br />
Both the Berg, which runs 15 minutes and the Schoenberg, which lumbers along at<br />
45, trace and retrace pretty much the same ground. The echoes of Wagner&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Tristan&#8221; have not died down, but the whole sense of tonality has begun to<br />
come apart. A tendency to screech when a softer cry might have sufficed: that<br />
is the frequent flaw in both works. Would either have survived in the repertory<br />
if their creators hadn&#8217;t gone on to greater achievements? That is one of<br />
music&#8217;s recurrent nagging questions, and it could have been asked more than<br />
once at this concert.<br />
The Schoenbergs specialize in this music, and they gave it the full feverish<br />
treatment, even at the points where a drier, more reticent approach &#8212; such as<br />
the way the late, lamented LaSalle Quartet performed on their complete<br />
recording &#8212; might have brought out more in the music. By far the lapidary,<br />
tiny, glittering Webern pieces fared best. For once, the performance and the<br />
music were properly matched.<br />
Preceding the concert was the first local showing of &#8220;Arnold Schoenberg: My<br />
Evolution,&#8221; a 50-minute film created by UCLA&#8217;s Office of Instructional<br />
Development to piece out visually a recording of a speech Schoenberg had given<br />
on campus in 1949. Fascinating and valuable stuff; the world suffers in that<br />
recording technology was invented so late in the history of the arts. A similar<br />
recording from Mozart or Beethoven might have lightened the scholars&#8217;<br />
load.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/schoenberg-qt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It should have been better. Of all the cultural events around town relating to the County Museum&#8217;s &#8220;Degenerate Art&#8221; show, the Los Angeles Philharmonic&#8217;s concert on Thursday night (repeated tonight) turned out to be one of the more paltry components. Why? The programming itself was part of the problem; it seemed lazily conceived. To be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should have been better. Of all the cultural events around town relating to<br />
the County Museum&#8217;s &#8220;Degenerate Art&#8221; show, the Los Angeles Philharmonic&#8217;s<br />
concert on Thursday night (repeated tonight) turned out to be one of the more<br />
paltry components.<br />
Why? The programming itself was part of the problem; it seemed lazily<br />
conceived. To be sure, the four composers represented &#8212; Ernst Krenek, Erich<br />
Korngold, Kurt Weill and Paul Hindemith &#8212; figured prominently on the Nazis&#8217;<br />
undesirables list. But the music chosen to represent these composers, with one<br />
exception, was only distantly related to the qualities the Nazis had found<br />
repugnant.<br />
Why, for example, represent Krenek with the &#8220;Symphonic Elegy&#8221; composed in<br />
1946, long after the composer had emigrated to the U.S.? It was a far different<br />
brand of music, exemplified by the jazz rhythms in the opera &#8220;Jonny spielt<br />
auf&#8221; and the subversive overtones in the twelve-tone &#8220;Charles V,&#8221; that had<br />
gotten Krenek proscribed; why hadn&#8217;t some of this been played instead? There is<br />
beautiful music in this Elegy (composed as a memorial to Anton Webern but<br />
actually full of motives that evoke memories of another Schoenberg disciple,<br />
Alban Berg). It did not, however, serve its purpose.<br />
It would be hard to discern any purpose served by the Korngold Violin Concerto<br />
&#8211; composed in 1945 and, thus, another after-the-fact work. A patched-together<br />
gathering of motives from several of Korngold&#8217;s vintage movie scores, the work<br />
is lathered over with a slick and sudsy violin line. Korngold designed the work<br />
for Jascha Heifetz but actually produced a virtual parody of that peerless<br />
virtuoso&#8217;s more superficial mannerisms. This is as close to a totally worthless<br />
piece as the repertory contains, not so much &#8220;degenerate&#8221; as depraved.<br />
Hindemith&#8217;s well-known symphony built out of the opera &#8220;Mathis der Maler&#8221;<br />
seemed a particularly lazy choice, considering the fund of unduly neglected<br />
works by this composer &#8212; the sharp-edged, acidulous set of chamber concertos<br />
from the 1920s, just for starters &#8212; that far more clearly epitomize what the<br />
Nazi cultural dogma found objectionable. This would have been the perfect<br />
occasion to bring some of this wonderful music down off the shelf, but no.<br />
That left only Kurt Weill&#8217;s flavorsome &#8220;Threepenny Music,&#8221; jaunty<br />
arrangements for wind band from the 1928 opera made at the request of Otto<br />
Klemperer. But here, as with everything else on the program, the utterly<br />
dreary, anti-rhythmic time-beating of conductor Lawrence Foster set everything<br />
into a pall. Such lively music, such lifeless playing, and such faulty<br />
intonation from a performing ensemble that seemed not to have been made to care<br />
about the week&#8217;s assignment. Sidney Weiss, the Philharmonic&#8217;s concertmaster,<br />
skated admirably across the glassy surface of the Korngold Concerto, but to<br />
little avail.<br />
The evening promised much, but delivered little. The tone was somehow reflected<br />
in the &#8220;Degenerate Music&#8221; exhibition that fills two lobby levels in the hall.<br />
It is a compelling display of valuable material about the Nazis&#8217; marauding<br />
music policies, but riddled with typos including, on one board, three<br />
misspelled names in one paragraph. Management promises to correct these errors.<br />
The concert itself, however, was beyond correction.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UMBRELLA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/umbrella-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/umbrella-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ernst Krenek turned 90 last summer.He lives in Palm Springs, where he continues to compose. His opus numbers are, in fact, well into the high 200s. At Monday night&#8217;s Green Umbrella concert at the Japan America Theater, the sweep across Krenek&#8217;s music ran from Opus 58, of 1928, to 234, of 1981. Krenek has spent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ernst Krenek turned 90 last summer.He lives in Palm Springs, where he continues<br />
to compose. His opus numbers are, in fact, well into the high 200s. At Monday<br />
night&#8217;s Green Umbrella concert at the Japan America Theater, the sweep across<br />
Krenek&#8217;s music ran from Opus 58, of 1928, to 234, of 1981.<br />
Krenek has spent more than half his life as a self-willed exile from central<br />
Europe, where the quotient of &#8220;degeneracy&#8221; in his music was recognized as<br />
early as 1927. In that year he wrote his jazz-tinged opera &#8220;Jonny spielt<br />
auf,&#8221; which brought down on his head epithets both racial and religious. The<br />
logo for the current &#8220;Degenerate Music&#8221; exhibition which opens this week at<br />
the Music Center is the Nazis&#8217; perversion of the figure of Jonny himself from<br />
that opera, taken from an old poster.<br />
Monday&#8217;s concert, well-attended as all the Philharmonic&#8217;s new-music series have<br />
been this season, offered a fascinating look into a composer who, in his many<br />
years, has composed many kinds of music. The latest work, a set of tiny<br />
orchestral movements called &#8220;Arc of Life&#8221; possessed, among its other charms,<br />
an unshakable sense of nostalgia.<br />
Krenek had never been part of Arnold Schoenberg&#8217;s circle of atonal<br />
practitioners, yet his own career seemed to reflect the work of these<br />
compatriots. Schoenberg, Berg and Webern had all composed sets of small<br />
orchestral pieces, aphoristic little wisps of sound, encompassing strongly<br />
defined sentiments in very few measures. And here was Krenek, decades later,<br />
doing the same sort of thing in the 12 movements &#8212; none more than 90 seconds<br />
long &#8212; of this captivating little suite.<br />
That work came, chronologically speaking, at the near end of the survey. At the<br />
far end was the &#8220;Little Symphony&#8221; (&#8220;little,&#8221; however, neither in length nor<br />
scoring), bristling and sarcastic, attached this time not to the Schoenberg<br />
ideal but to the dry-point nose-thumbing works of Kurt Weill and Paul<br />
Hindemith. If the effect was a little like being trapped in an elevator with a<br />
man who knows only one joke, the joke at least had its moments.<br />
In between, in this exceptionally engrossing concert, were two vocal works, the<br />
exquisite song-cycle &#8220;Through the Night&#8221; (in its third local performance<br />
within the past month and still sounding like some unknown piece of Schubert,<br />
updated but still radiant) and the dramatic monologue &#8220;The Dissembler.&#8221; This<br />
last seemed the most dated of all, the composer&#8217;s own text (so much Freud, so<br />
much strained comic pastiche) half-sung half-yelled by the admirable Hector<br />
Vasquez, immersed in a musical setting that seemed more sound effect than<br />
musical counterpart. Any composer who racks up over 200 opus numbers is<br />
entitled to  nod now and then.<br />
Performances were top-grade throughout. David Alan Miller, who led the<br />
Philharmonic New Music Group in three of the four items, continues to grow in<br />
insight and technical mastery with every appearance. Donald Crockett&#8217;s<br />
Contemporary Music Ensemble from USC did its customary fine job with &#8220;Through<br />
the Night,&#8221; with Anne Marie Ketchum&#8217;s expert handling of the fragrant,<br />
evocative text. The composer, too frail to attend, would have been proud.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/umbrella-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The phenomenon of Vladimir Ashkenazy brightens our musical landscape. Pianist and conductor, his mastery of both arts is truly remarkable. If anything, his prowess in the one area seems to nourish the other. He has been with us these two weeks in the latter capacity. On Wednesday he led the Los Angeles Philharmonic through a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phenomenon of Vladimir Ashkenazy brightens our musical landscape. Pianist<br />
and conductor, his mastery of both arts is truly remarkable. If anything, his<br />
prowess in the one area seems to nourish the other.<br />
He has been with us these two weeks in the latter capacity. On Wednesday he led<br />
the Los Angeles Philharmonic through a dazzling and rewarding all-Prokofiev<br />
program. You might think that an entire evening by this one composer might come<br />
off stylistically limited, and with lesser talents on the podium you might be<br />
right. But Ashkenazy, who as a pianist has delivered (and recorded) some<br />
overpowering Prokofiev performances, demonstrated on this occasion his ability<br />
to shine a variety of fascinating lights through the orchestral works as well.<br />
The crown of this week&#8217;s program (repeated, by the way, tonight and Saturday)<br />
is the Fifth Symphony, most extensive of Prokofiev&#8217;s seven and one of the<br />
latest works by any composer to take its place in the standard repertory. The<br />
work does explore a neo-romantic vein that, in some hands, might sound a little<br />
old-fashioned for a work dating from as recently as 1944. But there is an<br />
abrasive, thoroughly original side to this music as well, and this quality &#8211;<br />
the way long melodic lines, for example, take interesting and unexpected turns<br />
into dark areas &#8212; stood out especially well in Ashkenazy&#8217;s performance.<br />
It was an exceptionally attractive program, and a difficult one as well. There<br />
were passing problems in orchestral execution on Wednesday night, a few blurred<br />
wind and brass attacks, that would probably be smoothed out in subsequent<br />
performances. But at its best the Philharmonic honored its gifted guest<br />
conductor with playing robust and alert.<br />
The evening began with a relative novelty, an orchestral suite from the opera<br />
&#8220;War and Peace,&#8221; put together in 1987 by Christopher Palmer: dazzling dance<br />
pieces, a ravishing quiet Intermezzo and a final striding theme (the great<br />
chorus that ends the opera) that grabs you by the throat. If you need urging to<br />
take in the San Francisco Opera&#8217;s staging of this grand if imperfect work next<br />
September, let it be in this selection of snippets, 20 minutes of sublime music<br />
out of four hours.<br />
Alexander Treger, the orchestra&#8217;s co-concertmaster, was soloist in the D-major<br />
Violin Concerto, exquisite music, delicate and quiet, played with high regard<br />
for these qualities. Between this work of 1915, and the &#8220;War and Peace&#8221;<br />
excerpts from 1953, the variety of Prokofiev&#8217;s stylistic outlook was broad<br />
indeed. It was neatly sketched in this commendable concert.THE FACTSWhat: The Los Angeles Philharmonic in an all-Prokofiev program.When: 8 p.m., tonight and Saturday.Where: Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, 135 N. Grand Ave in downtown Los Angeles.Behind the scenes: Vladimir Ashkenazy, conductor; Alexander Treger, violin.Tickets: $9-$40; phone: 213 480-3232.Our rating: * * * *</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>POLLINI</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/pollini/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/pollini/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world is well supplied with promising pianists, accomplished pianists, even a few great pianists. Yet Maurizio Pollini stands apart, a musician of such towering intelligence and originality, coupled with with a virtuoso&#8217;s technique so close to flawless as anyone could hope from mortal fingers, that he seems to merit his own category. A cheering [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world is well supplied with promising pianists, accomplished pianists, even<br />
a few great pianists. Yet Maurizio Pollini stands apart, a musician of such<br />
towering intelligence and originality, coupled with with a virtuoso&#8217;s technique<br />
so close to flawless as anyone could hope from mortal fingers, that he seems to<br />
merit his own category.<br />
A cheering capacity crowd at the Music Center on Tuesday night roared its<br />
agreement. The program had no startling novelties: the complete Preludes of<br />
Chopin, Berg&#8217;s Piano Sonata, Schoenberg&#8217;s &#8220;Small Pieces,&#8221; Opus 19 and<br />
Stravinsky&#8217;s fiendishly demanding transcription of parts of his &#8220;Petrouchka&#8221;<br />
ballet, with Ravel and more Chopin as encores. Pollini&#8217;s playing was thoroughly<br />
novel, however; not a moment in this extraordinary recital failed to give off<br />
the sense that a sovereign intellect seemed to be creating each musical phrase<br />
anew.<br />
The effect in the Chopin was particularly arresting. Never a pianist to shrink<br />
from taking chances, Pollini brought to these visionary miniatures a broad<br />
spectrum of interpretive devices. Moments linger in the memory: the recitative-<br />
like passages in the second Prelude, so softly, mysteriously played that they<br />
seemed like voices from another planet; the thundering onrush of No. 16 and the<br />
soft but insistent mood-painting in the so-called &#8220;Raindrop.&#8221; Miniatures<br />
these works might be; as Pollini played them they fused into a single, most<br />
grandiose, musical entity.<br />
The Berg and Schoenberg works, appropriate contributions to the current<br />
showings around town of suppressed Germanic art, were also wonderfully put<br />
forth.There was a control of line and color here that set both pieces into a<br />
historic continuum: romanticism&#8217;s last gasp, and the first steps into a new<br />
musical territory where the old artistic standards no longer mattered.<br />
The Stravinsky was there, of course, to send the crowd home happy. Such useless<br />
music this is, contrasted to the orchestral original! Yet such exhilaration, as<br />
Pollini seemed to turn his resonant Hamburg Steinway into an idealized<br />
orchestra beyond even Stravinsky&#8217;s wildest dreams!<br />
Of course, the crowd didn&#8217;t exactly go home, happy or otherwise, at that point.<br />
As the final reward there came nothing less than the soaring, ecstatic B-flat<br />
minor Scherzo of Chopin.  Hardly a mere encore piece, the work capped an<br />
enchanted evening. Music-making doesn&#8217;t get much better than this.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/pollini/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MEC</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/mec-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/mec-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Art for the ear, art for the eye: it made for a compelling mixture at the County Museum on Monday night. In the Bing Theater&#8217;s Monday Evening Concert series, an imaginatively arranged program formed a musical reflection of the &#8220;Degenerate Art&#8221; exhibition across the plaza at the Anderson Gallery. By a stroke of generous planning, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art for the ear, art for the eye: it made for a compelling mixture at the County<br />
Museum on Monday night. In the Bing Theater&#8217;s Monday Evening Concert series, an<br />
imaginatively arranged program formed a musical reflection of the &#8220;Degenerate<br />
Art&#8221; exhibition across the plaza at the Anderson Gallery. By a stroke of<br />
generous planning, the exhibition remained open right up to concert time; the<br />
connections between sight and sound were easily measured.<br />
The effect, however, was not what most of the large audience surely expected.<br />
So overpowering are the elements in the visual display &#8212; the paintings, the<br />
film clips, the evocation of  life in the arts in a time of horror &#8212; that the<br />
concert itself, however well planned and performed, came across inevitably as<br />
an anticlimax.<br />
That fact, in itself, could stand as a tribute to the way Leonard Stein and his<br />
USC  colleagues planned the program. The musical elements most repugnant to the<br />
Nazis, after all, were the quiet, sophisticated intellectuality in the works of<br />
Arnold Schoenberg and his colleagues and disciples, the subtle, pointillistic<br />
patterns in Anton Webern, the complexity in Ernst Krenek and in Schoenberg<br />
himself. A program of this music, heard immediately after an immersion in the<br />
explicit fury that leaps off the walls in the exhibition, was bound to sound<br />
shackled.<br />
And so it was, despite some remarkable playing and singing by USC ensembles<br />
under Leonard Stein (in his final act of cultural glory before his retirement<br />
as head of USC&#8217;s Arnold Schoenberg Institute), Donald Crockett and Larry<br />
Rachleff. At the start there was Webern&#8217;s Concerto for Nine Instruments in a<br />
crisp, energized reading; at the end came Schoenberg&#8217;s &#8220;Accompaniment Music<br />
for a Film Scene,&#8221; handsomely delivered by the 40-member USC Chamber<br />
Orchestra. You don&#8217;t find, under every cabbage leaf, student ensembles capable<br />
of managing this kind of fearsome complexity. USC did itself proud.<br />
In between came a scattering of vocal works: Krenek&#8217;s radiant &#8220;Durch die<br />
Nacht&#8221; repeated from the campus performance of two weeks ago, some of<br />
Alexander von Zemlinsky&#8217;s lavender-tinged, world-weary pieces, and rather an<br />
excessive sampling of Hanns Eisler&#8217;s simplistic, sing-song settings of poetry<br />
of Bertolt Brecht and Ignazio Silone.<br />
Anne Marie Ketchum and Stephen  Kimbrough were the accomplished, stylish<br />
singers; the veteran Stein provided marvelous support as pianist and conductor.<br />
Wise counselor and musician, a bulwark of  musical life in this region for<br />
longer than anyone cares to remember, the 74-year-old Stein had come back from<br />
a recent heart attack to perform in a program obviously dear to his heart.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/mec-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUNDAYCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/sundaycol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/sundaycol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PAUL: I HAVE TO GIVE A LECTURE IN THE MORNING, IN AROUND NOON. HERE&#8217;S ANOTHER COPY OF MY SUNDAY COLUMN; I DON&#8217;T SEE WHERE ANY WORDS ARE MISSING UNLESS JON DID SOME EDITING> ANYHOW, I&#8217;LL SEE YOU LATER &#8212; ALAN [F/L]Paul Hillier, much respected for his recordings of early music with his Hilliard Ensemble, brings [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PAUL: I HAVE TO GIVE A LECTURE IN THE MORNING, IN AROUND NOON. HERE&#8217;S ANOTHER COPY OF MY SUNDAY COLUMN; I DON&#8217;T SEE WHERE ANY WORDS ARE MISSING UNLESS JON DID SOME EDITING> ANYHOW, I&#8217;LL SEE YOU LATER &#8212; ALAN [F/L]Paul Hillier, much respected for his recordings of early music with his Hilliard<br />
Ensemble, brings his forces to town on April 3 for the first American<br />
performance of the &#8220;Berlin Mass&#8221; by the contemporary Estonian-born composer<br />
Arvo Part. New Albion, a record label renowned for its service to hardcore<br />
contemporary music, has just produced a disc of early 15th century music from<br />
the Island of Cyprus. Something seems to connect certain kinds of very old and<br />
very new music, and the connections are fascinating.<br />
Take that collection from Cyprus as a starting point. The disc contains 16<br />
pieces, some sacred and some secular, composed at the court of Cyprus during a<br />
brief flowering of high culture on the island, collected in a manuscript now in<br />
a library in Turin. The performers are the members of P. A. N. (Project Ars<br />
Nova) based in Basel. The music is, for the most part, intricately composed,<br />
sometimes with three or more vocal parts sung simultaneously but using<br />
different texts and moving at different tempos.<br />
Beyond question, hearing this music is an exotic experience. The harmonies are<br />
both rich and austere, something like the stretched-out perspective of medieval<br />
paintings on gold backgrounds. By the standards we are most familiar with, the<br />
harmonic style from Bach to Mahler, the music constantly eludes our<br />
expectation, veering wildly into unexpected regions. These regions were not, of<br />
course, &#8220;unexpected&#8221; to their anonymous composers. If there isn&#8217;t a word for<br />
the auditory equivalent of &#8220;hindsight,&#8221; there ought to be. Try as we might,<br />
we cannot help but bring the full range of our previous listening  &#8212; Mozart,<br />
the Beatles, whatever &#8212; to any and every new experience that comes our way.<br />
Inevitably, we bring some of that same process to hearing new music. There,<br />
too,  as in those 15th-century Cyprus songs (which on their own, by the way,<br />
are marvelous, flavorsome pieces) our expectations are constantly being<br />
tricked. As we hear this old music with our late-20th-century ears, we derive<br />
the completely twisted picture of the composer who refuses to follow the<br />
classic rules &#8212; even though those &#8220;rules&#8221; hadn&#8217;t yet been invented. We react<br />
in much the same way to first hearings of music of our own time. This is not to<br />
state, of course, that the way to hear very new music is to steep yourself in<br />
very old, but it sometimes helps.<br />
Some modern composers, of course, draw the past around themselves as a sort of<br />
justification for their own innovations. Arnold Schoenberg, early in his<br />
career, was fascinated by the revival in Germany and Austria of the music of<br />
the great 14th-century musician/poet Guillaume de Machaut, especially in the<br />
way Machaut often constructed music around formal devices that no listener<br />
could ever be expected to hear.<br />
One of Machaut&#8217;s most famous songs is titled &#8220;My End is My Beginning,&#8221; and in<br />
the song the tenor part follows the soprano line note-for-note, but backwards.<br />
Nobody could ever hear what Machaut is doing here, and that doesn&#8217;t matter; it<br />
is simply a great secret stroke of structural genius and, of course, it fits<br />
the text. Schoenberg&#8217;s later theories of twelve-tone writing, as he himself<br />
acknowledged, drew some of their inspiration from this great idea of building a<br />
piece of music around a sense of order strong yet inaudible.<br />
No composer ever shakes completely free of music&#8217;s rich and glorious past.<br />
Some, in fact, wallow in it.<br />
The late Harry Partch, that sterling iconoclast whose dance-drama &#8220;The<br />
Bewitched&#8221; has just reappeared on a CRI compact disc, decided early in his<br />
career that music had started to go wrong around the Middle Ages. He spent his<br />
life working out a system of composition, for which he designed and built his<br />
own instruments, that would, he fondly imagined, transport our senses back to<br />
the scales and melodies of ancient Greece. On a diametrically opposite level,<br />
Germany&#8217;s Carl Orff, who figures as one of the enemy forces in the<br />
&#8220;degenerate&#8221;  art exhibits currently around town, served his Nazi masters by<br />
turning music from an ancient Bavarian manuscript into latter-day marching and<br />
drinking songs; hence, &#8220;Carmina Burana.&#8221;<br />
The matter of Arvo Part is particularly interesting. He is, first of all, the<br />
best-known of a small group of important names to emerge from Estonia, whence<br />
no names had emerged before: the composer Eduard Tubin  a generation back, and<br />
the conductor Neeme Jarvi &#8212; newly appointed music director of the Detroit<br />
Symphony who, like Part, fled his country some years ago fearing political<br />
oppression.<br />
Part currently lives in West Berlin. His early music includes three symphonies<br />
(recorded by Jarvi on Sweden&#8217;s B-I-S label). They are strong, compact works,<br />
densely contrapuntal, extroverted in their orchestral brilliance. But then, in<br />
the mid-1970s, Part&#8217;s music took a strange turn toward a much more inward,<br />
almost mystical style. The first record of his music to achieve fame in this<br />
country contained a series of quiet, still pieces that seemed, in ways not<br />
easily described, to invoke a sense of the distant musical past: the austere<br />
harmonies, once again, of Machaut.<br />
Then came the incredible &#8220;Passio&#8221; of 1982, 71 minutes of music so still, yet<br />
so gripping, that it seems to move out beyond such secular matters as time. It<br />
is, again, music of a medieval sensibility &#8212; not because it imitates the music<br />
of the past, which it doesn&#8217;t, but because its subtle, other-worldly sounds<br />
inspire the same feelings as you might find on entering a great Gothic<br />
cathedral. To hear Part&#8217;s &#8220;Passio&#8221; &#8212; a setting of verses from the Passion as<br />
told in the Book of John, for small chorus with instrumental quartet and organ<br />
&#8211; is to journey to Cologne in front of your own stereo.<br />
The recording of &#8220;Passio,&#8221;on the ECM label, is by Hillier and his Hilliard<br />
Ensemble, and this is reason enough to look forward to the same group&#8217;s<br />
performance here of the new Part work, April 3 at St. Basil&#8217;s Church in<br />
downtown Los Angeles, part of MaryAnn Bonino&#8217;s &#8220;Historic Sites&#8221; concert<br />
series.<br />
Like Arvo Part, Hillier himself has made a world for himself balanced between<br />
the very up-to-date present and the distant past. One of his most fascinating<br />
recordings, on the ECM label, is called &#8220;Proensa,&#8221; after an ancient version<br />
of the name Provence, that fragrant region in the south of France that nurtured<br />
the great tradition of the Troubadours, those poetic wanderers whose aim was to<br />
fill the world with song.<br />
Hillier has, on this disc, sampled the surviving examples of medieval solo<br />
song, and reconstructed a series of glosses on these songs, combining in a most<br />
attractive way elements of past and present. Three players on ancient<br />
instruments, such as the Troubadours themselves might use, are his backing. The<br />
music is purely joyous. Hillier, by the way, has abandoned his London base for<br />
a time and joined the music faculty of U.C. Davis: a welcome presence<br />
indeed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/sundaycol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cellists like to complain about the paucity of concertos for their instrument. And yet they have the Dvorak, and few concertos for any instrument are as rapturously beautiful as that supremely eloquent work. Lynn Harrell was the soloist in Dvorak&#8217;s concerto this past weekend, and Vladimir Ashkenazy conducted the Los Angeles Philharmonic. If there has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cellists like to complain about the paucity of concertos for their instrument.<br />
And yet they have the Dvorak, and few concertos for any instrument are as<br />
rapturously beautiful as that supremely eloquent work.<br />
Lynn Harrell was the soloist in Dvorak&#8217;s concerto this past weekend, and<br />
Vladimir Ashkenazy conducted the Los Angeles Philharmonic. If there has been a<br />
more sublime performance of anything at the Music Center this season, it has<br />
escaped these ears. As a solo performance, as a collaboration between soloist<br />
and conductor, as a study in give-and-take between soloist and orchestra, this<br />
was music-making of the highest order. On Saturday night the crowd cheered<br />
itself hoarse at the end. Even more remarkable, however,  was the audience&#8217;s<br />
respectful, cough-free silence throughout the performance.<br />
Harrell has played the concerto, as all cellists must, throughout his career;<br />
he has recorded it twice. Even so, there was a new dimension to his latest<br />
performance, a breadth in the rhetoric, a long and consistent line of thought,<br />
that represent something of a milestone for him.<br />
The touchstone for any performance of this work is the moment midway in the<br />
first movement where the cello and a solo flute converse, quietly but<br />
ecstatically. As Harrell and the orchestra&#8217;s flutist Janet Ferguson entered<br />
into this conversation, the drab concert hall suddenly became an enchanted<br />
place, with moonbeams everywhere.<br />
The whole performance, in fact, seemed motivated by a sense of intimacy, of<br />
creating chamber music on a grandiose but heartfelt level. Between the<br />
strapping Harrell and the diminutive Ashkenazy there is considerable distance.<br />
Where the Dvorak concerto was concerned, however these gifted musicians saw eye<br />
to eye.<br />
Otherwise, the evening held few charms. It may be possible, in fact, to chart<br />
civilization&#8217;s advance by how abominable William Walton&#8217;s &#8220;Wise Virgins&#8221;<br />
ballet music now sounds, half a century after its creation. In 1940 there<br />
seemed little harm in the composer&#8217;s taking on a clutch of arias and choruses<br />
from Bach cantatas and recasting them for full orchestra; now the work comes<br />
across as a grotesque and cruel insult to the source material. Ashkenazy and<br />
the orchestra gave it the full treatment, including a Paganini-sized vibrato in<br />
Sidney Weiss&#8217; violin solo in the &#8220;Sheep May Safely Graze&#8221; segment.<br />
Then there was some original Walton, the clattery and bombastic Second Symphony<br />
of 1960, a sad landmark in the creative decline in Walton&#8217;s late years. Had the<br />
composer assimilated a surfeit of tinsel from his years as a movie composer? Or<br />
was he simply written out? The Philharmonic had celebrated Walton&#8217;s music<br />
properly  a few weeks ago, with the marvelous Viola Concerto of 1929. That is<br />
where matters should have ben left.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CALARTS</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/calarts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/calarts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monday night at the Japan-America Theater, and the latest running of the CalArts Contemporary Music Festival came to a festive close, with the rattle and roar of Balinese percussion blasting its way through the sounds of Western-style woodwinds and brass. If not much else in the four-day round of concerts and discussions added up to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monday night at the Japan-America Theater, and the latest running of the CalArts<br />
Contemporary Music Festival came to a festive close, with the rattle and roar<br />
of Balinese percussion blasting its way through the sounds of Western-style<br />
woodwinds and brass. If not much else in the four-day round of concerts and<br />
discussions added up to the sheer dazzle of this last work, &#8220;Crossovers&#8221; by<br />
the Balinese composer I Nyoman Wenten, the least that can be said of this<br />
extended, challenging weekend was this: even its failures were<br />
interesting.<br />
The paired concepts of interaction and cross-culturation, stated at the outset<br />
of the festival last Friday, remained apparent to the end. Sunday&#8217;s concert, in<br />
the Modular Theater on the CalArts campus, was a case in point.<br />
It began with a joyous romp by jazz guru Charlie Haden and his Liberation Music<br />
Orchestra, abetted in some works by Paul Vorwerk&#8217;s CalArts Chorus. Big, loud,<br />
wonderfully extroverted but beautifully in control, the 22-piece ensemble<br />
worked mostly around a kind of primeval jazz; spirituals and African chants<br />
figured prominently in the texture, yet the pieces played were also<br />
&#8220;classical&#8221; in the sense of large-scale, intricate structuring. One regret:<br />
the music&#8217;s complexity demanded Haden&#8217;s services as a conductor, but allowed no<br />
time for his marvelous bass-playing.<br />
Sunday&#8217;s concert ended with more transculturation, music from the CalArts<br />
gamelan under its regular leader K. R. T. Wasitodiningrat, with traditional<br />
dances performed as dancing behind a shadow screen. Part of the ongoing charm<br />
at CalArts has always been the spectacle of its obviously Californiate students<br />
imbued with the techniques and the rhythms of the Indonesian gamelan; even a<br />
deaf person could have picked up on the transcultural process as it worked at<br />
this concert.<br />
The aim at Monday&#8217;s concert, with Vorwerk leading the New CalArts 20th Century<br />
Players, seemed to be a sort of sweep through a variety of progressive musical<br />
ideas, demonstrating the interaction process in the relation of player to<br />
computer (as in Jean-Claude Risset&#8217;s &#8220;Duet for One Pianist) as well as the<br />
interaction of cultures in the Wenten piece.<br />
Along the way there was one low bow toward one of progressive music&#8217;s<br />
archetypes, in Karlheinz Stockhausen&#8217;s &#8220;Refrain&#8221; (terribly dated after a mere<br />
30-year existence), another bow toward the instrumental experimenters (Robert<br />
Dick&#8217;s &#8220;Eyewitness&#8221; for flute quartet) and some attractive atmosphere-<br />
depiction (Libby Larsen&#8217;s &#8220;Black Roller&#8221;). There was also James Newton&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;The Suffering Servant,&#8221;  a setting of lines from Isaiah for singer and<br />
ensemble.<br />
Nothing much got proved. Bryan Pezzone&#8217;s yeoman service in the dreary Risset<br />
work, clattering away at one piano while also activating another by computer<br />
controi, seemed like a lot of fuss over something just as easily accomplished<br />
with one of those &#8220;Music Minus One&#8221; records. Newton&#8217;s piece, with all the<br />
good will in the world, still sounded like what it was, a timid effort by one<br />
of our superb jazz musicians to hide his best talent behind bland declamation<br />
and equally insipid instrumental support.<br />
In the long run, the triumph of the festival was of the usual kind. A lot of<br />
new music got heard over a brief and busy time, played with the high competence<br />
that CalArts drills into all its young performers. Success and failure were<br />
mingled in the classic proportion, and that&#8217;s par for the course.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/calarts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOWLORCH</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/bowlorch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/bowlorch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[*] laby2;p1205. By Alan Rich [B] Daily News Music Writer [B]On a blessedly rainy day last week, 85 musicians gathered for a recording session in a Culver City sound studio. If the sight was familiar enough, the circumstances weren&#8217;t. It was, in fact, the inaugural gig of a brand-new orchestra. It hadn&#8217;t yet given its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[*] laby2;p1205. By Alan Rich [B] Daily News Music Writer [B]On a blessedly rainy day last week, 85 musicians gathered for a recording<br />
session in a Culver City sound studio. If the sight was familiar enough, the<br />
circumstances weren&#8217;t. It was, in fact, the inaugural gig of a brand-new<br />
orchestra. It hadn&#8217;t yet given its first live concert, and wouldn&#8217;t for several<br />
months. Its members had never even played together, for that matter, before<br />
this session. In fact, the orchestra had only been recruited the week before.<br />
Yet it already had a lucrative recording contract with Philips.<br />
This, then, was the maiden flight of the brand-new Hollywood Bowl Orchestra,<br />
whose glowing prospects had been announced at a press conference last fall,<br />
long before a single member, aside from conductor John Mauceri, had been<br />
booked. Forty-five years ago, Hollywood Bowl had had its own resident orchestra<br />
and conductor, Leopold Stokowski&#8217;s Hollywood Bowl Symphony. Now with the word<br />
&#8220;symphony&#8221; dropped for good reason, the great Los Angeles summertime concert<br />
and picnic venue will again be served by its own titular orchestra.<br />
The dropping of &#8220;Symphony&#8221; from the title is significant. The new orchestra<br />
was formed, recuited from the immense local pool of freelance musicians,<br />
specifically to serve the Bowl for the lighter-weight programming: the weekend<br />
concerts that often come with fireworks and, therefore, draw huge crowds, and<br />
the opening preview week that encompasses the Bowl&#8217;s 4th-of-July<br />
celebrations.<br />
For those listeners, and their number is legion, who might have found<br />
intimidation in the notion of the august Los Angeles Philharmonic as the Bowl&#8217;s<br />
one resident ensemble, the presence of this second orchestra will suggest a<br />
kinder, gentler concertgoing experience. For the Philharmonic musicians, for<br />
whom playing those weekend-concert pop programs might have represented a kind<br />
of slumming, the new orchestra will send them back to their ivory towers. It<br />
will also, promises Philharmonic general director Ernest Fleischmann, allow the<br />
classical orchestra more time to rehearse its own Tuesday and Thursday<br />
symphonic programs, a consummation many listeners and critics have devoutly<br />
wished lo these many years.<br />
And so there was the latest orchestra in town, under its new conductor, working<br />
up its first recording, a disc to be called &#8220;Hollywood Dreams&#8221; &#8212; not, as<br />
conductor Mauceri pointed out, merely another collection of movie tunes and<br />
other morsels inspired by Hollywood, but a selection as well of &#8220;some of the<br />
dreams Hollywood created.&#8221; One selection was a genuine curio: a fanfare<br />
created by the formidable 12-tone composer Arnold Schoenberg, during his time<br />
as a Los Angeles resident,for Stokowski&#8217;s earlier Hollywood Bowl Symphony: a<br />
pastiche of themes from Schoenberg&#8217;s great choral work &#8220;Gurre-Lieder.&#8221;<br />
Behind thick glass walls, but connected to the control room by microphones and<br />
video cameras, Mauceri and the orchestra swung into a sonorous selection, some<br />
of the music for the forthcoming Albert Brooks film (or Meryl Streep film,<br />
depending on how you look at it) &#8220;Defending Your Life,&#8221; due out this summer.<br />
Composer Michael Gore, who is also the producer of this disc, beamed approval<br />
from behind an intimidating array of controls.<br />
&#8220;This movie starts off in a waiting room of Heaven,&#8221; Mauceri called out to<br />
the orchestra by way of cluing them in to the mood. &#8220;It&#8217;s all very sweet,<br />
about two dead people who meet.&#8221; A question came up about the scoring in a<br />
certain passage. &#8220;This might work for a moment in the movie,&#8221; Mauceri<br />
reasoned with the composer, &#8220;but could we change it for the record?&#8221; The<br />
composer acquiesced.<br />
&#8220;I hate records of bygone movie music,&#8221; Mauceri said during a break. &#8220;But<br />
this one will be better. The record will be out, next summer, while the movie<br />
is still playing, and so it&#8217;ll be much more current.<br />
New York-born and Yale-trained, the 45-year-old Mauceri has had a varied career<br />
that stamps him as ideal for a Hollywood Bowl identification. His actual debut<br />
as a conductor was in 1973 with the Los Angeles Philharmonic; in the same year<br />
he made his operatic debut at Washington&#8217;s Wolf Trap Festival. On Broadway, he<br />
was on the podium for the Hal Prince reworking of Bernstein&#8217;s &#8220;Candide&#8221; and<br />
also won a Tony for the revival of Rodgers and Hart&#8217;s &#8220;On Your Toes.&#8221;<br />
The Hollywood Bowl Orchestra is the first, however, that Mauceri can call his<br />
own. &#8220;&#8221;It&#8217;s been a long time coming,&#8221; he said, his dimples practically<br />
incandescent.<br />
&#8220;Conductors don&#8217;t have an easy time of it,&#8221; he went on. &#8220;A violinist can<br />
carry his instrument around; a pianist can always rent one. When I was at Yale,<br />
and desperately needed an orchestra to conduct, I used to cruise the streets,<br />
looking for whoever I could find who was carrying an instrument case. I would<br />
waylay that person; it didn&#8217;t matter how good or bad. And now, 25 years later,<br />
all that importuning has paid off.<br />
In Los Angeles, of course, there are more musicians walking the streets<br />
carrying instrument cases. The movie studios and broadcast stations don&#8217;t<br />
maintain the house orchestras that they once did, but even with this decline<br />
this remains one of the two American cities where a freelance musician can<br />
carve out a decent living &#8212; all other things being equal, of course. (New York<br />
is the other.)<br />
A freelance musician in Los Angeles earns his real money in the studios, doing<br />
the music for commercials and TV dramas, or in a movie orchestra for a big John<br />
Williams epic. If all this commercial work undermines his faith in artistic<br />
standards, he can play in one of the regional symphony orchestras: the<br />
Pasadena, Long Beach or Glendale, or the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra.<br />
The new Hollywood Bowl orchestra fits into that latter category. In its first<br />
season, which begins with the Bowl this summer, the orchestra will play six<br />
pairs of concerts under its own name; most of its members will play another<br />
pair under the name &#8220;Members of the Hollywood Bowl Orchestra.&#8221; Then in<br />
December there will be a tour, two weeks in Japan with a concert scheduled for<br />
Tokyo on New Year&#8217;s Eve. And then there&#8217;s the Philips contract, which sets the<br />
orchestra above the other regional groups that usually don&#8217;t get to<br />
record.<br />
&#8220;All that means about $20,000 this first year, which isn&#8217;t bad for this amount<br />
of work,&#8221; said oboist Joel Timm. &#8220;I came out to Los Angeles five years ago. I<br />
had done fairly well in New York, including a year as a temporary player in the<br />
New York Philharmonic. What lured me out here, aside from the obvious pleasures<br />
of life in a warm climate, was an offer to teach half-time at U.S.C.&#8217;s music<br />
school. That seemed like a job with high visibility in the music community, and<br />
that translates directly into good freelance jobs.&#8221;<br />
Even with that kind of experience and visibility, a freelancer newly arrived in<br />
Los Angeles, or in New York or San Francisco or Chicago, or anyplace with some<br />
amount of freelance activity and high amounts of competition, doesn&#8217;t<br />
immediately walk into top-ranking jobs. &#8220;I paid my dues,&#8221; Timm remembered.<br />
&#8220;No matter how good you are, and how nice a guy, the working people in this<br />
town aren&#8217;t just going to move over and let you into the group. You start in by<br />
working for what you can get, in smaller gigs or as a substitute. It&#8217;s only<br />
now, after six years, that I can feel safe in the inner circle &#8212; or close to<br />
it, anyhow.<br />
&#8220;And that&#8217;s because I&#8217;m an oboist, and there aren&#8217;t too many of us. If I were<br />
a violinist I might be still be struggling on the edges.&#8221;<br />
Another time-out, and freelance keyboard artist and pianist Ralph Grierson<br />
showed off his own fantasic music machine: an array of keyboards (10 or 11 in<br />
all) hooked up to another array of faucets and knobs, all of it hung on three<br />
racks that encompass a space about the size of an old-fashioned phone booth.<br />
Grierson was joking about all that synthesizing equipment someday taking over<br />
from live musicians, something he doesn&#8217;t believe for one minute. His jokes<br />
were not finding their mark with the live musician next to him, harpist Katie<br />
Kirkpatrick.<br />
&#8220;Los Angeles is a wonderful place,&#8221; Grierson said, &#8220;with this incredible<br />
aggregation of freelance musicians who can do anything and everything, with no<br />
need for help from electronics and synthesizers. But there&#8217;s all this fear of<br />
electronics taking over, which they won&#8217;t. If you could translate that fear<br />
energy into practice energy, think how much better, even, we&#8217;d all<br />
sound.&#8221;<br />
And the fact that someone, namely the Los Angeles Philharmonic, has in these<br />
fear-racked days gone out and started a brand-new orchestra should be, you&#8217;d<br />
think, assurance enough that live performance is here to stay.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/bowlorch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again we owe much to the venerable conductor, Kurt Sanderling. Whether or not his efforts with the vast, lumbering Eighth Symphony of Dimitri Shostakovich were actually worth his time with the Los Angeles Philharmonic this past weekend, he certainly put the work forward in the best possible light. The symphony dates from 1943 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again we owe much to the venerable conductor, Kurt Sanderling. Whether or<br />
not his efforts with the vast, lumbering Eighth Symphony of Dimitri<br />
Shostakovich were actually worth his time with the Los Angeles Philharmonic<br />
this past  weekend, he certainly put the work forward in the best possible<br />
light.<br />
The symphony dates from 1943 and needs to be heard, therefore, in the light of<br />
its composer&#8217;s moods in his war-torn country. Like the other &#8220;War&#8221; symphony,<br />
the Seventh, it begins with vast statements: in this case a deep, sombre<br />
opening slow movement that explodes into abrasive madness near the end and<br />
takes up nearly half of the symphony&#8217;s hourlong span. Comparisons to some of<br />
Gustav Mahler&#8217;s more psychotic outpourings are inevitable.<br />
Then, like Mahler, Shostakovich does a certain amount of thrashing to devise<br />
ensuing movements large enough to balance his opening statement. Like Mahler<br />
(in the Fifth Symphony, for example) he is not completely successful. The two<br />
brief  scherzos, in Shostakovich&#8217;s well-known jokey style, sound trivial. They<br />
lead to a slow movement that meanders down dark corridors before finally coming<br />
to rest in gleaming C-major sunshine.<br />
That one moment is the symphony&#8217;s highpoint, but it is a single moment out of a<br />
very long run. A finale, built out of forgettable melodic blocks, ends softly<br />
and serenely (an effect ruined on Friday afternoon by heavy conversation in<br />
seats L-27 and 28). That moment, too, is potentially beautiful.<br />
Sanderling&#8217;s way with Shostakovich is familiar from his previous visits here.<br />
Having known the composer, he also seems gifted with powerful insights into the<br />
rhetorical side of this music. He drew a tremendous, virtuosic performance out<br />
of the orchestra, full of pianissimos that you didn&#8217;t so much hear as feel as<br />
goosebumps, and overpowering outbursts that were never raucous or cheap. If<br />
there is a case to be made for this imperfect work, a matter open to argument,<br />
let it be on Sanderling&#8217;s level of eloquence.<br />
Elizo Virzaladze, the darkly handsome pianist from Soviet Georgia who had<br />
played Mozart with Sanderling on a previous visit, did so again, starting the<br />
program with the B-flat Concerto (K. 450). One of the less-frequently performed<br />
of Mozart&#8217;s mature concertos, it operates on a quiet, witty, warm-hearted<br />
level. Sanderling in his wisdom had reduced the size of the string contingent,<br />
so that the lovely wind scoring came through nicely.<br />
Even so, it was not a successful performance. A term like &#8220;deadpan&#8221; is never<br />
pleasant to encounter in discussing Mozart performances, but no other<br />
description fits Virzaladze&#8217;s unloving, uninflected onslaught on Mozart&#8217;s<br />
magical measures. The program biography states that she &#8220;reads Shakespeare and<br />
Goethe in their original languages.&#8221; Too bad she did not accord Mozart that<br />
same favor.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/03/lapo-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEGENERATES</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/degenerates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/degenerates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Half a century ago, Los Angeles teemed with Germanic art, as refugees from Adolf Hitler&#8217;s persecution moved their creativity westward. Now, with the &#8220;Degenerate Art&#8221; show at the County Museum currently drawing crowds and a corollary &#8220;Degenerate Music&#8221; show about to open at the Music Center, that episode in Los Angeles&#8217; cultural history takes on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Half a century ago, Los Angeles teemed with Germanic art, as refugees from Adolf<br />
Hitler&#8217;s persecution moved their creativity westward. Now, with the<br />
&#8220;Degenerate Art&#8221; show at the County Museum currently drawing crowds and a<br />
corollary &#8220;Degenerate Music&#8221; show about to open at the Music Center, that<br />
episode in Los Angeles&#8217; cultural history takes on a whole new perspective.<br />
The community at large is contributing handsomely to the observance of these<br />
strange and disturbing pages from history. This week, for example, there have<br />
been concerts at both U.S.C. and the County Museum, specifically devoted to<br />
examples of what Hitler&#8217;s minions had earmarked as &#8220;degenerate,&#8221; and the<br />
results have been illuminating and rewarding.<br />
On Tuesday night a too-small audience at U.S.C.&#8217;s Hancock Hall heard a program<br />
by the school&#8217;s own Contemporary Music Ensemble under Donald Crockett, with<br />
music fromn the 1930s by Anton Webern and Ernst Krenek that had certainly<br />
aroused Nazi anger, and a brilliant new piece that attests to Germany&#8217;s musical<br />
rebirth. On Wednesday, the superb New York-based American String Quartet played<br />
a mostly thrilling program of music by four proscribed composers: Webern again,<br />
Arnold Schoenberg, Paul Hindemith and Viktor Ullman, this time before a<br />
properly large and responsive audience at the County Museum.What did all this music have in common, such as to arouse the ire of the German<br />
censors? Seriousness and intricacy, for one thing. The complex unravelings in<br />
Schoenberg&#8217;s Third Quartet of 1927 no longer intimidate listeners; the gorgeous<br />
long melodic lines in the slow movement of Hindemith&#8217;s Opus 22 Quartet of 1922<br />
pose no problems; the visionary nature painting in Ernst Krenek&#8217;s 1931 song-<br />
cycle &#8220;Durch die Nacht&#8221; positively glow in the warm lighting of late<br />
romanticism.But there was a time when this was the newest new music of its day, and a lazy<br />
cultural consumership might find reasons, or invent reasons masked in some<br />
high-flown propaganda about race and nation, for shoving all this aside. Among<br />
the many things that these exhibits in town, and the accompanying musical<br />
events, prove, it is the damage the arts can suffer when those in charge cannot<br />
begin to comprehend the artistic material at hand. That message, unfortunately,<br />
is timeless.On the U.S.C. program, planned by the Schoenberg Institute&#8217;s Leonard Stein,<br />
there was also a new commissioned work, Berthold Tuercke&#8217;s Octet for winds,<br />
brass and strings: strong, abrasive music touched here and there by the ghost<br />
of Webern, but speaking throughout with its own voice as well. Thirty-three<br />
years old and currently teaching in Berlin, Tuercke is a find. The Kronos<br />
Quartet, among others, has taken up some of his music.Viktor Ullman&#8217;s short Third Quartet, eloquently played by the Americans, owes<br />
its fame to its historic circumstance: composed in 1943 while its composer, a<br />
former Schoenberg pupil, was in the notorious Terezin concentration camp in<br />
Nazi-occupied Czechoslovakia. For all this, however, it remains stillborn,<br />
note-spinning at romanticism&#8217;s death-throes, competent and correct. Its value<br />
as a document is beyond question; its value as music is beyond redemption.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/degenerates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UMBRELLA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/umbrella-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/umbrella-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If these Green Umbrella concerts keep getting better, they&#8217;re in danger, one of these Monday nights, of taking off into orbit. Once again, Monday night at the Japan-America Theater, the Los Angeles Philharmonic&#8217;s new-music series struck gold: a triumph both of programming and performance. Oliver Knussen conducted with great skill and inmsight, his second appearance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If these Green Umbrella concerts keep getting better, they&#8217;re in danger, one of<br />
these Monday nights, of taking off into orbit. Once again, Monday night at the<br />
Japan-America Theater, the Los Angeles Philharmonic&#8217;s new-music series struck<br />
gold: a triumph both of programming and performance.<br />
Oliver Knussen conducted with great skill and inmsight, his second appearance<br />
this season. The only thing wrong about that is the unseemly modesty that keeps<br />
him from programming any of his own excellent music. On his home turf, this<br />
burly Britisher is highly regarded as a composer, and also as a brilliant<br />
interpreter of other people&#8217;s new scores. Lucky Los Angeles, that he has chosen<br />
this as his major American base.<br />
Four works &#8212; two American and two British &#8212; constituted the program, with the<br />
best music placed at beginning and end. Morton Feldman&#8217;s &#8220;For Frank O&#8217;Hara,&#8221;<br />
which began proceedings, is one of that late composer&#8217;s characteristic<br />
exercises in sounds mostly at the edge of silence. Written for seven<br />
instruments &#8212; flute, clarinet, violin, cello, piano and two percussionists &#8211;<br />
and relatively brief (15 minutes or thereabouts) as Feldman pieces go, the<br />
music generates a spell both firm and gentle. A plink here, a plunk there, a<br />
silence in between: the sense of unfolding is inexorable.<br />
The final work was more lavish by far: Harrison Birtwistle&#8217;s {cq} &#8220;Meridian,&#8221;<br />
composed in 1971 but only now produced on the West Coast. Birtwistle, in his<br />
late 50s, is Britain&#8217;s most enigmatic composer, and one of its finest. Inward,<br />
intense, not easily approached yet thoroughly gripping, his big works have yet<br />
to make headway in this country. &#8220;Meridian,&#8221; for solo mezzo-soprano, six<br />
female voices in ensemble, and an ensemble of winds, harps and percussion with<br />
solo cello and French horn, exerts its power and lingers in the memory.<br />
The texts are fragments of love poetry by Thomas Wyatt (of the 16th century)<br />
and Christopher Logue (of our own); they are blended into the instrumental<br />
ensemble until the end product becomes a synthesis of spoken and unspoken<br />
drama. As Mary King sang the solos, marvelously enveloped by the ensemble under<br />
Knussen, the stage seemed to glow with radiant imagery.<br />
These were the evening&#8217;s highlights. Neither the pretensions of Judith Weir&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;The Consolations of Scholarship&#8221; nor the exuberant but not fully realized<br />
ambitions of Brian Kehlenbach&#8217;s &#8220;In the Land Beyond Beyond,&#8221; came close.<br />
Weir is best known for her &#8220;A Night at the Chinese Opera,&#8221; greeted with<br />
deserved hostility at the Santa Fe Opera two seasons ago. &#8220;Scholarship&#8221; is,<br />
blessedly, shorter but no better; again the matter at hand is a setting of<br />
Chinese texts in a self-consciously simplistic manner of little import &#8212; this<br />
despite a clever staging worked out for herself by singer Mary King. There was<br />
more promise in the work of Kehlenbach, currently a composition doctoral<br />
candidate at U.S.C. The composer mingles jazz harmonies skillfully into his<br />
ensemble; still his piece is somewhat shapeless, long for its length. As<br />
student music goes, Kehlenbach has made an impressive beginning. We will hear<br />
from him again.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/umbrella-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ELEKTRA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/elektra/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/elektra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when you thought it was unsafe to return to the Music Center Opera, along comes &#8220;Elektra,&#8221; and matters are again on the mend. The company&#8217;s new production of Richard Strauss&#8217; one-act mix of shock and shlock, unveiled Saturday night for the first of four performance, might have its flaws, but they rank as virtues [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when you thought it was unsafe to return to the Music Center Opera, along   comes &#8220;Elektra,&#8221; and matters are again on the mend. The company&#8217;s new   production of Richard Strauss&#8217; one-act mix of shock and shlock, unveiled   Saturday night for the first of four performance, might have its flaws, but   they rank as virtues compared to some of last fall&#8217;s shenanigans.  Note well, for starters, that director David Pountney has hit upon the   noteworthy scheme, apparently rare these days, of setting his production in the   time and place &#8212; post-Trojan War Greece &#8212; specified by Hugo von   Hofmannsthal&#8217;s libretto: no updating to Fresno in the 1980s. John Bury&#8217;s set   takes a few liberties; the ruined statue of Agamemnon in the foreground sports   a rather modernistic war helmet. But the designs are otherwise mostly abstract,   and the great palace facade, with its menacing flight of stairs slashed across   the front, looks appropriately timeless.   More remarkably, this set serves the opera&#8217;s title character, the crazed and   murderous Elektra, as a wonderful jungle gym. Marilyn Zschau, in the mounting   frenzy that is the opera&#8217;s dramatic thread, is all over the place, dashing up   and down the staircase, acting out her final dance of ecstasy while swinging   from some conveniently placed ropes, expiring at the end cuddled into the   dismembered hand of that statue of her murdered father.  All this would be fun enough to watch, but Zschau goes one further. Anyone who   remembers her fabulous Renata in the company&#8217;s Fiery Angel&#8221; some years back   knows that when it comes to giving voice to unbridled hysteria, nobody else in   opera can touch her. And so it was again. There was nothing much to ravish the   ear in Zschau&#8217;s Elektra; it&#8217;s a hard voice, with a jagged cutting edge. As   such, it is a tremendous vehicle for Strauss&#8217; steamy protagonist. This is an   Elektra as the role was conceived.  Then there is that Chrysothemis of Ealynn Voss, that towering talent (in any   sense of the term), simply stupendous in her company debut, remarkable in the   sound of her voice and, even more surprising, in the naturalness and grace of   her acting. Helga Dernesch is an uncommonly interesting Klytemnestra, not the   grotesque monster the character is often made out to be, but a woman in   believable human torment. Rodney Gilfry&#8217;s leather-boy Orest, in a silly red   hairdo, and Gary Bachlund&#8217;s Aegisthus round out the cast acceptably.  Lawrence Foster conducted, veteran of many Music Center productions, star of   none. He made his way tidily through the tangles of Strauss&#8217; murderous   orchestration, to be sure, but added little in the way of eloquence. Love this   music or loathe it &#8212; and there are potent arguments on both sides &#8212; there are   moments in the score that light up the sky, or should in a properly motivated   performance. This Elektra&#8221; was pure Lawrence Foster, competent and correct,   its glow steady but dim.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/elektra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/lapo-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/lapo-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enduring a performance of Edward Elgar&#8217;s Second Symphony should be no problem. Bring along a good book and a soft pillow, and you&#8217;ve got it made. Most of the audience at Thursday night&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic concert at the Music Center, however, had overlooked these amenities. Getting through the Elgar Second under those deprived circumstances, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enduring a performance of Edward Elgar&#8217;s Second Symphony should be no problem.<br />
Bring along a good book and a soft pillow, and you&#8217;ve got it made.<br />
Most of the audience at Thursday night&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic concert at<br />
the Music Center, however, had overlooked these amenities. Getting through the<br />
Elgar Second under those deprived circumstances, then, meant spending some 55<br />
minutes fighting off not sleep but insomnia. Sure, Andre Previn demonstrated<br />
his expected skill in shaping the performance, but this hardly represents a<br />
triumph of musicianship &#8212; merely of patience.<br />
Elgar&#8217;s symphonic language presents no problems. It is the basic overripe style<br />
brought to its culmination on the Continent by Richard Strauss, and blown up by<br />
Elgar to such proportions as to make  Strauss into a miniaturist. The musical<br />
sequences mount, in a manner familiar nowadays from music that accompanies<br />
movie or TV characters hurtling down dim corridors toward closed doors. The<br />
orchestration has a kind of rolling, gummy majesty, but the lines of thought &#8211;<br />
assuming that there are such &#8212; are difficult to tell apart in the sonorous<br />
muck.<br />
And yet the music remains admired in some circles, most of all in its native<br />
England. A critic quoted in the Philharmonic program notes claims that this<br />
music &#8220;still means much in the consciousness of the nation.&#8221; That stirs up a<br />
real problem:  how can a nation with this joyless, long-winded stuff in its<br />
consciousness also produce &#8220;Fawlty Towers&#8221; and the Goons? There is obviously<br />
more variety in this British consciousness than meets the ear.<br />
Previn did, in truth, get quite a lot of brave and mellow noise out of the<br />
orchestra, but that&#8217;s not really saying very much. Credit Elgar at least with<br />
mastery over a tamper-proof orchestral style; it&#8217;s hard not to make the right<br />
kind of noise here.<br />
Far more convincing as a measure of Previn&#8217;s musical worth was the opening<br />
work on the program, Mozart&#8217;s wondrous Clarinet Concerto, with the orchestra&#8217;s<br />
own Michele Zukovsky as soloist. Zukovsky and Previn had, by the way, worked up<br />
the performance on short notice, replacing the indisposed pianist Maria Joao {cq}<br />
Pires who was scheduled for another Mozart work.<br />
Like Previn&#8217;s Mozart performances two weeks ago, this was a triumph of serene<br />
musicianship and a superior sense of the give-and-take that is at the heart of<br />
Mozart&#8217;s concertos. Zukovsky, herself slender and reedy like her instrument,<br />
bends and sways as she plays. Her clarinet cannot mimic such motions, yet its<br />
music, as Zukovsky played it on Thursday night, had a similar beguiling<br />
flexibility. The work itself, the last of all Mozart&#8217;s concertos, shines its<br />
modest smile through the twilight; it is  the work of a composer who, at<br />
only<br />
35, had already mastered the insights of a full life. The slow movement,<br />
properly played, reaches toward the stars. It did just that the other<br />
night.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/lapo-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BALLO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/ballo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/ballo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here we are, a growing community of operatic connoisseurs, but starved this season for a touch from the warming hand of Giuseppe Verdi. No wonder the prospect of Opera Pacific&#8217;s &#8220;Un ballo in maschera&#8221; {cq upper &#038; lower case} looked so enticing. No such luck. &#8220;Ballo&#8221; can be reckoned Verdi&#8217;s perfect opera: beautifully proportioned, concise, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we are, a growing community of operatic connoisseurs, but starved this<br />
season for a touch from the warming hand of Giuseppe Verdi. No wonder the<br />
prospect of Opera Pacific&#8217;s &#8220;Un ballo in maschera&#8221; {cq upper &#038; lower case}<br />
looked so enticing. No such luck.<br />
&#8220;Ballo&#8221; can be reckoned Verdi&#8217;s perfect opera: beautifully proportioned,<br />
concise, elegantly balanced between frivolity and high tragedy. Just the<br />
opera&#8217;s second act could stand as the ideal demonstration of the dramatic<br />
power of romantic operatic writing, from Amelia&#8217;s first fear-racked aria to the<br />
vicious sarcasm of the final ensemble.<br />
But even perfection of design demands a shaping hand, and the element most awry<br />
in this generally dispiriting evening was the flabby conducting of Louis<br />
Salemno. The opera seemed to move along as so many small and unrelated<br />
outbursts, with little regard for anything resembling dramatic continuity &#8211;<br />
this in the most dramatically continuous of all Verdi&#8217;s operas. Salemno<br />
obviously admires the look of his own conducting; he was stationed high above<br />
the orchestra so that he became an added visual presence in front of the stage<br />
action. Unfortunately, like most of his contribution to the performance, this<br />
was just another needless distraction.<br />
Leona Mitchell was the Amelia, a good role for her somewhat dusky, nicely<br />
controlled voice; she sang a performance that, under better conditions, might<br />
have had some shape. This time it did not; like the conducting, it seemed a<br />
performance fashioned out of small moments loosely connected. There were<br />
moments &#8212; the start of the big Act Three aria for one &#8212; when there was hope<br />
for a typically moving Leona Mitchell performance. But her best intentions<br />
seemed constantly to dwindle.<br />
At that Mitchell owned a great deal of the performance. Certainly the wobbly<br />
Gustavo of Taro Ichihara, the lurch-&#8217;n'-clutch of his rudimentary stage<br />
presence, can&#8217;t have been much incentive to draw anyone into a realization of<br />
Verdi&#8217;s high purpose. Nor Rosemary Bollin&#8217;s squeaky Oscar, a perversion of one<br />
of Verdi&#8217;s most fascinating roles. Nor the unfocussed Ulrica of Cynthia Munzer.<br />
Nor the Broadway-motel decor of the usually trustworthy Zack Brown. Nor&#8230;<br />
Better than any of this was the Renato of Timothy Noble, despite the<br />
announcement early on that he was suffering from a throat inflammation. Here<br />
was singing in the grand Verdian manner, supported by a continually interesting<br />
stage presence. Perhaps Noble should have shared his affliction with the rest<br />
of the cast. At least he shared some sublime Verdi with the rest of us.<br />
THE FACTS:<br />
What: Opera Pacific presents Giuseppe Verdi&#8217;s &#8220;Un ballo in maschera.&#8221;<br />
Where: Segerstrom Hall, Orange County Performing Arts Center, Costa Mesa.<br />
When: 8 p.m., February 22, 28 and March 2; 2 p.m., February 24.<br />
Behind the scenes: production from the Washington Opera, staged by Anne Ewers,<br />
conducted by Louis Salemno, with sets and costumes by Zack Brown.<br />
Starring: Leona Mitchell and Taro Ichihara (February 24 &#038; 28); Priscilla<br />
Baskerville and Tonio DiPaolo (February 22 and March 2).<br />
Tickets: $20 to $70; information and reservations: 714 740-2000 or 213 480-<br />
3232.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/ballo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MEC&#160;XTET</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/mec-xtet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/mec-xtet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The name of Bright Sheng has come into circulation lately. Born in Shanghai in 1955, he came to New York in 1982, has had performances and commissions by orchestras here and abroad, is currently composer-in-residence at the Chicago Lyric Opera, and assisted Leonard Bernstein on that composer&#8217;s &#8220;Arias and Barcarolles.&#8221; At 35, he has made [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name of Bright Sheng has come into circulation lately. Born in Shanghai in<br />
1955, he came to New York in 1982, has had performances and commissions by<br />
orchestras here and abroad, is currently composer-in-residence at the Chicago<br />
Lyric Opera, and assisted Leonard Bernstein on that composer&#8217;s &#8220;Arias and<br />
Barcarolles.&#8221; At 35, he has made his mark.<br />
At Monday night&#8217;s concert by XTET {cq}, the splendid aggregation of freelance<br />
musicians with a special bent toward new music, Bright Sheng&#8217;s &#8220;Three Poems<br />
from the Sung Dynasty&#8221; was by all odds the evening&#8217;s knockout piece. Three<br />
ancient poems are set by the composer into a chamber ensemble brilliantly used.<br />
The atmosphere is less Oriental, more universal. Reminiscences of Stravinsky<br />
and Boulez float across the horizon. The songs were gorgeously sung by Dasietta<br />
{cq} Kim, and beautifully framed by the ensemble under Donald Crockett, in 20-<br />
or-so minutes of magical, strong music.<br />
The Bright Sheng songs, and lesser works by David Ocker and Donald R. Davis &#8211;<br />
most of it busy-busy writing without much focus &#8212; were framed by two<br />
&#8220;contemporary&#8221; works of the past. Stravinsky&#8217;s amusing cycle of pseudo-<br />
folksongs called &#8220;Pribaoutki&#8221; (also magically sung by Dasietta Kim) came at<br />
the start. Aaron Copland&#8217;s Sextet of 1937 sent the crowd home happy.<br />
An extraordinary work, that Copland. He wrote it as a &#8220;portable&#8221; version of<br />
his 1933 &#8220;Short Symphony,&#8221; partly out of justified fear that the orchestral<br />
version might be too difficult for conductors and orchestras of the time.<br />
(Serge Koussevitzky and Leopold Stokowski had both scheduled and then canceled<br />
performances, probably for that very reason.)<br />
Today this music arouses fewer fears, although it&#8217;s interesting to note that<br />
there is only one recording of the symphony in the current catalog &#8212; an<br />
excellent one, under Dennis Russell Davies &#8212; compared to two of the sextet.<br />
Still, the daring is as obvious in the work now as when it was new: most of all<br />
the driving, quirky motion (nicely described in Roger Lebow&#8217;s program notes as<br />
&#8220;street-wise, jazz-besotted rhythms&#8221;). The slow movement, with those arching,<br />
intense melodies that came to represent Copland&#8217;s best melodic style, is pure<br />
and beautiful, perhaps even more so in the chamber version.<br />
An exhilarating ending, then, to a concert with many rewarding moments. In a<br />
city well-stocked with skillful new-music ensembles, XTET ranks near the<br />
top.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/mec-xtet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/lapo-9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/lapo-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 1985, at the start of his leadership of the Los Angeles Philharmonic, Andre Previn guided the orchestra through several Haydn and Mozart performances that linger in the memory. Those fond recollections were rekindled on Friday night at the Music Center, as Previn and the orchestra devoted an entire program to a loving celebration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in 1985, at the start of his leadership of the Los Angeles Philharmonic,<br />
Andre Previn guided the orchestra through several Haydn and Mozart performances<br />
that linger in the memory. Those fond recollections were rekindled on Friday<br />
night at the Music Center, as Previn and the orchestra devoted an entire<br />
program to a loving celebration of the glory of Mozart.<br />
Three works constituted the program: the Sinfonia Concertante (K. 364),and the<br />
Symphony No. 39 (K. 543) &#8211; absolute masterpieces both &#8212; and the D-major<br />
Divertimento (K. 251), a lesser work but a charmer nonetheless. As is only<br />
proper, Previn used a reduced orchestra all evening: three stands of first<br />
violins (against the customary six) for the Divertimento and the Sinfonia, four<br />
for the Symphony. It was a lovely sound he drew, one which honored the essence<br />
of Mozart&#8217;s orchestral writing, the constant dialog between strings and<br />
woodwinds.<br />
What an extraordinary work, that Sinfonia Concertante! Young Uck Kim  Young<br />
is his first name [F/L] was the violin soloist, Heichiro Ohyama the violist.<br />
Together with Previn&#8217;s beautifully shaded orchestral support, they<br />
reconstructed the harrowing picture this music presents: the young Mozart at a<br />
sorrowful moment in his life, transforming himself in this work into the<br />
supreme expressive master he would now become. Can anyone remain unmoved by<br />
those poignant last measures of the slow movement? Previn and his soloists made<br />
that extremely difficult.<br />
That Sinfonia comes at the start of Mozart&#8217;s mature mastery; the Symphony No.<br />
39 comes close to the end; the juxtaposition of the two works (both in E flat,<br />
if that news matters) made for an interesting study in growth. Mozart composed<br />
no orchestral work more exuberant, more rich in the interplay of orchestral<br />
color, than this Symphony. From the full orchestral might in the slow<br />
introduction to the giggling duet for clarinets in the minuet (giggled<br />
enchantingly by Michelle Zukovsky and David Howard), the work proclaims a fact<br />
sometimes overlooked: that Mozart, among the other facets of his genius, was<br />
the greatest orchestrator of them all.<br />
This Previn and his cut-down orchestra proved beyond doubt in this altogether<br />
splendid concert. The smaller pleasures of the Divertimento were also much<br />
enhanced by David Weiss&#8217; splendid quacking of the oboe solos. A fine evening<br />
for the Philharmonic, and for Mozart as well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/lapo-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TAVERNER</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/taverner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/taverner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the risk of sounding obsessive, Tuesday night&#8217;s &#8220;Chamber Music in Historic Sites&#8221; concert was one in a long series for which &#8220;perfection&#8221; is the most accurate description. The venue was beautiful; so was the music; so was the way the two elements seemed made for one another. The matter at hand was a program [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of sounding obsessive, Tuesday night&#8217;s &#8220;Chamber Music in Historic<br />
Sites&#8221; concert was one in a long series for which &#8220;perfection&#8221; is the most<br />
accurate description.<br />
The venue was beautiful; so was the music; so was the way the two elements<br />
seemed made for one another. The matter at hand was a program of Claudio<br />
Monteverdi, music&#8217;s first true innovative genius. The performers were the<br />
members of Andrew Parrott&#8217;s Taverner Consort in their first Los Angeles<br />
appearance. Their music, and their singing, made the clean, noble outlines of<br />
the Wilshire Christian Church, in downtown Los Angeles, seem even more<br />
beautiful this once.<br />
The music was entirely drawn from Monteverdi&#8217;s vast compendium of sacred pieces<br />
composed for St. Marks in Venice in 1640, marvelously rich settings of psalm<br />
verses and other biblical texts for vocal ensemble with instrumental<br />
underpinning, interspersed with Gregorian chants sung by solo voices<br />
unaccompanied. The expressive range here is extraordinary.<br />
Monteverdi, already the supreme operatic and madrigal composer of his time,<br />
here brings his sublime dramatic gifts to the underlining of words of passion<br />
and exultation in the liturgical repertory. It was fascinating, for example, to<br />
trace in several selections on this program the setting of the one word<br />
&#8220;misericordia&#8221; (&#8220;mercy&#8221;), always lit with a deep, mysterious burst of<br />
innovative harmony, always different.<br />
Parrott is one of the long list of British conductors concerned with<br />
&#8220;authentic&#8221; musical interpretations. He and his group have a long list of<br />
recordings to their credit, including these Monteverdi pieces and a recent,<br />
jubilant performance of Handel&#8217;s &#8220;Israel in Egypt.&#8221; His views on authenticity<br />
are rational and enlightened; his players use old-style instruments but aren&#8217;t<br />
afraid of an expressive vibrato when it shines a light on the music. His<br />
singers &#8212; eight in number for this particular program &#8212; are, similarly,<br />
unafraid to sound like what they are: skillful and dedicated, thoroughly modern<br />
artists.<br />
The result was authenticity in the best sense: a glowing, rich tribute to one<br />
of music&#8217;s astonishing creators. The program ran without intermission; seldom<br />
have 70 minutes seemed so short.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/02/taverner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the list of once-renowned composers currently and undeservedly in limbo, the name of Bohuslav Martinu surely belongs. During his time in America as a refugee from Hitler&#8217;s holocaust, Martinu was much performed; it seemed as if orchestras waited in line to commission new scores from him. Now his devotees, though ardent, are more widely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the list of once-renowned composers currently and undeservedly in limbo, the<br />
name of Bohuslav Martinu surely belongs. During his time in America as a<br />
refugee from Hitler&#8217;s holocaust, Martinu was much performed; it seemed as if<br />
orchestras waited in line to commission new scores from him. Now his devotees,<br />
though ardent, are more widely scattered.<br />
Lawrence Foster, who conducted Martinu&#8217;s &#8220;Frescoes of Piero Della Francesca&#8221;<br />
at the start of Thursday&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic concert at the Music<br />
Center, is clearly one of these. He is, in fact, one of our most valuable<br />
pleaders of lost or forgotten causes, as his recent recording of Enesco&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Oedipe&#8221; also shows.<br />
The music dates from 1953, six years before Martinu&#8217;s death. Although the<br />
inspiration is the artwork by the great Italian painter, the music is pure<br />
Martinu: the lushness of his Czech ancestry peppered by a harmonic language<br />
reminiscent of Stravinsky. The orchestral coloration is applied with a sure<br />
hand worthy of the great Piero himself; still, the music itself vanishes rather<br />
quickly from the memory. More bluntly put, there is sweetness here, but no<br />
shape.<br />
If anything, the meanderings of Martinu were shamed most of all by the<br />
evening&#8217;s final work, the wonderful G-major Symphony (No. 8 in the<br />
authoritative listing) by his Czech forbear Antonin Dvorak, music set down with<br />
the same glistening orchestral palette, but infinitely more tender and<br />
memorable. If these adjectives did not entirely apply to Foster&#8217;s performance,<br />
in which the first and last movements seemed needlessly brutal, the shape of<br />
the music itself was still discernible.<br />
Among the echoes enshrined in the walls of the Music Center&#8217;s Dorothy Chandler<br />
Pavilion is the ghost of a supremely wise performance under Carlo Maria Giulini<br />
from 1982. It immediately dooms any subsequent attempt.<br />
The splendid young Yefim Bronfman was the evening&#8217;s soloist, in the C-minor<br />
Piano Concerto of Mozart (K. 491), a miracle among miracles. Something seemed<br />
to be lacking here, too, however. Bronfman, ordinarily an intelligent hand at<br />
preserving the proportions in these mature Mozart concertos, here seemed out of<br />
touch with Foster and, thus, with the orchestra. The piano was too far front,<br />
sonically speaking; the marvelous interplay between soloist and orchestra<br />
seemed, this time, to be carried out across too vast a distance. Some beautiful<br />
playing, from both piano and the orchestral woodwinds, seemed wasted this time<br />
around.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When did any of us last hear William Walton&#8217;s Viola Concerto in live performance? Probably a lifetime or two ago; concertos for viola are rare birds indeed. That made Yuri Bashmet&#8217;s supremely beautiful performance of the work, with Andrew Davis conducting the Los Angeles Philharmonic at the Music Center on Thursday night, all the more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did any of us last hear William Walton&#8217;s Viola Concerto in live<br />
performance? Probably a lifetime or two ago; concertos for viola are rare birds<br />
indeed. That made Yuri Bashmet&#8217;s supremely beautiful performance of the work,<br />
with Andrew Davis conducting the Los Angeles Philharmonic at the Music Center<br />
on Thursday night, all the more miraculous, all the more welcome.<br />
Writing of Walton&#8217;s work when it was new, in 1929, the essayist Donald Tovey<br />
could see &#8220;no limits to what may be expected of the tone-poet who created<br />
it.&#8221; That sense of omnipotence remains in the work. Not particularly daring in<br />
its musical language &#8212; Walton never was, in fact &#8212; the concerto is a<br />
remarkably satisfying essay in a warm, intensely lyric manner that expresses<br />
great thinking with the simplest gestures.<br />
The concerto only lasts about 20 minutes, but its progression &#8212; from the long,<br />
haunting melodic lines of the opening slow movement, through the garrulous<br />
scherzo, to the finale that recedes into dark shadows at the end &#8212; is the work<br />
of a sure master. Tovey&#8217;s recognition of its qualities was keen, but it could<br />
actually be argued that this early work persists as Walton&#8217;s masterpiece.<br />
The young Bashmet is a wonder. Adept as a soloist, chamber-music participant<br />
and, recently, conductor, he looks like a romantic hero out of Pushkin and<br />
plays in a similar manner. The elegance of his phrasing, his absolute command<br />
of the mellowness that lies at the heart of his instrument: these were the<br />
elements that ennobled his work in the important Walton work &#8212; and, as well,<br />
in an unimportant brief Telemann concerto at the start.<br />
Andrew Davis is no stranger here, in his earlier capacity as head of the<br />
Toronto Symphony and currently as music director of the Glyndebourne Festival<br />
and the BBC Symphony. A sober, correct musician rather than a spellbinding one,<br />
he got the orchestra through a clean, classic, refined reading of Stravinsky&#8217;s<br />
Symphony in C, and a rather unruly one of that composer&#8217;s &#8220;Firebird&#8221; excerpts<br />
in the suite fashioned in 1919.<br />
It could be, of course, that the vulgarity of the &#8220;Firebird&#8221; performance was<br />
preordained, coming as it did after the serene good sense of the Walton<br />
concerto. It was, therefore, one piece too many on the program; less might have<br />
been more.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SERKIN</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/serkin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/serkin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last season Peter Serkin, most intrepid and interesting of all American pianists, embarked on a truly brave mission. He commissioned short new works from a dozen major composers around the world, and toured the country with a program consisting of these works and nothing more. He gave the program at Royce Hall in December, 1989, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last season Peter Serkin, most intrepid and interesting of all American<br />
pianists, embarked on a truly brave mission. He commissioned short new works<br />
from a dozen major composers around the world, and toured the country with a<br />
program consisting of these works and nothing more. He gave the program at<br />
Royce Hall in December, 1989, and was cheered by an equally intrepid audience.<br />
For this year&#8217;s tour Serkin has culled three works from that program, and<br />
worked them in around other music by Mozart, Beethoven, Brahms and Chopin. This<br />
was his recital offering on Tuesday night at the Music Center, and again the<br />
audience stayed to cheer. The motivations behind the concert were exactly<br />
right; deserving new works should be allowed to stand beside standard repertory<br />
composers, not quarantined in all-contemporary concerts.<br />
Two of the three new works were indeed, if memory serves, the best of the<br />
bunch: Oliver Knussen&#8217;s tough, gritty Variations, Opus 24, and Alexander<br />
Goehr&#8217;s &#8220;&#8230;in real time,&#8221; full of charm and wit that outweigh the dense<br />
numerological plan attached to the work by the composer. The third, Peter<br />
Lieberson&#8217;s Debussy-derived &#8220;Breeze of Delight,&#8221; seemed unsubstantial by<br />
comparison.<br />
Setting the new music in a sort of context, Serkin chose some out-of-the-way<br />
works by familiar composers: three of the  organ Chorale-Preludes, transcribed<br />
for piano, that were to be Johannes Brahms&#8217; last work; the Opus 126 Bagatelles<br />
of Beethoven; the F-major Piano Sonata that Mozart cobbled together from two<br />
movements composed here and a rondo from there; the garrulous, little-known<br />
Bolero of Chopin (with two Chopin Etudes and a Mazurka as encores).<br />
Enterprising program-building this, although that&#8217;s not the saying that<br />
everything worked. Neither the woolly Brahms pieces nor the jagged, unruly<br />
Beethoven pieces challenged the best in the pianist; the Beethoven in<br />
particular seemed rather tame in relationship to its fund of wildness.<br />
The Mozart, on the other hand, was the evening&#8217;s real triumph. The work is<br />
seldom played; perhaps its dual origin arouses suspicion. It is actually very<br />
much of a piece, three strong and well-planned movements, each a different kind<br />
of venture. into serious counterpoint.  Mozart at the time was in the process<br />
of discovering and devouring the music of J. S. Bach, and this deep, powerful<br />
music, with its ravishing slow movement and its strange experiments in piano<br />
sonority at the end, makes that clear. Trust Peter Serkin to make his every<br />
visit here a voyage of discovery.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/serkin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COPPOLA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/coppola/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/coppola/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the many good reasons for looking in on the latest chapter in the ongoing family picnic known as &#8220;The Godfather,&#8221; musical matters rank high. Even in the two previous episodes the surge and onrush of events always seem to foreshadow some as-yet-unwritten violent musical melodrama from the hand of a Puccini or Mascagni. In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the many good reasons for looking in on the latest chapter in the ongoing family picnic known as &#8220;The Godfather,&#8221; musical matters rank high. Even in the two previous episodes the surge and onrush of events always seem to foreshadow some as-yet-unwritten violent musical melodrama from the hand of a Puccini or Mascagni. In &#8220;Godfather 3&#8243; that unwritten opera gets written, as the red-hot measures of Mascagni&#8217;s &#8220;Cavalleria Rusticana&#8221; counterpoint the horrific bloodbath that brings Francis Ford Coppola&#8217;s chronicle to its smoky conclusion.These scenes from &#8220;Cavalleria&#8221; are shown as taking place at the Teatro Massimo in Palermo, as Tony Corleone, son of Michael, makes his operatic debut as the lead tenor, the hapless Turiddu who gets knifed by a jealous husband for his amorous escapades. Never mind that no untried tenor in real life gets a debut at the prestigious Massimo as anything more than a stage extra. Never mind also that, in order to interlock with the action of the offstage drama, Mascagni&#8217;s little opera has been chopped up and reassembled with opening and closing scenes reversed. &#8221;We had to do it,&#8221; was Carmine Coppola&#8217;s simple explanation. &#8220;Otherwise it wouldn&#8217;t work.&#8221; The &#8220;Godfather&#8221; trilogy&#8217;s composer, arranger, conductor and cultural conscience-without-portfolio; father of Francis, who directed, and Talia, who played Michael&#8217;s sister; grandfather of Sofia, who played Michael&#8217;s daughter; brother of Anton, who conducted the operatic scenes: the elder Coppola himself serves as head-of-family to the whole filmed chronicle, and has from the start. Surging headlong into a pastrami-on-rye at a deli not far from his home &#8220;in the low-rent part of Woodland Hills,&#8221; Godfather Coppola seemed happy with his many roles.Record collectors past a certain age know, of course, yet another Coppola: Piero, a prodigal composer and conductor who flourished around 1930 and who himself came from a long line of singers and instrumentalists. &#8220;I got a letter from his widow once, asking if we were related, but I don&#8217;t know,&#8221; Coppola said. &#8220;The name is common all over Italy. I was in Milan once, and I saw a Banco Coppola so I went in and introduced myself. They still wouldn&#8217;t cash a check.&#8221;Carmine Coppola turned 80 last June. He, too, got to appear in &#8220;The Godfather, Part III&#8221;; you can see him leading the Italian folk band in the party scene. You can also see him as he was 40 years ago, in the videos of Arturo Toscanini telecasts with the NBC Symphony recently reissued by RCA. There he sits in the first flutist&#8217;s chair, playing his magic flute in, for example, Wagner&#8217;s &#8220;Forest Murmurs,&#8221; a diminutive fellow with hair slicked back. When RCA gets around to reissuing Toscanini&#8217;s audio recording of Act Two of Gluck&#8217;s &#8220;Orfeo ed Euridice,&#8221; you&#8217;ll hear Coppola in the long flute solo in the ballet music.&#8221;My father fell in love with the flute while he was in the Italian army,&#8221; Coppola reminisced. &#8220;He was stationed at Forli, near Rimini, and there was a small opera in the town. He went to &#8220;Lucia di Lammermoor,&#8221; and after the flute solo in the Mad Scene he resolved that if he had a son he&#8217;d make sure that the boy got flute lessons. He married, and moved to New York, and after I was born (June 11, 1910) he made good on his vow.&#8221;After graduating the Juilliard School, young Carmine got a job in Hartford. &#8220;Radio stations had their own orchestras in the 1930s, and I got a job at WTIC. From there I went to the orchestra at Radio City Music Hall. Of course I didn&#8217;t know then that I&#8217;d be back there some day, conducting my own music for the the silent movie of &#8220;Napoleon.&#8221; How&#8217;d you like the music for that? Pretty romantic, huh?&#8221;By the time Toscanini and NBC beckoned, Coppola had moved on to Detroit, where he played in the Detroit Symphony and was also on coast-to-coast radio as flutist in the weekly &#8220;Ford Sunday Evening Hour.&#8221; His second child, Francis, was born at Ford Hospital during the Detroit stint &#8212; just in case you&#8217;re wondering where  his middle name comes from. Carmine Coppola remained with Toscanini for nine years. If you have the pirate recording of Toscanini rehearsing &#8220;La Traviata,&#8221; youll hear the conductor arguing with soprano Licia Albanaes. &#8220;Listen to Coppola,&#8221; the old man is screaming. &#8220;He play it right. You no sing it right.&#8221; &#8221;I used to tell Toscanini that I wanted to conduct,&#8221; Coppola went on. &#8220;He&#8217;d argue with me: &#8220;Why you want conduct when you play flute so good?&#8221; &#8220;But you were a cellist,&#8221; I&#8217;d say, &#8220;Yes&#8221; he said, &#8220;but I wasn&#8217;t a good cellist.&#8221;Showbiz beckoned, and Coppola followed his conducting ambition as music director for David Merrick productions, easing his Italian conscience now and then by conducting operas at the Brooklyn Academy. &#8220;Horrible, one rehearsal, maybe even less. But fun.&#8221;I was conducting &#8220;Half a Sixpence&#8221; on Broadway when Francis called from Hollwyood. He&#8217;d been assigned to direct a musical &#8212; &#8220;Finian&#8217;s Rainbow,&#8221; it ended up a flop &#8212; and he needed me. Well, you know the rest.&#8221;Coppola worked on several major films, both as composer and arranger. &#8220;Victor Young asked me to rescore the aria from &#8220;Pagliacci&#8221; for Lauritz Melchior. Now Leoncavallo did a pretty good job of orchestrating that aria himself; no, Young had to have something bigger for the movies. That&#8217;s the way things sometimes worked&#8221;Then Francis saw a revival of the Douglas Fairbanks &#8220;Thief of Bagdad,&#8221; a silent film with a new score played by a live orchestra. He decided to try the same with the legendary Abel Gance &#8220;Napoleon,&#8221; with Carmine pulling together a score part-original part-pastiche, with legendary results. That, too, has been Carmine&#8217;s role in &#8220;The Godfather&#8221; films, pulling together the major themes created by the late Nino Rota, adding others of his own as needed, bringing in repertory pieces to fill out the atmosphere. &#8220;The Godfather III&#8221; is a veritable musical panorama, with a grand religious chorus by Carmine, a band version of the famous chorus from Verdi&#8217;s &#8220;Nabucco,&#8221; a beautiful setting for guitar of Rota&#8217;s archetypal &#8220;Godfather Theme,&#8221; and, of course, the climactic &#8220;Cavalleria Rusticana.&#8221;JON: SHOULD THE NEXT TWO GRAFS MAYBE GO IN A BOX? [F/L]Typical of the Coppolas&#8217; respect for dramatic verities, they decided early on not to cast Anthony Corleone merely as a pretty Sicilian face with a dubbed-in tenor, but to find a real tenor who could also pass as a Corleone. Franc D&#8217;Ambrosio, the 28-year-old Long Islander, was chosen after an extensive talent search. &#8220;didn&#8217;t even know I could sing until my teens,&#8221; he stated in a recent telephone conversation. Trained at Hartford&#8217;s Hartt College and also at the Accademia Vocale at Lucca, D&#8221;Ambrosio had never done any more than classroom short scenes when he found himself tapped for the role &#8212; and for a reported<br />
$350,000, which no tenor has ever pulled down for singing &#8220;Cavalleria Rusticana,&#8221; or anything else, in an opera house.&#8221;It was an unbelievable experience,&#8221; D&#8217;Ambrosio said. &#8220;I never saw myself as a &#8220;Cavalleria&#8221; tenor; I hear myself more as a light tenor for, say, &#8220;Barber of Seville.&#8221; But Beppe di Tomasi, who staged the opera scenes for the movie, was really impressed with me. He told people that he could help me technically, but that I had a sensitivity that nobody could touch.&#8221; Supertenor Luciano Pavarotti agreed. After hearing D&#8217;Ambrosio he invited the young singer to his home in Pesaro. &#8220;He was also most encouraging,&#8221; D&#8217;Ambrosio reported.JON: SHOULD THOSE LAST TWO GRAFS GO IN A BOX ? [F/L]Even in its mangled form, &#8220;Cavalleria&#8221; seems headed for the charts &#8212; not that it has ever been far away. It won&#8217;t do Franc D&#8217;Ambrosio any harm, either, although he says he&#8217;s now looking at movie scripts rather than opera contracts. Carmine Coppola chortled over the notion of a raw tenor making his debut in such a killer role. &#8220;Nice voice, gotta mature,&#8221; was his one-line review.&#8221;We didn&#8217;t change any of the music in the opera,&#8221; Coppola continued. &#8220;We just put some of it in different places.I told Francis I&#8217;d be willing to conduct the opera myself. After all, I&#8217;ve done it before, and it&#8217;s a pretty square score. But Francis thought it would be nice to bring Anton in on the project. &#8220;You&#8217;ve got enough to do,&#8221; he told me.&#8221;One thing I want you to understand,&#8221; said Carmine Coppola at the end of his sandwich and his interview. &#8220;Sure, there are a couple of Coppolas on these projects, but it&#8217;s not because we&#8217;re related. There&#8217;s absolutely no nepotism in any of Francis&#8217; decisions. When we work together, it&#8217;s strictly as composer and director, never as father and son.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/coppola/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LACE</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listening to new music is, to a large extent, a process of redefinition. The composer presents you with an array of unfamiliar sounds, and asks you to expand your personal musical vocabulary to embrace his innovative idwas. It sometimes works. LACE (Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions), a lively downtown art gallery that also includes a large [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listening to new music is, to a large extent, a process of redefinition. The<br />
composer presents you with an array of unfamiliar sounds, and asks you to<br />
expand your personal musical vocabulary to embrace his innovative idwas. It<br />
sometimes works.<br />
LACE (Los Angeles Contemporary Exhibitions), a lively downtown art gallery that<br />
also includes a large performance space, is presenting three concerts on<br />
successive Saturday nights in its &#8220;Sonic Series,&#8221; devoted to exploring new<br />
musical sounds. Last Saturday&#8217;s opening concert, in a real sense, got off with<br />
a bang, in a program by the percussionist Ron George and the sarod player Linda<br />
Moskow.<br />
George, as his many previous concerts have demonstrated, is not just any<br />
percussion player. He builds his own instruments and he composes his own music.<br />
For the first piece on Saturday&#8217;s program he sat in, you might say, the<br />
driver&#8217;s seat of the &#8220;Bell Tree,&#8221; a fantastic composite one-man instrument of<br />
his own design.<br />
From a scaffolding of pipes and clamps, there were suspended 15 metal pieces<br />
of various shapes: old drumheads, pot covers, Chinese gongs. Below these were a<br />
further collection of metallic pieces: bowls, goblets, hanging cymbals and a<br />
steel anvil. On both sides were several large gongs and a tam-tam, activated by<br />
pedals. Down amidst all the paraphernalia, a paper scroll containing the music<br />
unrolled at the touch of another pedal.<br />
None of this would be more than clever hardware, of course, except that the 20-<br />
minute piece he played on his instrument, &#8220;Variations on a Butterfly&#8221; turned<br />
out to be music of considerable beauty, remarkable for its variety of sound and<br />
mood.<br />
Later George and several collaborators showed off yet another instrument of his<br />
fashioning, an &#8220;American Gamelan&#8221; which did, indeed, produce sounds<br />
reminiscent of its Indonesian counterpart. Instead of the various exotic drums,<br />
however, George&#8217;s ensemble consists of clusters of various-sized tubes, metal<br />
and bamboo, plus several more large gongs. His piece for the ensemble, called<br />
&#8220;The Floating Bubble,&#8221; came off as 15 minutes of gorgeous, complex clatter,<br />
considerably denser than the typical Indonesian repertory, bursting with<br />
energy.<br />
Linda Moskow&#8217;s sarod &#8212; a handsome, traditional 25-string instrument both<br />
stroked and plucked, smaller than the familiar sitar but clearly related &#8211;<br />
also made some marvelous sounds. Her part of the program included both<br />
traditional Indian classical works and, just a shade less successfully, some of<br />
her own songs that created a somewhat uneasy mix of east and west. The twain<br />
don&#8217;t always meet, you know.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An old friend has been in town these last few days, and has made himself welcome. Bernard Rands, former professor of composition at U.C.-San Diego, Pulitzer winner (for his &#8220;Canti di Sole&#8221;), currently Boston based, brought a glowing new orchestral work to this weekend&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic concert. The Thursday night audience, which isn&#8217;t easily [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An old friend has been in town these last few days, and has made himself<br />
welcome. Bernard Rands, former professor of composition at U.C.-San Diego,<br />
Pulitzer winner (for his &#8220;Canti di Sole&#8221;), currently Boston based, brought a<br />
glowing  new orchestral work to this weekend&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic<br />
concert. The Thursday night audience, which isn&#8217;t easily charmed by new music,<br />
seemed genuinely charmed on this occasion.<br />
Rands&#8217; work, which lasts about 20 minutes, takes its title from a Samuel<br />
Beckett poem, &#8220;&#8230;body and shadow&#8230;&#8221;  punctuation and non-capitalization<br />
as given [F/L]. The first of its two movements is framed by a fearsome outburst<br />
from the solo timpani at beginning and end. In between comes a delicious<br />
orchestral workout, mostly on the furious side but coming to rest now and then<br />
in the sunlight of simple, clear harmonies. There is no direct derivation, says<br />
Rands, from the Beckett text; the two works, even so, share an air of poetic<br />
inscrutability.<br />
The second movement is even better, a haunting, sinuous melody, ever so lightly<br />
tinged by suggestions of Oriental harmonies, emerges slowly. Clouded over by<br />
interfering percussion instruments at the start, it eventually shakes itself<br />
free and seems to glisten in pure light. The music ends softly, but David Alan<br />
Miller&#8217;s conducting of the piece carried enough conviction that the audience<br />
knew to observe a few seconds of respectful silence at the end. This is sure,<br />
expressive music by a master of the craft. It was good to greet Rands and his<br />
art once again.<br />
Nothing else on the program quite reached that height, however. Rachmaninoff&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini&#8221; is so loaded with bright musical tricks<br />
that you&#8217;d think it impossible to play it badly. It fell to the evening&#8217;s<br />
soloist, Alexander Toradze, to achieve that dubious honor. Toradze&#8217;s big<br />
fingers dashed around on the keyboard with a certain flashiness, but the<br />
playing was merely cute and brittle; there&#8217;s more to the music than that.<br />
At the end Miller and the orchestra roamed through Mendelssohn&#8217;s &#8220;Scotch&#8221;<br />
symphony, gracefully but without notable event. For all its beauty, its<br />
glorious wind scoring in particular, this is music with problems. It totters on<br />
the brink of pomposity and, in the slow movement and the final peroration,<br />
falls in. There was nothing wrong with Miller&#8217;s performance, both spirited and<br />
respectful, but ot made for a very long 45 minutes even so.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PERLMAN</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/perlman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/perlman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outside, the world showed signs of coming apart; inside &#8212; in UCLA’s Royce Hall on Wednesday night, to be specific &#8212; all was well. Itzhak Perlman is more than just our best player of the violin; he is also a musician. Violin recitals do not always count as serious musical events; at least half of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outside, the world showed signs of coming apart; inside &#8212; in UCLA’s Royce Hall<br />
on Wednesday night, to be specific &#8212; all was well. Itzhak Perlman is more than<br />
just our best player of the violin; he is also a musician. Violin recitals do<br />
not always count as serious musical events; at least half of Perlman’s<br />
did.<br />
That half, consisting of sonatas by Mozart (the A-major, K. 526) and Prokofiev<br />
(the F minor, Opus 80), drew much of its appeal from Perlman’s superior sense<br />
of the ethereal elegance of a Mozart phrase, his phenomenal ability to turn the<br />
slow movement of the Prokofiev into a gossamer thread of sound right at the<br />
edge of silence. In both these works he drew immeasurable support, furthermore,<br />
from the collaboration at the piano of Janet Guggenheim, the Bay Area musician<br />
who has performed and recorded with him many times.<br />
An eloquent and imaginative musician on her own, Guggenheim provided at least<br />
as much of the shaping force in the Mozart, a marvelous, subtle work full of<br />
dark, lyrical mysteries, as did Perlman. The Prokofiev, similarly &#8212; a work<br />
both wry and introverted &#8212; similarly benefited from a continuous sense of<br />
give-and-take. It is consistently to Perlman’s credit, in fact, that he knows<br />
how to differentiate between the purely showoff aspects of, say, the music on<br />
the second half of this program and music of greater intellectual substance<br />
that demands a true collaborative approach. Not all violinists are that<br />
considerate.<br />
The second half &#8212; that string of desiccated marshmallows that Edvard Grieg put<br />
forward as his C-minor Violin Sonata, and another string of separate tidbits by<br />
Kreisler, Poulenc, Albeniz and Tchaikovsky &#8212; did, of course, serve some kind<br />
of purpose, as the cheers of the near-capacity crowd demonstrated. The<br />
repertory may be mindless, but it can achieve a kind of glory when fiddled with<br />
as Itzhak Perlman surely can. Master fiddler, master musician and, in some<br />
antic stage routines during the encore pieces, a not-bad comedian, Perlman<br />
ranks as best-of-breed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/perlman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GINDI</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/gindi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/gindi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Felix Mendelssohn&#8217;s Octet for Strings, out of which eight members of the Los Angeles Philharmonic played the living daylights at the University of Judaism&#8217;s Gindi Auditorium on Monday night, stirs the listener&#8217;s spirit in two quite different ways. First there is its own store of beauty and exquisite workmanship, to hold us spellbound over its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Felix Mendelssohn&#8217;s Octet for Strings, out of which eight members of the Los<br />
Angeles Philharmonic played the living daylights at the University of Judaism&#8217;s<br />
Gindi Auditorium on Monday night, stirs the listener&#8217;s spirit in two quite<br />
different ways. First there is its own store of beauty and exquisite<br />
workmanship, to hold us spellbound over its half-hour-or-so length. But it is<br />
also a humbling experience; what had we mere mortals accomplished at age 16 to<br />
equal what the juvenile Mendelssohn had here created?<br />
Even against the miracles by the adolescent Mozart, this Octet holds its own.<br />
Mozart at 16 was making sublime use of a musical language in common usage at<br />
the time. Mendelssohn invented a language: the long, poignant song melodies of<br />
the slow movement, the elfin trippings of the scherzo, the exultant, visionary<br />
outbursts that round off the cadences in first movement and finale.<br />
The wonder of the Philharmonic performance &#8212; by Mitchell Newman, Guido Lamell,<br />
Lawrence Sonderling and Judith Mass, violins; Evan Wilson and John Hayhurst,<br />
violas, and Daniel Rothmuller and Stephen Custer, cellos &#8212; was the players&#8217;<br />
remarkable response to the work&#8217;s fund of creative exuberance. It wasn&#8217;t<br />
exactly a careful performance, but its flaws &#8212; a pushed note now and then, an<br />
attack not quite precise &#8212; seemed to stem from the composer&#8217;s own daring.<br />
It was almost as though all of us in that hall, on stage and off, had become 16<br />
again for the duration of the music. At the end we all whooped and cheered like<br />
16-year-olds, because that was what the performance, and the music, deserved.<br />
This was one of the Philharmonic&#8217;s Chamber Music Society series at Gindi, seven<br />
concerts through the season of interesting, stimulating programs played by the<br />
orchestral members and occasional guests (pianist Yefim Bronfman next time, for<br />
example, on February 4). If the Mendelssohn gave the evening its warmest glow,<br />
it wasn&#8217;t the only delight.<br />
Before had come five duets from 1911 by the Russian composer Reinhold Gliere,<br />
scored for two cellos and played this time by cellist Stephen Custer and<br />
bassist Jack Cousins: dippy little pieces sometimes perky and sometimes merely<br />
gooey. Then came Prokofiev&#8217;s 1924 G-minor Quintet for winds (oboist Carolyn<br />
Hove and clarinetist David Howard) and strings (violinist Barry Socher, violist<br />
Meredith Snow and bassist Peter Rofe): marvelous sweet-sour music from the<br />
Russian composer&#8217;s most experimental years. In a strange way, the Prokofiev and the Mendelssohn made a fascinating pairing.<br />
Both works were about breaking through; both owe much of their appeal to that<br />
very act of pushing back musical horizons. In both work &#8212; all evening, in fact<br />
&#8211; the players seemed aware of the special kind of greatness in this music. It<br />
came across.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/gindi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 1991 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any lingering doubts as to the high place of Witold Lutoslawski among today&#8217;s progressive composers can now be set aside. Thursday night the great Polish composer led the Los Angeles Philharmonic in a program of his own music, and drew the kind of cheers from a Music Center Philharmonicaudience unheard in those precincts for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any lingering doubts as to the high place of Witold Lutoslawski among today&#8217;s<br />
progressive composers can now be set aside. Thursday night the great Polish<br />
composer led the Los Angeles Philharmonic in a program of his own music, and<br />
drew the kind of cheers from a Music Center Philharmonicaudience unheard in<br />
those precincts for a new-music concert since &#8212; well, since Lutoslawski&#8217;s last<br />
visit there eight years ago.What is this, about Lutoslawski&#8217;s bristling, uncompromising music that exerts<br />
this power, even over a large Philharmonic Thursday-night  subscription<br />
audience, an aggregation not noted for its spirit of adventure? It&#8217;s a quality<br />
hard to define, but it works its spell nevertheless. Lutoslawski ended<br />
Thursday&#8217;s program with his Third Symphony, now eight years old. It is a<br />
strange, wondrous work, lasting about half an hour, fearsomely difficult for<br />
the players, who must not only play passages of demanding virtuosity, but must<br />
also make certain decisions on their own as to how the music fits together.<br />
Yet the music, for all its abrasive counterpoint and dissonance, has a built-in<br />
power to communicate. Whether you follow its intricacies with a score, or let<br />
the music wash over you, somehow its violence, its surges of irresistible<br />
energy, come across. Against all the doomsayings about music&#8217;s future, here is<br />
a testimony to the continued strength of the symphony as a musical form.The composer, a sure and eloquent conductor of his own music, chose a beautiful<br />
program to illustrate milestones along his own career path. To begin there was<br />
an early work, the 1958 &#8220;Funeral Music&#8221; in memory of the greatly admired Bela<br />
Bartok, whose music had long cast its spell over the younger composer.Composed<br />
entirely for string ensemble, the work did indeed evoke such deep mysteries in<br />
Bartok&#8217;s music as the slow movement of the Concerto for Orchestra.Bartok again played a role, curiously enough, in the latest work on the<br />
program, the 1988 Piano Concerto,  written for Christian Zimerman and<br />
beautifully played by him on this occasion. Are those bird-like chirpings at<br />
the start a tribute to<br />
Bartok&#8217;s Third Piano Concerto? And might the tendency of the work to snap in<br />
and out of a somewhat romantic posture &#8212; with an echo of, say, Scriabin here<br />
and there &#8212; also  be a tribute to that attractive last work that Bartok did<br />
not live to finish?  The excursions into romanticism are brief and congenial. The concerto is a<br />
clattery, upbeat work, lasting about 25 minutes, that ought to become popular.<br />
If it lacks the fierce thinking of Lutoslawski&#8217;s earlier masterpieces, in<br />
delivers its own treasurable message: the greatest among our geniuses are the<br />
ones who know how to smile.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1991/01/lapo-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEWMEXICO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/newmexico/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/newmexico/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 1990 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bored with the perishable artifacts of our own time, we travel far in search of something rooted in history. We come out of Rome&#8217;s train station to have our sensors astounded by the ruined grandeur of Diocletian&#8217;s Baths; we marvel at the enduring dome fashioned by Michelangelo over St. Peters. We don&#8217;t have to travel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bored with the perishable artifacts of our own time, we travel far in search of something rooted in history. We come out of Rome&#8217;s train station to have our sensors astounded by the ruined grandeur of Diocletian&#8217;s Baths; we marvel at the enduring dome fashioned by Michelangelo over St. Peters. We don&#8217;t have to travel that far, however, to walk in the tracks of other civilizations of other times. There are some closer at hand, no further away than, say, New Mexico.  Nobody can pretend, of course, that the remnants of the Indian civilizations that once thrived around Santa Fe can satisfy the same esthetic cravings as do the artworks of Italy. The hand of a Michelangelo may be absent; nomadic tribes tend not to cultivate stable artists. But the sense of history grabs us even so. The towering sandstone towers loom large over Pecos; the hillsides at Bandelier National Monument tell of multiple dwelling-places that make today&#8217;s condos seem puny. Santa Fe&#8217;s motivating passion is an obsession with its past. Sure, the clustered galleries along Canyon Road, and the clustered menus of the new restaurants around the Plaza, sing of the trendy, the mod. But let someone violate the ancient building code, put up a gas station or burger joint that breaks out of the adobe-bungalow cliche of the local architecture, and watch the vigilantes swarm.  The adobe fetish borders on the absurd in downtown Santa Fe, but the devotion to the distant past is ardent and genuine in the surroundings. Pecos and Bandelier lie in opposite directions out of town, an hour&#8217;s drive in each case; you could do them both in a day, but that wouldn&#8217;t do them justice. Each of them tells of a way of life both pastoral and hazardous. The Santa Fe Plateau is ringed with narrow, deep valleys. Today they are semi-arid, washed by occasional flash floods but basically hostile to serious agriculture. That wasn&#8217;t the case, however, 800 years ago when, as near as anyone can tell, tribes of nomadic Indians pushed their way into the area from other blighted regions and found the land hospitable.  Along the Pajarito Plateau northwest of the city the Anasazis (&#8220;ancient ones&#8221;) planted corn, beans and squash. At about the same time the Pueblo Indians settled along the Pecos River to the southeast; their farms were, if anything, more prosperous than those of their northern neighbors, and they developed a lively trade with neighboring tribes. In both places, the tribes dug in. The cliffs that frame Bandelier (which, by the way, takes its name from the Swiss archeologist Adolph Bandelier, who first surveyed and wrote about the ruins) are pockmarked by deep caves, the work of millennia of running water through sandstone. These gave the dwellers shelter, and also provided a way of anchoring huge dwelling complexes that seemed to lean back against the hill for support.  Today we walk the two-mile trail through the valley, marvel at the extent of surviving foundations of living quarters on level land, and make the gentle climb up the cliffside to peer into the abandoned quarters of a people who once lived well on this land. Nobody knows why the Bandelier settlements failed, but around 1550, after four untroubled centuries, they simply fell apart. Drought, disease, massacres by unfriendly tribes: all explanations are plausible. The lot of Pecos&#8217; Indians was somewhat more dramatic. By the 1500s the settlement numbered nearly 2000; the main pueblo, whose foundation remains, stood over five stories high and contained something like 660 rooms. Interspersed among the high-rises were the underground rooms (kivas) used for ceremonies. In the late 1500s the Spanish explorer Francisco de Coronado arrived from the south, hellbent in his search for the legendary Seven Cities of Gold. Coronado and his followers sacked the pueblo; the Indians crept out under darkness, waited for the Spaniards&#8217; departure, and then returned. By 1620 the Pecos pueblo had become gentrified. The Franciscans brought Christianity and built a church whose bulk dominated the landscape. A people&#8217;s revolt in 1680 destroyed the church, whereupon an even larger one took its place. That must have been some edifice for its time; what remains of its gigantic tower and huge encircling walls attest to the Christians&#8217; obsession with making their message visible. By 1840 the Pecos Indian population had dwindled down to a couple of dozen. The land became overgrown; the mysterious round underground rooms filled in with the detritus of ages. Again, as at Bandelier, it was an outside archeologist &#8212; Alfred V. Kidder, in 1915-27 &#8212; who dug into both the stones and the history of Pecos, and restored it to view. The Pecos land fell eventually into private hands, those of rancher Buddy Fogelson and his wife, the actress Greer Garson. The Fogelsons donated the pueblo site to the government in 1964. Stop off at the Visitors&#8217; Center at the entrance to the park; that soft, mellifluous British voice that narrates the ten-minute film is Greer Garson (Mrs. Miniver, to those of us of a certain age). Even if you&#8217;re old enough to remember Greer Garson movies, the circuit of Pecos is an easy stroll. You climb the ladder down into the restored kivas, and sense the isolation that made these rooms into magic places. From the rise near the church ruins, you can look down along the rolling Pecos Valley in one direction, or out to the truck and bus traffic along Interstate I-25 in another. The choice is yours.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/newmexico/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LACO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/laco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/laco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 1990 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobody has yet devised a more congenial concert companion than the six &#8220;Brandenburg&#8221; Concertos of Johann Sebastian Bach, and it&#8217;s not likely that anyone ever will. That being so, it should come as no surprise that UCLA&#8217;s Royce Hall was packed to the rafters on Friday night, to hear Iona Brown and the Los Angeles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody has yet devised a more congenial concert companion than the six<br />
&#8220;Brandenburg&#8221; Concertos of Johann Sebastian Bach, and it&#8217;s not likely that<br />
anyone ever will. That being so, it should come as no surprise that UCLA&#8217;s<br />
Royce Hall was packed to the rafters on Friday night, to hear Iona Brown and<br />
the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra in their elegant, bewitching performances of<br />
all six of these marvelous orchestral essays.<br />
A word, first, about that current bugaboo known as &#8220;authentic performance.&#8221;<br />
If you look through the latest record catalogue, you&#8217;ll find several dozen<br />
complete &#8220;Brandenburg&#8221; recordings: symphony orchestras, ensembles of<br />
instruments from Bach&#8217;s own time, even an electronic version or two. The Los<br />
Angeles Chamber Orchestra, made up as it is of sturdy studio freelancers, who<br />
play Bach by night to purge their souls after playing panty-hose commercials by<br />
day, makes no attempt to preserve the &#8220;authentic&#8221; sound of early instruments.<br />
There are, after all, many other ways to honor the authentic spirit of old<br />
music.<br />
The performances Friday night handsomely illustrated the best of those ways.<br />
Brown, conducting the ensemble while playing first violin (a perfectly<br />
authentic touch, by the way) still allowed her group such modern expressive<br />
techniques as crescendos, slowdowns at the ends of movements, and a marvelous<br />
way of keeping the great Bach tunes aloft.<br />
Yes, there were points where &#8220;authentic&#8221; instruments might have helped<br />
clarify some inner voices. In the first movement of the first of these<br />
concertos, the horns play a triplet figure to conflict with the eighth-note<br />
passages in the rest of the orchestra, and chances are that no power on earth<br />
can make that particular effect audible with the heavy tone of modern<br />
instruments. In the first movement of the last of these concertos, however, the<br />
solo violas in modern-instrument performances are nearly always buried by the<br />
rumblings of cellos and basses, as they were this time. There is no question<br />
that a lighter tone from the lower instruments would help to improve<br />
balance.<br />
Some of Friday&#8217;s playing, therefore, did fall heir to these performance<br />
hazards. But there were so many redeeming features &#8212; the burbling flutes in<br />
No. 4, the deliciously squawking oboes in the last movement of No. 1, and the<br />
over-all vitality of Brown&#8217;s visions of these wondrous works &#8212; that it would<br />
be downright mean-spirited to dwell upon passing deficiencies. It was a great<br />
night for Bach and, therefore, for us all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/laco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASSCOL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/classcol-25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/classcol-25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 1990 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even allowing for his usual boyish exuberance, Peter Sellars overstated the case for Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; only slightly, in his preamble to his famous video versions aired last winter. &#8220;A completely shattering experience,&#8221; he called the opera, &#8220;an evening in Hell.&#8221; &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; is all that, at least. If Mozart&#8217;s incredible artwork can strike modern [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even allowing for his usual boyish exuberance, Peter Sellars overstated the case for Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; only slightly, in his preamble to his famous video versions aired last winter. &#8220;A completely shattering experience,&#8221; he called the opera, &#8220;an evening in Hell.&#8221; &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; is all that, at least. If Mozart&#8217;s incredible artwork can strike modern ears that way (as it is bound to, when the Music Center Opera gives it the first of a five-performance run on October 7) think of what its effect might have been on its first audiences, in Prague 204 years ago. Even allowing for Prague as the most sophisticated artistic capital in Europe at the time, nobody had ever tried to put into an opera the devices that Mozart hurled into &#8220;Don Giovanni.&#8221; Opera at the time was usually beautiful, sometimes sublime, but it was still an entertainment of fairly conventional construction, a succession of musically independent separate numbers. The action went forward in the recitatives, then the characters held back and examined their feelings in the arias and duets. Even &#8220;The Marriage of Figaro,&#8221; Mozart&#8217;s masterpiece of 1786, the year before &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; starts out in time-honored fashion: a vocal number, some recitative accompanied only by the keyboard player, another vocal number, etc. &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; was like none of the above. Just take the first ten-or-so minutes; they burst through every convention of the time. Before we&#8217;ve even settled in our seats, Mozart (and, don&#8217;t forget, his librettist Lorenzo da Ponte) have stopped our breath. The overture, usually some joyous orchestral exercise (as in &#8220;Figaro&#8221;) that doesn&#8217;t necessarily relate to the music itself, starts off this time with the horrendous, jagged dissonances that will return, three hours later, to escort its miscreant hero to the Underworld. The overture doesn&#8217;t even come to a full stop; we are swept along into Leporello&#8217;s first aria, as the servant grumbles at his lot in life. Already that short pieces plunges us into the atmosphere of social awareness and struggle that will become a supporting thread as the opera unfolds.That short aria, too, doesn&#8217;t round off to a full ending. It breaks off. In bursts the Don himself, and clinging to him is Donna Anna, his latest attempted conquest. Is Anna trying to capture him? to shake loose of him? to get him to complete the rape? The music doesn&#8217;t stop its headlong pace long enough to tell us. The Commandant arrives; he and the Don fight and the old man is murdered, while Leporello, hidden on the sidelines, chatters away like a demented bassoon. Five minutes of overture, five more minutes of continuous, violent action: no opera in the world zooms so violently, so suddenly into orbit. Three hours later, it still hasn&#8217;t faltered. No less overtly than Wagner&#8217;s &#8220;Tristan und Isolde&#8221; or Strauss&#8217; &#8220;Salome,&#8221; &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; draws its motive power from human sexuality. &#8220;We don&#8217;t have the words to talk about it,&#8221; Sellars has said, &#8220;but Mozart&#8217;s music goes right into the dark crevices of the human soul.&#8221; How soon that shows up in the opera! Soon after the murder we confront one of Giovanni&#8217;s latest rejects,  Elvira, stalking the countryside like a starved panther, the archetypal woman driven mad by love (as with Dido of &#8220;The Trojans&#8221; here only last week). She comes onstage, her madness in full flower. She tries an aria, but Mozart keeps breaking off the vocal line into short, jagged phrases. That short spray of  broken-off, confused declamation does, indeed, get into the crevices of Elvira&#8217;s soul and lay bare her passion. Mozart&#8217;s music has broken out of the notion that pretty tunes merely decorate a dramatic situation; words, music and emotion become the parts of a single-minded, intense drama. Mozart&#8217;s ability to match music to character is phenomenal. At one end of the social scale there is the jilted, high-born Elvira. At the other end there is the gullible peasant girl Zerlina. Moments after the first Elvira scene, Giovanni is all over the innocent maiden, trying to lure her back to his palace. Their duet, &#8220;La ci darem la mano,&#8221; is probably the opera&#8217;s best-known piece; it is a grand tune, but also a fabulous demonstration of music&#8217;s power over the mind. The device is simple enough: Giovanni lays down his proposition in a long musical phrase. Zerlina&#8217;s answering phrase is equally long. But as the message takes hold, the phrases get shorter, the two characters move closer together (on the stage and in their music), until they&#8217;re finally singing in close harmony. What more do you need to translate the act of seduction into music? No opera of any era works on so many levels of perception. Sellars&#8217; controversial conception, with its background of gang warfare in a contemporary urban slum, had lifted the proportion between what was innovative in the opera in its own time and its social milieu, and transferred those proportions exactly to our own time. Again, it was the depth of Mozart&#8217;s own work that enabled the Sellars perception to achieve its purpose. Take, as proof, one final example. In the party scene that ends the first act, Mozart has pulled another amazing trick, to describe purely in musical terms the levels of society assembled in that grand salon in Giovanni&#8217;s palace. The aristocrats dance a minuet; the middle-classes do a contra-dance in contrasting rhythm; the peasants do some sort of clog-dance in yet another rhythm. Mozart&#8217;s incredible genius allows us, for a moment or two, to hear all three dances simultaneously, as if it were, indeed, possible for people on different social levels to coexist. But that dream is quickly shattered. Giovanni has gotten Zerlina off to a side room, and proceeds to dismantle her virtue. One scream from the girl, and the onstage dancing idyll is shattered. The social message is blindingly clear. The classes of society can coexist, only if the right of the upper class to rape the lower class remains intact. Imagine, putting all this into an opera! It only happened once, which is why &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; remains in a class by itself. Beyond doubt, Jonathan Miller, who directed the Music Center Opera&#8217;s production and Bob Israel, who designed it, have a vastly different &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; for our delectation here next week. But the power of the work remains. line Space&#8221;Don Giovanni&#8221; isn&#8217;t the only work of musical theater on the horizon, however. On October 4 and 5, at UCLA&#8217;s Royce Hall, Paul Dresher&#8217;s &#8220;Pioneer&#8221; will have its local premiere. If you know Dresher&#8217;s previous pieces, &#8220;Slow Fire&#8221; and &#8220;Power Failure,&#8221; with their brilliant fusion of pop, rock and extraordinary electronic invention, their devastating range of stage metaphorfor the myth and reality in contemporary life, you need no urging to make tracks for this latest venture. Old Dresher hands, among them the amazing singer/dancer Rinde Eckert, are again involved. Be there.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/classcol-25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COMPETITION</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/competition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;You have to realize,&#8221; says a contestant at Moscow&#8217;s Ninth International Tchaikovsky Competition, &#8220;that two weeks from now, one of us will be a world- renowned pianist, and the rest of us will be right where we are, or maybe running shops.&#8221; Honest, cynical and dismaying, the comment epitomizes Bill Fertik&#8217;s 90-minute documentary on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You have to realize,&#8221; says a contestant at Moscow&#8217;s Ninth International<br />
Tchaikovsky Competition, &#8220;that two weeks from now, one of us will be a world-<br />
renowned pianist, and the rest of us will be right where we are, or maybe<br />
running shops.&#8221; Honest, cynical and dismaying, the comment epitomizes Bill<br />
Fertik&#8217;s 90-minute documentary on the competition, airing at 8 p.m. tonight on<br />
KCET-TV (with simulcast on KUSC-FM). It may be the first clear-headed appraisal<br />
ever put on film of the grueling psychological and physical horror of today&#8217;s<br />
music competitions.<br />
The irony, of course, is that Fertik has aimed his cameras at the latest<br />
running of the very event that first put international virtuoso competitions in<br />
the limelight. If Van Cliburn&#8217;s win at the first Tchaikovsky contest in the<br />
summer of 1958 sent the Texas superboy into orbit, it did the same for the<br />
whole institution of the competition.<br />
Thirty-two years later Cliburn himself has all but disappeared from the scene;<br />
his &#8220;comeback&#8221; concerts last year went nowhere. The competition in Fort Worth<br />
that bears his name has become a ludicrous media circus. And the competition in<br />
Moscow that launched him has, as Fertik&#8217;s probing cameras make devastatingly<br />
clear, deteriorated into a parade of peevishness, bickering, unethical conduct<br />
by both judges and contestants and over-all mismanagement. A dreadful paradox<br />
obtains: a big competition win is still the best way to launch a career, and<br />
yet there are so many competitions these days that the value of a big win has<br />
sunk pathetically.<br />
Fertik&#8217;s excellent documentary zeroes in on two contestants who become friends,<br />
the American Stephen Prutsman and the Soviet Boris Berezovsky. Against a<br />
background of Moscow in the throes of perestroika&#8217;s economic hardship &#8211;<br />
terrible restaurant food, poor hotel service, pianos in disrepair and a paucity<br />
of practice space &#8212; the two somehow hammer their way to the top. Berezovsky<br />
takes the top prize but Prutsman, who comes in fourth, becomes a huge crowd<br />
favorite. Tall, lanky and golden-haired, he is greeted as a Cliburn<br />
reincarnation.<br />
Does it matter? The history of competition winners lists few who went on to<br />
long-term careers. At least Fertik&#8217;s documentary captures this air of pathos<br />
and frustration. Comparison with Peter Rosen&#8217;s goody-goody piece on the 1989<br />
Cliburn Competition (aired last winter on PBS as &#8220;Here to Make Music&#8221;) is<br />
inevitable. This one tells it as it is.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUNDAY&#160;COL</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/sunday-col/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/sunday-col/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Classical music is dead. So began a column encountered recently, by some writer beyond the mountains hiding behind the generic name of Jones. The premise of his morose words is that the giants have fled, and that they have taken their art with them. The giants in this instance are Herbert von Karajan, who died [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classical music is dead. So began a column encountered recently, by some writer<br />
beyond the mountains hiding behind the generic name of Jones. The premise of<br />
his  morose words is that the giants have fled, and that they have taken their<br />
art with them. The giants in this instance are Herbert von Karajan, who died<br />
last year, and Leonard Bernstein, who left us last October.<br />
Nobody with a working pair of ears takes this kind of guff seriously. Classical<br />
music has died, with commendable regularity, throughout civilized history. It<br />
died, attended by great public sorrowing, with Handel in 1759, with Beethoven<br />
in 1827, with Verdi in 1901. It died less publicly noticed, with Mozart in 1791<br />
(as we will not be allowed to forget in the anniversary year to come) and, most<br />
tragically of all, when Schubert’s unfinished life ended in 1828. &#8220;Every day a<br />
little death,&#8221; runs a lyric in a Stephen Sondheim show, and Sondheim is one of<br />
several living proofs that music lives on, and gloriously.<br />
The passing of Karajan and Bernstein happens, in fact, to be especially<br />
inadequate testimony to the demise of music. Both were, themselves, capable and<br />
confessed guardians of a dead art. Bernstein himself admitted as much more than<br />
once. Karajan would have done the same if he had had Bernstein&#8217;s gift for the<br />
public statement. Music&#8217;s particular glory has been its power of self-renewal,<br />
and it has possessed that power since the time of the ancient Greeks. It feeds<br />
upon itself to nourish its continual powers of growth and of change. It<br />
preserves its own corpses with immaculate skill. Karajan was adept at this, and<br />
so was Bernstein. The deaths of embalmers and pall-bearers do not, as writer<br />
Jones would have us believe, spell out the death of the civilization they<br />
serve.<br />
What this writer mistakes for death, actually, is nothing more than the latest<br />
stage in a pattern that runs through all the arts at all times. The phenomenon<br />
of the charismatic conductor, engaged in a two-way mystic relationship (with<br />
the music and with the audience) did, indeed, come to its long-drawn-out end<br />
with the passing of these two masters of the podium. Already, in their time, a<br />
rebirth of classical music had taken place in the presence of another species<br />
of conductor. Rather than placing his own podium manner at the center of the<br />
performance, this new breed relinquishes some of the spotlight to the music<br />
itself. Some do it with a great show of concern for the &#8220;authentic&#8221; sounds of<br />
music of the past. Others stay with the traditional sounds of the symphony<br />
orchestra, and accomplish their new-fangled results though the force of their<br />
intelligence.<br />
It is the pastime of the media to replace fallen giants with their latter-day<br />
clones. On Public Radio last week there was a serious and extended discussion<br />
of who would be the next Aaron Copland; similar discussions in past months were<br />
similarly concerned with &#8220;the next Bernstein.&#8221; These discussions, in both<br />
cases, missed one most important point. There is no need for another Bernstein<br />
or another Copland. These giants themselves fought the battles: for American<br />
music, for young American conductors. Why reenact these struggles, when the<br />
fruits of victory are already at hand? (The Copland replacements decided upon,<br />
if you care, were Elliott Carter and John Adams.)<br />
The easiest refutation for the notion of classical music&#8217;s death, of course, is<br />
to direct our attention to those many who stand in living disproof. This being<br />
the season of list-making, therefore, here is a handy list of ten guardians of<br />
the future of music. It is not, please note, the one definitive top-ten<br />
listing, but it&#8217;s a start. They are listed in no order except the way they<br />
first came to mind.<br />
[*] bo. Evgeny Kissin [B] The 19-year-old Soviet  whizbang has served<br />
irrefutable notice that the age of the musicianly romantic pianist has<br />
recommenced. Unlike the torrent of flashy fingerwork paraded on and off our<br />
concert stages in recent years, this sobersided, fiendishly talented youngster<br />
plays real music. Check out the RCA album of his Carnegie Hall debut if you<br />
still don&#8217;t believe.<br />
[*]bo. Simon Rattle [B] Now 35 and, thus, safely out of the prodigy category,<br />
Rattle has redefined the role of symphonic conductor in two ways. First, he has<br />
taken hold of the cultural growth of his community (Birmingham) and has gone<br />
most of the way to establish the city as a major British arts venue. Second,<br />
his own versatility (Bach, Gershwin, Stravinsky, etc.) sounds the final knell<br />
of the notion of a separating wall beween serious and pop.<br />
[*]bo. James Levine [B] Not the greatest, but merely the most important of<br />
traditional conductors, he has redefined opera &#8212; in his own Metropolitan and<br />
in all houses &#8212; as a musical balance of singer and orchestra. Even when<br />
results onstage are the despair of singing-buffs, he has made opera musically<br />
valid once again.<br />
[*]bo. Peter Sellars [B] Phenomenally interesting at all times, even at his<br />
brattiest, Sellars has redefined the whole realm of performance art as a close<br />
interweaving: music as drama as music.<br />
[*]bo. Carlos Kleiber [B] No, the spectacle of the mysterious, unapproachable,<br />
perfectionist conductor is not quite dead. Kleiber has achieved legend status<br />
for the marvelous strength and clarity of his performance, for the narrowness<br />
of his repertory (a fabulous opera conductor with only six operas in his<br />
intellectual luggage) and for his penchant for cancelling when matters are not<br />
to his liking. Like Maria Callas a generation ago, his stupendous performances<br />
suggest that his idiosynacracies are worth putting up with.<br />
[*]bo. Alfred Schnittke and Sofia Gubaidulina [B] Europe&#8217;s greatest composers,<br />
Soviet masters of a wide range of expression, mostly abrasive and all of it<br />
communicative. Schnittke&#8217;s Quartets and the Gubaidulina &#8220;OPffertorium,&#8221; on<br />
records, are proof enough that there are still masterpieces to be created.<br />
[*]bo. John Adams [B] A crossover darling, perhaps, but Adams&#8217; major<br />
contribution has been to compose thoroughly modern, approachable music within<br />
traditional frameworks (including grand opera).<br />
[*]bo. The Kronos Quartet [B] Like Adams, they are poised on the cusp of that<br />
mythical barrier between serious and pop. What they play (Reich, Hendrix, a<br />
medieval motet) they play with classical strength and depth. They make new<br />
music matter, and that is a crucial accomplishment.<br />
[*]bo. Stephen Sondheim [B] Like all the greatest artists, he forces upon us a<br />
rethinking of artistic categories, and he bestrides the boundaries with assured<br />
talent.<br />
[*]bo. Thomas Hampson [B] The young American baritone has been opera&#8217;s latest<br />
glory. (Check out his &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; on records.) Intelligent, versatile,<br />
phenomenally endowed, he could be the cornerstone of opera&#8217;s next, eagerly<br />
awaited golden age.<br />
Hardly a pallbearers&#8217; list, wouldn&#8217;t you agree?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/sunday-col/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/lapo-14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/lapo-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gustav Mahler&#8217;s Second Symphony, that grinning, gibbering fast ride across the hellish environs, that most sacred of all symphonic monsters, ricocheted dizzyingly through the Chandler Pavilion of the Music Center on Thursday night. Everyone knew that Yuri Temirkanov, the Leningrad dragonslayer, would carry the Los Angeles Philharmonic into outer space with his performance of this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gustav Mahler&#8217;s Second Symphony, that grinning, gibbering fast ride across the<br />
hellish environs, that most sacred of all symphonic monsters, ricocheted<br />
dizzyingly through the Chandler Pavilion of the Music Center on Thursday night.<br />
Everyone knew that Yuri Temirkanov, the Leningrad dragonslayer, would carry the<br />
Los Angeles Philharmonic into outer space with his performance of this work in<br />
this, the final event in his two-week guest stint. Everyone was right.<br />
If there is such a thing as larger than larger than life, this work of Mahler&#8217;s<br />
relatively tender years &#8212; be began it at 27  &#8212; is surely it. Even among the<br />
wild jumble of his later works, nothing quite equals the Second for the<br />
arrogance of its vision, the incredible variety of moods and devices that lie<br />
across his path. Some conductors would minimize the breadth of contrasts and<br />
impart to the work some sense of symphonic consistency. Not for Temirkanov,<br />
however, this easy path.<br />
It was, if anything, a performance full of illusion. It seemed, as it unfolded,<br />
quite remarkably broad: a measured pace for the opening funeral march, a slow<br />
dance through the andante with the opening upbeats oddly protracted, a finale<br />
that swept toward the stage, inexorably but tantalizingly, from what seemed<br />
like vast distances (but were only a few feet backstage, where the extra brass<br />
and percussion were stationed). If Temirkanov’s tempo contrasts seemed extreme,<br />
so did the dynamics, with the soft percussion strokes that began the finale<br />
particularly memorable, and the quiet, other-worldly start of the final chorus<br />
an effect bordering on the incredible.<br />
Yet there was illusion here; a performance so broad, so full of sweeping,<br />
mysterious oratory, seemed to go on for hours and yet ended up at the same<br />
timing (82 minutes or thereabouts) as the swift-sounding, matter-of-fact<br />
recordings by Georg Solti among others. Music plays tricks, and this strange<br />
bulk of a symphony sounded, under Temirkanov&#8217;s fluent, intensely personal and<br />
inventive direction, positively feather-light.<br />
Mezzo-soprano Christine Cairns, remembered for her splendid solo in the Andre<br />
Previn restoration of Prokofiev’s &#8220;Alexander Nevsky&#8221; film score, seemed<br />
somewhat out of her range in her first solo in the Mahler, but recovered nicely<br />
for her brief invocation near the end. Soprano Susan Patterson&#8217;s brief last-<br />
movement solo was properly angelic. And John Currie&#8217;s Master Chorale,<br />
motionless on the stage for the first 70 minutes like silent watchers at the<br />
brink of an inferno, blazed into its own brilliant life at the end. Wow.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/lapo-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MEC</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/mec-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/mec-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of all living composers generally accorded a place in the upper echelons, Hans Werner Henze is one of the most difficult to classify. German by birth, his musical inclinations are toward the earmarks of the French manner. To call him a German Stravinsky is to propound an oxymoron, but the description comes close. This week&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all living composers generally accorded a place in the upper echelons, Hans<br />
Werner Henze is one of the most difficult to classify. German by birth, his<br />
musical inclinations are toward the earmarks of the French manner. To call him<br />
a German Stravinsky is to propound an oxymoron, but the description comes<br />
close.<br />
This week&#8217;s Monday Evening Concert at the County Museum had as its final work a<br />
major Henze score, 32 years old but unplayed on the West Coast up to now,<br />
called, simply, &#8220;Chamber Music.&#8221; It is a work of great beauty, in that<br />
special Henze manner in which beauty seems suspended in a dark void, both cold<br />
and compelling.<br />
The work, which runs 45 minutes, is a setting of a fragmentary text by the<br />
mystical poet Friedrich Holderlin, meditations  on beauty and on the<br />
relationship of mankind to divinity. Henze has divided the text into six<br />
sections, sung by tenor accompanied by guitar and, once in a while, a few wind<br />
instruments. Between these songs, and again framing the entire work, are<br />
passages for guitar, some solo and some with strings and winds. Quiet and<br />
haunting, this is music that stays in the memory.<br />
A recording exists, with the tenor Neil Jenkins on the Koch-Schwann label, but<br />
Monday&#8217;s performance, conducted by Gerhard Samuel (one-time Los Angeles<br />
Philharmonic associate conductor, now based in Cincinnati) was altogether<br />
superior. Tenor Randall Gremillion curled his light, fluent voice beautifully<br />
around Holderlin&#8217;s redolent poetry; guitarist David Tanenbaum, {cq} known on<br />
his own for splendid recorded performance of Henze&#8217;s solo works, brought his<br />
refined artistry to bear on this score. In a season marked by an unusual number<br />
of truly rewarding new-music events, this one ranks high.<br />
The concert began with Gremillion and the instrumental ensemble in an excerpt<br />
from another major, neglected score, Luciano Berio&#8217;s wildly experimental work<br />
of 1970 called, simply, &#8220;Opera.&#8221; (This was an evening for music with generic<br />
titles.) It continued with Tanenbaum&#8217;s expert performance of Peter Maxwell<br />
Davies&#8217; rather faceless solo Guitar Sonata. Samuel himself was represented by<br />
his &#8220;Outcries and Consolations,&#8221; a work for chamber ensemble, in its world<br />
premiere.<br />
Samuel, German-born and, later, a disciple of Paul Hindemith, is a composer of<br />
some skill, in a rather academic style. Now and then some of his music gives<br />
off sparks, but the new work seemed, on first hearing, like so much proficient<br />
tinkering. On its own, however, the craftsmanship was constantly<br />
impressive.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/mec-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TALLIS</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/tallis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/tallis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Historic site, historic sounds: the Tallis Scholars were in town again on Sunday night, performing their superb repertory of Renaissance liturgical music, and also performing their familiar miracle of cleansing the ears and raising the spirit with the pure beauty of their singing. This was the Scholars&#8217; third visit, always under the aegis of MaryAnn [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historic site, historic sounds: the Tallis Scholars were in town again on Sunday<br />
night, performing their superb repertory of Renaissance liturgical music, and<br />
also performing their familiar miracle of cleansing the ears and raising the<br />
spirit with the pure beauty of their singing.<br />
This was the Scholars&#8217; third visit, always under the aegis of MaryAnn Bonino&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Chamber Music in Historic Sites&#8221; series, this time at Pasadena&#8217;s handsome<br />
neo-Gothic Westminster Presbyterian Church. The space was somewhat smaller than<br />
last year&#8217;s venue (the First Congregational in downtown Los Angeles) and the<br />
sound may have been a shade drier. But the gain was in clarity, the chance to<br />
hear the contrapuntal lines in a Palestrina mass and a Lassus motet curl<br />
gracefully and insinuatingly around one another.<br />
Conductor Peter Phillips had chosen a program in keeping with the season, but<br />
rewarding in any season. Anyone still under the delusion that all Renaissance<br />
choral music sounds alike should have learned otherwise from the juxtaposition<br />
of different composers&#8217; settings of the same text: William Byrd&#8217;s quiet,<br />
profound setting of &#8220;O magnum mysterium,&#8221; for example, against the simpler,<br />
childlike setting by Palestrina. Clearly, the spectrum of musical styles was as<br />
broad four centuries ago as it is today.<br />
And anyone still deluded that early music is all dull and slow must have been<br />
warmed and undeceived by the vitality of the ten-member Tallis group. Their<br />
aim, since their founding in 1978, has been to recreate the authentic spirit,<br />
rather than merely the sound, of old music. That, to Phillips, obviously means<br />
letting go at times, of overstating, say the marvelous interplay of rhythms at<br />
the end  of the Gloria in the Palestrina &#8220;Ut re me fa&#8221; Mass, the crown of<br />
Sunday&#8217;s program, to make its proper joyful noise.<br />
And so, Phillips&#8217; work is full of meaningful rhythmic liberties, all in the<br />
quest for vitality. His choir includes women&#8217;s voices &#8212; five, against five<br />
men, this year &#8212; because they are easier to put in tune than the customary<br />
boys&#8217; voices. The effect of his music-making, and that of his marvelously in-<br />
tune small chorus, is to propound the gospel that, above all, early music can<br />
be fun. Sunday&#8217;s concert, before a sold-out church, was fun all the way.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/tallis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/lapo-15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/lapo-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A mighty man, this Yuri Temirkanov. He proved it last month, when he brought his own Leningrad Philharmonic to the Music Center and had it jumping through hoops. He proved it again on Friday afternoon with the Los Angeles Philharmonic, in the first of a two-program appearance as guest conductor. As with the Leningrad, Friday’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A mighty man, this Yuri Temirkanov. He proved it last month, when he brought his<br />
own Leningrad Philharmonic to the Music Center and had it jumping through<br />
hoops. He proved it again on Friday afternoon with the Los Angeles<br />
Philharmonic, in the first of a two-program appearance as guest conductor.<br />
As with the Leningrad, Friday’s program had been planned as all-Russian, but<br />
Aaron Copland&#8217;s &#8220;Quiet City,&#8221; played to honor the late composer, was a<br />
welcome substitution for a piece of Rimsky-Korsakov fluff. The gods move<br />
strangely to bestow their favors.<br />
Temirkanov is great fun to watch. He hurls himself around in the grand, old-<br />
fashioned manner, with an occasional &#8220;how&#8217;m I doing?&#8221; look over his shoulder.<br />
Some may find it all excessive, but even the naysayers can&#8217;t help but notice<br />
Temirkanov&#8217;s galvanizing effect on the orchestra. Like Kurt Sanderling, but in<br />
an entirely different way, he gets the players to give their best.<br />
Nobody can really have wanted to hear Rachmaninov&#8217;s &#8220;Symphonic Dances,&#8221; the<br />
big orchestral work that ended the program. But nobody could have expected the<br />
music to gleam forth, in a grand burst of extroverted energy, as it did under<br />
Temirkanov.<br />
Arguably, this late work from Rachmaninov&#8217;s pen, with its occasional<br />
interesting flicker of sinister, sardonic harmony and even a quote from the<br />
&#8220;Day of Wrath&#8221; liturgical chant at the end, hangs together more cohesively<br />
than some of his orchestral flapdoodle, but that isn&#8217;t saying much. That<br />
Temirkanov found the impulse to make the music into a thrilling orchestral romp<br />
is, however, saying much for the conductor&#8217;s skills.<br />
Karine Georgian, 1966 gold medalist in Moscow&#8217;s Tchaikovsky Competition, was<br />
the splendid soloist in the Second Cello Concerto of Shostakovich: glistening,<br />
sinister music wondrously played. Perhaps the First Concerto has more emotional<br />
depth, but this work of 1966 is, all the way, a startling sound exercise. Most<br />
interesting of all is the strange clickety-clack for percussion right at the<br />
end, a curious anticipation of the 15th Symphony of six years later. Its quiet,<br />
inward solo writing has few rewards for a mere virtuoso. Karine Georgian, who<br />
has given much of her time to the new music of her Soviet countryman, brought<br />
to the work the intelligence and imagination it requires. She is clearly a<br />
major artist, here for the first time.<br />
Later this week the flamboyant Temirkanov ends his visit by conducting Mahler&#8217;s<br />
equally flamboyant Second Symphony, one of his few ventures here into non-<br />
Russian repertory. Can&#8217;t you just taste it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/lapo-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TENDERLAND</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/tenderland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/tenderland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[π[*] laby2;p1205. By Alan Rich [B] Daily News Music Critic [B] TO JIM JOHNSON: NO OTHER ART AVAILABLE; GO WITH COPLAND [F/L]As the final event in its month-long celebration of Aaron Copland, underwritten by the E. Nakamichi Foundation &#8212; meant originally to honor the composer&#8217;s 90th birthday but now serving as a memorial as well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>π[*] laby2;p1205. By Alan Rich [B] Daily News Music Critic [B] TO JIM JOHNSON: NO OTHER ART AVAILABLE; GO WITH COPLAND [F/L]As the final event in its month-long celebration of Aaron Copland, underwritten<br />
by the E. Nakamichi Foundation &#8212; meant originally to honor the composer&#8217;s 90th<br />
birthday but now serving as a memorial as well &#8212; the forces of the U.S.C.<br />
School of Music took up the considerable task of a complete performance of<br />
&#8220;The Tender Land.&#8221; Composed in 1954, the work deserves some attention as<br />
Copland&#8217;s only full-scale opera. Even so, and despite the valiant efforts of<br />
well-trained student performers, nothing happened at Thursday night&#8217;s first<br />
performance (of four this weekend) to vanquish the suspicion that &#8220;The Tender<br />
Land&#8221; is better off as a statistic in the Copland legacy than an actuality on<br />
the stage.<br />
Horace Everett&#8217;s libretto is set in, as if you couldn&#8217;t guess, the American<br />
midwest, where sweet Laurie falls for Martin the wanderer, only to be pulled<br />
out of his clutches by her mean and glowering granddad. The plot evokes dozens<br />
of well-known models, of which the play and movie called &#8220;The Heiress&#8221; comes<br />
quickly to mind. Is it coincidence that Copland did the film score for that<br />
very play?<br />
The fault, however, lies not in the timeworn plot but in the facelessness of<br />
Copland&#8217;s music, and particularly the clumsiness in almost all of his writing<br />
for solo voice. There are fine things in &#8220;The Tender Land,&#8221; mostly in the<br />
square-dancing choruses and orchestral interludes in the second act. But we<br />
don&#8217;t need to look into this otherwise bland stage work to establish Copland&#8217;s<br />
excellence in composing gfood square-dance music. E/P]<br />
Of character depiction and dramatic impetus, there is little in Copland&#8217;s score<br />
to establish its composer as any kind of master of the lyric stage. The opera&#8217;s<br />
most famous vocal scene, a 12-minute duet for the two principals, is a collage<br />
of small, incoherent patches. The musical idiom itself, Copland at his most<br />
open-handed, the harmonies sweet and inocuous, demands some sort of melodic<br />
profile and a sense of climax. None is readily at hand.<br />
For the U.S.C. production conductor Larry Rachleff used a greatly reduced<br />
orchestration, by Murry {cq} Sidlin, of Copland&#8217;s own revised and cut-down<br />
orchestra, and in the dull acoustics of U.S.C.&#8217;s Bing Theater not much sound<br />
got out of the pit. Thursday&#8217;s cast, one of two which will perform in<br />
alternation, had Susan Holsonbake and Scott Herrick as the romantic leads; that<br />
group will also sing on Saturday. Frans Boerlage&#8217;s staging had a curious<br />
tendency to clump most of the action on stage right; he did, however, succeed<br />
in drawing some lively action patterns out of the U.S.C. Chamber Singers, who<br />
consituted the chorus.<br />
THE FACTS<br />
*What: the U.S.C. Opera performance of Aaron Copland&#8217;s &#8220;The Tender<br />
Land.&#8221;<br />
*Where: Bing Theater, U.S.C. campus, near the Jefferson/McClintock<br />
entrance.<br />
*When: 8 p.m. Saturday, 2 p.m. Sunday.<br />
*Tickets: $4-$7.50; for information call 213 743-7111.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/12/tenderland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/lapo-16/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/lapo-16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So vast is the expanse of Gustav Mahler&#8217;s Ninth Symphony, so audience- involving its outlay of violent, palpable emotion, that any performance that gets through the work unscathed is bound to seem at least skillful. Even so, the performance by the Los Angeles Philharmonic under Kurt Sanderling on Thursday night must rank as an extraordinary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So vast is the expanse of Gustav Mahler&#8217;s Ninth Symphony, so audience-<br />
involving its outlay of violent, palpable emotion, that any performance that<br />
gets through the work unscathed is bound to seem at least skillful. Even so,<br />
the performance by the Los Angeles Philharmonic under Kurt Sanderling on<br />
Thursday night must rank as an extraordinary achievement.The music &#8212; 85 minutes of heaven-storming, demoniacal grimacing and, at the<br />
end, sublime, eloquent leave-taking &#8212; is as challenging as anything in the<br />
symphonic repertory, to conductor and audience alike. As at previous<br />
performances of the work in recent years, the Music Center audience was not<br />
entirely equal to the challenge; there were some premature departures.The forces onstage were more than equal, however. Search your memories as you<br />
may, it will be hard to remember playing as poised, as beautifully balanced,<br />
as the final five-or-so minutes of Mahler&#8217;s finale, with the sublime last<br />
melody working its way through the strings, ever softer until sound and<br />
silence become a single unity. Ungainly on the podium as he is, with his<br />
baton clumsily held as if it might turn and attack, Sanderling was<br />
nevertheless the shaping force in a supremely communicative performance.<br />
Those who question the high qualities of this orchestra under proper<br />
circumstances are invited to sample  memories of this one experience.Starting the program there was an authentic and endearing novelty: early Haydn<br />
(the Symphony No. 39), charming, witty and full of beans, a symphony in G<br />
minor that even ended in that key, against the common practice of always<br />
coming around to a &#8220;happy ending&#8221; in the major.  With music like this, the German symphonic tradition began; with the Mahler<br />
Ninth, it came to its close. At both ends, Sanderling reigned supreme.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/lapo-16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CONTINUUM</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/continuum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/continuum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The history of serious progressive music in the Soviet Union is only now coming into focus. It&#8217;s a history of oppression, of composers harrassed by official governmental forces, denied access to music from the West, and commanded to straitjacket their own compositions to fit the needs of the state. It is also the story of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The history of serious progressive music in the Soviet Union is only now coming<br />
into focus. It&#8217;s a history of oppression, of composers harrassed by official<br />
governmental forces, denied access to music from the West, and commanded to<br />
straitjacket their own compositions to fit the needs of the state. It is also<br />
the story of a few brave composers working virtually in secret, smuggling<br />
forbidden scores in and out of the country,  an avant-garde underground.<br />
This past weekend several departments at U.S.C. combined to present a symposium<br />
on &#8220;forbidden&#8221; Soviet art, and the climactic event occurred at the Schoenberg<br />
Institute on Saturday night: a fascinating concert of Soviet avant-garde music<br />
from the 1920s to the present. The performers were members of Continuum, the<br />
New York-based new-music organization led by by Joel Sachs and Cheryl Seltzer.<br />
It&#8217;s only recently, as Sachs explained in a pre-concert talk, that Soviet<br />
composers have gained access to the masterworks of their own time. Like beggars<br />
at a banquet, Sachs said, they eagerly assimilated 75 years&#8217; worth of outside<br />
influence, and some of their new music teems with the results of this new<br />
assimilation.<br />
That was certainly the case, on Saturday&#8217;s program, with a wildly eclectic,<br />
fearsomely energetic work by Alfred Schnittke for violin and piano, subtitled<br />
&#8220;Quasi una Sonata,&#8221; in which both instruments seemed bent on tearing huge<br />
holes in the atmosphere with the passion of their outcries. A Sonata for<br />
clarinet alone by Elena Firsova seemed motivated by the same intentions; in no<br />
more than ten minutes it explored with furious skill the full range of the<br />
instrument&#8217;s possibilities, and a few impossibilities as well.<br />
Two expansive vocal works were among the evening&#8217;s high points. &#8220;Pain and<br />
Silence,&#8221; Edison Denisov&#8217;s settings of lines from Osip Mandelstamm, was the<br />
one work that could, from any standpoint, be thought of as beautiful; Ukranian<br />
composer Leonid Hrabovsky&#8217;s {cq} &#8220;Kogda,&#8221; commissioned by Continuum, set some<br />
tiny poems of Velimir Khlebnikov (author of the mystical &#8220;Zangesi,&#8221; produced<br />
several years ago at MOCA) into a background full of such avant-garde toys as a<br />
thunder sheet and a brake drum banged upon with a hammer.<br />
Starting off the program was some short pieces from Soviet music&#8217;s early days:<br />
some dreary piano works and songs by Nicolay Roslavets and Alexander Mosolov &#8211;<br />
the latter best known for his piece of orchestrated social realism, &#8220;The Steel<br />
Foundry.&#8221; Also included was a 1949 Trio by Galina Ustvolskaya, a dry-point but<br />
well-crafted work by a Soviet iconoclast who was exploring her own brand of<br />
Western-style dissonance at a time when she might have been shot for doing<br />
so.<br />
Performances couldn&#8217;t have been better, with Sachs and Seltzer sharing the<br />
burdens at the piano, the stalwart mezzo-soprano Ellen Lang, violinist Mia Wu<br />
and clarinetist Nathan Williams. New York&#8217;s new-music audience is notoriously<br />
fickle, but their support of Continuum over 25 years suggests that they do know<br />
quality when they hear it. So did the cheering, capacity crowd at Schoenberg<br />
Institute, for a most worthy event.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/continuum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LONG&#160;BEACHOPERA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/long-beachopera/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/long-beachopera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Milenski has done it again.On paper, the opening offering of Milenski&#8217;s Long Beach Opera&#8217;s 13th season, introduced on Wednesday night and repeated next Sunday afternoon, may have looked like marking time. Given the company&#8217;s reputation for innovative fare, a revival of Mascagni&#8217;s &#8220;Cavalleria Rusticana&#8221; may have seemed like warmed- over turkey; Massenet&#8217;s &#8220;La Navarraise,&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Milenski has done it again.On paper, the opening offering of Milenski&#8217;s Long Beach Opera&#8217;s 13th season,<br />
introduced on Wednesday night and repeated next Sunday afternoon, may have<br />
looked like marking time. Given the company&#8217;s reputation for innovative fare,<br />
a revival of Mascagni&#8217;s &#8220;Cavalleria Rusticana&#8221; may have seemed like warmed-<br />
over turkey; Massenet&#8217;s &#8220;La Navarraise,&#8221; which completed the double bill,<br />
is less familiar, yet cut from very much the same cloth. But paper is fragile stuff, and Long Beach has, once again, put on a terrific<br />
show. The reasons are numerous. They begin with two spellbinding performances<br />
by Elizabeth Day, who sang the leading roles in both short operas. The list<br />
continues with the stunning work of director/designer Hugo De Ana, whose<br />
staging of both operas was full of fresh ideas including, in the Massenet,<br />
some battlefield fireworks that could easily blow you out of your seat. They<br />
also include the conducting of Michael Recchiuti, who delivered two poised,<br />
nicely balanced readings.Elizabeth Day is not a newcomer; she was the Elisabetta in the Long beach<br />
&#8220;Don Carlo&#8221; of 1986 and the Tatiana in the &#8220;Eugene Onegin&#8221; the year<br />
before. Those were roles for a dramatic soprano; Santuzza and the Navarraise<br />
actually call for a high mezzo. (Marilyn Horne&#8217;s recording of &#8220;La<br />
Navarraise&#8221; is the way most of us know the opera.) In this range Day is<br />
marvelously communicative. There were a couple of rough spots in the<br />
Mascagni, which may have just been warming up. In the Massenet she dominated<br />
the stage with some stunning vocalism, and a marvelous stage presence to<br />
match. This was, make no mistake, the work of a big new star.The rest of the vocal work was at least competent, sometimes more so. Arturo<br />
Spinetti&#8217;s big, burly Turiddu, delivered fortissimo for the most part, is<br />
surely one of several legitimate ways of getting through &#8220;Cav&#8221; (if not the<br />
only one). Kirk Redmann, the love interest in &#8220;La Navarraise&#8221; got through<br />
the notes acceptably, but might consider narrowing his rather juicy vibrato.<br />
Excellent support in minor roles was provided by Paula Rasmussen (a perky<br />
Lola in the &#8220;Cav&#8221;) and Louis Lebherz, in the villain&#8217;s role in &#8220;Nav.&#8221;<br />
Not the least of the evening&#8217;s pleasures was the rediscovery of that latter<br />
work. We know Massenet from the lavender and gossamer of his big, romantic<br />
operas. &#8220;La Navarraise&#8221; has its share, but also some gorgeous large-scale<br />
thunder. Its action-packed brief duration is a marvel of dramatic<br />
compression. Nobody ever said that about &#8220;Cav,&#8221; and nobody ever will.<br />
THE FACTS:What: The Long Beach Opera presents Mascagni&#8217;s &#8220;Cavalleria Rusticana&#8221; and<br />
Massenet&#8217;s &#8220;La Navarraise.&#8221;Where: Terrace Theater, Long Beach Convention Center.When: 2 p.m., Sunday, December 2.Starring: Elizabeth Day, Arturo Spinetti, Kirk Redmann.Behind the Scenes: Conducted by Michael Recchiuti; designed and directed by<br />
Hugo De Ana.Tickets: $10-$55. Information: 213 596-5556.Our rating: * * * *</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/long-beachopera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MEC</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/mec-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/mec-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Copland turned 90 on November 14, and the event has been widely and wisely celebrated. It is doubtful, however, whether a more loving and imaginative tribute has been staged anywhere than this week&#8217;s Monday Evening Concert at the County Museum.The turnout was one of the largest in the series&#8217; history; nearly every seat in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron Copland turned 90 on November 14, and the event has been widely and<br />
wisely celebrated. It is doubtful, however, whether a more loving and<br />
imaginative tribute has been staged anywhere than this week&#8217;s Monday Evening<br />
Concert at the County Museum.The turnout was one of the largest in the series&#8217; history; nearly every seat<br />
in the drab Bing Auditorium was filled. The crowd had come for Copland, of<br />
course, but also for Leo Smit, the great composer, pianist and toiler in the<br />
cause of new music, now officially retired but still glowing with his<br />
wonderful energy. Smit was the pianist throughout the concert: first in<br />
Copland&#8217;s Piano Quartet (with string players Elizabeth Baker, Valerie Dimond<br />
{cq} and Roger Lebow), then as partner to soprano Rosalind Rees in a bouquet<br />
of songs by  Copland himself and 18 of Copland&#8217;s close friends, and finally<br />
with pianist Adam Stern in a two-piano version of Copland’s &#8220;Billy the Kid&#8221;<br />
ballet.It was an evening full of rewards. Copland&#8217;s 1950 Piano Quartet isn&#8217;t often<br />
heard; it&#8217;s a tough work, full of a rough-cut, honest beauty that demands<br />
close listening. It represents Copland at a sort of crossroads, moving away<br />
from the easy style of the great ballet scores and toward a denser harmonic<br />
manner, and at the same time looking back to the gritty, dissonant works of<br />
his early days. It is also a wonderfully brainy work, with a final slow<br />
movement that resolves all previous problems and dies out in an angelic calm. Between the Quartet and the ballet of 12 years earlier the stylistic gap is<br />
wide. For all the loss of instrumental color, hearing &#8220;Billy the Kid&#8221; in<br />
Copland&#8217;s piano version makes it easy to concentrate on the hard-edged<br />
originality of the work, its pungent harmonies, its sheer bravado in, for<br />
example, ramming melodic lines together in separate and unrelated keys.<br />
The song group was beautifully chosen: a set of bright, brief birthday cards,<br />
sung with great style and exemplary diction by Rosalind Rees (wife of the<br />
noted choral conductor, Gregg Smith). With the auditorium in darkness (why?)<br />
it was sometimes hard to remember which song was which, but such beauties as<br />
Virgil Thomson&#8217;s setting of Gertrude Stein&#8217;s &#8220;Susie Asado&#8221; and Elliott<br />
Carter&#8217;s of the Robert Frost &#8220;The Line-Gang,&#8221;  were easy to identify and<br />
hard to forget. So was David Raksin&#8217;s well-worn but still haunting &#8220;Laura&#8221;<br />
and an unfamiliar, ravishing Leonard Bernstein song, the 1950 &#8220;My House&#8221; to<br />
a text of his own.Performances throughout were of top-quality, but the evening&#8217;s highest<br />
pleasure was the sight of Smit at the piano, obviously standing in for<br />
Copland himself, having a whale of a good time  and anxious to share<br />
it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/mec-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/lapo-17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/lapo-17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It didn&#8217;t take much imagination to predict that the stars would be in their proper places for this past weekend&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic concerts. With Murray Perahia, our most serious romantic pianist, on hand to play Brahms, and Kurt Sanderling, one of the last of the old-school classicist, involved with Beethoven, Friday night&#8217;s program (repeated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It didn&#8217;t take much imagination to predict that the stars would be in their<br />
proper places for this past weekend&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic concerts. With<br />
Murray Perahia, our most serious romantic pianist, on hand to play Brahms,<br />
and Kurt Sanderling, one of the last of the old-school classicist, involved<br />
with Beethoven, Friday night&#8217;s program (repeated on Saturday and Sunday)<br />
added up to a couldn&#8217;t-lose situation.And so it was. Perahia and the orchestra began with a spacious, warm-hearted<br />
reading of the Brahms Second Concerto. It lasted nearly an hour, but it was<br />
paved with gold all the way.Actually, there is no other way to play this work. In a meeting of minds that<br />
bridged the age gap between soloist (42) and conductor (78), Perahia and<br />
Sanderling mined the vast expanses of the Brahms for its fund of eloquence<br />
and sweet poetry. The slow movement, brought on by the melting warmth of<br />
Ronald Leonard&#8217;s cello solo, properly became the sort of quiet reverie that<br />
you hear with your inner ear. The buoyant finale positively scampered.A routine program-planner might have scheduled the Brahms at the end, and the<br />
quieter joys of the Beethoven &#8220;Pastoral&#8221; Symphony for starters. By<br />
reversing the order, however, and by conducting the Beethoven in a manner so<br />
miraculous that the work almost seemed newly composed, Sanderling sent the<br />
crowd home with all kinds of new thoughts about this much-loved and yet<br />
little-known flight of Beethoven&#8217;s purest fantasy.Do we, for example, pay enough attention to the miracle of Beethoven&#8217;s<br />
instrumentation in this work &#8212; a quality not at all evident, by the way, in<br />
the mangled version used in Disney&#8217;s &#8220;Fantasia?&#8221; Here, in the subtle glints<br />
of this music, is the extraordinary case of a composer going rapidly deaf,<br />
yet able in his mind to concoct a rainbow of sounds &#8212; the blend of strings<br />
and a solo bassoon that rounds off the first movement, the music of the<br />
second-movement brook, its own murmuring constantly echoed by other dabs of<br />
murmuring in the woodwinds, the radiant joy of horns and other brass<br />
instruments in the sunlight after the storm.All this came across in the quiet, understated Sanderling performance, in<br />
which the overriding concern seemed to be the preservation of absolute<br />
orchestral clarity. There was one miscalculation: the specified repeat in the<br />
first movement went unobserved, and the over-all balance of the movement<br />
suffered thereby. Still, there was the exuberance of Beethoven&#8217;s remarkable<br />
invention, otherwise beautifully honored under Sanderling&#8217;s probing<br />
leadership.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/lapo-17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASNTZ</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/clasntz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/clasntz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A small office building stands at the corner of Tampa Ave. and Roscoe Blvd. in Northridge. From its half-timbered, archaic look, it might have been designed by and for a gang of Munchkins. Instead, it houses the headquarters of DCC Compact Classics, which is the outfit you talk to whenever you&#8217;re looking for recordings from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A small office building stands at the corner of Tampa Ave. and Roscoe Blvd. in<br />
Northridge. From its half-timbered, archaic look, it might have been designed<br />
by and for a gang of Munchkins. Instead, it houses the headquarters of DCC<br />
Compact Classics, which is the outfit you talk to whenever you&#8217;re looking for<br />
recordings from Bulgaria.<br />
DCC is a label both old and new. Old, it was  known as Dunhill, with a strong<br />
pop identification and a catalog listing the likes of Sammy Davis Jr,, Judy<br />
Garland and Ray Charles. Then, sometime last year, the makers of Dunhill<br />
cigarettes brought suit against the use of their name, and so Marshall<br />
Blonfield, the head of Dunhill-the-record, set up new quarters in Northridge,<br />
with a new label, DCC in which the &#8220;D&#8221; &#8212; which doesn&#8217;t require an<br />
encyclopedia to figure out &#8212; maintains the link with the past.<br />
What has any of this got to do with Bulgaria? Enter Jerry Tolmich, one of the<br />
surviving patriarchs of the classical record business, p-r executive for a<br />
time at Columbia Records on both coasts, currently head of his own company<br />
called AVM (&#8220;Audio-Visual Masterpieces&#8221;) which is the exclusive American<br />
affiliate of Balkanton, which is Bulgaria&#8217;s major classical label. Under a<br />
DCC-AVM alliance, Tolmich has moved his office, too, up to the Munchkin<br />
building in Northridge, making that corner the Bulgarian records capitol of<br />
the entire Western World.<br />
&#8220;AVM is a company to be reckoned with, now and in the future,&#8221; says the<br />
hearty, garrulous Tolmich. Already, his catalog bears out his boast.<br />
Everything in it so far is some kind of premiere. One disc contains all of<br />
Bartok&#8217;s Piano Concertos &#8212; the first time all three have been on a single<br />
record. Another contains three Liszt Piano Concertos: the familiar Nos. 1 &#038; 2,<br />
and an obscure orchestration of the solo &#8220;Concerto Pathetique&#8221; and also,<br />
thus, a world premiere. A complete recording of Debussy&#8217;s piano Preludes is<br />
listed as &#8220;the first time complete Preludes in stereo on 1 CD.&#8221;  One genuine<br />
curiosity is a piano transcription of, of all things, Edward Elgar&#8217;s First<br />
Symphony. Responding to a raised eyebrow, Tolmich asserted that the pile of<br />
advance orders for that undoubted rarity was already mountainous.<br />
One AVM-DCC disc clearly bound for success is an operatic recital, recorded in<br />
1981, by the legendary Bulgarian bass Boris Christoff, with chorus and<br />
orchestra conducted by Ettore Gracis. &#8220;That one is only a western-world<br />
premiere,&#8221; smiled Tolmich. &#8220;It has never been issued outside Bulgaria.&#8221;<br />
One major breakthrough concerns price: AVM&#8217;s classical line lists at $8.98.<br />
with an even cheaper &#8220;Best of Composer&#8221; line priced at $5.98. Even here<br />
there are surprises: a &#8220;Best of Gershwin&#8221; disc with performances of<br />
&#8220;Rhapsody in Blue&#8221; and the Concerto in F, by the Bulgarian Broadcasting<br />
Symphony under Jo Alfidi.<br />
Remember Jo Alfidi? They called him Joey back in 1960, when as a dimpled<br />
cherub of 10 he had played his  Piano Concerto for the Queen Mother Elisabeth<br />
of Belgium. Two years later, he got her to visit his own home in Yonkers; now<br />
there he is, conducting Gershwin in Sofia for records distributed out of<br />
Northridge. Small, indeed, is the world!<br />
[*]bo. Where and When? [B] Trying to discover the extent of Los Angeles-area<br />
music making is frustrating at best, and becomes more so as the number of<br />
events increases year after year. No daily or weekly newspaper has room for<br />
the complete list, nor the facility to hunt down all the information.<br />
This, then, is by way of greeting the 1990/91 Cauer Calendar of Classical<br />
Musical Events, fresh at hand, a 36-page well-printed listing of the entire<br />
ongoing musical season so far as it is presently known. Robert Cauer is a<br />
violin restorer and dealer, with a shop at 2242 Cahuenga Blvd., Hollywood<br />
90068. He has produced his calendar free of charge, supported by a few<br />
advertisers.<br />
It&#8217;s a remarkable job, covering the concert and operatic scene from the San<br />
Fernando Valley down to Costa Mesa and east to Riverside. It even includes<br />
such added amenities as an accurate phone list of musical venues, including<br />
churches. Blessings upon Robert Cauer, for recognizing one of this community&#8217;s<br />
most urgent needs and fulfilling it so well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/clasntz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/lapo-18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/lapo-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Los Angeles Philharmonic is many kinds of orchestra, depending on the circumstances. For the young conductors, it is quirky and edgy; under Andre Previn, it matches his grayness; for Kurt Sanderling, it is somehow transformed into a noble, resonant ensemble in the best European manner. Thursday night at the Music Center, Sanderling began his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Los Angeles Philharmonic is many kinds of orchestra, depending on the<br />
circumstances. For the young conductors, it is quirky and edgy; under Andre<br />
Previn, it matches his grayness; for Kurt Sanderling, it is somehow<br />
transformed into a noble, resonant ensemble in the best European manner.<br />
Thursday night at the Music Center, Sanderling began his annual stint that has<br />
become a high point in every Philharmonic season; a large crowd made it clear<br />
that he had been missed. Nobody in the orchestra has ever advanced a<br />
satisfactory explanation as to why this venerable veteran, now 78, invariably<br />
makes our local ensemble sound better than you&#8217;d think it could. It’s not a<br />
matter of technical wizardry so much as simple mutual respect and love. &#8220;It&#8217;s<br />
just that he makes us aware of the music itself,&#8221; one player once said. It&#8217;s<br />
as simple as that.<br />
Sanderling&#8217;s major work on this, the first of four programs he is down for<br />
this season, was the Bruckner Fourth, that majestic symphonic corpse. It would<br />
be stretching a point to suggest that he brought the work completely to life,<br />
since that is a task beyond human capability. But he and the orchestra did<br />
join forces in 75 minutes of marvelous sound-spinning, from the first<br />
throbbing of the strings, like an intake of breath right at the edge of<br />
silence, to the exultant hunting horns of the scherzo, to those final pages<br />
(of triumph? or simply of relief?) when the heavens do, indeed, open and the<br />
hot celestial light pours through.<br />
That, one presumes, is why people bother with Bruckner at all: those hours of<br />
pain and the ensuing moments of blessed release. In defense of the Fourth, it<br />
can at least be ascertained that the work is shorter than some.<br />
Miriam Fried was the evening&#8217;s soloist, the good Romanian-born violinist now<br />
living in New York, one-time protegee of Isaac Stern. She played the Mozart<br />
A-major Violin Concerto, for which Sanderling had wisely cut down the<br />
orchestra to chamber-ensemble size.<br />
Even so, she did not seem happy in the work. The term &#8220;dead-pan&#8221; is not very<br />
kind, but it came to mind at many junctures in the performance. She used the<br />
corny, sentimental cadenzas of Joseph Joachim, which strengthened the<br />
impression that she didn&#8217;t really know, or care, what this lovely, unruffled<br />
music is really about.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/lapo-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EMERSONS</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/emersons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/emersons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ultimate test of quality for any chamber-music ensemble, and for its audience as well, is the slow movement from any of Beethoven&#8217;s mature string quartet. The sublime blend of vision, passion and mystery, the way Beethoven combines so few notes to signify so much: these stand as the definitive statement on the power that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ultimate test of quality for any chamber-music ensemble, and for its<br />
audience as well, is the slow movement from any of Beethoven&#8217;s mature string<br />
quartet. The sublime blend of vision, passion and mystery, the way Beethoven<br />
combines so few notes to signify so much: these stand as the definitive<br />
statement on the power that music exerts at both ends of the process of<br />
communication.<br />
And it was this moment in the Emerson Quartet&#8217;s concert on Sunday afternoon,<br />
at UCLA&#8217;s Schoenberg Hall before a turnaway crowd, that most glowingly<br />
affirmed the greatness of the event. These four young men, together now for 14<br />
years, delivered the slow movement of Beethoven&#8217;s Second &#8220;Rasoumovsky&#8221;<br />
Quartet with an extraordinary blend of intensity and intense calm. If the<br />
legend that Beethoven conceived this particular music while contemplating the<br />
starry sky has any validity, the Emersons&#8217; performance fulfilled the story.The<br />
silence their playing inspired out front was something you could almost taste.<br />
None of this should come as any surprise. The Emerson Quartet is a frequent<br />
and welcome visitor, with series of concerts at the John Anson Ford<br />
Amphitheater and a Beethoven cycle at several historic sites among their<br />
recent local credits. In an era when cool meticulousness is especially prized,<br />
this group stands apart by virtue of the passion in their work and their<br />
fearless risk-taking (ub their choices of extreme ranges of tempo and<br />
dynamics, for example). They seem capable of every musical emotion except<br />
boredom.<br />
They are proficient, as well, in a wide range. Sunday&#8217;s program included<br />
Mozart&#8217;s stern, chill C-minor Adagio and Fugue, Elliot Carter&#8217;s pliant little<br />
Elegy for Quartet (early Carter, somewhat French in its musical manner) and<br />
the exuberant First Quartet of Bela Bartok, music teeming with its own energy<br />
and full also of prophecies of the greater composer to come. Even the one<br />
encore was uncommonly interesting: a Mozart Rondo, planned for the A-major<br />
Quartet but left unfinished. By a composer&#8217;s triumphs, and by his abandoned<br />
projects as well, we learn his full stature.<br />
All this was superbly played, but the Beethoven surpassed all else, even so.<br />
Music restless, full of grit and defiance, at rest only in the amusing<br />
quotation of a Russian folksong in the scherzo: it clearly held the four<br />
players in its spell, and they communicated the magic. First violinist Philip<br />
Setzer, who had occupied the second violinist&#8217;s chair during the program&#8217;s<br />
first half, got his instrument to soar enchantingly in that slow movement. His<br />
colleagues: violinist Eugene Drucker, violist Lawrence Dutton and cellist<br />
David Finckel were no less in tune with this one-of-a-kind masterwork.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/emersons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LENINGRAD&#160;2</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/leningrad-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/leningrad-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Leningrad marvel continues. Thursday night&#8217;s concert at the Music Center, the second of four by the visiting Leningrad Philharmonic, once again drew a capacity crowd and gave it plenty to cheer. Mariss Jansons, the orchestra&#8217;s associate conductor was in charge, remembered here for the Tchaikovsky Festival concerts he led with the Los Angeles Philharmonic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Leningrad marvel continues. Thursday night&#8217;s concert at the Music Center,<br />
the second of four by the visiting Leningrad Philharmonic, once again drew a<br />
capacity crowd and gave it plenty to cheer. Mariss Jansons, the orchestra&#8217;s<br />
associate conductor was in charge, remembered here for the Tchaikovsky<br />
Festival concerts he led with the Los Angeles Philharmonic in the spring of<br />
1988.<br />
No greater contrast in podium manner exists than between Jansons&#8217; clear,<br />
classic beat and his unassuming stance and the flamboyant demeanor of his<br />
colleague, Yuri Temirkanov  that&#8217;s the real spelling [F/L] as witnessed at<br />
Wednesday&#8217;s concert. Both, however, drew resplendent results, an amazing<br />
display of orchestral discipline, beautifully balanced tone and stunning<br />
control over dynamics.<br />
Jansons&#8217; program, once again, was Prokofiev/Tchaikovsky: a suite of &#8220;Romeo<br />
and Juliet&#8221; ballet excerpts and the one-movement First Piano Concerto by the<br />
former, and Tchaikovsky&#8217;s Fifth Symphony. Dmitri Alexeev was the capable<br />
soloist in the concerto, a strange, vacillating work (robust romanticism one<br />
minute, brittle abrasiveness the next) interesting mostly as the pad from<br />
which a brilliant career would someday be launched. {E/P]<br />
The Tchaikovsky, as you might have guessed, was the evening&#8217;s major triumph.<br />
What was there, you had to wonder, that made this performance under Jansons<br />
satisfying in exactly the way last week&#8217;s performance here by the Japan<br />
Philharmonic was not? It wasn&#8217;t just a matter of nationality; plenty of non-<br />
Russian orchestras do spectacularly well by Tchaikovsky.<br />
No, it had to do with matters of eloquence. Both performances were note-<br />
perfect; both took some fearsome risks with breakneck tempos in the finale.<br />
But the one, the Japanese performance, seemed to stop at putting the notes<br />
across. Under Jansons, and with some stunning solo work from all over his<br />
orchestra &#8212; the brooding, stark clarinet tone, the extraordinary playing of<br />
the horns, not only in the famous &#8220;Moon Love&#8221; solo but elsewhere in their<br />
soft, muted punctuation &#8212; you heard long, oratorical lines of thought, a<br />
sense of building relatively simple ideas into grandiose structures. This time<br />
the Tchaikovsky Fifth resounded as a masterpiece; the last time it didn&#8217;t: as<br />
simple as that.<br />
Some details were fascinating. The orchestra is seated with the first and<br />
second violins down front on either side, behind to the right and cellos and<br />
basses to the left. Violins down front lend a special brilliance to any<br />
orchestra. Toscanini favored that arrangement; now it is generally out of<br />
favor except for &#8220;authentic&#8221; early music ensembles. But a lot of<br />
Tchaikovsky&#8217;s scoring seems to demand a special  kind of interchange, back and<br />
forth across the stage between the two groups of violins, and those effects<br />
were nicely brought out in this week&#8217;s performances.<br />
Someday, in a better world, all orchestras will sound like this.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/leningrad-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LENINGRAD</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/leningrad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/leningrad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Word has it that the Leningrad Philharmonic Orchestra of the U.S.S.R. &#8212; to use its full title this once &#8212; is some kind of stupendous performing organization. Word, this once, is right.Its history is splendid enough. Descended from the orchestra of the St. Petersburg court, the ensemble was anointed the Leningrad State Orchestra in 1917 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word has it that the Leningrad Philharmonic Orchestra of the U.S.S.R. &#8212; to<br />
use its full title this once &#8212; is some kind of stupendous performing<br />
organization. Word, this once, is right.Its history is splendid enough. Descended from the orchestra of the St.<br />
Petersburg court, the ensemble was anointed the Leningrad State Orchestra in<br />
1917 and amalgamated into the first Soviet concert society in 1921. During<br />
World War II, under the legendary Eugene Mravinsky (who led the orchestra for<br />
50 years, from 1938-1988) the orchestra never missed a concert. Mention any<br />
notable Russian composer past or present, and you&#8217;ll find his destiny<br />
inextricably linked to the Leningrad Philharmonic.It now performs under Yuri Temirkhanov, who conducts two of the orchestra&#8217;s<br />
four concerts here (including one tonight), and its associate conductor,<br />
Mariss Jansons, who leads the other two (including tomorrow&#8217;s). Temirkhhanov,<br />
who led Wednesday&#8217;s opening concert here, is a known quantity in this<br />
country, both as a gifted conductor and as something of a podium show-off. He<br />
has appeared at the Hollywood Bowl, and is due back here for two weeks with<br />
the Los Angeles Philharmonic next month. He was high in the running for music<br />
director with the Philadelphia Orchestra, although his present post, as head<br />
of the best orchestra in Eastern Europe &#8212; arguably on the entire continent<br />
&#8211; is nothing to take lightly.What makes this orchestra so spectacular? Its noble tradition under Mravinsky<br />
was a good starting point, and Temirkhanov has obviously maintained that<br />
level. He has, for example, preserved that tremendous, clean cutting tone in<br />
the brass, which play without the vibrato that, to some extent, afflicts the<br />
tonal purity of some American orchestras. The sound of the massed Leningrad<br />
brass section jabbing its way through the murky texture at the start of<br />
Tchaikovsky&#8217;s &#8220;Manfred&#8221; Symphony is something one doesn&#8217;t easily<br />
forget.The entire orchestra, larger in number (112) than most European groups, plays<br />
with a cleanness, a forthrightness, that is different from the mellowness of,<br />
say, the Vienna Philharmonic and not quite as dry as the Berlin. You get the<br />
feeling, rare at the Music Center, that even when the full orchestra is<br />
roistering through something loud and furious, that there is a welcome amount<br />
of air space around their tone.This opening concert under Temirkhanov was superior stuff all the way, from<br />
the opening romp through Prokofiev&#8217;s delicious &#8220;Lieutenant Kije,&#8221; through<br />
the clattering amorphousness of that composer&#8217;s Third Piano Concerto, with<br />
Dmitri Alexeev fully up to its virtuosic demands, to the hour-long<br />
&#8220;Manfred,&#8221; a work that suggests that the words &#8220;neglect&#8221; and<br />
&#8220;undeserved&#8221; don&#8217;t always go together.Even so, Tchaikovsky&#8217;s meanderings came across capitally, with marvelous<br />
lightness in the Mendelssohnian second movement, and some elegant wind<br />
playing all the way through. For the encore Temirkhanov and the orchestra<br />
clowned their way through Schubert&#8217;s harmless little F-minor &#8220;Moment<br />
Musical,&#8221; an unworthy gesture after this most imposing concert.THE FACTS:<br />
What: The Leningrad Philharmonic, presented by the Los Angeles Philharmonic When: 8 p.m., Friday and Saturday Where: Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, Music Center, 135 N. Grand Ave.<br />
Behind the Scenes: Conductors: Yuri Temirkhanov (Friday) and Mariss Jansons (Saturday)<br />
Tickets: $10-$45; reservations (213) 480-3232; information: (213) 972-7211</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/leningrad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NORRINGTON</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/norrington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/norrington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like a powerful and refreshing cleansing agent, the sound of Roger Norrington&#8217;s London Classical Players swept through the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion at the Music Center on Sunday night. It lit lights in the dark corners, clearing out the accumulated sludge of years of Strauss and Sibelius. It cleaned out the ears, as well, of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like a powerful and refreshing cleansing agent, the sound of Roger<br />
Norrington&#8217;s London Classical Players swept through the Dorothy Chandler<br />
Pavilion at the Music Center on Sunday night. It lit lights in the dark<br />
corners, clearing out the accumulated sludge of years of Strauss and<br />
Sibelius. It cleaned out the ears, as well, of a near-capacity audience, and<br />
left them cheering at the end.<br />
The LCP is one of London&#8217;s many groups dedicated to playing bygone music on<br />
the instruments of that music&#8217;s own time, and with some attempt at recreating<br />
performance practices of the time. Most groups stick to 18th-century music,<br />
butNorrington has taken his ensemble farther afield. They are currently well<br />
along in an invasion of the 19th century. Their latest record is of Schumann<br />
symphonies.<br />
Sunday&#8217;s program represented a recent stage in that invasion. It consisted of<br />
symphonies by Beethoven and Schubert (the Fourth, in each case), Beethoven&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Egmont&#8221; Overture and a Rossini tidbit (the &#8220;Signor Bruschino&#8221; Overture)<br />
as encore. Even confined to a single decade (1806-16), there was enough<br />
variety to underscore the strengths and weaknesses of Norrington&#8217;s musical<br />
outlook.<br />
Beyond question, he thrives on controversy. Journals here and abroad delight<br />
in huge spreads on the authentic-performance question, and Norrington&#8217;s name<br />
invariably turns up as hero and/or villain. And so he did on this occasion.<br />
The Schubert Fourth, the first stirrings of romanticism in the teenage<br />
composer&#8217;s orchestral work, was not so much performed as shaken for dear<br />
life. The performance wasted no time on affection; it sped along, ignoring<br />
the specified repeats in the first movement and finale (and then inserting<br />
unspecified repeats in the Minuetto). Sure, the wind solos, played on genuine<br />
wood instruments, were ravishing, and so was the over-all blend of winds,<br />
strings strung with gut not steel, and the authentically brassy brass. The<br />
sound was there, but Schubert was not.<br />
As bad as was the Schubert, so splendid was the Beethoven Fourth, from its<br />
slow, spaced out opening (a vista of distant stars) to its giggling,<br />
breakneck finale. Maybe it was what Beethoven intended, maybe not; we&#8217;ll<br />
never know. But it was an exhilarating tracing of the published notes of<br />
Beethoven&#8217;s score, and that&#8217;s all we can expect from any performance,<br />
authentic or otherwise.<br />
The whole question becomes silly, in any case. Here we had music played by a<br />
Beethoven-sized orchestra (50-or-so players), in a hall ten times larger than<br />
any that Beethoven knew, for an audience with 20th-century tastes and<br />
expectations, and with the inauthentic spectacle of a flamboyant (but<br />
talented) conductor out front. All you can really expect from Norrington, or<br />
his fellow practitioners of the art of musical resuscitation, is a series of<br />
speculative essays on what might certain masterpieces from the past might<br />
have sounded like when new.<br />
The one authentic and indestructible quality in music is beauty. As long as<br />
that survives in the playing of such groups as Roger Norrington&#8217;s LCP, other<br />
questions become irrelevant.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/11/norrington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TARTUFFE</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/tartuffe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/tartuffe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the 27 years since its founding, the Opera Workshop at the California State University at Northridge has provided valuable training to its young participants, and substantial entertainment to the folks out front as well. Its over 100 productions have ranged from repertory works to contemporary novelties. Its current production of Kirke Mechem’s &#8220;Tartuffe,&#8221;which runs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 27 years since its founding, the Opera Workshop at the California State<br />
University at Northridge has provided valuable training to its young<br />
participants, and substantial entertainment to the folks out front as well.<br />
Its over 100 productions have ranged from repertory works to contemporary<br />
novelties. Its current production of Kirke Mechem’s &#8220;Tartuffe,&#8221;which runs<br />
through this weekend at the school&#8217;s Little Theater, is a distinguished entry<br />
in the latter category.<br />
A resident of the Bay Area, where he has taught at several schools, Mechem<br />
has composed prolifically in many musical forms. First produced at a San<br />
Francisco Opera workshop in 1980, &#8220;Tartuffe,&#8221; has made the rounds. And why<br />
not? It gives off an aura of high professionalism; it gives its singers a<br />
good workout, and puts up only a mild challenge to its audience. Its text has<br />
been adapted by Mechem himself from Moliere&#8217;s sublime satirical comedy, and<br />
he, too, has done a highly professional job.<br />
The opera&#8217;s musical ancestors are the sure-fire old masters: Puccini above<br />
all, whose best manner Mechem has carefully absorbed; Strauss (both Johann<br />
and Richard) in a few nice waltz tunes and in some dissonant scampering right<br />
out of &#8220;Till Eulenspiegel.&#8221; To these borrowings Mechem adds a passing nod<br />
or two: some Wagner (both &#8220;Tannhauser&#8221; and &#8220;The Ring&#8221;) as appropriate<br />
underlining to the pretentiousness of the title character, a flicker of the<br />
Beethoven Fifth to illuminate a fateful knocking at a door.<br />
If the resulting agreeable pastiche is somewhat less than memorable in<br />
itself, it at least accords well with Moliere&#8217;s delicious comedy, and the<br />
opera &#8212; which runs about 2 1/2 hours &#8212; does sail. Its acoustic setting at<br />
CSUN, in the 200-seat theater where the sounds from the orchestra pit tended<br />
to overwhelm all else, did the work less than full service, however.<br />
Still, the production, conducted and staged by the workshop&#8217;s founder, David<br />
W. Scott, did the work proud; the composer, in attendance on Tuesday night,<br />
looked pleased. Cathy Susan Pyles designed an attractive single set; the<br />
costumes by Teresa Gibson caught the period quite nicely.<br />
And while one hesitates to single out individual performers during their<br />
workshop years, don&#8217;t be surprised to see the names of Michelle de Young, a<br />
large-voiced dramatic soprano who sang Mme. Orgon, and Robin Lee Parkin, a<br />
pert, high-stepping soubrette as Dorine, showing up one of these days in the<br />
big time. Jason Daniel was the imposing, menacing Tartuffe; Benito Galindo,<br />
the properly dithering Orgon; Barbro Johansson his sweet if somewhat starchy<br />
daughter Mariane. The next CSUN Opera Workshop is scheduled for mid-March:<br />
&#8220;Suor Angelica&#8221; and &#8220;Gianni Schicchi,&#8221; real Puccini this time.<br />
THE FACTS:<br />
What: Kirke Mechem&#8217;s &#8220;Tartuffe,&#8221; presented by the CSUN Opera Workshop.<br />
Where: The Little Theater, School of the Arts, Nordhoff St. and Etiwanda Ave.<br />
in Northridge.<br />
When: 8 p.m., Friday and Saturday.<br />
Behind the Scenes: staged and conducted by David W. Scott, designed by Cathy<br />
Susan Pyles and Teresa Griffin.<br />
Tickets: $5-$10; information: 818 885-3093.<br />
Our rating: * * *</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/tartuffe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PASADENA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/pasadena/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/pasadena/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#8217;re off and running again in Pasadena.Saturday night at the Civic Auditorium, Jorge Mester and his Pasadena Symphony Orchestra ended their season&#8217;s opening concert with a mighty sprint through Dvorak&#8217;s &#8220;New World&#8221; Symphony &#8212; transformed for the occasion from the music of a composer nostalgic for his homeland to the music of a man apparently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re off and running again in Pasadena.Saturday night at the Civic Auditorium, Jorge Mester and his Pasadena Symphony<br />
Orchestra ended their season&#8217;s opening concert with a mighty sprint through<br />
Dvorak&#8217;s &#8220;New World&#8221; Symphony &#8212; transformed for the occasion from the<br />
music of a composer nostalgic for his homeland to the music of a man<br />
apparently obsessed with having a plane to catch. There were impressive<br />
moments along the way, to be sure; the orchestra managed to remain upright<br />
over most of the hurdles its conductor had chosen to erect. But the feeling<br />
remained that a lot less fuss might have produced a lot more music.<br />
Have no doubts: Mester is an exciting conductor, and better his brand of<br />
podium exuberance than the work of certain of his sleepier colleagues. If he<br />
tends now and then to throw caution to the winds (and to the strings and<br />
brass, as well), he has a good aggregation of musicians to do his bidding,<br />
some of the area&#8217;s best studio freelancers. The orchestra plays fast and<br />
slow, loud and soft; there were times, in fact &#8212; in the symphony&#8217;s famous<br />
Largo &#8212; when the conductor had throttled the volume of the orchestra down<br />
below the audible level of the hall&#8217;s noisy (and inefficient) air-<br />
conditioning system.<br />
This is Mester&#8217;s seventh season in Pasadena, where (judging from Saturday&#8217;s<br />
turnout) he is much loved. He has now abandoned his post as music director of<br />
the Aspen Festival, and shuttles between his New York base (as head of the<br />
New Music Orchestral Project) and a new post as head of the Western Australia<br />
Symphony, with Pasadena as a handy stopping-off point. The Australian<br />
connection probably explains the new work on Saturday&#8217;s concert, Peter<br />
Sculthorpe&#8217;s 17-minute tone poem called &#8220;Kakadu,&#8221; named after a national<br />
park in the northern end of that continent.<br />
Sculthorpe is Australia&#8217;s best-known composer, a master at devising sound<br />
patterns that move easily between primitive percussive effects and a lively,<br />
inventive orchestral language. &#8220;Kakadu&#8221; is a big, attractive piece, neatly<br />
balanced between some impressive moments of violent instrumental cataclysm<br />
and a lovely quiet middle section built around a sinuous melody for English<br />
horn, (Between the Sculthorpe and the Dvorak, the orchestra&#8217;s solo English<br />
hornist, Joel Timm, had a big night for himself.)<br />
Midway came William Walton&#8217;s Violin Concerto, a work created for Jascha<br />
Heifetz in 1939 and affording a fair workout where empty virtuosity is the<br />
object, but not otherwise one of the splendid Briton&#8217;s better works.<br />
(According to a printed program note &#8212; illustrated, by the way, with a photo<br />
not of Walton but of Kurt Weill &#8212; the composer himself didn&#8217;t like it<br />
much.)Perhaps the famous Heifetz tone made its way successfully through the rather<br />
ponderous orchestration (at least it did on the recording), but the soloist<br />
in Pasadena, Kyoko Takezawa, was less successful. When she could be heard,<br />
she seemed to be responding adequately to the work&#8217;s limited fund of<br />
eloquence. Beyond question, however, she and the audience might have been<br />
happier with a different choice.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/pasadena/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/lapo-19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/lapo-19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At New York&#8217;s Carnegie Hall last month, Andre Previn had led the Los Angeles Philharmonic in Steven Stucky’s &#8220;Angelus&#8221; and William Schuman&#8217;s Third Symphony, and was scheduled to do so again this week at the Music Center. Later discovering that he needed more time to prepare an upcoming program in Vienna Previn, with his renowned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At New York&#8217;s Carnegie Hall last month, Andre Previn had led the Los Angeles<br />
Philharmonic in Steven Stucky’s &#8220;Angelus&#8221; and William Schuman&#8217;s Third<br />
Symphony, and was scheduled to do so again this week at the Music Center.<br />
Later discovering that he needed more time to prepare an upcoming program in<br />
Vienna Previn, with his renowned curious sense of priorities, dropped his Los<br />
Angeles commitment. It was caught by the Philharmonic&#8217;s associate conductor<br />
David Alan Miller, to his greater glory.<br />
Half a century separates Schuman&#8217;s big, exuberant symphony from Stucky&#8217;s<br />
empty little sound-bite, and the paradox of which is the more modern of the<br />
two is too obvious to belabor. Schuman&#8217;s symphony lasts just over half an<br />
hour; it is a strong, thoroughly original work with a particularly handsome,<br />
elegiac slow section at the start of the second of its two movements. It&#8217;s<br />
intricacies are not all that difficult to untangle; even Carlo Maria Giulini,<br />
whose taste for American music wasn&#8217;t profound, conducted it here quite<br />
successfully.<br />
The Stucky, co-commissioned by Carnegie Hall and the Los Angeles<br />
Philharmonic, has not improved on second hearing: ten minutes of clever<br />
orchestral sound effects purporting to represent different kinds of bells,<br />
harmless music meant to be forgotten five minutes after it&#8217;s over. Stucky has<br />
written better music, most of it for smaller performing groups. His message<br />
seems to be, however, that you write for orchestra these days with extreme<br />
caution, that the reaction you solicit from your hearers is &#8220;that wasn&#8217;t so<br />
bad.&#8221;<br />
Many composers today, apparently, harken to that message, writing these<br />
inocuous works for orchestra as if Jesse Helms might show up in the front row<br />
arm-in-arm with the chairman of the orchestra&#8217;s board.. Schuman, full of<br />
beans at 30, obviously worked from no such message, which is why his<br />
marvelous symphony, 50 years later, still sounds fresh and inventive.<br />
Both works drew out the best in young Miller, in big, extroverted<br />
performances nicely balanced and outgoing. Indeed, his poised, nicely planned<br />
reading of the Schuman ranks among his finest achievements here.<br />
Viktoria Mullova was the evening&#8217;s soloist, the splendid young Russian emigre<br />
whose mission here &#8212; at this appearance and the last, two years ago &#8212; seems<br />
to take on the hoariest chestnuts in the violin-concerto repertory and make<br />
them sound fresh. Last time it was the Tchaikovsky; this time, the<br />
Sibelius.<br />
Mullova is all musician. She does not bob or weave as she plays, nor flirt.<br />
Barring, at the most, two squeezed notes in the finale, her technique was all<br />
but flawless; even in the amorphous expanses of the Sibelius, she found more<br />
than mere technical challenge.<br />
Starting with the opening solo, which she shaped into a kind of rhapsodic<br />
improvisation over the buzzing and grumbling of the orchestra, she projected<br />
the work as something fresh and vivid. You forgot the actuality of the work<br />
as one of Sibelius&#8217; more tawdry creations, and listened as if to a piece of<br />
real music. The crowd stayed to cheer.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/lapo-19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MEC</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/mec-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/mec-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past 40 years more or less, under one or another name, the Monday Evening Concerts have served to instruct, thrill, irritate, bore and fascinate audiences of various sizes, with their obsessive programs devoted mostly to the outer edges of the musical repertory. It is doubtful, however, whether many events in that series have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past 40 years more or less, under one or another name, the Monday<br />
Evening Concerts have served to instruct, thrill, irritate, bore and<br />
fascinate audiences of various sizes, with their obsessive programs devoted<br />
mostly to the outer edges of the musical repertory. It is doubtful, however,<br />
whether many events in that  series have been any more valuable, or have<br />
drawn a larger and happier crowd, than the latest edition, this past Monday<br />
at the County Museum.<br />
The program was planned as a memorial to the Italian composer Luigi Nono, who<br />
died earlier this year. Only one work by Nono himself was included . Filling<br />
out the long and rewarding list were works by Nono&#8217;s teachers, Gian-Francesco<br />
Malipiero and Bruno Maderna, and his colleagues, Luigi Dallapiccola and, as<br />
the one living composer represented, Luciano Berio. Juan Felipe Orrego-<br />
Benavente was the conductor, with a slendid group of local freelancers<br />
including the soprano Dasietta {cq} Kim and the tenor Jonathan Mack.<br />
What the program turned out to be, to its planners&#8217; immense credit, was a<br />
retrospective of a slice of contemporary musical history that has of late<br />
been virtually forgotten. These Italian composers, Malipiero, from an older<br />
generation, perhaps excepted, worked out their distinctive approach to the<br />
twelve-tone style very much in vogue throughout Europe in the first decades<br />
after World War II. They did so, however, on their own, very Italianate,<br />
terms.<br />
From Dallapiccola there came a string of quiet, elegant pieces full of<br />
fearful melodic gambits that somehow combined with the lyrical spirit of<br />
great Italian art of earlier times. The result, as two works on thie program<br />
&#8211; the &#8220;Little Night Music&#8221; for instruments, and the &#8220;Four-Part<br />
Divertimento&#8221; for soprano &#8212; clearly proved, was music of great charm, even<br />
of wit.<br />
If the Dallapiccola works were the highlight, the works of Berio (his<br />
&#8220;Sequence&#8221; for solo oboe cavorting with a single sustained B on tape, and<br />
his setting of James Joyce&#8217;s &#8220;Chamber Music&#8221;) and the gorgeously intricate<br />
Serenade of Maderna were worthy program companions. Nono himself was<br />
handsomely, if skimpily, represented by his quirky settings of Machado&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Songs to Guiomar.&#8221;<br />
Of slighter challenge but no less charm were the two Malipiero works, &#8220;Four<br />
Antique Songs&#8221; and, in its American premiere, the long visionary song &#8220;The<br />
Celestial Kingdom.&#8221; Where has all this music been? There was a time when the<br />
music of this small group of Italian pioneers figured frequently on concert<br />
program. This program provided a resuscitation long overdue.<br />
The singing, the individual instrumental work, the strong, committed<br />
leadership of Orrego-Benavente: all were on a high level. Chalk it up as an<br />
unquestioned triumph (also long overdue) for these variable but valuable<br />
Monday Evening Concerts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/mec-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MISCHA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/mischa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/mischa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The spirit of Mischa Schneider hovered smilingly over UCLA&#8217;s Schoenberg Hall on Sunday afternoon. Cellist of the Budapest Quartet of fond memory, teacher and saintly friend to all chamber-music players, Schneider is now celebrated in &#8220;Music for Mischa,&#8221; a moveable chamber-music feast that began its fifth season on Sunday before a sizable if not capacity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spirit of Mischa Schneider hovered smilingly over UCLA&#8217;s Schoenberg Hall<br />
on Sunday afternoon. Cellist of the Budapest Quartet of fond memory, teacher<br />
and saintly friend to all chamber-music players, Schneider is now celebrated<br />
in &#8220;Music for Mischa,&#8221; a moveable chamber-music feast that began its fifth<br />
season on Sunday before a sizable if not capacity crowd.<br />
The series has been organized by two former members of another distinguished,<br />
much-missed quartet, the Sequoia: violinist Miwako Watanabe (who did not<br />
participate in Sunday&#8217;s concert) and cellist Robert Martin, who decidedly<br />
did. Together with violinist Barbara Govatos and pianist Cynthia Raim, Martin<br />
performed in an elegant and challenging program of trios, by Haydn, Beethoven<br />
and Dvorak. Govatos, by the way, is a member of the Philadelphia Orchestra,<br />
who flew in to replace the scheduled violinist, Sylvia Rosenberg, recently<br />
injured in a car accident (but currently on the mend).<br />
Trios for piano, violin and cello are a special and cherishable class of<br />
chamber music. They were an extremely popular form of house entertainment<br />
around 1800; Haydn and Beethoven even arranged some of their orchestral works<br />
for trio; as with records in a later age, this was the way you got to hear,<br />
say, a Haydn or Beethoven symphony in your own home.<br />
The Mischa group, however, chose works originally composed for trio: an A-<br />
major Trio by Haydn dating from his last years, and the C-minor Trio from<br />
Beethoven&#8217;s Opus 1 &#8212; two works actually created in the same year (1793)  by<br />
composers of succeeding generations. The contrast was striking: the Haydn,<br />
full of forward-looking harmonic adventures, the Beethoven delightfully<br />
poised between classicism and his own dramatic musical language in its<br />
formative years.<br />
At the end came a seldom-heard Dvorak trio, the F minor, Opus 65: hearty,<br />
robust romanticism, perhaps a bit too crammed with oratorical gesture, but<br />
graced with a most enchanting slow movement. Throughout the afternoon the<br />
playing was skilled, and also colored with a fine sense of fantasy. One thing<br />
that Mischa Schneider always epitomized was the love of whatever he was<br />
doing; that has become the hallmark, as well, of the players&#8217; organization<br />
that honors his name.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/mischa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GLENDALE</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/glendale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/glendale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe the Glendale Symphony Orchestra isn&#8217;t actually in or from Glendale. But the crowd that made the pilgrimage to the Music Center on Sunday night, to greet the start of the ensemble&#8217;s 67th season, made it quite clear that this was the orchestra of Glendale. In actuality, the orchestra is formed from the immense local [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the Glendale Symphony Orchestra isn&#8217;t actually in or from Glendale. But<br />
the crowd that made the pilgrimage to the Music Center on Sunday night, to<br />
greet the start of the ensemble&#8217;s 67th season, made it quite clear that this<br />
was the orchestra of Glendale.<br />
In actuality, the orchestra is formed from the immense local pool of<br />
freelance players &#8212; as are most of the other metropolitan orchestras in the<br />
area (Pasadena, Long Beach, etc.). The concertmaster is the ubiquitous Stuart<br />
Canin, whose presence at his first-violinist&#8217;s stand is usually in itself a<br />
guarantee of high-level playing. The Glendale may not offer the most profound<br />
musical programming in these parts. If orchestras were breweries, this one<br />
would classify as Lite, low on calories but well-supplied with froth.<br />
That latter commodity bubbled forth in a work called &#8220;Impresiones,&#8221;<br />
composed by the evening&#8217;s conductor, Lalo Schifrin, for the evening&#8217;s<br />
trumpet-wielding soloist, Carl Severinsen, known outside the medical<br />
profession as &#8220;Doc.&#8221; Considering the circumstances &#8211;a work by a well-known<br />
and successful purveyor of film and TV scores (over 100 at last count) for a<br />
well-known talk-show bandleader and all-around entertainer &#8212; it should come<br />
as no surprise that &#8220;Impresiones&#8221; is not exactly a challenging latter-day<br />
masterpiece.<br />
It is, as expected, a nicely-crafted, harmless half-hour, claiming<br />
inspiration from a Garcia Lorca poem, but more obviously inspired by<br />
television travel ads. Travel where? Severinsen himself provided a hint, with<br />
an encore rendition of some slick variations on the old Spanish pop tune<br />
&#8220;Granada.&#8221;The audience responded with the familiar standing ovation, a<br />
practice which has obviously made the journey from Los Angeles to Glendale.<br />
The concert began with part of Mendelssohn&#8217;s &#8220;Midsummer Night&#8217;s Dream&#8221;<br />
Overture &#8212; minus, for some curious reason, its soft, luscious ending. It<br />
ended with Mussorgsky&#8217;s &#8220;Pictures at an Exhibition&#8221; in the Ravel<br />
orchestration. Aside from a startling number of boo-boos (horns in the<br />
Mendelssohn, winds in the Mussorgsky) the performances were brisk and<br />
noncommital. Nobody seemed to care.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/glendale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BERNSTEIN</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/bernstein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/bernstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8221;VE MADE A FEW QUICK CHANGES HERE AS A ROUGH UPDATE. Nobody with any sense of history could have taken Leonard Bernstein&#8217;s retirement announcement of last Tuesday at face value. He had, after all, made the announcement before: casting off one facet of his multifaceted talent in order to devote more time to another. Sure, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8221;VE MADE A FEW QUICK CHANGES HERE AS A ROUGH UPDATE. Nobody with any sense of history could have taken Leonard Bernstein&#8217;s retirement announcement of last Tuesday at face value. He had, after all, made the announcement before: casting off one facet of his multifaceted talent in<br />
order to devote more time to another. Sure, anyone who had seen him close up<br />
in the past few years &#8212; picked out his small, stooped figure, that is, in<br />
the middle of a dense cloud of cigarette smoke &#8212; knew that he had to be in<br />
poor health these days; anyone who has seen him at any distance knew the<br />
energy he poured into his conducting. IKt still seemed, lasty Tuesday, as if the time for obituary writing was a long way off. It wasn&#8217;t.<br />
He was never the retiring type. In 1969<br />
he &#8220;retired&#8221; as music director of the New York Philharmonic, which he had led for the past dozen years. A year or so later, back on the on that orchestra&#8217;s podium as guest conductor, he turned to the audience in one of his frequent folksy speeches, and all but asked for his old job back. His big compositional projects that he had left the orchestra to pursue &#8212; an opera based on Thornton Wilder&#8217;s &#8220;Skin of Our Teeth&#8221; and another on a play by Bert Brecht &#8212; had fizzled. So, in fact, did most of his p[rojects after the early sensational success of "West Side Story." A string of failures had to have left him embittered, and he desperately struggled to regain his own past glory. "This is my orchestra," he told the audience that night, "and, somehow, I'm going to come back."<br />
But Bernstein had a way of making any orchestra his own: the Boston Symphony,<br />
which was virtually his practice band in the early years under Serge<br />
Koussevitzky's watchful tutelage, at Boston's Symphony Hall and, most of all,<br />
at Tanglewood; later the New York Philharmonic, the Israel, the Vienna. Who<br />
else, besides this writer, cherishes vivid memories of this arrogant young<br />
genius striding the Tanglewood grounds in, say, 1946, flamboyant in his red<br />
turtleneck and sandals in a time when wearing such apparel constituted a<br />
statement of rebellion, especially in the poresence of the aloof, sartorially<br />
impeccable Koussevitzky. ?[ E/P]<br />
Who else remembers the music he made in those early days: the Mahler Second<br />
with the Boston Symphony when there were not yet the present 20 available<br />
recordings, when the work ranked as an exotic item? Or Britten&#8217;s &#8220;Peter<br />
Grimes,&#8221; whose American premiere he led that summer with mostly student<br />
forces and with the composer at hand, beaming approval?<br />
Bernstein had already, by the time of those early Tanglewood performances,<br />
become the most important conductor of his generation; that famous sudden<br />
debut with the New York Philharmonic, at a nationwide broadcast concert, had<br />
occurred three years earlier &#8212; on November 14, 1943. That concert &#8212; which<br />
you can still hear, on an LP of the radio broadcast issued by the New York<br />
Philharmonic and available for a donation to the orchestra &#8212; wasn&#8217;t just<br />
your basic Hollywood yarn of the understudy triumphantly taking over from the<br />
star. It stood, far more, for the explosive enabling force that made it<br />
possible for a young man, an American trained in his own land,  and even<br />
bearing the burden of a generic Jewish name (which Koussevitzky, in a widely-<br />
circulated anecdote, had once urged him to change) to earn credibility on a<br />
symphonic podium.<br />
And so it wasn&#8217;t just the success of that last-minute substitution (for the<br />
ailing Bruno Walter) that turned the 25-year-old Bernstein into the pivotal<br />
figure in the annals of American musical performance. More, it was the fact<br />
that it all happened in the glare of national publicity, in the depths of<br />
wartime gloom when the country desperately needed this kind of good<br />
news.<br />
And this made the Bernstein accession even more crucial: his approachability.<br />
When he started becoming a familiar podium on American podiums, he charmed<br />
the daylights (and the donations) out of his audiences by turning around and<br />
chatting with them about the music. The statesman-conductors of his time &#8211;<br />
Koussevitzky, Toscanini, Walter &#8212; walked through the world as serene,<br />
unapproachable demigods who received their messages direct from Beethoven and<br />
Tchaikovsky, never from the common herd. Not Bernstein. &#8220;Call me Lenny,&#8221; he<br />
said on our first meeting. Try to imagine Toscanini&#8217;s &#8220;call me Artie.&#8221;<br />
Bernstein, who drove fast cars and showed up in nightclubs and delivered<br />
friendly chats to his audiences &#8212; and who, when the medium was ready for<br />
him, betook his knowledge and his pizzazz to the television studios &#8211;<br />
signaled a new breed of conductor. He was the enabling force behind any new<br />
podium master who dared to dream of achieving fame before the customary<br />
debutant&#8217;s age of 50 and beyond. Michael Tilson Thomas, Simon Rattle, Esa-<br />
Pekka Salonen, Zubin Mehta? They&#8217;re all here because Lenny got here<br />
first.<br />
None of this would matter much except for one thing: Bernstein was as good as<br />
his early hypesters said he was, perhaps more. He had that mix of talents<br />
that few of his predecessors &#8212; Leopold Stokowski maybe but who else? &#8211;<br />
possessed: phenomenal talent as a conductor matched by his abilities to sell<br />
his art. He drew the casual concertgoer by his talks, and by his podium<br />
acrobatics that would have driven any ballet dancer to despair. But behind<br />
all this was the mind of an extraordinary creative musician, a spellbinding<br />
evangelist fiercely dedicated to the music he believed in.<br />
Plenty of conductors before his time, for example, had argued the case for<br />
Mahler, but it took Bernstein to turn that composer&#8217;s tortured flamboyance<br />
into show-biz. He did this (for Mahler, for Ives, for a certain, highly<br />
selective segment of the contemporary repertory) not merely by playing lots<br />
of their music, but by organizing Mahler Cycles, Ives Cycles, New-Music<br />
Festivals: neat, sexy packages that looked good in newspaper publicity. Some<br />
conductors are skilled at playing the house; Bernstein played the world.<br />
He made himself at home in a large part of that world. London&#8217;s critics<br />
looked upon him initially with the jaundiced eye they reserve for all<br />
colonials. (Get hold of some copies of The Gramophone in the 1950s. if you&#8217;re<br />
looking for textbook illustrations of chauvinism.) Later the Brits came to<br />
shower him with the sort of praise they usually reserve for their own queen.<br />
He has conquered Vienna, which seems implausible, since his own way of<br />
conducting some of the Viennese classics (the feverish Brahms, the sluggish<br />
&#8220;Rosenkavalier&#8221; and the distorted &#8220;Fidelio&#8221;) goes somewhat against that<br />
city&#8217;s tradition. Has the Austrian reverence for Bernstein become part of its<br />
expiation as the birthplace of Adolf Hitler? &#8220;Na ja.&#8221; say the wily Viennese<br />
when asked &#8212; the equivalent of a shrug and a knowing wink.<br />
But the art of Bernstein needs no such rationalization. There are those, this<br />
writer among them, who prefer other ways of conducting much of Bernstein&#8217;s<br />
classic repertory. There are also those who deplore the fact that, as a<br />
ground-breaking, dazzling product of a young musical society, he didn&#8217;t use<br />
more of his skills to perform, or at least to plead the case, for other young<br />
composers of progressive tendencies. He played the contemporary establishment<br />
(Copland, Schuman and, of course, himself) brilliantly; other, more<br />
adventurous souls, however, could have used his help.<br />
The records endure, however, to attest Bernstein&#8217;s enormous breadth of<br />
musical interest. Curiously, however, they don&#8217;t capture as much of the<br />
personal magnetism of Bernstein&#8217;s live performances as you&#8217;d think. That bond<br />
that he forged between everyone in that hall, and that dynamic bundle of<br />
himself on the podium, is a quality that no recording microphone has learned<br />
to capture.<br />
You had to have been there.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/bernstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCHIFF</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/schiff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/schiff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recitals by strong-fingered pianists are reasonably common. Strong-fingered pianists with equally strong musical intelligence are a far rarer phenomenon. Monday night&#8217;s Music Center concert by Andras Schiff, however, proved eminently satisfactory on both counts. The program itself was a particularly brainy selection. Large works of Beethoven (the B-flat Sonata, Opus 22) and Schumann (the Symphonic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recitals by strong-fingered pianists are reasonably common. Strong-fingered<br />
pianists with equally strong musical intelligence are a far rarer phenomenon.<br />
Monday night&#8217;s Music Center concert by Andras Schiff, however, proved<br />
eminently satisfactory on both counts.<br />
The program itself was a particularly brainy selection. Large works of<br />
Beethoven (the B-flat Sonata, Opus 22) and Schumann (the Symphonic Etudes)<br />
formed the end-pieces. In between were shorter works by both composers:<br />
Beethoven&#8217;s strange, prophetic Opus 126 Bagatelles, and two charming genre<br />
pieces (and a third as an encore) in which Schumann seemed to fulfill that<br />
prophecy. It added up to a lovely mixture, all of it beautifully played.<br />
The Beethoven sonata was a special joy, one of the less-often performed of<br />
the 32, but one of the most remarkable. Already, in 1800, the composer was<br />
pushing toward unexplored territories. The work is full of what must have<br />
been at the time strange, unaccustomed sounds. Here and there the pianist&#8217;s<br />
left hand takes the principal melodic line, an effect new in Beethoven&#8217;s time<br />
that was to become one of Schumann&#8217;s favorite devices. The finale, light-<br />
textured and smiling, seems to float in a manner almost Schubertian. Early<br />
Beethoven though the sonata surely is, its stylistic adventures make it seem<br />
later than you think.<br />
The loving, expansive performance by Schiff seemed to take cognizance of all<br />
this. Without overstatement or excessive underlining, he managed to suggest<br />
both the similarities and the violent contrasts between this congenial work<br />
of Beethoven&#8217;s youth and the quirky, disjointed outbursts in that strange,<br />
inward set of late-period Bagatelles.<br />
If anything, the evening&#8217;s  Schumann performances, for all the music&#8217;s<br />
romantic exuberance, seemed more classic, more controlled. This is music, the<br />
pianist seemed to say, that can speak for itself. And so it did.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/schiff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRICE</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/price/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[*] laby2;p1205.By Alan Rich [B]Daily News Music Critic[B] Considering the number of years the musical world has basked in the glow of Leontyne Price&#8217;s artistry &#8212; 33, since her lustrous Aida at the San Francisco Opera &#8212; one might have regarded the soprano&#8217;s Royce Hall recital on Saturday night as an exercise in nostalgia. No [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[*] laby2;p1205.By Alan Rich [B]Daily News Music Critic[B] Considering the number of years the musical world has basked in the glow of<br />
Leontyne Price&#8217;s artistry &#8212; 33, since her lustrous Aida at the San Francisco<br />
Opera &#8212; one might have regarded the soprano&#8217;s Royce Hall recital on Saturday<br />
night as an exercise in nostalgia. No such thing; the years rolled back on<br />
that magical evening, and there stood that achingly beautiful artist, still,<br />
mioraculously, at the top of her vocal form.<br />
Some artists travel with easy-listening programs for the boonies, made up of<br />
the chestnuts of the repertory. Not Price; she paid her compliment to the<br />
capacity audience with a substantial  and rewarding program: two big classic<br />
arias, groups of German and French songs, four by the contemporary American<br />
Lee Hoiby, the &#8220;Pace, pace&#8221; from Verdi&#8217;s &#8220;La Forza del Destino&#8221; and a<br />
final spiritual that, in turn, activated a generous outlay of encores.<br />
One of the classic arias was Electra&#8217;s Mad Scene from Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Idomeneo&#8221;<br />
which, by coincidence, had been performed in its operatic context at the<br />
Music Center the night before. It stretches no point to suggest that the<br />
piano support of the veteran David Garvey at the recital was noticeably more<br />
responsive to the drama of the music than the orchestral forces at the opera.<br />
The voice of Price, now as then, is a wondrous instrument. It is especially<br />
so in the music of Verdi&#8217;s tragic heroines; there is a vibrance there that<br />
curls itself enchantingly around those big lyric lines, lands with awesome<br />
splendor on those final notes (the B-flat in the &#8220;Forza&#8221; aria as a shining<br />
example) and shades them down until you feel them throbbing under your own<br />
skin.<br />
There was a time when she tended to overuse the chest tone as a dramatic<br />
device. This time, in the &#8220;Forza&#8221; aria and also in arias from &#8220;Madama {cq}<br />
Butterfly&#8221; and &#8220;Adriana Lecouvreur&#8221; among the encores, one heard instead<br />
singing of remarkable purity, no less communicative but ravishing in its very<br />
freedom.<br />
That&#8217;s the word, &#8220;ravishing.&#8221; The German song group included two<br />
charming deceits by the underrated late romantic Joseph Marx along with three<br />
unfamiliar Richard Strauss works. The Hoiby group also had some exceptional<br />
material. A composer of conservative leanings (most recently known for his<br />
tiny operatic setting of a Julia Child chocolate cake recipe), Hoiby&#8217;s songs<br />
display a firmer art than one might otherwise believe. Outstanding among the<br />
four chosen by Price were two Emily Dickinson settings, &#8220;Wild Nights&#8221; and<br />
&#8220;There came a Wind.&#8221;  On stage &#8212; in something of dusky green in the first half, blue in the second<br />
&#8211; Price seduced the eye no less than the ear; just that generous smile of<br />
hers is enough to light lights anywhere. She lights even more lights with her<br />
art, of course; she could put on an evening of nothing but C-major scales and<br />
still send the crowd home happy. She was, and she remains, one of our few<br />
remaining genuine class acts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GLUCK</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/gluck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/gluck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try as they might, not even the assembled forces of the Music Center Opera could obliterate the radiant beauties of Gluck&#8217;s &#8220;Orfeo ed Euridice.&#8221; The question must be raised, therefore: why did they even try? The production, which opened on Wednesday night and runs for three more performances, was brought in from Santa Fe, where [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try as they might, not even the assembled forces of the Music Center Opera<br />
could obliterate the radiant beauties of Gluck&#8217;s &#8220;Orfeo ed Euridice.&#8221; The<br />
question must be raised, therefore: why did they even try?<br />
The production, which opened on Wednesday night and runs for three more<br />
performances, was brought in from Santa Fe, where it was staged last summer.<br />
There are grand mountain vistas at Santa Fe&#8217;s outdoor opera house, which might<br />
have taken an observer&#8217;s mind off the ugliness of Steven Rubin&#8217;s set, but the<br />
Dorothy Chandler Pavilion offers no such distraction. We face the mess on<br />
stage straight on. the creaky revolving panels with their artsy-craftsy-glitzy<br />
projections, the shaky shadow projections, the drab lighting.<br />
We try to keep from laughing at the dancing &#8212; Kimi Okada&#8217;s choreography<br />
perpetrated by the nine members of San Francisco&#8217;s Oberlin Dance Company &#8211;<br />
with no great success. The hootchy-kootch of the denizens of Hades is bad<br />
enough; hell, by Okada&#8217;s standards, is somewhere close to Las Vegas. The crowd<br />
in the Elysian Fields, on the other hand, all in virginal white, brings back<br />
memories of Greek Day at the Weedhaven Laughing Academy.<br />
Yet the music is honorably treated, and this makes the evening at least<br />
tolerable, and often more. Marilyn Horne, it comes as no news, owns the role<br />
of Orpheus for this generation. Perhaps the voice has lost some of its plummy<br />
resonance; perhaps there are even hints now and then of a faltering<br />
marksmanship (always, however, corrected within a note or two). But the<br />
sublime musicianship remains intact, the absolute rhythmic accuracy, those<br />
urgent, tragic tones of hers that simply disarm all resistance, most of all in<br />
that great scene of the taming of the furies.<br />
The Euridice of Benita Valente is almost as good. This supremely intelligent<br />
singer, her sweet, limpid soprano still a marvel after three decades of noble<br />
use, was as always a joy to hear. She had been given some silly stage business<br />
early on, weaving and bobbing to touch hands with dancers, and she is not the<br />
most graceful of actresses. What she does, however &#8212; sing a classic line with<br />
clarity and conviction &#8212; she did once again on this occasion.  As the Love-<br />
Goddess we had the delicious small bundle of a Tracy Dahl (last season&#8217;s<br />
Euridice, if anyone has the misfortune to remember the company&#8217;s otherwise<br />
disgraceful venture into the Offenbach &#8220;Orpheus&#8221;), done up as a sort of<br />
Spaceman-Cupid.<br />
Randall Behr conducted an unexceptionable performance, with the brass nicely<br />
brassy for the Hades scenes. The version used was basically that prepared by<br />
Hector Berlioz, itself a hodge-podge of parts from Gluck&#8217;s several versions,<br />
with an added bravura aria (plus cadenza) at the end of Act One that violates<br />
all of Gluck&#8217;s own principles about not pandering to singers&#8217; show-off needs.<br />
Oh well, if Gluck had had Marilyn Horne to conjure with, he&#8217;d probably never<br />
have made those rules.<br />
THE FACTS:<br />
What: The Music Center Opera Company&#8217;s production of Gluck&#8217;s &#8220;Orfeo ed<br />
Euridice.&#8221;<br />
Starring: Marilyn Horne as Orfeo; Benita Valente as Euridice; Benita Valente<br />
as Amor.<br />
Behind the Scenes: Randall Behr, conductor; Lamont Johnson, director; Steven<br />
Rubin, designer; Kimi Okada, chorographer.<br />
Where: Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, 135 N. Grand Ave. in downtown.<br />
When: 8 p.m., Saturday, 10/9, 10/14.<br />
Tickets: $10-$75; information: 213 480&#8211;3232, or 213 972-7219.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/10/gluck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SENDAK</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/sendak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/sendak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;It&#8217;s not quite true, what it says in the gallery brochure,&#8221; said Maurice Sendak, &#8220;that I only got into opera so that I could design &#8220;Idomeneo,&#8221; but it&#8217;s close. All those old-time &#8220;Idomeneo&#8221; lovers, they all look down on us newcomers as some sort of cultural yuppies. But I&#8217;m 62, and I&#8217;ve loved that opera, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not quite true, what it says in the gallery brochure,&#8221; said Maurice<br />
Sendak, &#8220;that I only got into opera so that I could design &#8220;Idomeneo,&#8221; but<br />
it&#8217;s close. All those old-time &#8220;Idomeneo&#8221; lovers, they all look down on us<br />
newcomers as some sort of cultural yuppies. But I&#8217;m 62, and I&#8217;ve loved that<br />
opera, above all others, since adolescence.&#8221;<br />
Softspoken, witty in the abrasive New York manner, Sendak took a few minutes<br />
off from applying finishing touches to the Music Center Opera&#8217;s upcoming<br />
&#8220;Idomeneo&#8221;  for a quick sandwich at the pleasant little cafe at MOCA, just<br />
down the street. He was obviously aglow from this labor of love. &#8220;I needed to<br />
do this,&#8221; he said, &#8220;not only out of love for the opera, but also to get out<br />
of the kiddie-book-illustrator-turned-opera-designer mold for once.&#8221;<br />
At that, he hasn&#8217;t gotten very far out of it. See for yourself. Mozart&#8217;s<br />
masterful opera may stand at some remove from the world of the kiddie-book<br />
illustrator, but all of Sendak&#8217;s set and costume sketches for the opera go on<br />
display this week (September 25 through October 28) at Every Picture Tells a<br />
Story, that most charming gallery of children&#8217;s-book art at 836 N. LaBrea in<br />
West Hollywood, where they will sit surrounded by a vivid selection of<br />
Sendak&#8217;s really-truly kiddie books.You can buy the books, but not the<br />
sketches.<br />
Even within the mold of kiddie-oriented opera, of course, Sendak&#8217;s work hasn&#8217;t<br />
been exactly frivolous. &#8220;I think of &#8220;The Magic Flute&#8221; as the most serious<br />
of all Mozart&#8217;s operas. Sure, there were those barnyard animals in Janacek&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Cunning Little Vixen,&#8221; but the opera was really about Janacek&#8217;s last<br />
thoughts on humanity. And &#8220;Higgledy&#8221; was the most tragic of them all.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Idomeneo&#8221; stands as a work apart. Its American career has been relatively<br />
brief. Its first performance, by an operatic workshop at Tangelwood, wasn&#8217;t<br />
until 1947, 166 years after its premiere. It only made it to the Metropolitan<br />
Opera in 1982, where its initial reception at the box-office was insured by<br />
the presence of Luciano Pavarotti in the title role. The darker side of its<br />
reputation has everywhere preceded it: that it is long, that its plot is full<br />
of old-fashioned devices, that it is serious and complex.<br />
&#8220;Idomeneo&#8221; is all of those things; its plot devices (father bound by the<br />
gods to sacrifice a favorite child, multi-level conflict of love and honor,<br />
last-minute redemption after the avenging god &#8212; Neptune, in this case &#8211;<br />
changes his mind) were indeed well-worn by Mozart&#8217;s time.<br />
But there is one aspect of the work that conquers all else: its radiant, noble<br />
beauty. It&#8217;s interesting, and fortuitous, that the Music Center Opera&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Idomeneo&#8221; should be flanked on the schedule by Gluck&#8217;s &#8220;Orfeo ed<br />
Euridice&#8221; and Beethoven&#8217;s &#8220;Fidelio,&#8221; because in a very real sense, Mozart&#8217;s<br />
sublime creation forges a link, musical and dramatic, between the other two<br />
operas.<br />
&#8220;I want to do &#8220;Idomeneo,&#8221; &#8221; Sendak continued, &#8220;because I am happiest<br />
doing fantasy operas. &#8220;Cosi fan Tutte,&#8221; or &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; or &#8220;The<br />
Marriage of Figaro&#8221; &#8212; they&#8217;re all basically room operas. Unless I can<br />
overcome my extraordinary limitations &#8212; like, how to get in and out of<br />
properly designed rooms &#8212; I can&#8217;t do them; I can&#8217;t vibrate to them. Sure, I<br />
saw the Peter Sellars &#8220;Don Giovanni&#8221; in New York last summer, and it was set<br />
outdoors. It was plenty vibrant, but they weren&#8217;t my vibrations.<br />
&#8220;I do fantasy operas, because I can set them in some place of my own<br />
invention. I&#8217;ve seen &#8220;Idomeneo&#8221; productions that had no fantasy. There was<br />
one at Caramoor {the elegant summer festival just outside New York), but all I<br />
can remember is a lot of slaves being pushed around. And the one at the Met:<br />
well it was just your basic Jean-Pierre Ponnelle, may he rest in peace:<br />
pillars and schmattas.&#8221;<br />
We had by now walked back to the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion. On stage there<br />
were no pillars, no schmattas, just a Maurice Sendak fantasy ship in two<br />
guises, whole and wrecked.<br />
Sendak had a confession. &#8220;I really should have become a musician. The truth<br />
is, my family couldn&#8217;t afford a piano, and watercolors were cheaper. This kind<br />
of work&#8221; &#8212; a sweep of that supremely endowed right hand toward the ships on<br />
stage &#8212; &#8220;is the closest I can get. I stand here at rehearsal while the<br />
chorus sings its music, and I nearly faint from the beauty, and I wonder if<br />
those bums in the chorus know how jealous I am of just what they&#8217;re doing as<br />
their routine job.&#8221;<br />
All of Sendak&#8217;s operatic work so far has been with director Corsaro. &#8220;We sit<br />
at a table. He talks, I doodle. We agree on something or other, so I go home<br />
and do the sketches. Then, the next day, he sees the sketches, yells &#8220;what<br />
the hell is this!&#8221; and we discuss some more. Finally we come to an agreement.<br />
It&#8217;s a marvelous arrangement, because we work so closely. I couldn&#8217;t work any<br />
other way, with a director or with a writer. If some writer tells me that he<br />
trusts me to do the illustrations, that he doesn&#8217;t want to see them, I know I<br />
can&#8217;t work with him.&#8221;<br />
The future? Sendak listed a &#8220;Hansel and Gretel&#8221; for the Music Center Opera<br />
two seasons from now. &#8220;Now that I&#8217;ve broken the kiddie-book identification<br />
with &#8220;Idomeneo,&#8221; I can go back to it.&#8221; For further down the line, he talks<br />
of starting a children&#8217;s theater, probably near his current home in<br />
Connecticut, &#8220;where I can have complete control over design and direction,<br />
where I can develop new works, small and complex like my books.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Control? &#8220;That&#8217;s the most important thing. Ideal, of course, is for the<br />
designer to be his own director, like Ponnelle. Working so closely with Frank,<br />
that&#8217;s the next best thing. I love the opera company here, because they offer<br />
respect, and freedom, and control; that&#8217;s rare. If anyone is trying to<br />
sabotage me here, it&#8217;s so subtle that I haven&#8217;t noticed it.<br />
THE FACTS:<br />
WHAT: The Music Center Opera Company production of Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Idomeneo.&#8221;<br />
WHERE: Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, 135 N. Grand Ave., downtown.<br />
WHEN: 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, Friday and Oct. 2 and 5.<br />
STARRING: Siegfried Jerusalem, Susan Quittmeyer, Christine Weidinger.<br />
BEHIND THE SCENES: Directed by Frank Corsaro. Designed by Maurice Sendak.<br />
Conducted by Roderick Brydon.<br />
TICKETS: $15 to $80. For ticket information call (213) 480-3232. For more<br />
information, call (213) 972-7219.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/sendak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OCKER/GOLIA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/ockergolia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/ockergolia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of all musical instruments, the clarinets come closest to the sound of the human voice. You might, therefore, expect a concert by two expert clarinetists to come close to the sound of real conversation. You&#8217;d be right. Exactly that happened, in fact, in a splendidly communicative encounter by two of this region&#8217;s most valued progressive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all musical instruments, the clarinets come closest to the sound of the<br />
human voice. You might, therefore, expect a concert by two expert clarinetists<br />
to come close to the sound of real conversation. You&#8217;d be right.<br />
Exactly that happened, in fact, in a splendidly communicative encounter by two<br />
of this region&#8217;s most valued progressive musicians, David Ocker and Vinnie<br />
Golia. Ocker, a member of the chamber group called Xtet {cq} is usually<br />
thought of as part of the classical world; Golia usually busies himself with<br />
jazz.<br />
The music at their joint concert Saturday afternoon, part of the Los Angeles<br />
Festival offshoot known as the &#8220;Open Festival,&#8221; given in the charming garden<br />
in back of the Joanne Warfield Gallery in West Hollywood, hovered around the<br />
invisible line between the two worlds: fluent and improvisatory in the jazz<br />
sense, splendidly complex, full of bright contrapuntal exchange, to appease<br />
the classicists.<br />
Between them (and with the added assistance in one piece of visiting New York<br />
clarinetist Jane Ira Bloom), the players managed something like a dozen<br />
different sizes of clarinet, along with a few flutes plus a Chinese<br />
harmonica-type gadget called the Shang. The afternoon was, in fact, a little<br />
like a family reunion of the wind family. The huge contrabass clarinet, with<br />
enough plumbing to equip a small town, hobnobbed with tiny bamboo flutes; the<br />
piccolo shrieked its greeting to the sopranino saxophone.<br />
More important, however, was the sense that the players were well in tune with<br />
each other.There was a sense of solid music-making, even in passages that<br />
exploited the more arcane possibilities of the instruments: the squawk of the<br />
overblown clarinet, for one.  The music, some of it improvised, floated<br />
through the garden like bright butterflies. Most of the pieces had no names;<br />
they needed none. There ought to be more concerts as informal, as full of<br />
inventiveness, with the sense of togetherness,  the pure pleasure of music-<br />
making, that this one had.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/ockergolia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIXON&#160;REVIEW</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/nixon-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/nixon-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I HAVE NEW ART, 1 VERTICAL OF DICK &#8216;N&#8217; PAT, WILL BRING IN [F/L]It would be possible, with a little hard work, to have a terrible time at the Music Center Opera&#8217;s &#8220;Nixon in China,&#8221; but why waste the effort? However you may feel about the particularities of the work &#8212; the broad eclecticism of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HAVE NEW ART, 1 VERTICAL OF DICK &#8216;N&#8217; PAT, WILL BRING IN [F/L]It would be possible, with a little hard work, to have a terrible time at the       Music Center Opera&#8217;s &#8220;Nixon in China,&#8221; but why waste the effort? However you       may feel about the particularities of the work &#8212; the broad eclecticism of       John Adams&#8217; musical style (sometimes repetitive, sometimes abrasive, often       romantic) or the liberties Alice Goodman&#8217;s text takes with historical       characters (some still living) &#8212; the fact remains that the sheer energy of       the piece, the level of daring in both its music and its text, not to mention       Peter Sellars&#8217; marvelously adept staging, and its moments of irresistible       beauty add up to a spellbinding experience in contemporary musical theater.       Miss it at your peril.      You surely know the details by now; &#8220;Nixon in China&#8221;is, if nothing else, the       most famous American opera since &#8220;Porgy and Bess.&#8221; The opera makes its       initial appeal through its abundance of good theatrical fun. That starts right       off with the landing of the American plane at the Peking airport (and never       mind that wide-bodied aircraft do not make vertical, helicopter-style       landings; all opera demands some suspension of belief).       It runs on through the tender comedy of poor, bemused Pat Nixon being pushed       this way and that through her obligatory guided tour of Peking. It embraces       the horrendous/hilarious night at the Chinese ballet (where choreographer Mark       Morris has based his work on Madame Mao&#8217;s actual jingoistic creation, &#8220;The       Red Detachment of Women&#8221; with its army lads and lassies doing their military       maneuvers en pointe).      But what really remains in the memory is the opera&#8217;s deeper undercurrent,       captured in the poetic, wondrously observant libretto and subtly undescored in       Adams&#8217; equally observant score: the Nixon-Mao meeting with its tangle of       verbal cross-purposes, and the final, surrealistic scene with its counterpoint       of self-revelations. You may hear some sneers about the use of supertitles in       this English-language opera in which the cast&#8217;s diction is fair enough, yet       the subtleties of Goodman&#8217;s word-choices are worth underscoring in this       manner.      The opera has made the rounds, since its Houston premiere three years ago, but       the cast has remained constant, to its greater glory. Small subtleties abound;       James Maddalena&#8217;s rightness in the title role, his little twitches of       incomprehension in the scene with Mao, his homely, clumsy gestures of       affection toward Pat, create a whole character; maybe it isn&#8217;t Richard       Nixon,maybe it is; it certainly is somebody. And what is true of Maddalena&#8217;s       work extends through the cast: Carolann Page&#8217;s frightened, fluttering Pat,       Trudy Ellen Craney&#8217;s shrieking, malevolent Madame Mao, Sanford Sylvan&#8217;s deep,       quiet Chou En-lai.       Along the way from the Houston performance (which was also televised),       director Sellars has made certain changes, all for the better. His ballet       scene now ends in a riot reminiscent of last year&#8217;s Tianamen Square tragedy;       his last act, which seemed a little bare at Houston, is now nicely filled out       with dancing and some added props.      And there is Kent Nagano&#8217;s conducting of his superb orchestral forces: strong,       vivid, finely spirited. &#8220;Nixon in China&#8221; has fared well on the podium: John       DeMain in Houston, Edo de Waart in Brooklyn and on the Nonesuch recording.       Nagano is worthy of these predecessors; his role in an altogether enthralling       night of genuine, stirring opera is considerable.      FACTS: WHAT: The Music Center Opera&#8217;s production of John Adams&#8217; and Alice       Goodman&#8217;s &#8220;Nixon in China.&#8221;      STARRING: James Maddalena as Nixon, with Carolann Page, Trudy Ellen Craney,       John Duykers and Sanford Sylvan.      BEHIND THE SCENES: Directed by Peter Sellars, with choreography by Mark       Morris; conducted by Kent Nagano; designed by Adrianne Lobel and Dunya       Ramicova.      WHERE: Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, 135 No. Grand Ave., in downtown Los Angeles.      WHEN: 8 p.m. Friday and 9/29; 2 p.m. 9/16 and 10/7.      TICKETS: $15 to $80; reservations: 213 480-3232; information: 213 972-      7219.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/nixon-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KUNOPERA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/kunopera/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/kunopera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The aim of the Los Angeles Festival, as frequently stated by its producers, is to expand the horizons of local audiences through new and mysterious artistic experiences. That being so, Saturday night&#8217;s visit to the Japan-America Theater by the Kun Opera of China must be reckoned a success. It was a most mysterious evening. There [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The aim of the Los Angeles Festival, as frequently stated by its producers, is<br />
to expand the horizons of local audiences through new and mysterious artistic<br />
experiences. That being so, Saturday night&#8217;s visit to the Japan-America<br />
Theater by the Kun Opera of China must be reckoned a success. It was a most<br />
mysterious evening.<br />
There is only one valid way, actually, for an audience unaccustomed to this<br />
kind of exotic musical/dramatic art (or any kind for that matter) to deal with<br />
its challenge: to approach it as a child might approach an unfamiliar toy, to<br />
examine it first for its outward glitter and ponder its meaning later on. The<br />
Kun &#8212; artistic descendants of a centuries-old Chinese company which was, for<br />
a time, scattered during the so-called &#8220;Cultural Revolution&#8221; but now<br />
reassembled &#8212; was a joy to watch and to hear, even if merely for the<br />
acrobatic skill of its performers and the jangly charm of its music (a few<br />
raucous small gongs, a couple of wind instruments and a small harp).<br />
Yet the mystery was needlessly compounded on this occasion; there were no<br />
programs, and the three works performed &#8212; all of them excerpts from longer<br />
classic works &#8212; were only scantily described by an announcer at the start of<br />
each. Most of the vocalism was in the form of artifically inflected speech,<br />
with now and then a sweet, small song accompanied by instruments in unison.<br />
Never was the case for supertitles more eloquently stated.<br />
Except for a musicians&#8217; area on the side marked off in red fabric, the stage<br />
was bare; surely this cannot be a Chinese operatic tradition, considering the<br />
brilliant fantasy of the costumes &#8212; including a pair of marvelous, elongated<br />
plumes on a headdress in the first piece that seemed to execute their own<br />
graceful choreography.<br />
This report, then, is of what seemed to happen and probably did. In the first<br />
piece a Monkey King (played by Chen Tongshen) tries to capture the magic fan<br />
belonging to a Princess (Shi Jehua), and succeeds only when he changes himself<br />
into a fly which the Princess then  accidentally swallows. In the second, a<br />
monk (Zhong Weide) tries to escape the monastic life, comes down the mountain,<br />
battles a wine merchant (Kai Qinling) and imbibes his wares, does a drunken<br />
dance and then returns up the mountain. In the third, a girl (the lovely Hua<br />
Wen-yi) repressed by her parents falls asleep in a peony patch, dreams of a<br />
love affair, but then wakes to reality.<br />
All of this was acted out, sung and played in a style of movement full of<br />
symbols honed over centuries. Beautiful, and sometimes extremely funny, as it<br />
all was to watch, a little elucidation out front would have deepened the<br />
experience. Still, anyone from any culture had to react to the extraordinarily<br />
lithe acrobatics of Chen Tongshen&#8217;s Monkey King, and the hilarious<br />
&#8220;bellyache-dance&#8221; of his Princess when she has swallowed that fly. And that<br />
Monk&#8217;s drunken dance in the second piece did seem to speak for all imbibers<br />
anywhere in the world: a universal language if ever one was.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/kunopera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIDELIO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/fidelio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/fidelio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has any opera company of any size, anywhere in the world, run up in its first five years a more distinguished string of successes than that of our own Music Center Opera. Sure, there have been lapses along the way, but Tuesday night&#8217;s &#8220;Fidelio&#8221; wasn&#8217;t one of them. The very excellence of the high points [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has any opera company of any size, anywhere in the world, run up in its first<br />
five years a more distinguished string of successes than that of our own Music<br />
Center Opera. Sure, there have been lapses along the way, but Tuesday night&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Fidelio&#8221; wasn&#8217;t one of them.<br />
The very excellence of the high points in Beethoven&#8217;s sole operatic venture<br />
makes &#8220;Fidelio&#8221; one of opera&#8217;s great problem pieces. One problem is the<br />
difficult balance between the shattering passions at the work&#8217;s sublime<br />
moments and those other moments &#8212; the love/hate bickering between the<br />
juvenile lovers, and the crushing vulgarity of the final chorus &#8212; that raise<br />
questions about the composer&#8217;s sanity. Another problem is the theme of its<br />
story, and the temptations it presents to a stage director to turn those plot<br />
elements &#8212; the political oppression meted out to defenders of truth, and the<br />
heroism of their  rescuers &#8212; into some sort of contemporary allegory.<br />
There is no question what contemporary images the opera has stirred in<br />
director Goetz Friedrich&#8217;s own imagination. His Prisoners&#8217; Chorus is<br />
unmistakably a vignette out of Buchenwald or Dachau; his final scene, with the<br />
prison now pulled apart into fragments of scenery and the citizens daubing<br />
graffiti on every available surface, is just as obviously the destruction of<br />
the Berlin Wall.<br />
Those are his references; to his credit, he does not pound us over the head<br />
with them. Designer Peter Sykora&#8217;s costumes are, perhaps purposely, of no<br />
particular period: some Biedermeier, some Victorian. The arch-villain Pizarro<br />
(sung a little drily by Michael Devlin), is by contrast a most fearsome, up-<br />
to-date 1990&#8242;s skinhead in floor-length leather coat; his office, furthermore,<br />
sports an  electric fan.<br />
If this &#8220;Fidelio&#8221; bounces around in various historical eras, its musical<br />
direction is commendably straightforward. Aided considerably by the splendid<br />
impulse of Jiri Kout&#8217;s conducting, Friedrich gets us past even the opera&#8217;s<br />
real nuisance scenes with remarkable dispatch. His Marzelline (Karen<br />
Beardsley) and Jacquino (Jonathan Mack) have become, this once, creatures of<br />
flesh, blood and a fair amount of anger. Wise old Father Rocco, his garrulous,<br />
patchy music splendidly thundered forth by  Matti Salminen, is also a far more<br />
compelling figure than usual.<br />
The Fidelio is Karan {cq} Armstrong; the Florestan, Gary Bachlund. These are<br />
roles often visited by the Wagnerian contingent, and the sheer animal<br />
intensity of a Nilsson or a Vickers isn&#8217;t easily gotten out of the memory.<br />
Those are not the sounds at the Music Center, however. Armstrong is a<br />
marvelous actress, and sings like one. Her smallish, over-bright tones on<br />
opening night went harsh at the top, yet she had the consistent ability to<br />
make her singing mean something, and that counted for a lot.<br />
Bachlund&#8217;s Florestan was, similarly, a dramatic creation of genuine power.<br />
Lighter of voice than most tenors who brave the role, he still produced some<br />
thrilling sounds at the start of his stupendous aria, which he began virtually<br />
prostrate; when he stood up near the end, however, the music seemed to run out<br />
of steam.<br />
These are minor points, however; the major point is that this uneven but<br />
spellbinding masterpiece of Beethoven&#8217;s has received full treatment at the<br />
hands of conductor Kout and director Goetz Friedrich and their assembled<br />
forces, and when the climactic scene arrived and Fidelio flung forth her<br />
incredible revelation, that moment was observed at the Music Center through<br />
not very many dry eyes.<br />
THE FACTS: WHAT: Beethoven&#8217;s &#8220;Fidelio,&#8221; produced by the Los Angeles Music<br />
Center Opera.<br />
THE CAST: Karan Armstrong as Fidelio; Gary Bachlund as Florestan; Michael<br />
Devlin as Pizarro.<br />
BEHIND THE SCENES: Goetz Friedrich, stage director; Jiri Kout, conductor, with<br />
the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra; Peter Sykora, designer.<br />
WHERE: Dorothy Chandler Pavilion, 135 N. Grand Ave., downtown.<br />
WHEN: 8 p.m., September 7, 12, 15; 2 p.m., September 9.<br />
TICKETS: $15-$80; information: 213 972-7219; 213 480-3232.<br />
OUR RATING: * * * *</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/fidelio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RICHPIK</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/richpik/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/richpik/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Operatically inclined radio listeners within reach of New York&#8217;s WQXR know the voice and the wisdom of George Jellinek. For years, especially on his program called &#8220;The Vocal Scene,&#8221; he has expounded on the great voices of our time, without indulging in the kind of hysterical jabberwock that some opera fanatics assume as their lingua [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Operatically inclined radio listeners within reach of New York&#8217;s WQXR know the voice and the wisdom of George Jellinek. For years, especially on his program called &#8220;The Vocal Scene,&#8221; he has expounded on the great voices of our time, without indulging in the kind of hysterical jabberwock that some opera fanatics assume as their lingua franca. Among his other accomplishments, jellinek wrote the first major biography of Maria Callas; it still stands up.Now Jellinek goes nationwide, by means of a new weekly radio series, &#8220;Texaco/Metropolitan Opera: Echoes from the Last 50 Years,&#8221; which starts Saturday, September 1 on KUSC-FM at 9:30 a.m., honoring Texaco&#8217;s 50-year sponsoship of the Met broadcasts. Peter Allen, host of those  broadcasts, will be the host, but the words and the wisdom will be Jellinek&#8217;s own. First: a survey of &#8220;Aida&#8221; performances from the Met, with rare recordings (some from broadcast tapes) as far back as Giovanni Martinelli and as up-to-date as Aprile Millo. &#8212; ALAN RICH</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/09/richpik/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUNCOL&#160;STYLE</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/08/suncol-style/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/08/suncol-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 18,000-or-so fortunate souls who sat at Ella Fitzgerald’s feet (in a manner of speaking) at the Bowl last Wednesday night were treated a display of pure style, a rare and precious commodity becoming more rare, more precious, in our lifetime. Homage was due this smiling, crippled old lady not as a relic but as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 18,000-or-so fortunate souls who sat at Ella Fitzgerald’s feet (in a manner<br />
of speaking) at the Bowl last Wednesday night were treated a display of pure<br />
style, a rare and precious commodity becoming more rare, more precious, in our<br />
lifetime. Homage was due this smiling, crippled old lady not as a relic but as<br />
a continuing presence, not merely for what she has done but for what she still<br />
can do.<br />
Style; the word gets kicked around a lot, but it takes on many shapes for many<br />
pairs of ears. What it means above all, to this pair of ears, is the power<br />
some  musicians have to absorb the music &#8212; not merely the notes but the<br />
lingering echoes of the energy that created those notes &#8212; and then to become<br />
transformed into the essence of that music.  Ella, now 72, may have needed a<br />
little help on and offstage at her concert (and it was wonderful to see her<br />
coming out on the supporting arm of her 83-year-old jazz buddy Benny Carter),<br />
but once she was in place, it was the music that kept her aloft.<br />
That’s what happens with those few great stylists among today&#8217;s performers;<br />
for the listener it simply means being glued to your seat by the power and the<br />
purity of the experience. Last week, on some cable station, there was another<br />
of these stylistic revelations. It came in an unlikely place, a dreary and<br />
pretentious TV special on Great Moments from the Metropolitan Opera, snippets<br />
from Met telecasts over the years with the singers themselves mouthing the<br />
usual music-appreciationese platitudes before each performance.<br />
But in the middle of all this  pseudo-cultural bathwater Teresa Stratas came<br />
on and sang Mimi&#8217;s Farewell from &#8220;La Boheme,&#8221; and for those four minutes the<br />
tiny body, the burnished-bronze thread of tone and the harrowing dark eyes of<br />
Stratas literally transformed themselves into the fragile tragedy of Puccini&#8217;s<br />
haunting music. That, too, was style: not a singer here, a composer there, a<br />
TV camera somewhere else, but a single musical essence which, when it ended,<br />
required an act of will on the viewer&#8217;s part to return to Earth.<br />
Then, also last week, there came in the mail a most wondrous three-record set:<br />
the great Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau, who at 65 is still most people&#8217;s favorite<br />
singer of artsongs, in some of the Schubert songs he recorded in 1951 and &#8217;52.<br />
This was the start of his career, and what these disks capture above all is<br />
the rich glow of revelation, as an ardent young singer with a voice of pure<br />
velvet makes his first discoveries of what it feels like to sing this glorious<br />
music. That glow illuminates this Angel-EMI release, again a venture in pure<br />
style.<br />
And that&#8217;s what Ella kept doing in front of that capacity crowd last<br />
Wednesday. At one point she got Cole Porter&#8217;s &#8220;Night and Day&#8221; into her<br />
clutches, and what she didn&#8217;t do with that evergreen if much-mistreated<br />
venerable ballad! What she did &#8212; after singing it through straight and<br />
gloriously &#8212; was to take both words and music and turn them into toys,<br />
tossing little fragments (&#8220;Night, Night, Night, Day, Day, Day&#8221;) up into the<br />
air until they seemed to reflect the starlight overhead like so many diamonds,<br />
then catching each one of them in her warm and loving lap.<br />
If you weren&#8217;t paying attention, you could write off that sort of thing as<br />
pure trickery, and the Lord knows Ella&#8217;s own bag of tricks is as big as<br />
anyone&#8217;s &#8212; as you&#8217;ll easily agree if you stayed around for that great scat<br />
medley with Ella and all her jazz pals at the concert&#8217;s end. But that &#8220;Night<br />
and Day&#8221; wasn&#8217;t just trick stuff; it was a woman clutching that song close to<br />
her heart, and then just poking around inside it to help make it shine better<br />
than ever. That&#8217;s not tricks; that&#8217;s art, as when Stratas sings Puccini&#8217;s<br />
heroines and Fischer-Dieskau sings Schubert.<br />
There are no pat definitions for this matter of style, which is to say that<br />
there are many. Pure technical mastery &#8212; Pavarotti getting one of Donizetti&#8217;s<br />
high B-flats lodged in his throat, and holding onto it for longer than human<br />
strength should allow, Nureyev dashing up into the stratosphere and just<br />
sitting there for a while &#8212; is for many cultural consumers reason enough to<br />
shell out hard cash for tickets. Others demand artistry.<br />
Kathleen Battle, who looks a million on the stage, owns a pure and pretty<br />
voice which she used with superior marksmanship, and also drew  large crowds<br />
to her recent Bowl concerts,  strikes these ears nevertheless as a singer not<br />
often involved in what she sings; recent published words to that effect drew<br />
some heavy mail. One man&#8217;s stale, apparently, is another&#8217;s style.<br />
Here, for what it&#8217;s worth, is a personal little list of recordings, or of<br />
moments on recordings, that glow particularly bright in the stylistic<br />
firmament. Of Ella there is generous representations, best of all in the huge<br />
&#8220;Song Book&#8221; series (Gershwin, Porter, Berlin, etc., two or three disks each,<br />
all out now on CD) she recorded for Verve (and with Verve) in the 1950s:<br />
vintage stuff, a treasury!Of the young Bing Crosby, much underestimated today as a fabulous master of<br />
rhythm and the lyric line (and a scat artist right up there with Ella) there<br />
is, alas, little currently available. One ASV single of Crosby with Bix<br />
Beiderbecke is around, and it is essential.<br />
On the other side of the fence: the best news, for all worshippers of<br />
performing style at its most radiant, is the reissue on Angel-EMI of Pablo<br />
Casals&#8217; performance of Dvorak&#8217;s Cello Concerto (with Georg Szell and the Czech<br />
Philharmonic). Just that mighty swipe by the Casals bow at the start of his<br />
first solo carries the assurance that this noble musician is deep inside the<br />
music and knows exactly what to do.<br />
The list also includes, for as an example of pure flair and stylistic bravado<br />
in action, Glenn Gould&#8217;s first recording of Bach&#8217;s &#8220;Goldberg&#8221; Variations on<br />
CBS, Carlo Maria Giulini&#8217;s Mahler Ninth Symphony (with the Chicago Symphony)<br />
on DG, and&#8230;<br />
There may be more, but these words are being written with the sound of Ella<br />
still in the ears, and that&#8217;s hard to dislodge.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/08/suncol-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GETTY</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/08/getty-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/08/getty-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anytime you get the premonition that civilization might be doomed, you need no firmer assurance of survival that the Saturday night series of concerts at the J. Paul Getty Museum. You can&#8217;t get in, of course; the series is always sold out. But it helps just to know it&#8217;s there: civilized, highly imaginative programs presented [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anytime you get the premonition that civilization might be doomed, you need no<br />
firmer assurance of survival that the Saturday night series of concerts at the<br />
J. Paul Getty Museum. You can&#8217;t get in, of course; the series is always sold<br />
out. But it helps just to know it&#8217;s there: civilized, highly imaginative<br />
programs presented in the most civilized setting.<br />
Saturday&#8217;s program was the collaboration of two of UCLA&#8217;s blithe spirits, the<br />
musical scholar Robert Winter and the theatrical director John Hall, who<br />
between them concocted a replica of an 18th-century London musical and<br />
dramatic entertainment. The framework, as conceived by Hall, consisted of a<br />
confrontation between a troupe of hoity-toity  Italian opera singers and some<br />
English comedians. They squabble as to whose is the higher art and then, in<br />
the manner of Richard Strauss&#8217;s &#8220;Ariadne auf Naxos,&#8221; they reconcile their<br />
difference and put on their combined show.<br />
The idea was genial, but what made it work was the high quality of the music<br />
&#8211; a pastiche of songs and arias by popular composers of the time, including<br />
Thomas Arne, George Friedrich Handel and Stephen Storace &#8212; and the level of<br />
performance. All six singers &#8212; sopranos Laura Freeze, Frances Young and Shawn<br />
Daywalt; countertenor Brian Asawa, tenor Dale Trecy and baritone Jeff Calof &#8211;<br />
are active in opera workshops in and around Los Angeles &#8212; and all were first<br />
rate. Young Asawa, 23 and still finishing his studies at U.S.C., sang his<br />
stratospheric roulades with a marvelous ease and purity of style; he is<br />
someone to watch.<br />
The music was mostly unfamiliar and included some delightful rareties: songs<br />
and ensembles from a 1794 opera by Stephen Storace called &#8220;The Cherokee,&#8221;<br />
whetting the appetite for a complete performance; a ravishing trio from<br />
Handel&#8217;s &#8220;Imeneo&#8221; and, as an encore, Thomas Arne&#8217;s original operatic setting<br />
of &#8220;Rule, Britannia.&#8221;<br />
It was, then, a captivating idea for a concert, and  brilliantly brought off,<br />
with surprise and delight around every turn. Robert Winter officiated at the<br />
harpsichord. The evening&#8217;s damp air did raise some havoc with the fragile old-<br />
style instruments of Greg Maldonado&#8217;s Los Angeles Baroque Orchestra; the group<br />
has sounded better-tuned on other occasions. Oh well, a small price to pay for<br />
an evening of treasures beyond price.<br />
There&#8217;s one concert left in this summer&#8217;s series, on August 25, sold-out as<br />
usual. Maybe if you sneaked in a couple of days before, and hid behind the Van<br />
Gogh&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/08/getty-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PASQUALE&#160;SUNDAY</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/07/pasquale-sunday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/07/pasquale-sunday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perfection in the arts comes in many shapes and sizes. Nobody could mistake the grand, humanitarian strokes in Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Marriage of Figaro&#8221; for the glistening, small-scale artifice of Donizetti&#8217;s &#8220;Don Pasquale&#8221;; each are perfect comic operas in the elegance of their design, and in the way each work accomplishes what it set out to do, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfection in the arts comes in many shapes and sizes. Nobody could mistake   the grand, humanitarian strokes in Mozart&#8217;s &#8220;Marriage of Figaro&#8221; for the    glistening, small-scale artifice of Donizetti&#8217;s &#8220;Don Pasquale&#8221;; each are    perfect comic operas in the elegance of their design, and in the way each work    accomplishes what it set out to do, so masterfully, with such    originality.  &#8220;Don Pasquale&#8221; is a perfect small comedy, and the classic 1933 recording,    newly issued on the MM (Music Memoria) label, brings it perfectly to life. The    plot couldn&#8217;t be simpler: the old operatic warhorse, many times ridden, about    the foolish old man, his infatuation with a young girl, and his comeuppance    engineered by the girl and her allies.  The wonder of Donizetti&#8217;s small comic masterpiece lies in its swift and    unflagging pace. He doesn&#8217;t waste a note. The opera runs considerably under    two hours, and its pace is breathtaking &#8212; literally so at times, since it is,    among other things, a singer&#8217;s paradise. The solo pieces, especially the arias    for the not-all-that-bright hero Ernesto, are ravishing, but the ensemble    writing is even more brilliant.   There is a comic duet for the foolish old Pasquale and his sidekick, Dr.    Malatesta (= &#8220;Headache&#8221;) that is just about as funny as anything in opera,    but it is also a marvel of musical construction: first one singer in a     tongue-twisting rapid patter, then the other, then both together, with the    orchestra all the while carrying on in high hilarity with a tune of its own.    When you come to this point on the recording (side 2 band 5) you will surely    want to repeat it, and repeat it again; the nice thing about compact-disk    technology is the way you can do this simply by pushing the right button.  The Ernesto in this ancient, but thoroughly clear, recording is the great    Italian lyric tenor Tito Schipa; this was the only complete operatic recording    he made during his long and memorable career. Ernesto Badini is the Pasquale;     the Malatesta is Afro Poli: two first-class burlesque comedians whose    marvelous sense of timing, of give-and-take, is an art virtually vanished from    operatic stages today. Norina, the heroine, is Adelaide Saraceni, a little    shrill at times, less good only when measured against the high quality of the    rest of the cast. Carlo Sabajno conducts, a solid, workhorse conductor much    used in the early days of operatic recording.It is of course Schipa, above all, who will sell this remarkable recording,  that wonderfully suave, beautifully modulated singer who had the intelligence  throughout his long career to recognize what he could do the best and, more  important, to shun what he could not do. Against the supertenor heroes of his  time, from Enrico Caruso through to Beniamino Gigli and Giovanni Martinelli,  Schipa was a lightweight: a Mozart singer, a perfect exponent of the bel-canto  repertory, a superfine Alfredo in &#8220;La Traviata.&#8221; Generations later, Luciano  Pavarotti could have become the Schipa of our day, had he not been lured into  the more strenuous repertory that dulled that marvelous bloom his voice once  had. But this reissue of &#8220;Don Pasquale&#8221; isn&#8217;t meant to deplore what might have  been, but to celebrate what was. Among the many welcome reissues of valuable  performances from the first years of complete-opera recordings (including a  wealth of Gigli material now reissued on Angel-EMI) this two-disk set looms  large. There&#8217;s enough room on the second disk to include a ravishing selection  of Schipa singles, some of them duets with Amelita Galli-Curci and &#8212; although  uncredited on the labeling &#8212; Toti dal Monte. The record comes without  libretto and with only the most meagre plot summary, but the music &#8212; and the  way it is sung &#8212; tells its own story.LINE SPACE The fear, at the dawn of the digital era, that the new technology would  relegate the great repertory of the past to the back shelves of collectors&#8217;  shops, has proven groundless. CD reissues like the &#8220;Don Pasquale,&#8221; along  with disk after disk of solo records by the greatest of the bygone artists,  have become profitable on the major labels and the smaller ones as well. Sure,  there is gold in the Pavarotti market, but who could have predicted the hot  competition now going on in the Caruso department? Hot on the heels of its Toscanini reissues, RCA has announced a Caruso  promotion, with the legendary tenor&#8217;s entire repertory on that label (his  major outlet during the two-dozen years of his recording career) to be  reissued in a CD set this fall. Another label, Germany&#8217;s Bayer (unrelated to  the aspirin people) also has a &#8220;complete&#8221; Caruso set on the way, and  meanwhile there have been Caruso singles on other labels, including Pearl,  Club 99, Pair and Nimbus. The overlap in actual repertory has, of course, been  widespread.Has it been worth the effort? Of course it has; you need only a few notes from  any vintage Caruso performance to fill in with actual sound all the raving  accounts about the beauty of his voice, the versatility of his repertory, the  radiant splendor of his phrasing. Sure, there are extravagances here that are  somewhat out of step with today&#8217;s passion for historically accurate  performance practices. It&#8217;s a safe bet, however, that if a tenor showed up  today sounding like Caruso he, too, would be allowed the liberties that Caruso  assumed as his nature-endowed right.Still dubious? Start with the &#8220;O paradiso&#8221; from Meyerbeer&#8217;s &#8220;L&#8217;Africana&#8221;  (currently on RCA&#8217;s &#8220;Enrico Caruso, 21 Favorite Arias&#8221; and on the Nimbus  disk simply labeled &#8220;Caruso&#8221;). Sure the aria is sung in Italian instead of  the proper French; sure Caruso milks the pianissimos and overshades the  climaxes of many phrases. But sure, too, is the stature of this record as a  study in suave, seductive singing of a quality that has vanished from this  world.The Caruso reissues have been created along two divergent philosophies. The RCA  series employs the digital re-engineering techniques developed by Thomas  Stockham and known as the Stockham/Soundsteam Computer Process which, without  getting into abstruse technology, digitally reconstitutes everything that was  on the original disks, and then does away with such unwanted elements as  surface scratch and the occasional blasting from notes that strained the  resources of the acoustic-horn recording studio. Most other releases,  including Nimbus Records&#8217; fancily-named &#8220;Prima Voce Natural Ambisonic  Transfer Technology&#8221; sticks more closely to the original product, scratch and  all, assuming that the consumer can twiddle his own knobs to improve the  sound.There are solid arguments for and against both systems. The RCA system, as  heard on Caruso disks already issued, creates a creamy-sounding product, with  scratch remarkably suppressed. But there is no escaping the fact that the  sound is an electronic product; something of the impact of that charismatic  singer in an ancient Victor Talking Machine Corporation studio, letting fly at  a primitive acoustic-horn recorder with the blaze of his incomparable  artistry, seems unnecessarily tamed by all this new technology. With all  the surface noise and other defects of their time, the undoctored Caruso, as  on the recent Nimbus reissues, retains its dazzle.The art of recording great music, after all, started from scratch. Perhaps it  should stay that way.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/07/pasquale-sunday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GETTY</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/getty-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/getty-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a certain shock value in hearing the music of the distant past, as there often is with music of today. Our most familiar repertory stems from a time (Bach, say, through Debussy) when certain stated or implied rules governed such musical matters as harmony and structure. Anything composed before those rules, or after [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a certain shock value in hearing the music of the distant past, as<br />
there often is with music of today. Our most familiar repertory stems from a<br />
time (Bach, say, through Debussy) when certain stated or implied rules<br />
governed such musical matters as harmony and structure. Anything composed<br />
before those rules, or after they had worn out their welcome, can put the<br />
timid listener to flight.Nobody actually tried to flee the wonderful concert at the Getty Museum on<br />
Saturday night. The fact that the music was all half a millennium old<br />
conferred on the performers &#8212; the Early Music Ensemble of San Diego and the<br />
lutenist Michael Eagan &#8212;  an aura of antiquarian respectability. Even so, it<br />
turned out to be a night full strange, daring sounds.<br />
It was a time and place, the court of Burgundy late in the 15th century, when<br />
all the arts seemed swept by a passion for change. In painting, the Van Eyck<br />
brothers experimented with perspective; in music the composers Guillaume Dufay<br />
and Gilles Binchois dabbled in new harmonic colorations &#8212; in something as<br />
natural to today&#8217;s ears as the triad, which was at that time denounced by<br />
cultural leaders as a  dissonance. In a fantastically colorful motet, Dufay&#8217;s<br />
&#8220;Flos florum,&#8221; sung by the San Diegans on Saturday, a vulnerable listener<br />
might well have expected the handsomely decorated walls of the Getty&#8217;s Inner<br />
Peristyle Garden to collapse from the weight of those twisted melodic lines<br />
with their raw, tortured harmonies.It was, therefore, a concert both new and old: a program in which,<br />
paradoxically, the opening set of short religious works seemed the livelier,<br />
and the later series of lovesongs seemed like one slow, lovelorn lament after<br />
another &#8212; all, of course, hauntingly beautiful.The five-member San Diegan ensemble has worked as an early-music group since<br />
1972.  Their voices did not come across as super-suave, in the manner of all<br />
those  British ensembles that have come to town recently. Their forte is the<br />
splendid  sense of ensemble, the give-and-take that even seems willing to<br />
admit that  some of this music is actually rather comic, and is meant to<br />
be.At intermission, to add to the music&#8217;s impact, there was the chance to wander<br />
through the museum, to marvel at the million-dollar shadows on the shiny<br />
surface of Van Gogh&#8217;s &#8220;Irises&#8221; and, even better, to take in the splendid<br />
illustrated manuscript of &#8220;The Visions of Tondal,&#8221; dating from the same time<br />
and place as the music, and reflecting the same wild grotesqueries as in the<br />
music downstairs. This was the first in the Getty&#8217;s fifth annual biweekly concert series, devoted<br />
this year to the historic music of five European cultural centers (next time,<br />
Florence). It has become a hot ticket; this summer&#8217;s series is already sold<br />
out, and deservedly so.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/getty-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MOZART</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/mozart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/mozart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elsewhere the drought took its toll, but the UCLA campus has been richly awash these last four days &#8212; inundated, that is, with magical Mozart, much of it unfamiliar, all of it beautifully done. Perhaps the limitations suggested by the title &#8220;Baroque Mozart&#8221; were not strictly observed in this third biennial E. Nakamichi Festival, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elsewhere the drought took its toll, but  the UCLA campus has been richly awash     these last four days &#8212; inundated, that is, with magical Mozart, much of it     unfamiliar, all of it beautifully done. Perhaps the limitations suggested by     the title &#8220;Baroque Mozart&#8221; were not strictly observed in this third biennial     E. Nakamichi Festival, but so what? Mozart&#8217;s genius belongs to all ages; it     spills beyond the historians&#8217; attempts to cram it into a single stylistic     period. Friday night&#8217;s Royce Hall concert proved this point triumphantly. The shadows     of Mozart&#8217;s musical ancestors fell across the evening&#8217;s big choral work, a C-    major Mass (No. 337 in Koechel&#8217;s chronological listing) full of the rousing     glories that Mozart might (or might not) have gleaned from Handel, and very     Baroque indeed in the &#8220;Benedictus&#8221; section that starts off in a Handelian,     fugal manner and moves with Handelian ease into its exultant Hosannas. But the program also included the evidence of Mozart&#8217;s uncanny prophesies of     musical styles to come: in the rhapsodic meanderings in the slow movement of     the G-major Piano Concerto (K. 453) and, indeed, in the way that whole     miraculous work seems like a conversation about romantic, personal emotions. Again, as at earlier concerts last week, the visiting Philharmonia Baroque     Orchestra from San Francisco, with its marvelously rich-sounding (if sometimes     treacherous) instruments modeled on those of Mozart&#8217;s time, filled Royce Hall     with sounds most mellow and grand. Even  the seating of the players was     authentically Mozartian, to allow for a dramatic give and take between, say,     first violins on one side and seconds on the other, or between trumpets and     trombones widely separated. Malcolm Bilson was the soloist in the concerto, hampered somewhat by a rather     drab-sounding early-style piano, but still finely sensitive to the way     Mozart&#8217;s miraculous scoring merges the solo instrument into his iridescent     orchestration. The chorus in the Mass (and in a remarkable single &#8220;Kyrie,&#8221;     K. 341) was that fine local group, I Cantori, not heard around here nearly     often enough; the solo quartet included the radiant soprano Judith Nelson. Neal Stulberg conducted, replacing the orchestra&#8217;s own Nicholas McGegan who was     obliged to honor European commitments this week. Stulberg, remembered      hereabouts as the Los Angeles Philharmonic&#8217;s assistant conductor in the     Giulini days, now has Albuquerque&#8217;s New Mexico Symphony as home base. His work     this week has been that of a poised, insightful, communicative musician; this     &#8220;rediscovery&#8221; has proven one of the festival&#8217;s most festive byproducts. Alongside the evening events, the Nakamichi program offered a full bill of     daytime concerts: Haydn and Mozart by Judith Nelson with Bilson at the same       early-style piano, a solo Bilson recital, a fascinating concert by UCLA&#8217;s     Thomas Harmon on the university&#8217;s splendid Baroque organ, and some fine-    grained playing by Gregory Maldonado&#8217;s Los Angeles Baroque Orchestra. It all     made for a busy four days, full of rewards and, with the Mozart bicentennial     due upon us next year, an enticing foretaste of things to come.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/mozart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HAPPY&#160;END</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/happy-end/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/happy-end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just before the happy end of &#8220;Happy End,&#8221; the 1929 Bert Brecht/Kurt Weill musical that began a five week run at Costa Mesa&#8217;s South Coast Repertory on Friday night &#8212; the ringleader of the bandit gang delivers a ringing speech. Robbing a bank, she (yes, she) proclaims, is nowhere near as great a sin as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just before the happy end of &#8220;Happy End,&#8221; the 1929 Bert Brecht/Kurt Weill<br />
musical that began a five week run at Costa Mesa&#8217;s South Coast Repertory on<br />
Friday night &#8212; the ringleader of the bandit gang delivers a ringing speech.<br />
Robbing a bank, she (yes, she) proclaims, is nowhere near as great a sin as<br />
owning one. Since the mostly marvelous production at South Coast has been<br />
underwritten by the &#8220;honorary producer,&#8221; the First Interstate Bank, it&#8217;s<br />
clear that Orange County contains more liberal spirits than are usually<br />
credited.<br />
Not, of course, that these ringleader&#8217;s sentiments or anything else in this<br />
hugely amusing (and hugely messy) dramatic farrago is to be taken at face<br />
value. Barbara Damashek&#8217;s sizzling, whizzing staging, and her superior cast of<br />
ruby-throated comedians who carry it out, forestall such a possibility.<br />
Brecht himself publicly disowned the playscript, yet his thumbprints are all<br />
over: the setting among Chicago gangsters and Salvation Army lassies, which he<br />
returned to in other plays, the cynical doubletalk, the inane satire of the<br />
&#8220;happy end.&#8221;  Michael Feingold&#8217;s English text is more a version than merely a<br />
translation; common sense lurks somewhere just out of reach. (By the way, the<br />
Damon Runyon story that became &#8220;Guys and Dolls,&#8221; which Brecht&#8217;s story most<br />
resembles, was as yet unwritten at the time of &#8220;Happy End.&#8221;)<br />
But Brecht at least acknowledged his lyrics, and these were what drew out of<br />
Kurt Weill a torrent of music that ranks among the best theater songs of his or<br />
anyone else&#8217;s time. When Patricia Ben Peterson pins the audience to its<br />
collective seats with her searing &#8220;Surabaya Johnny,&#8221; the song that is the<br />
exact orchestration of heartbreak; when the gang of thugs go all to pieces with<br />
their nostalgia for &#8220;Bill&#8217;s beerhall in Bilbao&#8221;; or when thugs and<br />
salvationists join forces for the hilarious sendup known as &#8220;The Liquor<br />
Dealer&#8217;s Dream,&#8221; you know you&#8217;re being had and you willingly give in.<br />
It&#8217;s a splendid production all told. Oh, perhaps Christopher Allport could lose<br />
some of his stiffening as the romantic lead; perhaps Ron Boussom, as the<br />
insidious &#8220;Dr. Nakamura&#8221; could keep his Japanese accent from veering off into<br />
middle-high German. Perhaps&#8230;<br />
Never mind. Peterson&#8217;s Lillian is mostly glorious. Among the thugs there&#8217;s the<br />
marvelous solo turns by Robert Machray and  Jerome Butler; as the uptight<br />
Salvationist major Jane A. Johnston is a starchy delight. Ralph Funicello&#8217;s<br />
stage design, including an oversized Industrial-Revolution engine to drive a<br />
mere nickelodeon, is its own catalog of wonders. &#8220;Happy End&#8221; is eminently<br />
worth your while; you&#8217;ll be happy long before the end.<br />
THE FACTS<br />
What: Bertolt Brecht and Kurt Weill&#8217;s &#8220;Happy End&#8221;<br />
Were: South Coast Repertory, 655 Town Center Drive, Costa Mesa.<br />
When: 8 p.m., Tuesday-Friday; 2:30 and 8 p.m. Saturday; 2:30 and 7:30 p.m.,<br />
Sunday, thru July 13.<br />
Behind the scenes: staged by Barbara Damashek, musical direction by Dennis<br />
Castellano; designed by Ralph Funicello.<br />
Starring: Patricia Ben Peterson, Christopher Allport and Ron Boussom.<br />
Tickets: $27-$34; for reservations phone 714 957-4033.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/happy-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FANCIULLA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/fanciulla/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/fanciulla/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By general agreement, &#8220;The Girl of the Golden West&#8221; is Puccini&#8217;s problem opera. Maybe so, but the Music Center Opera&#8217;s new production, unveiled Wednesday night in an out-of-town tryout at the Orange County Performing Arts Center in Costa Mesa, presents a whole string of problem-solvings, most of them brilliant. The problems are basic, the principal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By general agreement, &#8220;The Girl of the Golden West&#8221; is Puccini&#8217;s problem<br />
opera. Maybe so, but the Music Center Opera&#8217;s new production, unveiled<br />
Wednesday night in an out-of-town tryout at the Orange County Performing Arts<br />
Center in Costa Mesa, presents a whole string of problem-solvings, most of them<br />
brilliant.<br />
The problems are basic, the principal one being the notion of a romantic<br />
Italian opera drawn from David Belasco&#8217;s sweet but primitive melodrama set<br />
among bandits and miners during the California gold rush. &#8220;Whiskey per<br />
tutti,&#8221; someone sings; &#8220;Doo-da, Doo-da&#8221; sings the chorus, and the audience<br />
inevitably snickers. (And so the audience did on Wednesday night.) Another<br />
problem probably escaped Belasco&#8217;s notice: the idea of a spinster of uncertain<br />
age, virginal house-mother to a horde of thirsty miners, suddenly turned to<br />
amorous mush by the first bandit to challenge her resistance.<br />
Harold Prince&#8217;s production, introduced at the Chicago Lyric Opera and now here<br />
on loan, gets around that latter problem most effectively, by pretending it<br />
doesn&#8217;t exist. Under Prince&#8217;s guidance Gwyneth Jones&#8217; Minnie is, quite simply,<br />
a study in pre-menopausal repression that Tennessee Williams might have<br />
recognized, ready to snap her hinges at the very sight of the equally middle-<br />
aged, portly Placido Domingo, who apparently fell into banditry only because<br />
his daddy bequeathed him his old gang.<br />
Making no attempt at being believable, and singing away with the blazing lung-<br />
power that Puccini&#8217;s shaggy score demands, these two superstars become the<br />
pillars of an evening of mostly thrilling opera. It matters in no way that<br />
there isn&#8217;t a single moment that inspires belief. It&#8217;s all pure hokum on a<br />
level so high that you could almost mistake it for art.<br />
It&#8217;s a handsome production, at that, with its gold-rush rusticity and its<br />
snowflakes falling prettily &#8212; straight down despite the howling of the wind<br />
machine. The hand of Harold Prince shows in the prevailing sense of too much of<br />
everything: extra people-props, a set with cabins and teepees whirling around<br />
on turntables like so many spinning tops and, in the last act, a towering<br />
railroad scaffolding to serve as the bandit&#8217;s gallows. (On the other hand, the<br />
customary horses have given way to a single railway handcar.)<br />
Justino Diaz is a fine, sturdy &#8220;Sceriffo&#8221; (sheriff, to you); Michael Gallup<br />
is his usual solid self as Sonora. Even in the questionable acoustic<br />
surroundings at Costa Mesa, and even under Richard Buckley&#8217;s lethargic time-<br />
beating, the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra provided a suitable backdrop.<br />
Another performance remains in Costa Mesa, Saturday at 8 p.m.; the opera<br />
reopens at its home base in the Music Center on Wednesday, June 12 for the<br />
first of five performances, with Carol Neblett replacing Gwyneth Jones in the<br />
last two.<br />
THE FACTSD<br />
What: The Music Center Opera production of Puccini&#8217;s &#8220;The Girl of the Golden<br />
West.&#8221;<br />
Where &#038; When: Orange County Performing Arts Center at 8 p.m. Saturday; Los<br />
Angeles Music Center at 8 p.m. June 12, 15, 18 and 21, 2 p.m. June 23.<br />
Starring: Placido Domingo and Gwyneth Jones, with Carol Neblett replacing Jones<br />
on June 21 and 23.<br />
Behind the scenes: Directed by Harold Prince; conducted by Richard Buckley;<br />
designed by Eugene and Franne {cq} Lee.<br />
Tickets:<br />
20 to $80; for information phone 714 556-ARTS for the Orange County<br />
performance; 213 972-7211 for Los Angeles.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/06/fanciulla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALA,&#160;ZAMBELLO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/ala-zambello/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/ala-zambello/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 1990 17:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=3019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even before Francesca Zambello arrived at the appointed hour, expectations had been shaped by memories of another hugely talented, innovative, ferociously energetic operatic stage director of our time. You can&#8217;t help it. It was Boston&#8217;s Sarah Caldwell, after all, who did the first American staging of Serge Prokofiev&#8217;s titanic &#8220;War and Peace&#8221; (which Zambello staged [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even before Francesca Zambello arrived at the appointed hour, expectations had  been shaped by memories of another hugely talented, innovative, ferociously  energetic operatic stage director of our time. You can&#8217;t help it.
<p>It was Boston&#8217;s Sarah Caldwell, after all, who did the first American staging  of Serge Prokofiev&#8217;s titanic &#8220;War and Peace&#8221; (which Zambello staged in  Seattle last year). It was Caldwell who staged America&#8217;s first encounter with  Hector Berlioz&#8217;s &#8220;The Trojans&#8221; (which Zambello will stage for the Los  Angeles Music Center Opera this coming Saturday). After that, Zambello flies  off to Geneva to stage yet another Berlioz opera, &#8220;Benvenuto Cellini.&#8221;  Caldwell had put that opera on once, too.
<p>Zambello arrived, and the resemblance was further confirmed. No, she hasn&#8217;t  even come close to Caldwell&#8217;s famous girth that sometimes made for an unkind  remark or two. But there&#8217;s a lot of Zambello even so, and when she speaks it&#8217;s  with Caldwell&#8217;s forward-thrusting, dynamic, bronze-colored alto, and, of  course, with the same sense that she knows exactly where she&#8217;s going and how  to get there. If we&#8217;re lucky, history will repeat itself, Zambello in for  Caldwell.
<p>Born in New York to an American mother and an Italian father, both  actor/singers, she got her degree (in philosophy) at Colgate University and  launched her operatic career as assistant to yet another in the pantheon of  innovative stage directors, the late Jean-Pierre Ponnelle, a man governed by  the philosophy that anytime you don&#8217;t like what the composer tells you to do,  do something else.
<p>She&#8217;s come a long way; who, outside of Milwaukee, knew her name six years ago?  That&#8217;s where she did her first important professional work, starting in her  mid-20s as co-director of that city&#8217;s Skylight Opera Theater. Her partner   there was Stephen Wadsworth, best known as the librettist for Leonard  Bernstein&#8217;s unfortunate fling into grand opera known as &#8220;A Quiet Place.&#8221;  They have now gone their separate ways, but Zambello pinpointed the Milwaukee  experience as the best kind of training for a stage director with innovative  ideas.
<p>&#8221;It&#8217;s a small theater, 300 seats and only a chamber-orchestra pit,&#8221; she said.  &#8220;But we accomplished a lot there, eight productions a year, 15 or 20  performances of each. It became a sort of laboratory, where you learned to  focus on intimate performance details, on acting rather than just belting out  high notes.
<p>&#8221;Actually,&#8221; she continued, &#8220;I like to balance large and small productions,  and sometimes they even intermix.&#8221; She talked about her now-famous production  of Puccini&#8217;s &#8220;Tosca&#8221; in London last season, not at an opera house but in a  sports arena at Earls Court, seating 10,000. &#8220;Sure, it had to be big. We put  the production in the center of the arena, with a set that looked like the  whole city of Rome, with 10 horses and 20 dogs. When the shepherd sang in the  last act, instead of being offstage as the libretto demanded, he came on with  a flock of sheep.&#8221;
<p>Still, according to the star of that production, Los Angeles resident Julia  Migenes, the great thing about Zambello&#8217;s concept was the intimacy it  provided. &#8220;Instead of having to sing XI Love You&#8217; to the second balcony,&#8221;  Migenes remembered during a recent conversation, &#8220;the microphones made it  possible to sing it to the tenor.&#8221;
<p>Zambello also spoke with good feelings about her most recent gig, the American  premiere of Wolfgang Rihm&#8217;s &#8220;Oedipus&#8221; at the Santa Fe Opera, where she was  working for the first time. Here was innovative opera at its most resolute,  and it demanded innovative staging: singers on the opera house&#8217;s topmost  towers (in, as it happened, howling rainstorms at all four performances), one  onstage singer simulating (awesomely) suicide by hanging, all manner of  amplification tricks. The critics (present company excepted) hated it;  Zambello, she claimed, had a ball.
<p>&#8221;That&#8217;s my kind of opera house: no stars, heavy emphasis on ensemble, 4 weeks  of rehearsal. Sure, the critics jumped all over it, and that&#8217;s a real tragedy  nowadays. We don&#8217;t have enough critics who love opera, really love it I  mean.&#8221;
<p>Will the critics love the 4-1/2-hour expanse of Berlioz&#8217; &#8220;The Trojans&#8221;?  Nobody is saying, yet; the least everybody is saying is that our local company  is brave beyond belief in even attempting to cope with it. But that&#8217;s Peter  Hemmings&#8217; doing; after all, it was his Scottish  Opera&#8217;s production in the  1960s that restored the long-neglected score in its full glory to world  attention. When Hemmings took over the Los Angeles Music Center Opera six  years ago, he made no secret of the fact that a revival of &#8220;The Trojans&#8221; was  his fondest hope.
<p>Zambello feels that the recent popularity of Richard Wagner&#8217;s &#8220;Ring of the  Nibelung,&#8221; that 17-hour epic beside which any other opera (even &#8220;The   Trojans&#8221;) is no longer than a sneeze, cuts through any resistance to modern  full-length productions. This &#8220;Trojans,&#8221; she poined out with pride, is even  longer than previous &#8220;complete&#8221; performances. &#8220;There&#8217;s an 8-minute scene,  early on, where the Greek double agent Sinon tries to convince the Trojan King  Priam to accept the Greeks&#8217; gift of the famous Wooden Horse. Berlioz never  finished the orchestration of that scene, so it&#8217;s never been done. Now it has  been completed, by the Berlioz scholar Hugh MacDonald, and this will be its  American premiere.
<p>&#8221; XThe Trojans&#8217; really is the French XRing,&#8217; &#8221; Zambello said. &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t  only tell the story of the fall of Troy and the love of Dido and Aeneas; it  frames all this, as Wagner framed his gods and goddesses, with a text of even  higher significance. I&#8217;ve tried to bring this out in this production.
<p> &#8220;As in Wagner, I have the ancient gods standing around the stage, overseeing  the action of the mortals. I see Troy as a dead culture, its beaten warriors  mourning that demise, the whole thing set in dark colors and black.
<p> &#8220;But Carthage is different, and here we&#8217;ve brought the action up to Berlioz&#8217;  own time, and with lighter, brighter colors. After all, Carthage is only 7  years old when the Trojans land there. The city is still being built; there&#8217;s  scaffolding all around. And it&#8217;s being built as a Utopian society, Marxist,  Hegelian. But now Aeneas comes along and the whole plan goes up in flames.  Human weaknesses win out over grand ideas.&#8221;
<p>Pressed to describe the look of her production, Zambello hung back. &#8220;No, I&#8217;m  not going to tell you what our Trojan Horse will look like,&#8221; she said with a  conspiratorial wink. &#8220;Some things you have to find out for yourself.
<p> &#8220;I promise you,&#8221; said Francesca Zambello, &#8220;you won&#8217;t be bored. Not for a  minute.&#8221;<br />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/ala-zambello/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEW&#160;YORK</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/new-york/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/new-york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 1990 17:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=3017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every visitor, and even a few residents, recognize Manhattan as a paradise for the sightseer. But there needs to be a comparable word &#8212; &#8220;soundhearer,&#8221; perhaps? &#8212; for the music critic, with a few hours off from official duties, who decides to cruise the island specifically to sample its indigenous noises. Herewith, an account of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every visitor, and even a few residents, recognize Manhattan as a  paradise for the sightseer. But there needs to be a comparable word &#8212;  &#8220;soundhearer,&#8221; perhaps? &#8212; for the music critic, with a few hours off from  official duties, who decides to cruise the island specifically to sample its  indigenous noises. Herewith, an account of a few hours of noise-cruising in  Manhattan on a recent Thursday, a sp[endid day warmed by an Indian summer  sun.</p>
<p>9:30 a.m. My  hotel maintains a small coffee shop, run on what you might call  informal principles. You find a seat; the man at the cash register, across  the room, yells out a friendly &#8220;what&#8217;ll ya have?&#8221; and somehow a process is  set in motion. A benign pandemonium reigns, punctuated by the horns and  engine roarings of heavy crosstown traffic on 51st St.</p>
<p>9:50 a.m. Surcease awaits, directly across the street in the form of  Greenacre Park: a small, blessed oasis, no larger than a single building  site, with a 25-foot waterfall at one end, some handsome plantings, a few  chairs and tables, a coffee bar. My day&#8217;s second cup, therefore, has a far  more agreeable sound setting. From a seat beside the waterfall, all of New  York recedes.</p>
<p>10:30 a.m. Not many years ago New York&#8217;s subways were a sonic nightmare:  rattletrap cars, screeching brakes, outcries from protesting wheels rounding  curves that could set your teeth on edge. New cars and track repairs have  made life underground somewhat more bearable. Now you get harangued, all too  clearlu, by the sleazoid beggars and peddlers on their rounds from car to  car. And they get outshouted from time to time by the conductor&#8217;s station  announcements over the p.a.system that is usallu on the blink.</p>
<p>10:50 a.m. End of the line, and blessed, momentary relief. Manhattan&#8217;s true  miracle is the transformation that has taken place at the lower tip of the  island: not only the gigantic towers of the World Trade Center, the World  Financial Center and the waterside apartment complexes at Battery Park City,  but the complex of personal amenities that have been installed in, under and  beside these structures.</p>
<p>A walkways leads from the subway station directly to a concourse lined with  markets, snackbars and formal restaurants. One level up, on the streets of  Lower Manhattan, the sounds of traffic roil and surge; here, below ground,  there&#8217;s only the sounds of foot traffic on stone flooring. Where else can you  hear this strange mix of urgent pedestrian sounds in a seeming sound vacuum?  The back streets of Venice (the one in Italy) come immediately to mind.</p>
<p>11 a.m. My wanderings lead me to the architectural jewel of the building  complex, the Winter Garden on the ground level of Cesar Pelli&#8217;s  World  Financial Center.  A cascade of broad marble steps leads down to the floor  level, to a vast garden lined with our own California fan palms. At the far  end, a  windowed facade looks out on New York harbor, with Lady Liberty and  the newly restored Ellis Island in clear perspective.</p>
<p>Here, in a city where real estate is valued by the cubic inch, the prodigal  space-wastage of the Winter Garden stops the breath. It astounds the ear as  well. From the marble stairs, the distant rattle of china and silver at the  cafe tables rings like the chatter of far-off birds. The clink and purr from  the marimbas of a Mexican band, rehearsing for a free concert later in the  day, echo from the upward-curving roof like points of audible light. As is  only right, the Winter Garden serves as site for an ongoing list of free  concerts; I note with envy that jazzman Milt Hinton is scheduled a few days  from now when, alas, I&#8217;ll be otherwise engaged.</p>
<p>12 noon. Outdoors once again, I head toward Broadway, two blocks to the east.   Silence reigns, as always, in the small, handsome churchyard at St. Paul&#8217;s  Chapel, and inside as well. George Washington prayed here, moments before his  inauguration as our first President, and his pew is nicely preseved. Trinity  Church, a few blocks to the south, is the grander of New York&#8217;s two 18th- century churches, but I love St. Paul&#8217;s for its intimacy, and the way the  silence seems to wrap itself around the visitor.</p>
<p>12:15 p.m. On route to Trinity, there is a small park a few steps below  street level. There a girl on roller skates holds the crowd enthralled with  her rap songs, helped by a ghetto blaster whose sound probably carries to New  Jersey.</p>
<p>12:20 p.m. Fortunately, it doesn&#8217;t carry to Trinity&#8217;s elegant inner space,  where an organist runs through some tortured 19th-century harmonies. I wait  for a while, in hopes that he might try some Bach. No such luck.</p>
<p>12:30 p.m. Starting with the restrained, elegant rococo of Trinity, and then  along the twisted, tiny, aimless streets of Lower Manhattan,  it&#8217;s possible  as in few American places to imagine yourself in some European town. Sure,  the old buildings are now festooned with fast-food signs, but if you aim your  gaze upward the fantasy of Old New York, before the invention of the grid  pattern for streets (and the consequent gridlock), does take hold.</p>
<p>1 p.m. Along Fulton Street, heading east, the crescendo in fish odors tells  me I&#8217;m heading in the right direction. To the west, Lower Manhattan is  greatly enhanced by the new construction; on the east side, it&#8217;s the old  structures,  handsomely restored, that seize the attention. An area of  several blocks at the end of Fluton, just before the East River has been  closed to daytime traffic, and turned into a pedestrian mall, ringed by great  old buildings. Again, as in the underground concourse, memories of the  unnatural quiet on Venice&#8217;s untrafficked streets become inescapable.</p>
<p>The crown of the restoration is the South Street Seaport, with its few old  ships still at anchor &#8212; converted, for the most part, into tourist traps,  but still handsome on a late-September sunny day. In the open space a  superior jazz combo holds forth (trombone, bass, drums): the Chicken Wing  Trio. Not bad.</p>
<p>1:30 p.m. Across the street are New York&#8217;s two most serious seafood  restaurants: Sweet&#8217;s, which as usual looks jammed, and Sloppy Louie&#8217;s, which  doesn&#8217;t.Sloppy Louie&#8217;s main dining room is entirely tin-lined: walls and  ceiling both. The bluefish is marvelous, but the sound level creates the  sensation of a huge thumb, pushing me down toward the floor.</p>
<p>3 p.m. Back uptown, I soothe my ears in the sound of my waterfall.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/new-york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OPERA</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/opera/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/opera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 1990 17:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=3015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems to be a Long Beach Opera axiom that the more challenging the work at hand the more brilliant the results. The results this season bear this out: an indifferent stab at a couple of sure-fire romantic melodramas to start, and now a torrent of enlightened imagination applied to Debussy&#8217;s &#8220;Pelleas and Melisande.&#8221; The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be a Long Beach Opera axiom that the more challenging the work at  hand the more brilliant the results. The results this season bear this out: an  indifferent stab at a couple of sure-fire romantic melodramas to start, and now  a torrent of enlightened imagination applied to Debussy&#8217;s &#8220;Pelleas and  Melisande.&#8221; The production had its premiere on Wednesday night; two  performances remain.</p>
<p>&#8220;Pelleas&#8221; is an opera for the brave in heart, on both sides of the  footlights. It invests Maeterlinck&#8217;s sad, symbolic tale with a musical tapestry  woven out of shadows. On the other hand, the opera &#8212; both text and music &#8212; is  so full of half-meanings and ambiguities that it can be made to work in either  a literal or  symbolic production. The Long Beach forces, marshalled by stage  director Brian Kulick, designers Mark Wendland and Craig Pierce, and conductor  Paul Connelly, have chosen the latter approach.</p>
<p>You know what&#8217;s in store almost immediately, as the lost Golaud walks onto a  bare platform, facing a barren mound that looks like sand strewn with waste  paper, and sings of being &#8220;lost in a forest.&#8221; The forest is in Debussy&#8217;s  music, not on the stage and that, to the producers, is enough. They make us  believe, as well.</p>
<p>Some of the symbolic gadgetry may, in truth, be a little excessive. Melisande  has no long hair to let down from her tower, so her Pelleas must cope with a  symbolic bolt of some shiny fabric. The child Yniold does his spying number,  not through a window into Melisande&#8217;s room but down into a cut-away doll-house.  It isn&#8217;t Golaud who gets to hurl Melisande around by her hair, but a black-clad  surrogate, one of three silent stooges who function as stagehands and who, on  occasion, clutter the production with a welter of gratuitous images.</p>
<p>Yes, there are moments when less might have been more. Overriding these passing  flaws, however, is a consistent production philosophy under which Debussy&#8217;s  subtle, supple operatic masterpiece fills in the cramped spaces of the Center  Theater, throbs with its own life-force, and comes across as the kind of  challenging, memorable entertainment that has marked this company&#8217;s best work   through the past decade.</p>
<p>Musically, the forces are equal to the dramatic demands. Nobody could confuse  the matronly Michal Shamir for the child-bride of Maeterlinck&#8217;s text. Yet,  under Connelly&#8217;s expert pacing, she creates a Melisande out of whole fabric,  and her final moments are truly moving. James Schwisow is a Pelleas ardent and  haunted; Neil Howlett a marvelously fluent, menacing Golaud. But the authentic  miracle here is the Arkel of Jerome Hines, 70 this year, 50 years out from his  professional singing debut (which happened to be in Los Angeles). You have to  have those figures in front of you, to underscore the unbelievability factor in  the rolling, rock-solid eloquence of this performance.</p>
<p>Connelly&#8217;s pacing of the score was judicious and sympathetic; his orchestra,  behind a scrim in back of the performance, contributed an appropriately shadowy  visual background &#8212; and an unscheduled laugh as well when, at the end, the  scrim was pulled away on the line &#8220;why are all these people here?&#8221; Oh yes,  the opera was sung in English, a translation by Hugh MacDonald. Against all  fears of violence to the strange, half-lit French of Maeterlinck&#8217;s text, the  new words worked remarkably well. A memorable, spellbinding evening, then; go  see for yourselves.</p>
<p>THE FACTS: What: Debussy&#8217;s &#8220;Pelleas and Melisande,&#8221; by the Long Beach Opera.</p>
<p>When: Tonight [*] FRIDAY [F/L] at 8, April 28 at 2.</p>
<p>Where: Center Theater, Long Beach Convention Center.</p>
<p>Behind the scenes: staged by Brian Kulick; conducted by Paul Connelly; designed  by Mark Wentland and Craig Pierce.</p>
<p>Tickets: $22 to $55. Information: 213 596-5556.</p>
<p>Our rating: * * * *</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/opera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LINSHO,&#160;PAVAROTTI</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/linsho-pavarotti/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/linsho-pavarotti/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 1990 17:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=3013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As expected, Luciano Pavarotti filled the Hollywood Bowl on Monday night, both with his voice and with his fans. The one was received by the others &#8212; 17.979 strong, the full Bowl capacity &#8212; with clear and obvious delight. It was a night that the true believers could take home, relive and cherish. Pavarotti was, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As expected, Luciano Pavarotti filled the Hollywood Bowl on Monday night, both  with his voice and with his fans. The one was received by the others &#8212; 17.979  strong, the full Bowl capacity &#8212; with clear and obvious delight. It was a  night that the true believers could take home, relive and cherish.</p>
<p>Pavarotti was, in fact, in fair voice quite a bit of the time. His chosen  program could not exactly count as arduous. There was a generous spattering of  instrumental pieces to allow the singer to replenish his stock of high notes,  loud notes, soft and crooning notes and the rest of the vocal paraphernalia  that has earned him his particular place on the cultural landscape.</p>
<p>There were also, of course, problems. As early as the third aria on the  program, the &#8220;Cielo e mar&#8221; from Ponchielli&#8217;s &#8220;La Gioconda&#8221; there were  identifiable moments of strain. Later on, in the set of three sentimental  Italian songs that concluded the program, there were vocal slips, small but  constant. Now and again he seemed motivated to try a full-throated pianissimo,  a beautiful effect when it works. This time, nothing worked.</p>
<p>Why nitpick? Simply because in a program such as this, with a vocal superstar  at the center and nothing much around the edges. there isn&#8217;t much to  concentrate on except questions of vocal excellence. There was only one  message here, that Pavarotti can do no wrong. When he did something wrong,  therefore, it stood out.</p>
<p>In fairness, there were also moments that were glowingly, glisteningly right.  The big aria from Verdi&#8217;s &#8220;Luisa Miller,&#8221; which began Pavarotti&#8217;s part of  the program, was ravishingly delivered. The &#8220;Turandot&#8221; aria that was the  last of the five encores, was sent aloft sheathed in vocal brass, gold, steel  and many rarer metals as well. Either of those moments was easily worth the  price of a ticket (up to a thousand-dollar top).</p>
<p>Pavarotti aside, however, it was an evening strewn with silliness. This was the  final stop of a portable package, put together by impresario Tibor Rudas, that  also included the dubious services of conductor Leone Magiera and flutist  Andrea Griminelli &#8212; here with an aggregation from the Los Angeles  Philharmonic. A clutch of instrumental tidbits filled in the spaces around the  Pavarotti numbers, dispatched with no discernible grace. The lighting design  leaned heavily toward a lurid hot pink that turned the stage into a monumental  boudoir. Two truckloads of sound equipment were brought in, to replace &#8212; but  not improve upon &#8212; the Bowl&#8217;s own excellent facilities.</p>
<p>This last proved an especially sore point. Someone among Rudas&#8217; minions dreamed  up the notion of bending the whole sound image toward a rock-style  presentation, with dozens of microphones around the stage and with Pavarotti  so heavily miked that the orchestra behind his arias might as well have gone  home. The effect was more of a vocal recording being mimed than a live  performance.</p>
<p>IIt could be that Pavarotti  likes this line of work, and he can&#8217;t be blamed  for liking the money it brings. But with the world&#8217;s supply of tenors in dire  straits,it remains a shame that he has sealed himself off from serious  culture. It must be noted, however, that nearly 18,000 screaming, whistling,  stomping, cheering Pavarottists, at the Bowl on Monday night, acted as if they  believed otherwise.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/linsho-pavarotti/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALA,&#160;MORT</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/ala-mort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/ala-mort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 1990 17:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=3011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are certain advantages to being old. I can collect the awe of the multitude for having seen Rachmaninoff play the piano, and for having shaken hands with Bela Bartok. Still there are drawbacks. I have made the terrible blunder, for example, of letting myself, at this advanced age, become interested in the whole complex [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are certain advantages to being old. I can collect the awe of the multitude for having seen Rachmaninoff play the piano, and for having shaken hands with Bela Bartok. Still there are drawbacks. I have made the terrible blunder, for example, of letting myself, at this advanced age, become interested in the whole complex of computer technology as it relates to music. I hear people talk about the wonderful gadgetry that will be in every home by the year 2025, and I shudder to think what difficulty I will have, at age 101, in mastering all these wonders.A few weeks ago the California Institute of the Arts held a demonstration, at Santa Monica&#8217;s Electronic Cafe, of some of the devices that are being worked on at the school&#8217;s newly formed Center for Art, Information and Technology. That center, funded by AT&amp;T and the Peter Norton Family Foundation, is the umbrella under which the beardless techies and bearded electronic eminences at CalArts &#8212; and, eventually we &#8212; can command the creation, the shape and the sound of music in a manner as yet undreamed of.At this demonstration, Morton Subotnick &#8212; charter electronic guru at CalArts since its founding in 1969 &#8212; put something called the Gesture Piano through its paces. It isn&#8217;t a piano at all, of course, but a software program that enables a keyboardist to access whatever music the program has stored, and make it respond to the user&#8217;s whim. Take a Beethoven Sonata, as Subotnick did; lay it into the machine, and a performer at the keyboard can transfigure a performance of that work according to his own vision. A child, in learning that Beethoven Sonata, can command the way his machine performs the work; he can, in learning the work summon up repeats until a phrase becomes familiar. I wondered to myself, just for a moment: how is this matter of recreating a Beethoven Sonata through electronic means all that different from recreating a famous painting from a sheet of paper with numbered spaces to fill in with the right color? The answer lies in this magic word &#8220;interactive.&#8221; You don&#8217;t just recreate the Beethoven Sonata, you recreate it along the lines of your own personal vision of the way the music works. .David Rosenboom, newly anointed Dean of Music at CalArts, came on with a program called &#8220;Heirarchical Music Specification Language,&#8221;which also involved interactions whereby the whole process of artificial intelligence somehow conspires to create virtual new intelligent instruments within the computer. And the morning ended with a spectacular dance demonstration, called by its inventor, Mark Coniglio, a MIDI-Dancer. That, to an outsider, was both alluring and understandable. A dancer, her both arms wired to small receptors that sent information to a computer via a wireless transmitter strapped to her back, as she moved her arms, moved through a series of steps. Her movements, picked up by the arm terminals, controlled the music, and also the lighting of the improvised stage area in which she worked. This, of course, was stunning, if only for the elementary reason that the wired dancer creating the music and lighting was locked in to a perfect synchrony.That, of course, is also something of a drawback. The greatest hangup about the role of computers in the creation of art,. it seems to me, is the dehumanization process, the lack of randomness and surprise. The dynamic of a live  performance  is the risk factor,  the real chance that human factors will inevitably intercede in a performance, that no two will be exactly alike. Subotnick talked about the shared concern in this problem, and about the development of such things as a metronome that can allow for human variations in the rhythm and meter of a piece. Sounds self-contradictory to me: a random metronome; but who am I, at this advanced age, to say? I have seen the interactive future. and it is user-friendly. This is Alan Rich with Notes on Music.,</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/ala-mort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HI-FI&#160;MOVIE</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/hi-fi-movie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/hi-fi-movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 1990 17:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=3009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With three books already out on its collective lives and musicianship, and now a full-length documentary movie, the Guarneri Quartet must be doing something right. One of the things it does right, obviously, is to sign on with the right management and public-relations personnel; chamber-music ensembles don&#8217;t automatically become documentary subjects without a push here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With three books already out on its collective lives and musicianship, and now a full-length documentary movie, the Guarneri Quartet must be doing something right. One of the things it does right, obviously, is to sign on with the right management and public-relations personnel; chamber-music ensembles don&#8217;t automatically become documentary subjects without a push here and a shove there. Another thing it does right is to play well. It has, indeed, been doing  that for over a quarter-century, and it has gone through that long life without a single membership change.</p>
<p>Allan Miller, previously known for his Oscar-winning 1981 documentary &#8220;From Mao to Mozart: Isaac Stern in China,&#8221; is obviously a practiced hand at keeping a low profile around his subjects. He actually makes you believe that he and his camera crew just happened to be at the Guarneri Quartet&#8217;s rehearsal sessions during moments of hand-to-hand (or foot-to-mouth) combat over points of interpretation and repertory.</p>
<p>Did that crew just happen to be on the plane, for example, when viola player Michael Tree pulled a peevish tantrum about wanting to play violin once in a while? Were they really just in the neighborhood when violinist Arnold Steinhardt vainly tried to interest his colleagues in the trashy String Quartet by Fritz Kreisler, only to have cellist David Soyer ridicule the work as &#8220;Chinese monkey-business&#8221;?</p>
<p>Whatever its ratio of verity to hokum, &#8220;High Fidelity &#8212; the Adventures of the Guarneri String Quartet&#8221; is loaded with valuable insights. You do get to eavesdrop on some illuminating rehearsal moments, and come away with a fair idea of the genuinely democratic outlook that forms the heartbeat of any such ensemble. You weep along, as the group must sacrifice its comfortable stage setups to appease a gang of smug German television engineers. You shudder, as manager Harry Beall, obviously a shrewd money hand, laments that the group refuses to play more than 100 dates a year.</p>
<p>There is also some excellent travel footage, lots of in-and-out-of-airports stuff, a Prague audience turned rapturous at music by their own Smetana (in a Guarneri performance described by a critic as &#8220;staggeringly and wonderfully Americanm&#8221;); the absurdly gorgeous venue of a made-over theater in Tampa, miles too large for chamber music; adoring college audiences asking bright questions in pre-concert get-togethers.</p>
<p>Therein, in fact, lies the real &#8220;fidelity.&#8221; As far as the Guarneris themselves are concerned, Miller&#8217;s documentary is mostly high-class contrivance. Then you get a look at a young audience held spellbound by what the Guarneris have been doing so well these 25 years (and still do): the dizzying virtuosity in a Beethoven finale, the diabolical mystery in a Bartok excerpt. And so you believe at least one of the Guarneri statements into Miller&#8217;s ubiquitous microphone. &#8220;There aren&#8217;t many musicians,&#8221; says cellist Soyer, &#8220;who can say that they&#8217;re doing exactly what they want to do.&#8221;</p>
<p>Accompanying &#8220;High Fidelity&#8221; is a 5-minute short, &#8220;To Her Glory,&#8221; in which Los Angeles Philharmonic harpist Lou Anne Neill loads her harp into a van, drives through some pretty Oregon scenery, and ends up serenading Mt. Hood &#8220;in a personal act of honoring Mother Nature.&#8221; She plays a Handel concerto, and an invisible orchestra materializes in the background, just like in the old Harpo Marx movies.</p>
<p>THE FACTS*The film: &#8220;High Fidelity, the Adventures of the Guarneri Quartet&#8221; (unrated).*The stars: The Guarneri String Quartet &#8212; Arnold Steinhardt and John Dalley, violins; Michael Tree, viola; David Soyer, cello.*Behind the scenes; Produced and directed by Allan Miller; released by the Four Oaks Foundation.*Running tiime: One hour, 25 minutes.*Playing: Laemmle&#8217;s Monica 4-plex, Santa Monica.*Our rating: ***</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/04/hi-fi-movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KRONOS</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/01/kronos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/01/kronos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were more kinds of music at the Kronos Quartet concert, Saturday night at UCLA&#8217;s Wadsworth Theater, than you could shake a stick at. There was, indeed, a fair amount of stick-shaking, in one of the movements of John Zorn&#8217;s &#8220;The Dead Man,&#8221; wherein the four players wave their bows menacingly in the air, in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were more kinds of music at the Kronos Quartet concert, Saturday night at<br />
UCLA&#8217;s Wadsworth Theater, than you could shake a stick at. There was, indeed, a<br />
fair amount of stick-shaking, in one of the movements of John Zorn&#8217;s &#8220;The Dead<br />
Man,&#8221; wherein the four players wave their bows menacingly in the air, in exact<br />
rhythm but to no exact purpose.<br />
Everything on the program, Alfred Schnittke&#8217;s Quartet No. 2 aside, was music<br />
commissioned and composed for the Kronos, and the variety of that music is<br />
proof of the enterprise of this remarkable ensemble. From John Zorn, guru of<br />
the lower Manhattan crossover crowd, the Kronos has elicited an extended<br />
collection of patches, some hilarious and some exasperating, some beautifully<br />
written for the instruments and some merely squawks: a compendium of what four<br />
string players should and shouldn&#8217;t do with and to their instruments.<br />
Other commissioned works were somewhat more listener-friendly. Australia&#8217;s<br />
Peter Sculthorpe, whose music the Kronos has befriended for all of its 12<br />
years, has provided, in his &#8220;Jabiru Dreaming,&#8221; a smooth and successful mix of<br />
native aborigine dance rhythms and Sculthorpe&#8217;s own percussive, dissonant<br />
style. From the African-born Dumisani Maraire and Foday Musa Suso, there came<br />
two short, congenial pieces of no great complexity, built out of simple,<br />
ingratiating folk melodies. From Canada&#8217;s John Oswald and Hungary&#8217;s Istvan<br />
Marta came two short works involved the live playing of the quartet with some<br />
wild and busy tape sounds.<br />
But the 20-minute Schnittke Quartet of 1981, the most substantial work on the<br />
program, towered above all else in depth and beauty. The great Soviet composer<br />
has, in this work, built a dense texture out of several mystical medieval<br />
church melodies, seemingly spread across infinite space at the start and the<br />
end, savage and defiant in the dense middle movement. Any doubts that the<br />
Kronos Quartet exists only to play musical tricks and deal out a kind of<br />
crossover mayhem, were easily dispelled by this fluent, beautifully shaped<br />
performance.<br />
As usual, the concert also embraced a carefully planned, imaginative visual<br />
scheme, with subtle color changes and abstract shapes projected onto a back<br />
screen and, of course, the quartet members&#8217; customary propensity for kicky<br />
costumes. One demurrer, however: while amplification may have been necessary in<br />
the pieces with tape and the woolly sound effects in the Zorn, it betrayed the<br />
best efforts of the quartet in the more serious Schnittke and Sculthorpe works.<br />
The Wadsworth theater may not be our prime acoustic marvel, but it isn&#8217;t<br />
Hollywood Bowl, either, and doesn&#8217;t need to be treated as such.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/01/kronos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LAPO</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/01/lapo-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/01/lapo-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question of the day: Is Richard Strauss&#8217; &#8221;"Domestic Symphony&#8221; the ugliest orchestral piece ever written, or does it just sound that way?  That gross and untidy bulk formed the second half of this past weekend&#8217;s Los Angeles Philharmonic concert (heard on Saturday night). Christof Perick, who conducted, seems caught up in a Straussian passion, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question of the day: Is Richard Strauss&#8217; &#8221;"Domestic Symphony&#8221; the ugliest  orchestral piece ever written, or does it just sound that way?   That gross and untidy bulk formed the second half of this past weekend&#8217;s Los  Angeles Philharmonic concert (heard on Saturday night). Christof Perick, who  conducted, seems caught up in a Straussian passion, since he also has conducted  several of the operas, in San Francisco and at the Metropolitan, to great  acclaim. He conducted the &#8220;Domestic&#8221; from memory, and so that work, too, must  mean something to him.   He conducted it, in fact, very well. No power on earth can unravel the  horrendous orchestral chaos near the end, where Strauss gathers up all his   tawdry, sentimental and bombastic tunes and sets them grinding against one  another simultaneously in a ludicrous travesty of serious counterpoint. Perick,  however, came close. He achieved a remarkable orchestral clarity throughout the  work, and a commendable range of control over dynamics. Conductors do not  automatically earn their passage to heaven by succesful performances of  Strauss. If they did, however, Perick would be an early arrival.   The first part of the program was both quieter and more substantial. It began  with an old friend, Beethoven&#8217;s Third &#8220;Leonore&#8221; Overture, given a rather  soiemn but nicely shaded performance with a hairraising buildup to the great  dramatic rush at the end. Then came the evening&#8217;s soloist, Richard Goode, in  one of Mozart&#8217;s lesser-known mature piano concertos, the F major (K. 459).   Goode is, shall we say, even better that good. He is one of that group nurtured  at Vermont&#8217;s Marlboro Festival, where the emphasis is on playing in a chamber-music, rather than a virtuosic, manner. That approach worked especially well in  this blithe, whimsical work, where solo elements in the orchestra &#8212; woodwinds  in particular &#8212; were allowed as much prominence as the pianist.   Perick was of considerable help here, by reducing the supporting forces to  chamber-orchestra size. There was a fine give-and-take among all elements in a  superior performance. Three more Mozart concertos, in place of that Straussian  phantasmagoria, would have made it a truly, not just partially, enchanted  evening.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/01/lapo-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV&#160;DOCUMENTARIES</title>
		<link>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/01/tv-documentaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/01/tv-documentaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 1990 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://soiveheard.com/?p=2867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Music moved passed its share of milestones in the year just ended, and some of the more significant have become the substance of some rewarding TV-documentary footage. This weekend, for example, PBS watchers can journey along with cellist/conductor Mstislav Rostropovich on his first visit to his native Russia after nearly 17 years of exile (KCET-28, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Music moved passed its share of milestones in the year just ended, and some of<br />
the more significant have become the substance of some rewarding TV-documentary<br />
footage. This weekend, for example, PBS watchers can journey along with<br />
cellist/conductor Mstislav Rostropovich on his first visit to his native Russia<br />
after nearly 17 years of exile (KCET-28, tonight at 9:30). They can journey<br />
through time, the 100-year history of &#8220;Carnegie Hall, a Place of Dreams&#8221;<br />
(KCET-28, Sunday at 6:30).<br />
The stories, each running 90 minutes, are otherwise quite different, of course,<br />
and they are differently told. It wasn&#8217;t much of a problem for producer Peter<br />
Rosen to ferret out miles of Carnegie Hall footage, some of it dating back to<br />
some fairly shaky film clips from the 1930s, and piece together a convincing<br />
demonstration that Manhattan&#8217;s fabled hunk of masonry, still standing strong at<br />
57th Street and Seventh Avenue after at least one attempt to tear it down, has<br />
been home to a stupendous parade of talent in its 100 years.<br />
Being Peter Rosen (who last year gave us a slick TV overview of dimples and<br />
doubletalk at the 1989 Van Cliburn Competition), he has surrounded his survey<br />
in some pretty pretentious hype, starting with the program&#8217;s title. You lose<br />
count, after a while, of the metaphors his celebrities conjure up, from Isaac<br />
Stern&#8217;s &#8220;ingathering of excellence and grace&#8221; to Leontyne Price&#8217;s &#8220;state of<br />
being American.&#8221; You learn to look and listen past, however. With the likes of<br />
Arturo Toscanini, Bruno Walter and Fritz Reiner on the podium, and with<br />
Vladimir Horowitz, Arthur Rubinstein and Gregor Piatigorsky (surrounded by an<br />
all-girl, all-harp orchestra in a knockout distillation of Saint-Saens&#8217; &#8220;The<br />
Swan&#8221;) the documentarian&#8217;s hifalutin handiwork is easy to ignore.<br />
The Rostropovich piece, which profits handsomely from the close-to-the-bone<br />
documentary skill of Albert Maysles (&#8220;Grey Gardens,&#8221; &#8220;Gimme Shelter&#8221;) tells<br />
another kind of message. To know Rostropovich, at whatever distance, is to feel<br />
the violence of the man&#8217;s larger-than-life but infectious passions: no greeting<br />
without its crushing hug and drenching kiss.<br />
To today&#8217;s Soviet populace, crowding in, showering the visitors with cakes and<br />
flowers and love, Rostropovich is the closest to an authentic, accessible hero.<br />
The music-making, with cello and baton, hardly subtle but irresistible (in the<br />
sense that pile-drivers are irresistible) helps. But the man&#8217;s radiation of<br />
life and love &#8212; for his people, and for the political and moral sanity of his<br />
country &#8212; is no less operatic in its own way than that of his wife at his<br />
side, diva Galina Vishnevskaya. Perspective is provided by the shadowing<br />
presence of Mike Wallace, following along to make his own &#8220;60 Minutes&#8221;<br />
feature, taking in every profoundly human incident and immediately restating it<br />
as a squared-off  piece of TV-ese newspeak.<br />
Rostropovich, this marvelous, adoring, eye-watering all-too-brief essay tells<br />
us, is music&#8217;s Zorba. The embattled art could use a few more of his kind.<br />
THE FACTS:<br />
WHAT: &#8220;Soldiers of Music &#8212; Rostropovich Returns to Russia.&#8221;<br />
WHEN: 9:30 p.m., tonight, KCET-28.<br />
BEHIND THE SCENES: Produced by Susan Froemke, Peter Gelb, Albert Maysles and<br />
Bob Eisenhardt.<br />
DURATION: 90 min.<br />
OUR RATING: * * * *<br />
WHAT: &#8220;CARNEGIE AT 100: A PLACE OF DREAMS&#8221;<br />
WHEN: 6:30 p.m., Sunday, KCET-28.<br />
BEHIND THE SCENES: Peter Rosen, writer and producer.<br />
DURATION: 90 min.<br />
OUR RATING: * * *</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.soiveheard.com/1990/01/tv-documentaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

